Tufnell given last chance - again
By Martin Johnson
SOMEWHERE at Lord`s, there is a dossier which takes two men to
lift, and several weeks to read. It is labelled: "The Phil
Tufnell Form Guide", and the form in question has less to do
with the Middlesex bowling averages than a disciplinary record
as long as his arm ball.
However, while England had long been thought to have thrown
away the key, the reason for the cell door creaking open once
again yesterday is pretty clear to see. Two of the selectors,
Michael Atherton and Graham Gooch, have both submitted overseas
tour reports on Tufnell intimating that they would only take
him again if the TCCB appointed a full-time child minder,
but when it came to totting up England`s spin bowling
resources this week, they failed to make it past the fingers of
one hand.
There has always been space for Tufnell on an England team
sheet, but the space that has most concerned the selectors has
been the one between his ears. A former England team-mate once
described him thus: "A great cricketer - and a complete
dickhead. Most people grow up, and some don`t. Sadly, he may be
among the latter."
Tufnell has always cut an anti-Establishment figure, with his
shuffling 10 to two walk, stubbly chin and rolled-up fag
permanently dangling from his lip. His reluctance to embrace
authority led to a premature departure from Highgate School, and
he emerged from his studies with one O-Level, in art. He
qualified as a silversmith, but his arrival at Middlesex was
prefaced by previous employment as a taxi driver and a
builder`s mate.
The first indication that his temperament might suffocate his
talent came on his debut tour, to Australia in 1990-91. He had a
row with an umpire in his first Test match, in Melbourne, and
when he threw another wobbler in his second Test, in Sydney,
Gooch publicly told him to stop behaving like a twerp.
Tufnell`s response was to refuse his captain`s proferred
handshake when he finally took his first Test wicket, and he
was in Gooch`s bad books again on the 1993 tour to India, when
he was fined 500 after another umpiring contretemps. Neither did
Tufnell find India`s shortage of creature comforts quite to his
liking, claiming, fairly early on, that having "done the
elephants, seen the beggars" he`d rather like to go home.
Then, two winters ago in Australia, his second Test captain,
Michael Atherton, found that he was certainly the man to
handle Tufnell - albeit only by fighting off an urge to place
both sets of fingers around his throat. During a one-day
international in Melbourne, Tufnell managed to get himself
arraigned on a disrepute charge by not one, but both umpires, and
once again returned home lighter in the wallet than he was in
mood.
Given that Tufnell`s problems have all come on tour, it is
ironic that England should have ignored him all summer - at
times, when he was badly needed - and now recalled him for the
winter. Over a five-day period, not even Tufnell can get into
too much hot water, but three months in a confined space, and
anything could happen. All in all, Tufnell has this one last
opportunity to put his house in order, and the required
remedial work is all upstairs.
His last match-winning performance in a Test match was in New
Zealand, on the 1991-92 tour, when he took 11 for 147 in
Christchurch, and his type of bowling, relying as it does as much
on deception as extravagant spin, is ideally suited to a country
where the pitches are apparently prepared with embalming fluid.
Alan Mullally and Dominic Cork should manage to embrace the
conditions better than most, given that Test matches in New
Zealand, like county matches in Leicester and Derby, attract
crowds occasionally approaching (if you include the gatemen)
double figures.
Zimbabwe, similarly, will have two flat, slow pitches for the
Test matches, and the cricket is likely to be attritional
rather than heart-stopping. England really ought to win both
series, but even if they do, as a yardstick for next summer`s
Ashes series, it will be a bit like taking a compass reading at
the North Pole.