Australia v India, 3rd ODI, Melbourne January 17, 2016

Mature Maxwell hopes 'stupid nicknames' will drop

100

Play 03:54
Maxwell reveals his batting mantra

By his own admission, this was the kind of innings that the old (or young) Glenn Maxwell could not have played. Chasing 295, he came in at almost precisely the halfway point with almost exactly half the runs still required. A run a ball was needed, or near enough, and a run a ball he delivered, or near enough: his half-century came from exactly 50 balls, and he lifted his tempo only towards the end to finish on 96 off 83.

The old (or young) Maxwell would have gone hard from the time he strode to the crease, and maybe it would have come off, but more likely he would have perished trying for the big shot, not quite living up to the Big Show nickname that he hates. Maxwell acknowledges that it will take far more innings like this to change the public perception of him, but he believes as Australia's ODI No.5 he has made significant strides, starting with last year's series in England.

"I probably got, early on in my career, a little bit too excited trying to score 150 strike-rate every game and trying to be the match-winner every game and I didn't really finish the job a whole lot," Maxwell said after the win over India in Melbourne, which secured a series victory for Australia. "It's a long process. I don't think it's something that's just going to happen overnight by one innings.

"It's going to have to be a slow grind. It's going to have to be trying to change a lot of people's perceptions of how I'm seen. I'm hoping a lot more innings like that and hopefully people will start to forget about the stupid nicknames and all that sort of thing, and the hype, and the trick shots. It's something I'm trying to change and it's been something I'm really working on."

Maxwell hopes that the natural extension of his development and the work he has put in off the field on the mental side of his game is that eventually he will again be considered for Test cricket, having failed to offer much in his three matches so far in the baggy green. In the chase at the MCG he showed his ability to pace things to perfection, and it was notable that his reverse sweep made only a couple of appearances.

Not that Maxwell played in what you would call a classical style. The most memorable moment was when he dealt with the off-side field being up to Barinder Sran by slapping Sran over extra cover for six. Describing the shot is not easy: it was arguably related to the cut family, but about as distantly as the hippopotamus is related to the whale family.

"I have areas that I want to hit the ball, and I think it's pretty obvious on the field where I'm trying to hit the ball," Maxwell said. "I haven't really cared about how it looks trying to get the ball there. I think people get caught up in attractive batting, good-looking batting, with balls hit to the fielder.

"I've always thought it doesn't matter how it looks, as long as you can get it to the fence. I've never looked to be an attractive batsman, I'll always just try to get the job done. It's something I've probably failed to do over the past few years. I've scored quickly and scored a few runs in one-day cricket but haven't really got the job done. Tonight was a big step forward."

Maxwell fell with one run left in the chase and four runs left for his hundred - he skied a catch off Umesh Yadav that might have flown over the infield for four, and his century, had he connected properly. "I didn't really care where it went, I just wanted to hit it over the infield," he said. "I didn't care if it went for one, two, eight, four."

But Australia still had three wickets in hand and eight balls to get the one run required - they only needed one delivery as James Faulkner bunted a single next ball. It completed a remarkable run of victories in this series, the team having overhauled India's 309 at the WACA, 308 at the Gabba, and 295 at the MCG - all record successful run chases for the venues.

"It's amazing the way our team is playing and the way we've been approaching those chases," Maxwell said. "I don't think a lot of teams are doing it like we are at the moment, as comfortably as it looks at the moment. To do it three times in a row is pretty phenomenal and probably shows why we're No.1 in the world at the moment. It's a backing from the coach to play with everything on the line, it doesn't matter if you die trying, that's fine, as long as you give it a crack."

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. @brydoncoverdale

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Shaggy076 on January 20, 2016, 11:44 GMT

    Shane Oh - Sorry didnt realise you were the only one allowed to pot players and that your opinion is to not be challenged. Wont make that mistake again.

  •   Earl John on January 19, 2016, 8:23 GMT

    So, new nicknames required... Try (& these are some from someone whose middle name is Maxwell): Mad Max ... Maxwell Smart ... Maxwell's Silver Hammer ... or possibly Brian (from Life of Brian's Naughtyus Maximus)

  • shane-oh on January 19, 2016, 7:30 GMT

    @SHAGGY076 - McCullum's record across formats, demand in competitions around the world, crowd pulling power, and high level of respect around the cricket world (apart from in Australia) say more than you'll ever have the vocabulary to articulate.

  • shane-oh on January 19, 2016, 7:28 GMT

    @JACKA92 - as for fielding, Guptill is one of the best in the world. But generally, I agree that comparing the two is a bit silly.

  • shane-oh on January 19, 2016, 7:27 GMT

    @JACKA92 and @CHRIS_P - I made a comment early on that I think Maxwell is overrated, which I do, and someone else decided to start bringing up Guptill randomly. It was a poor choice as there has just been an article on here sowing his stats to be in the top six ODI openers in history, so I had to make the point about the gulf in class.

    I don't agree that SR is the most important think in short forms, though it is of course important, and more so every year. I massive strike rate is fine but if you hardly score any runs then it is pretty useless. Stats support the argument that Maxwell is nowhere near as good as some people think he is - but as I already acknowledged, his ODI record is improving and he may prove me wrong yet. I think what we are seeing is tacit acknowledgement from him that he's not good enough to score a lot of runs at the pace he usually scores (few players are), so he is better off slowing down a bit and contributing more runs more often.

  • dunger.bob on January 19, 2016, 6:59 GMT

    If Maxwell really has matured then he's going to be a huge asset to us in every format but most especially the shorter ones. I'm going to leave it at that because that's all I need to know.

  • Chris_P on January 19, 2016, 2:31 GMT

    @SHANE-OH While acknowledging Guptill is a fine player, for SF, they are totally different players. Strike rate is the biggest plus you can have & Maxwell's is exception, 160 & 125 for T20 & ODI whereas Guptill's is 129 & 85. Gupltill's average is higher because he slogs less due to him starting the innings while Maxwell comes in @ #6 in the finisher role. totally different roles.. That sort of S/R that Maxwell gets gives us the "X" factor because when he delivers, it is a huge plus for us. As long as people don't expect it too often I would much prefer him in my side than against me. Over-rated? As long as he delivers. he is fine with me.

  • Bikerguy on January 19, 2016, 1:44 GMT

    So he doesn't like the nick name he gave himself now cause he can't cut the mustard with the big boys and is stuck in crappy T20 and ODI games where every grandma and her dog gets a go? Sorry mate, you brought this on yourself. Just because you finally got a half decent score for the second time in your career doesn't make you a mature player.

  • cricketsubh on January 19, 2016, 1:22 GMT

    Karthikrby@ in odi cricket pitches are flat all over the world 2 thing this Australian bating lineup very very strong 3 thing 2019 world cup play in England I agree but in Odi cricket pitches in eng not helps bowlers last year eng chase 350 against newziland so in Odi cricket pitches are flat every where...

  • Phat-Boy on January 19, 2016, 1:04 GMT

    @Zain.K. You have got to be kidding. Johnson was never shy of a word or two but he and Maxwell are not in the same hemisphere as Warner. Johnson is renowned as being shy and polite away from the cricket field. Warner is not.

  • No featured comments at the moment.