Matches (13)
IPL (2)
PSL (1)
BAN-A vs NZ-A (1)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
WCL 2 (1)
Women's One-Day Cup (1)
Numbers Game

Leading by example with the bat

Are the batting captains of today more prolific than their counterparts from earlier eras?

S Rajesh
S Rajesh
20-Feb-2009

Graeme Smith has lifted South Africa to several Test wins in the last couple of years © Getty Images
 
Chris Gayle's century in the first Test against England in Jamaica set up a fantastic win for West Indies; Andrew Strauss hit back with a hundred of his own in Antigua, setting up what was so nearly a fitting reply by England; throughout 2008, Graeme Smith was the talismanic leader for South Africa, coming up with a match-winning knock under pressure almost every time his team needed him to. Ricky Ponting, too, has been amazingly prolific, while Mahela Jayawardene, about to begin his last series as captain, set new standards in batting when captain, reaching levels that hadn't been achieved since Don Bradman. All these are leaders who led by example in terms of personal performances. Are the batting captains of today more prolific than their counterparts from earlier eras? Let's dig up some numbers and see what they reveal.
Looking at all stats since 1950, and only for captains who have batted in the top six (to avoid bringing the wicketkeepers and bowlers into the mix), the numbers in this decade are better than in any other. Captains average 43.80 in the 2000s, marginally ahead of the 43.28 they averaged in the 1960s. They also scored 136 centuries from 419 games in the 2000s, which converts to one every three games - much better than in the 1990s (one every four). Compare the non-captains, though, and the difference between the 2000s and the next-best decade is slightly more: 38.49 in the 2000s, and 37.32 in the 1970s.
Batting stats of captains in the top six over the decades
Decade No. of players Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
2000s 51 419 49,275 43.80 136/ 214
1960s 29 185 21,642 43.28 48/ 109
1990s 37 341 40,676 41.76 85/ 217
1970s 30 193 21,379 41.51 54/ 101
1980s 32 257 26,093 40.32 60/ 128
1950s 34 150 12,444 36.49 30/ 58
The difference in averages, though, is much more significant when restricting to captains' performances only in victories. In the 2000s, captains have indeed played the lead role in many of the 282 wins by their teams, with an outstanding average of more than 57, which is much higher than the 50.64 they managed in the 1960s. Their conversion-rate of fifties to hundreds is outstanding too in this decade, with 73 centuries out of 167 scores of over 50. It's also a huge improvement from the earlier decade: in the 1990s, captains batting in the top six averaged 48.39, with only 34 centuries in 202 wins.
Batting captains in Test wins decade-wise since 1950 (Qual: batting in top six)
Decade Players Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
2000s 36 282 21,786 57.18 73/ 94
1960s 18 77 5723 50.64 14/ 28
1980s 20 117 7763 50.40 19/ 40
1970s 22 100 7458 50.05 23/ 31
1990s 30 202 14,181 48.39 34/ 78
1950s 23 82 4665 43.19 15/ 19
So who are the leaders who've been so influential - with the bat at least - in their team's wins this decade? Among those who've scored at least 500 runs in wins, at the top of the heap is West Indies' Brian Lara, who averages 88.33 in four Test wins by West Indies, but both his hundreds came against the lesser teams - he notched up 191 against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo in 2003, and 120 against Bangladesh in Kingston in June the following year. Inzamam-ul-Haq's four centuries were scored against stiffer opposition - two against India, and one each against Sri Lanka and West Indies - giving him an average of more than 86 in 11 Tests.
Mahela Jayawardene's record is remarkable, especially for his conversion of starts into hundreds - he has scored seven centuries, including that monumental 374 against South Africa, and two fifties in 15 Tests. Smith has notched up his hundreds at an amazing rate too - he has 12, including two doubles, in 33 Test wins for South Africa.
While eight batsmen average more than 50 (with the 500-run qualification) in the 2000s, in the 1990s only five batsmen made the cut. Graham Gooch led the way, averaging 90.43, with a remarkable seven hundreds - including his 333 against India at Lord's in 1990 - and only one half-century. Australia is well represented with three players out of the list of 10, but the one who was the most successful in terms of team wins, Mark Taylor, contributed the least the bat. Plenty has been written about Taylor's inspirational captaincy, but he wasn't one of those whose batting talked the loudest - in 26 Test wins in the 1990s, he averaged only 34.65.
Most successful captains in wins since 2000 (Qual: 500 runs in wins)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Brian Lara 4 530 88.33 2/ 3
Inzamam-ul-Haq 11 1037 86.41 4/ 6
Mahela Jayawardene 15 1654 75.18 7/ 2
Graeme Smith 33 3247 66.26 12/ 11
Ricky Ponting 36 3592 65.30 13/ 17
Sanath Jayasuriya 16 1316 62.66 4/ 7
Steve Waugh 33 2028 57.94 9/ 6
Rahul Dravid 8 637 57.90 1/ 4
In fact, in the all-time list of most successful captains in Test wins (with a qualification of 1000 runs), four out of the top 10 have led their teams only in the 2000s, which apart from suggesting an ability to lead from the front is also consistent with the general increase in batting averages during this decade. It's again an Aussie-heavy list, with Don Bradman, Bob Simpson, Greg Chappell and Ricky Ponting all up there with the cream of the crop. (Click here for the full list of captains batting in the top six who have scored 1000 or more runs in Test wins.)
Overall list of most successful captains in Test wins (Qual: 1000 runs in wins)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Don Bradman 15 2208 116.21 11/ 3
Graham Gooch 10 1558 86.55 7/ 2
Inzamam-ul-Haq 11 1037 86.41 4/ 6
Brian Lara 10 1252 83.46 4/ 6
Greg Chappell 21 2197 81.37 9/ 8
Bob Simpson 12 1518 75.90 6/ 7
Mahela Jayawardene 15 1654 75.18 7/ 2
Graeme Smith 33 3247 66.26 12/ 11
Ricky Ponting 36 3592 65.30 13/ 17
Mohammad Azharuddin 14 1071 63.00 4/ 3

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo