Kent XI vs Middlesex XI, at London, May 16 1796 - Full Scorecard

RESULT
Lord's (Old), May 16 - 17, 1796, England Domestic Season
62 & 91
(T:112) 42 & 60

Kent XI won by 51 runs

Kent XI 1st Innings
Middlesex XI 1st Innings
Kent XI 2nd Innings
Middlesex XI 2nd Innings
Match Flow
Info
Kent XI 1st Innings 
Batting RBM4s6sSR
hit wicket 16-----
b Walker1-----
c Shackle8-----
c Ray1-----
b Beauclerk6-----
c Wells10-----
b Walker9-----
c Ray0-----
c Ray0-----
b Walker11-----
not out 0-----
Extras0
Fall of wickets
10-62
BowlingOMRWECON0sWDNB
010.00-00
030.00-00
Middlesex XI 1st Innings 
Batting RBM4s6sSR
b Boxall0-----
b Bullen10-----
b Boxall0-----
not out 0-----
b Boxall2-----
c Hammond2-----
c Ring5-----
run out 13-----
run out 2-----
c Boxall2-----
c Pilcher6-----
Extras0
Fall of wickets
10-42
BowlingOMRWECON0sWDNB
030.00-00
010.00-00
Kent XI 2nd Innings 
Batting RBM4s6sSR
b Walker0-----
c Wells39-----
c Wells11-----
c Graham14-----
c Walker3-----
run out 10-----
c Ray5-----
c Shackle1-----
b Walker0-----
not out 6-----
c Graham0-----
Extras(b 2)2
Fall of wickets
10-91
BowlingOMRWECON0sWDNB
020.00-00
Middlesex XI 2nd Innings (T: 112 runs)
Batting RBM4s6sSR
b Boxall6-----
b Pilcher14-----
b Boxall0-----
c Pilcher0-----
b Boxall1-----
b Bullen0-----
c Ring0-----
b Boxall3-----
c Hammond24-----
not out 9-----
b Boxall2-----
Extras(b 1)1
Fall of wickets
10-60
BowlingOMRWECON0sWDNB
050.00-00
010.00-00
010.00-00
Unlocking the magic of Statsguru
ask_cricinfo_logo
Close of Play
Mon, 16 May
day 1 - unknown
Tue, 17 May
day 2 - Middlesex XI 2nd innings 60 - end of match
Match Flow
General
Kent XI Captain not named
Kent XI Wicket-keeper not named
Middlesex XI Wicket-keeper not named
Middlesex XI Captain not named
Kent XI 1st innings: bowlers' runs conceded do not balance
Middlesex XI 1st innings: bowlers' runs conceded do not balance
Kent XI 2nd innings: bowlers' runs conceded do not balance
Middlesex XI 2nd innings: bowlers' runs conceded do not balance
Walker played for Middlesex in 1796 without being mentioned as a given men, so he was probably residing in the county. Middlesex had Wells as a given man. SB questions whether this was John Wells, but it seems likely that Middlesex (even with T Walker) would have needed reinforcement by a 'crack' player against Kent. W Beldham was the given man in the return match (if it can be called that - both games were at Lord's).
Match Details
Tossno toss
Season1796
Match daysday (2-day match)
AskESPNcricinfo Logo
Instant answers to T20 questions