The importance of being earnest
Ajit Bhalchandra Agarkar did not gift the world a new batting philosophy with his memorable hundred at Lord's on Monday
Rajesh Kumar
31-Jul-2002
Ajit Bhalchandra Agarkar did not gift the world a new batting
philosophy with his memorable hundred at Lord's on Monday. He only
reiterated the importance of being earnest, a virtue last stated with
witty originality by the peerless Oscar Wilde.
![]() Ajit Agarkar against all bowlers - India 2nd innings at Lord's © CricInfo |
But far from showing any signs of agitation in the midst of this
turbulence, an earnest Agarkar, showing unstinting commitment, kept
his head for once and let the strokes flow. After arriving at the
batting crease on the fourth evening, he made a cautious start,
scoring only six runs off his first 35 balls. But the return of new
boy Simon Jones and Andrew Flintoff to the bowling crease found
Agarkar changing gears, one searing cut shot and a series of copybook
drives taking him to within earshot of senior partner VVS Laxman.
From then on, these were to be his favourite shots. Taking a distinct
liking to the English bowlers and their short-of-a-length deliveries,
he scored as many as 38 runs in the region between point and third
man. Jones was the main culprit as far as England were concerned,
conceding as many as 15 of these runs. Drives and pick-up shots
between mid-off and mid-wicket for their part yielded 42 runs,
speaking eloquently about Agarkar's willingness to hit the ball -
often over the infield - when it was up to be hit.
As much as his wagon-wheel speaks about his strokes, it also speaks
about where England erred in their bowling on Monday. On a belter of a
batting wicket that actually got flatter as the game progressed,
bowling short of a length on the fifth day was simply begging to be
hit. The bounce was even and true, and Agarkar, with his quick eye,
could do no wrong under such circumstances.
England erred in line as well. Many of the deliveries bowled to
Agarkar were not only short but also outside the off-stump, giving the
batsman room to free his arms and play his strokes. Bowling closer to
the batsman's body may have seen an intended cut fly to slip or chop
the ball onto the stumps, but it was not to be, and the English attack
was accordingly flayed.
The shots were all played with lovely timing and considerable elan -
facets of Agarkar's batting that came to the fore in his famous 21-
ball 50 against Zimbabwe at Rajkot in December 2000. But sadly before
Sunday, this was all lost upon a Test arena that only knew him as a
batsman with a famous penchant for ducks. His invigorating hundred at
starchy Lord's was timely penitence for the gross injustice that he
had done to his undoubted batting talents on the big stage until now.