Sticky dogs and media men (13 February 1999)
Every so often I feel I should share an interesting letter that crosses my desk with Express readers
13-Feb-1999
13 February 1999
Sticky dogs and media men
Earl Best
Every so often I feel I should share an interesting letter that
crosses my desk with Express readers. If I direct it to the person
responsible for the Letters page and it gets rejected, I try to make
the room for it here in sport.
The letters were legion for the second half of the South African tour
but they were angry rather than informative. The start of the domestic
cricket season has turned up something of real interest, written by
two cricketers who call themselves Zaggy & Ziggy.
Their subject is unfair uncricketing practices that are becoming more
and more pervasive as prize money increases. Here's their letter:
This is a plea to the relevant authorities, in other words, the
Trinidad and Tobago Cricket Board, to take the necessary
action-drastic and swift penalties-against those guilty of the
practice of doctoring their cricket pitches. The TTCBC must
immediately put an end to the most sickening habit of allowing these
deliberate attempts at cheating to pass as accidents or mishaps.
We are also calling on the Umpires Association to also get involved-or
develop some cojones-and report fairly on the practice as well as,
where necessary, re-schedule play.
The rules require that National League teams provide proper covers for
their wickets during home games. However, often when the home team
bats first and fails to post a really challenging total, the wicket is
either underprepared or wet on the other days when they are not
expecting to take the crease. But what is the Board doing about this?
Nothing!
In one game last weekend, for example, the home side batted in
brilliant sunshine on the first day on Saturday and were all out for
less than 200. having started their reply that same afternoon, the
visitors arrived on the following day on Sunday to find the entire
playing field and the adjoining pitch, which were uncovered, dry. Not
surprising since no rain had fallen the night or on the morning of the
game. So it was bewildering to discover wet areas strategically
located just in front of the batting crease on both ends of the
wicket.
In that game, a staggering 22 wickets fell for 115 runs on the second
day even though play started half an hour late because of the wet
conditions.
In another game, a total of 609 runs were scored while only 14 wickets
fell over the two days.
There were some six young players eligible for selection on the
National Under-19 team this year participating in the rain-affected
game. So the question arises: how can a young player be expected to
develop properly in the prevailing conditions? How can cricket in
Trinidad and Tobago develop if such situations recur and the guilty
parties go punished?"
We were quick to point fingers during the recently concluded tour of
South Africa where the WI batsmen could not cope with pitch
conditions. But perhaps we need to look closer home to find the real
source of the problem.
Perhaps the mediamen who seem to take such pleasure in criticising our
batsmen whenever they fail should get out of the ivory towers where
they sit in judgment over the players and visit some of the local
venues where cricket is played and report on the ill practices that
impede the development of our youth.
We certainly can do worse.
Point taken. But the two things go hand in hand and the media must
also discharge their responsibility to offer constructive criticism of
the performance of the Test team.
Source :: The Trinidad Express (https://www.trinidad.net/express/)