Mark Nicholas: England take to wing with a new desire (26 May 1997)
BARELY a handful of teams have been successful in any form of cricket without first applying the basic disciplines of the game and then bringing flair to their performance
26-May-1997
Monday 26 May 1997
England take to wing with a new desire
By Mark Nicholas
BARELY a handful of teams have been successful in any form of
cricket without first applying the basic disciplines of the game
and then bringing flair to their performance. For some time now,
and for a collection of muddled reasons, English cricket has
been confused by the adoption of unorthodox methods which have
worked for a few and misled many who have played in county
cricket.
The aspects of England`s successful week in the one-day matches
which most impressed were the straight and intelligent bowling,
allied to crafty movement of the ball; the thrilling fielding,
which had a touch of the South Africans` athleticism to it; and
the calm authority of the batting, which answered most of the
tricky questions set by the Australian bowlers.
It is unfair, and would be typically English, to suggest
that a swallow doesn`t make a summer because that swallow, if it
is bright and well directed, can be the first in a
migration from the hapless to the hopeful, and beyond as well if
the flock is prepared to tuck in behind it and respond to
the lessons of previous shortcomings.
The first signs of England flying in from the cold came in
Wellington at the start of the second Test in New Zealand
last February. The signs coincided with the arrival in New
Zealand of Lord MacLaurin - the boss of English cricket who has
given the game the strong character it secretly craves and
must now trust - and with the luck of losing the toss, when play
that first day was restricted to one short evening session.
In that session, England made the most of their luck - New
Zealand chose to bat on the lively pitch - and by bowling
and catching with the enthusiasm and skill of winners,
captured six New Zealand wickets for 50-odd. England were on a
high and could spread their wings with confidence; these past
few days have been the extension of that sparky dominance in New
Zealand.
The first of them on Thursday, at Headingley, was the day they
repelled any self-doubt - remember 40 for four and an uncertain
looking Adam Hollioake at the crease - and by winning so
resoundingly catalysed yesterday`s trophy-lifting smile.
Saturday, at the Oval, was the day they knew it for themselves
and illustrated as much with a relaxed and efficient performance
that featured all the basic disciplines and a great deal of
flair, too.
Best of all on Saturday was the way in which the players
fed off each other, the way the bowlers formed
partnerships, the way the fielders knew instinctively when to
back up for each other. If the phrase for ideal and skilful
harmony in football is "total football" then for a time on
Saturday, and remember on a batsmen-friendly pitch, England
discovered "total cricket".
Michael Atherton wouldn`t admit as much, being a stubborn
so-and-so, but I`d wager that underneath that implied defiance
he has never felt so comfortable leading his country.
Applause, then, to the three wise men, the selecting three Gs,
for their emphasis on youth in their party of 15, cleverly
balanced by over-30s Alec Stewart and Phillip
DeFreitas, worked like a dream. Even more rivetingly, the
choice and success of both Hollioakes was the sort of treat
English cricket has not had since Dominic Cork ran through the
West Indians at Lord`s nearly two years ago.
Atherton mentioned after Headingley that it was heroic cricket
that England needed, not heroes. He was spot-on to a point and
he was doubtless looking to deflect the probable fawning
over Adam Hollioake (he had not seen Ben`s knock yesterday by
that stage). But one rather follows from the other and
heroes give the English people hope and give their
children inspiration. It is how the heroes cope with their
adulation that matters rather than the mere heroism. Shane Warne
will tell you.
None of this is new to Australia, whose recent
impressive cricket has been based on the age-old principles.
For once, they got their sums wrong, being "underdone", as Allan
Border might say, in their preparation for the series.
They might admit that England have surprised them, so now
beware the wounded kangaroo and do not gloat at these outstanding
cricketers for they will entertain and surely remain
favourites to outwit England yet. Just no longer be agog at
England. Those wings are still spreading and a feeling
persists that the energy and application of Texaco Trophy
time 1997 is here to stay.
Source :: The Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/)