May 14, 2008

Associates

Matches more than money

Martin Williamson

Much is spoken about the expansion of the international game, and if, as expected, proposals for a significant increase in funding for the Associates is approved when the ICC meets in June, then their progress should be further boosted.

But cash and goodwill can only go so far. What is widely agreed is that to improve, the leading Associates need to play more, and against the elite top ten Full Member countries. And that is where the problems come.

A casual glance at the international schedule will show that the major countries are on an almost constant global tour. In part this is because of the requirements of the Future Tours Programme, but more often than not the large gaps in that schedule are filled with lucrative one-day tours or tournaments.

In an ideal world, there would be time for India or England to undertake ambassadorial tours to Kenya or the Netherlands. But given the choice between a lucrative three-match series against commercially attractive opposition containing star names or a trip to a cricketing outpost in Africa or Europe, it's not a contest.

Click here for the full article

RELATED LINKS

Martin Williamson is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

RSS Feeds: Martin Williamson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Zoeb Tayebjee on (June 4, 2008, 5:34 GMT)

I disagree that associate members should be given fixtures again Full member countries. Amongst top associate members are Kenya who have been beaten by A teams of the Test playing countries. Not long ago Kenya was beaten by India A, Pakistan A and Sri Lanka A. Not only that, Australian Academy side, basically under 19, whitewashed Kenya in Nairobi. First, let these associate members be given much more fixtures against A teams of Test Playing Nations. Even so, this would be somewhat one-sided in favour of A teams of test playing nations (past results are evidence), however, this would serve as learning curve. Playing and getting thrashed against Test Playing nations would be discouraging to these associates.

Posted by josh gibson on (May 24, 2008, 12:54 GMT)

i think they need to have more test nations in cricket the main contenders i think if they did that would have to be Kenya, The Netherlands, Scotland and Ireland. also get more odi nations like Denmark and Namibia.

Comments have now been closed for this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Martin Williamson
Executive editor Martin Williamson joined the Wisden website in its planning stages in 2001 after failing to make his millions in the internet boom when managing editor of Sportal. Before that he was in charge of Sky Sports Online and helped launch and run Sky News Online. With a preference for all things old (except his wife and children), he has recently confounded colleagues by displaying an uncharacteristic fondness for Twenty20 cricket. His enthusiasm for the game is sadly not matched by his ability, but he remains convinced that he might be a late developer and perseveres in the hope of an England call-up with his middle-order batting and non-spinning offbreaks. He is now managing editor of ESPN EMEA Digital Group as well as his Cricinfo responsibilities.

All articles by this writer