ICC March 10, 2010

ICC in a quandary over Nepal riot

The ICC has dismissed criticism it was too slow to react to the crowd trouble which marred the match between Nepal and USA in Kirtipur in the ICC World Cricket League Division 5 tournament.

The ICC has dismissed criticism it was too slow to react to the crowd trouble which marred the match between Nepal and USA in Kirtipur in the ICC World Cricket League Division 5 tournament.

The ICC was roundly attacked for its seemingly slow response, not announcing an investigation until two days after the end of the tournament, but it has told Cricinfo the process was started in the immediate aftermath of the game. The next stage is the findings of the investigation will be delivered to the board who will deliberate what to do when they meet in Dubai in April.

The ICC is in a difficult position. If it fails to act then there is a danger it sets a precedent for crowds to disrupt matches if doing so will benefit their side. Against that, it will not want to stamp down to heavily on a country where cricket has really taken hold.

Click here for the full article.

Martin Williamson is executive editor of ESPNcricinfo and managing editor of ESPN Digital Media in Europe, the Middle East and Africa

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Darwin Niraula on March 27, 2010, 8:14 GMT

    Its not the fault of our players. I agree match refree should have taken action but this thing has happened before. Indian crowd has done it even in Australia when Ganguly was run out. Nepal is an emerging nation in cricket and they went on to win that very tournament of division 5. They should not be banned from hosting tournament but the security must be made tight.

  • Vikram Maingi on March 20, 2010, 8:33 GMT

    Match Refree should have taken a strong action in this case. I feel whatever crowd did is something they shouldn't have done but match refree didn't perform his responsibilities appropriately. Nepal should be banned from hosting any ICC tournament for at least next four years.

  • Darwin Niraula on March 27, 2010, 8:14 GMT

    Its not the fault of our players. I agree match refree should have taken action but this thing has happened before. Indian crowd has done it even in Australia when Ganguly was run out. Nepal is an emerging nation in cricket and they went on to win that very tournament of division 5. They should not be banned from hosting tournament but the security must be made tight.

  • Vikram Maingi on March 20, 2010, 8:33 GMT

    Match Refree should have taken a strong action in this case. I feel whatever crowd did is something they shouldn't have done but match refree didn't perform his responsibilities appropriately. Nepal should be banned from hosting any ICC tournament for at least next four years.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Vikram Maingi on March 20, 2010, 8:33 GMT

    Match Refree should have taken a strong action in this case. I feel whatever crowd did is something they shouldn't have done but match refree didn't perform his responsibilities appropriately. Nepal should be banned from hosting any ICC tournament for at least next four years.

  • Darwin Niraula on March 27, 2010, 8:14 GMT

    Its not the fault of our players. I agree match refree should have taken action but this thing has happened before. Indian crowd has done it even in Australia when Ganguly was run out. Nepal is an emerging nation in cricket and they went on to win that very tournament of division 5. They should not be banned from hosting tournament but the security must be made tight.