
|

Shoaib Malik: Proving indispensable
© Getty Images
|
|
Nowhere are lines between success and failure, between panning a team and
praising them to the skies, between hailing a captain and booing him,
between a good decision and a bad one, thinner than in ODIs. All through
this match, in so many decisions and moments, this fact screamed out for
Pakistan. In virtually all of them, Pakistan lost.
How thin is the line? The decision to bring on Abdul Razzaq as late as the
30th over initially seemed an inexplicably poor decision by
Inzamam-ul-Haq; then, as he got rid of Sachin Tendulkar and bowled a
couple of tight overs, a masterstroke, before finally reverting to being a
baffling one.
So thin is it that Rana Naved-ul-Hasan's experimentation, so often
decisive in victory, proved crucial in defeat here. He'd had a bad day
anyway when he replaced Razzaq in the 42nd over, started with a wide and
went for 13 in that over and 16 in his following one. He mixed length
balls with too many shorter ones, varied his pace but no yorkers were
bowled. Inzamam's decision to bring him on in the first place, especially
when Mohammad Asif had overs left looks a poor one. But given that Rana's
bowling at the death has been generally spotless, and that Razzaq had
given 12 runs in the over previous, it probably wasn't as poor a one as it
eventually became.
Should Inzamam have attacked more, by keeping a gully or an extra slip
early on when the ball was seaming? Maybe, but his bowlers did have India
at 12 for 2 and things looked peachy. Umar Gul and Asif beat the bat so
many times in any case and by such narrow margins - the thin line again -
another early wicket could have changed the game. Kamran Akmal's leg-side
dropping of Sachin Tendulkar when he was 36 illustrates vividly this
thinness; had he caught it, who knows what could have happened.
Maybe also Pakistan didn't need to fiddle with their top order and
certainly in light of the collapse to 82 for four, it appears they
shouldn't have. But Shahid Afridi as opener is a concept as open to
failure as it is to success. One of Inzamam, Mohammad Yousuf or Younis
Khan could have come in earlier and Kamran Akmal, once demoted from
opening, further down. Maybe, but in the end 288 appeared for the most of
India's chase a competitive total.
Instead, so thin is the line that it probably serves more purpose to look
at what Pakistan can take from here. Like Rawalpindi, they have at least
the remarkably versatile powers of Shoaib Malik to celebrate. Until and
including Peshawar, Malik's importance in Pakistan's chases demanded
attention. But two more innings since highlight his importance in any
situation and particularly in a crisis. He walked in at 39 for two in the
seventh over and despite losing partners at regular intervals until the
33rd over, when Younis was dismissed, he herded momentum. Only five
boundaries came in his first fifty, yet he kept the run-rate at nearly
five until the 40th over. Thereafter, he upped it further and although he
went in the 46th over, his acceleration and Razzaq's explosion ensured
that Pakistan's reputation for batting deep remains intact.
Unlike Rawalpindi, they will also take some solace in their opening
bowlers, Asif and Umar Gul. This was only Asif's fourth ODI yet he already
seems so seasoned, it is unnerving. From the off, he settled into a
groove, not giving room on length or line, taking two wickets and beating
the bat many more times. In only his fourth game, he did precisely what
has come to be expected of him. But possibly, Gul's spell was more crucial
to Pakistan, for two games into his comeback, he had looked lost
internationally, going for 84 runs in 12 overs. His start here was also
erratic, but he made sure that with the bad balls, plenty of unplayable
ones were also delivered. Even more often than Asif, he beat both
Tendulkar and Dravid and deserved more than the solitary wicket he ended
with.
Finally, though, so thin is this line that after two consecutive losses,
Pakistan find themselves 2-1 down and their recent ODI effervescence
looking a little stale. They find within them, an absent strike bowler in
Shoaib Akhtar and one, in Rana, who has been so out of sorts, he has
conceded nearly eight runs an over through the series. They find that
although their batting is long, its upper half isn't looking so robust.
Over the last 18 months, they have been renowned for their ability to not
lie down and fight. Forget thin lines for that ability, more than
anything, will now come under its sternest examination.
Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of Cricinfo