Matches (15)
IPL (4)
PSL (3)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Stats Analysis

Houghton's 142, and McDermott's five-for

A look at the best batting, bowling, allround, and team performances of the 1987 World Cup

Craig McDermott was the top wicket-taker in the 1987 World Cup with 18 wickets

Craig McDermott was the star performer of the 1987 World Cup final  •  Getty Images

A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.

The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.

The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.

The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.

The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.

Let us move on to the Performance Analysis tables for 1987.

Top Batting performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Batsman For VsRuns Balls
1 5161987 457IVA Richards West Indies Slk181 125
2 5141987 454DL Houghton Zimbabwe Nzl142 137
3 4961987 476GA Gooch England Ind115 136
4 4011987 470GR Marsh Australia Nzl126*149
5 3871987 473RB Richardson West Indies Pak110 135
6 3491987 453GR Marsh Australia Ind110 141
7 2921987 474SM Gavaskar India Nzl103* 88
8 2891987 464A Ranatunga Sri Lanka Win 86*100
9 2821987 477DC Boon Australia Eng 75 125
10 2801987 463Rameez Raja Pakistan Eng113 148

Even though Richards' 181 was a huge innings the real quality innings of the tournament were the ones featured in the next two positions. Chasing a middling total of 252, Houghton played magnificently scoring a better-than-run-a-ball 142 out of the Zimbabwe innings of 239 runs. They fell a single stroke short.

Gooch played one of the best innings ever, in terms of tactics, when he swept the Indian spinners to such a level that Shastri and Maninder went for over 100 in their 20 overs. The Indian team did not read the situation well. But Gooch (and England) could not be denied. There are no detailed records available. However, since I watched the game, my memory suggests that over 50% of the runs were scored in the fine and square leg area. Marsh's hundred was a top quality match winning one against the old foe, New Zealand. Marsh also played another match winner in the narrow 1-run win over India. Gavaskar's hundred was a stern message to the followers that he was one of the most gifted stroke-makers ever.

Top Bowling performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Bowler For VsAnalysis
1 3341987 475CJ McDermott Australia Pak10.0 - 0 - 44 - 5
2 3051987 455Abdul Qadir Pakistan Eng10.0 - 0 - 31 - 4
3 3041987 463Imran Khan Pakistan Eng 9.0 - 0 - 37 - 4
4 3031987 459CA Walsh West Indies Pak10.0 - 1 - 40 - 4
5 2931987 476EE Hemmings England Ind 9.3 - 1 - 52 - 4
6 2831987 461M Prabhakar India Zim 8.0 - 1 - 19 - 4
7 2731987 453CJ McDermott Australia Ind10.0 - 0 - 56 - 4
8 2661987 468PAJ DeFreitas England Win 9.1 - 2 - 28 - 3
9 2521987 459Saleem Jaffer Pakistan Win10.0 - 0 - 30 - 3

This table is headed by McDermott's match-winning effort against Pakistan in the semi final at Hyderabad. This was a close win and McDermott captured the early key wickets and polished off the tail when only 20 runs were needed. A major effort considering that Australia crossed one more hurdle. Abdul Qadir and Imran come in next. Each of them spear-headed the Pakistani wins over England. Walsh's excellent effort against Pakistan was in vain: Pakistan winning a cliff-hanger by one wicket. Hemmings followed up Gooch's beautiful hundred with an incisive spell against India.

Top Player performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Player For Vs Runs Balls Analysis
1 3811987 475Imran Khan Pakistan Aus 58 8410.0-1-36-3
2 2881987 456KM Curran Zimbabwe Aus 30 38 8.0-0-29-2
3 2681987 465M Azharuddin India Aus 54* 45 3.5-0-19-3
4 2671987 460JE Emburey England Slk 30* 1910.0-1-26-2
5 2621987 466AH Omarshah Zimbabwe Nzl 41 9010.0-0-34-2
6 2551987 477AR Border Australia Eng 31 31 7.0-0-38-2
7 2281987 469N Kapil Dev India Zim 41* 2510.0-2-44-2
8 2231987 476N Kapil Dev India Eng 30 2210.0-1-38-2

The shortage of bowling performances during the 1987 World Cup meant that I had to lower the qualification criteria only for this World Cup so that I could get some player performances at least. With the normal cut-offs, only three performances qualified. Imran Khan's magnificent all-round performance against Australia was in vain, Australia winning a close match by 18 runs. Similarly Curren's all-round performance against Australia was in vain. Azharuddin is a surprise entry in this table, pulling his weight with the ball in a comfortable win against Australia. He cleaned up the last three wickets. Emburey's cameo propels him to the fifth place in the easy win over Sri Lanka.

Top Team performances
SNo Rating Pts Year ODI# Team Own score Vs Other score
1 7091987 476England 254 for 6 in 50.0Ind219 for 10 in 45.3
2 6891987 477Australia 253 for 5 in 50.0Eng246 for 8 in 50.0
3 6861987 475Australia 267 for 8 in 50.0Pak249 for 10 in 49.0
4 6671987 474India 224 for 1 in 32.1Nzl221 for 9 in 50.0
5 6571987 457West Indies 360 for 4 in 50.0Slk169 for 4 in 50.0
6 6431987 460England 296 for 4 in 50.0Slk158 for 8 in 45.0
7 6361987 473West Indies 258 for 7 in 50.0Pak230 for 9 in 50.0
8 6231987 468England 269 for 5 in 50.0Win235 for 10 in 48.1
9 6171987 472England 219 for 2 in 41.2Slk218 for 7 in 50.0
10 6111987 453Australia 270 for 6 in 50.0Ind269 for 10 in 49.5

England's semi final win over India just about edges Australia's title win to second place. The reason is that India was the home country and the margin was much higher. Australia's final win carried enough weight to pip their semi-final win over Pakistan. It is appropriate that the two teams in the final occupy the top three positions. Then comes India's 9-wicket vanquishing of New Zealand. And West Indies' demolition job over Sri Lanka.

This was a somewhat feature-less tournament with very few great performances. Everything went according to plan. India was expected to roll over England at Mumbai, Pakistan over Australia at Hyderabad and a grand sub-continental final at Eden gardens. Both plans went awry and the Ashes teams upstaged their sub-continental counterparts. One through a tactical masterpiece and the other through good quality all-round cricket. The final also went to the underdog, possibly because of Veletta's explosive cameo, Athey's slow batting and Gatting's reckless stroke. The winning margin was only 7 runs.

The match of the tournament was Pakistan's one-wicket win over West Indies: a match which also saw extraordinary sportsmanship by Walsh in not running out Saleem Jaffer. That act should be seen by every cricketer of today a few times. There were quite a few narrow wins in the tournament.
The bowling spell of the tournament was the crucial 5-wicket capture by McDermott against Pakistan in the semi final.
The innings of the tournament was a toss-up between Gooch's tactical masterpiece of 115 against India in the semi final and Houghton's incomparable 142 against New Zealand at Hyderabad. Because of the importance of the match and the opponent, Gooch's innings gets the vote.

Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems