22 April 1999
Over The 'Bourda'
Haydn Gill in Georgetown
Bourda, after watching over of a bizarre finish to a
limited-overs cricket international six years ago, witnessed yet
another confused and chaotic climax here Wednesday.
As in 1993, hundreds of exuberant spectators invaded the field
before play could be completed.
As then, International Cricket Council (ICC) match referee Raman
Subba Row decided the outcome was a tie.
The drama began to unfold after the completion of the
penultimate over when the crowd initially invaded the field
thinking the match had ended and grabbing stumps. The scoreboard
had indicated that the 30th and last over had been completed.
After the field was cleared and play resumed, at 5:55 p.m. it
came down to Australia needing four runs off the final ball to
win the fifth Cable & Wireless One-Day International against the
West Indies.
As Steve Waugh pulled Keith Arthurton's final ball to Stuart
Williams on the long-on boundary, about 500 spectators and more
than 100 policemen had already started to sprint to the middle.
Waugh and Shane Warne desperately scrambled two runs, and were
about to go for the third when the stumps at either end of the
pitch were uprooted by fans.
At one point Waugh had to struggle with a spectator who tried to
take his bat.
The general feeling at the time was that two runs were scored,
and Australia, replying to the West Indies' 173 for four in a
match that was reduced to 30 overs because of rain, had ended on
172 for seven.
It was recorded that way in the official scorebook and the
confirmation will come after a report is submitted to the ICC
today.
Subba Row summoned the two captains and managers to a meeting,
and after half-hour of deliberations, he emerged just after 7
p.m. describing the confusion a "great shame".
"Cricket has got to be the winner. We cannot go on with rancour
that such a thing might have happened or might not have
happened," he said.
"I think when you get chaos like that, I think you have got to
make sure that commonsense prevails. I personally think that a
tie is the right answer."
An experienced match referee and former England Test player,
Subba Row explained the thinking behind his decision.
"The third run really would have been difficult; but as you can
see, Steve is fighting his way down the wicket to get the third
with all those people around him," he said while reviewing
television replays with Trans World International commentator
David Hookes.
"The situation had really become quite impossible, but they had
started on the third run, and that's something that influenced
me considerably."
In 1993 Subba Row also declared a tie in the match between West
Indies and Pakistan when there was a virtual carbon copy of what
took place yesterday.
West Indies needed two runs off the final ball which they
achieved, but opposing captain Wasim Akram successfully
protested that the crowd had impeded his team in trying to field
the ball.
The two runs were credited, but Subba Row ignored the playing
condition that would have given the West Indies the match by
virtue of losing fewer wickets.
Source :: The Barbados Nation (https://www.nationnews.com/)