AB displaces Gayle at the top
An analysis of performances in the World Cup after the first 20 matches of the World Cup
AB de Villiers' 66-ball 162 displaced Chris Gayle's double-century from the top spot. • Getty Images
This analysis will be done at suitable points during the World Cup 2015 so that the readers can see the way the Performance tables evolve. As more matches get played the top performance mosaic changes and readers can identify with what happened in the past few days. The qualifying bar for inclusion moves higher as more matches get played.
One of the biggest thrashings administered in any World Cup by a team to another was followed by one of the modern classics: a match which reminded one of the 1996 World Cup semi-final. Then a team of oldies and rejects was shown its place by a ruthless team. The fighting spirit shown by the UAE in the previous matches was missing here. So we had three different matches in this set. But this has been an eventful two days with three of the tables having changes to the top.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 579 | 2015 | 3616 | AB de Villiers | South Africa | Win | 162* | 66 |
2 | 572 | 2015 | 3612 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 |
3 | 460 | 2015 | 3615 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 |
4 | 460 | 2015 | 3610 | S Dhawan | India | Saf | 137 | 146 |
5 | 397 | 2015 | 3601 | DA Miller | South Africa | Zim | 138* | 92 |
6 | 389 | 2015 | 3613 | Shaiman Anwar | U.A.E. | Ire | 106 | 83 |
7 | 386 | 2015 | 3600 | JWA Taylor | England | Aus | 98* | 90 |
8 | 370 | 2015 | 3600 | AJ Finch | Australia | Eng | 135 | 128 |
9 | 362 | 2015 | 3607 | BB McCullum | New Zealand | Eng | 77 | 25 |
10 | 351 | 2015 | 3614 | Samiullah Shenwari | Afghanistan | Sco | 96 | 147 |
This was to be expected. If there was one innings that could have displaced Chris Gayle's brilliancy, it was AB de Villiers' masterpiece. De Villiers' blitzkrieg secured 579 points, just about pipping Gayle. Some of his strokes were not human. These were strokes of a humanoid that had studied every angle and played the perfect stroke to suit the ball. I am going to stick my neck out and say that de Villiers is the most destructive batsmen to have ever played limited over cricket. Yes, I include Viv Richards in my list.
There was no other change and I am glad that Samiullah Shenwari's lovely 96 stays on for another few days. It can be seen that the cut-off for the top-10 placings is 350 rating pts.
de Villiers' innings is in seventh position across all WCs. Gayle's is one position lower.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 671 | 2015 | 3617 | MA Starc | Australia | Nzl | 9.0 - 0 - 28 - 6 |
2 | 606 | 2015 | 3607 | TG Southee | New Zealand | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 7 |
3 | 484 | 2015 | 3617 | TA Boult | New Zealand | Aus | 10.0 - 3 - 27 - 5 |
4 | 452 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 5 |
5 | 429 | 2015 | 3602 | Sohail Khan | Pakistan | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 55 - 5 |
6 | 358 | 2015 | 3616 | Imran Tahir | South Africa | Win | 10.0 - 2 - 45 - 5 |
7 | 321 | 2015 | 3608 | JE Taylor | West Indies | Pak | 7.0 - 1 - 15 - 3 |
8 | 307 | 2015 | 3600 | ST Finn | England | Aus | 10.0 - 0 - 71 - 5 |
Mitchell Starc's 6 for 28, one of the best World Cup spells ever has taken up the top place, displacing Tim Southee's effort. The reasons are obvious. Defending a total of 151 against a top class batting team, that too away and coming quite close to a win gave Starc this exalted position. Trent Boult's match-winning spell is in third position. R Ashwin's 4 for 25, just about made to the top ten. But it can be seen that this secured only 269 rating pts while the tenth best batting effort secured 351 points. Since the bowling cut-off has now been raised to 300 rating pts, there are only eight entries in the table.
If Australia had won, Starc's spell would be in the third position across all WCs. Now it remains in the fourth position. Southee's effort is in fifth position.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 700 | 2015 | 3612 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 | 6.0-0-35-2 |
2 | 579 | 2015 | 3615 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 | 8.0-0-35-2 |
3 | 504 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 23 | 20 | 9.0-0-33-5 |
4 | 434 | 2015 | 3611 | MM Ali | England | Sco | 128 | 107 | 10.0-0-47-2 |
5 | 353 | 2015 | 3608 | AD Russell | West Indies | Pak | 42* | 13 | 8.0-2-33-3 |
6 | 317 | 2015 | 3614 | RD Berrington | Scotland | Afg | 25 | 46 | 10.0-0-40-4 |
7 | 298 | 2015 | 3606 | SC Williams | Zimbabwe | Uae | 76* | 65 | 8.0-0-43-2 |
8 | 298 | 2015 | 3613 | Amjad Javed | U.A.E. | Ire | 42 | 35 | 10.0-0-60-3 |
9 | 281 | 2015 | 3599 | CJ Anderson | New Zealand | Slk | 75 | 46 | 3.1-0-18-2 |
10 | 258 | 2015 | 3614 | AC Evans | Scotland | Afg | 28 | 37 | 10.0-1-30-2 |
There are no changes to the player performance table. In the past two days there have been outstanding batting and bowling performances rather than all-round performances.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 721 | 2015 | 3616 | South Africa | 408 for 5 in 50.0 | Win | 151 for 10 in 33.1 |
2 | 713 | 2015 | 3607 | New Zealand | 125 for 2 in 12.2 | Eng | 123 for 10 in 33.2 |
3 | 691 | 2015 | 3610 | India | 307 for 7 in 50.0 | Saf | 177 for 10 in 40.2 |
4 | 665 | 2015 | 3618 | India | 104 for 1 in 18.5 | Uae | 102 for 10 in 31.3 |
5 | 664 | 2015 | 3608 | West Indies | 310 for 6 in 50.0 | Pak | 160 for 10 in 39.0 |
6 | 640 | 2015 | 3605 | Bangladesh | 267 for 10 in 50.0 | Afg | 162 for 10 in 42.5 |
7 | 626 | 2015 | 3611 | England | 303 for 8 in 50.0 | Sco | 184 for 10 in 42.2 |
8 | 626 | 2015 | 3615 | Sri Lanka | 332 for 1 in 50.0 | Bng | 240 for 10 in 47.0 |
9 | 598 | 2015 | 3617 | New Zealand | 152 for 9 in 23.1 | Aus | 151 for 10 in 32.2 |
10 | 598 | 2015 | 3612 | West Indies | 372 for 2 in 50.0 | Zim | 289 for 10 in 44.3 |
As expected, South Africa's 257-run win over West Indies moves to the top, with 721 rating pts. As important as the 400-plus was, it was the dismissing of West Indies for 151 which clinched this position. New Zealand's eight-wicket win over England has been moved to the second position. India's two resounding wins occupy the next two positions.
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems