HC asks BCCI to file reply on merits in Jadeja case
The Delhi High Court today asked the Board of Control for Cricket in India to file a reply on the merits of the case banning cricketer Ajay Jadeja for five years from playing on match fixing charges
18-Jul-2001
The Delhi High Court today asked the Board of Control for Cricket in
India to file a reply on the merits of the case banning cricketer Ajay
Jadeja for five years from playing on match fixing charges.
Directing the BCCI to file replies on the merits of the case within a
week, Justice Mukul Mudgal said "in the meantime, hearing of the case
will continue".
Appearing for Jadeja, senior advocate PP Malhotra alleged that the
decision to ban the former all rounder for five years was taken
without following the principle of "natural justice" and "rule of
law".
"The BCCI has not followed the principle of natural justice. Any
action of the Board should be in confirmity with the rule of law," he
said adding that Jadeja's claim for relief was maintainable under
Article 226 of the constitution.
Earlier, during the course of the argument, BCCI counsel had said
Jadeja's petition challenging the Board's decision to ban him from
playing was not maintainable under Article 226 as it was not
performing any of the state's functions.
Stating that the scope of Article 226 is much wider, Malhotra
contended that "technicalities should not come in way of guaranteeing
natural justice and maintaining rule of law when a body is involved in
performing public duty".
The arguments from both sides had been confined to the issue of the
maintainability of the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Jadeja's counsel had earlier contended that "the scope of Article 226,
under which any citizen can move the High Court for seeking relief for
violation of his right, is very wide as such a right can be enforced
against a state, its authorities or a person."
The cricketer in his civil writ, had sought quashing of the ban as
well as Union Sports Ministry's notice to him seeking explanation why
the Arjuna award conferred on him should not be taken back.
The BCCI had imposed a life ban on former captain Azharuddin and Ajay
Sharma, while Jadeja and Manoj Prabhakar were banned for five years.