May 9, 2014

Australia's wicketkeeper dilemma

Who's to fill Haddin's shoes when the time comes? There's no easy answer
30

Wade can bat, but his keeping isn't stellar
Wade can bat, but his keeping isn't stellar © Getty Images

Far more so than we sometimes admit, wicketkeepers are the barometers of Test sides. England's recent dip in fortunes coincided entirely with the demotion of Matt Prior from English Test player of the year to Ashes non-starter. His and England's form was so bad that they threw in a guy who wasn't really a keeper in attempt to get out of their rut.

At the same time Australia's renaissance was inarguably strengthened by the steady hands (well, pretty much) and level head of Brad Haddin, who scored the counter-attacking runs often needed when Australia were five down for nothing very substantial. Haddin was so good he allowed the Aussies to carry an underperforming batsman (George Bailey) for the entire summer.

This might just be a personal view of mine, and maybe flavoured by the fact that I grew to love the game in the stable, successful eras with Ian Healy and Adam Gilchrist behind the stumps, but no player other than the captain embodies the strengths or weaknesses of Australian cricket as much as the national wicketkeeper does. When Australia have been skittish and unreliable, so too has been their custodian. It's most certainly a more important position to fill than the vice-captaincy, and in fact, often keepers have been presented as the most glaringly obvious men for that role too.

Fast bowlers come and go. They're not irreplaceable when they're good and it's true that Australia's recent successes have been as much about Mitchell Johnson as anyone, but bowlers are the muscle. Batsmen are the bedrock. A team is really not a team at all without batsmen, but keepers are appropriately named because they're the ones that keep it all together. When Brad Haddin lost his bundle a few years back, his fortunes mirrored an Australia losing their way. When he returned at the request of his overworked captain, Michael Clarke, he delivered and he led. He was dependable, he refused to be pushed around and he showed that he was a winner. That's a hole a lot bigger to fill than will be realised until he's gone for good.

Of the contenders to replace him, Tim Paine and Matthew Wade appear the most obvious at first glance. Wade was the man deposed by Haddin on account of Clarke's desire for leadership assistance and cleaner glovework. Whether he did enough to establish his credentials in either of those fields during his exile period at Shield level last season is debatable. As Victoria captain he was suspended for pitch-tampering and otherwise could often be seen lipping off in frustration. He can seriously bat, though and he's got guts, Wade. He's all guts. The actual wicketkeeping part is what's generally acknowledged as the deal-breaker.

Paine is possibly aided by the ascent of Rodney Marsh into the role of chairman of selectors in the wake of John Inverarity standing down. Marsh has previously expressed his liking for Paine. Still, many would rightly point to the fact that the guy has scored one first-class century in his career. That's a paltry return for a batsman of his capabilities and begs some uncomfortable questions, as does his decision to stand down from the Tasmania vice-captaincy to focus on his own game. Hopefully that decision reaps individual rewards because 473 runs at 31.53 in the Shield summer just gone was solid but not spectacular with the bat.

Elsewhere Sam Whiteman has appeared the most genuinely exciting prospect coming through from the generation below. He's young, eager, has benefited from the responsibility placed on him by Western Australia coach Justin Langer, and his batting can be destructive when he's on song. Six hundred and eighty-seven runs at 45.80 placed him sixth on the Sheffield Shield run-scorers table in 2013-14 and it's a result that should put his name forward.

From his own career Rod Marsh would be keenly aware of the role that a keeper has in influencing the personality and spirit of the side. It's a batting judgement and a keeping judgement, but it's also a character judgement and a statement about what Australia want to be as a Test side

Another interesting name on the Shield run chart is that of Ryan Carters, who made 861 runs at 53.81 for NSW but couldn't prise the keeping gloves away from the equally talented Peter Nevill, himself once called upon by the national side to provide injury cover. Nevill's 472 runs at a shade under 40 included an unbeaten century and two fifties, and he's a player of undoubted quality.

In South Australia, Tim Ludeman might be encouraged by Marsh's insistence this week that he'd be willing to break, or reset, the mould and pick the most technically proficient wicketkeeper. With a first- class batting average of 25, Ludeman needs to be sharp with his glovework. Up north, Queensland's Chris Hartley remains the country's most unsung and unfairly ignored player of the current generation. Almost 32 years old, he has been a rock for over a decade, and seven first-class centuries amply illustrate his batting talent.

You can crunch the numbers all you like but one thing is certain: Marsh will have the strongest say in the selection of Haddin's eventual replacement. From his own career Marsh would be keenly aware of the role that a keeper has in influencing the personality and spirit of the side. It's a batting judgement and a keeping judgement, but it's also a character judgement and a statement about what Australia want to be as a Test side.

Thirty-two men have kept wicket for Australia at Test level. That's 12 fewer than have captained the country in that time. Eight of those keepers spent a decade as their country's go-to gloveman. But for injury and his brief replacement by Wade, Haddin has been at it for seven years at Test level. The player who replaces him will need to be every bit as resilient, because a team takes shape around that perma-stooped figure behind the stumps.

Russell Jackson is a cricket lover who blogs about sports in the present and nostalgic tense for the Guardian and Wasted Afternoons. @rustyjacko

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on May 15, 2014, 8:22 GMT

    Hartley should have been picked years ago, and still should be if Hadden falters. Wade is a shocker behind the stumps. Paine is a maybe, but not as reliable a batsman as Hartley. Keeping skills must come first though. One missed chance is more damaging than the benefit from another 10 runs on the batting average.

  • wellrounded87 on May 12, 2014, 2:48 GMT

    This article has exagerated the role of keeper astronomically. First of all Prior was abysmal in England yet they still won 3-0. Haddin was equally poor in South Africa and Australia won 2-1 despite ABD being his usual destructive best.

    Haddins form played a big role, but to say the hopes and fortunes of a test cricket side rely on the keeper is a blatant disregard for the other 10 players on the team.

    Prior didn't make the rest of the English Batsmen unable to get runs and he didn't make the English bowlers (broad and stokes excluded) unable to take wickets. Haddins form didn't unleash Dave Warner or propel Steve Smith and it certainly didn't provide MJ with the consistency we've all been wishing he could have. If you want to put it all on one position look no further than the coach. Completely different team environments of Arthur and Lehman with a painfully obvious gap in the quality of performances.

  • stormy16 on May 11, 2014, 10:37 GMT

    I must say a while back I was calling for Aus to move past Haddin mainly because he was irresponsible with the bat but credit to Aus who stuck with him and credit to Haddin who held the Aus batting togeather in the Ashes and really now there will never be a question of Haddin's spot but at the write states - life after Haddin.

    Most teams are faced with the delima - do you play the keeper with the best batting record and accept a few missed chances or do you play the best keeper and accept an average batter? Gilly offered the best of both worlds but few others have. Prior and then Boucher were also good options but most other first choice keepers are more in the Healy mould - average in the 30's but good with the gloves.

  • kuntal_cares on May 11, 2014, 9:15 GMT

    Chris Hartley has been the spine of Queensland for years. A very strong candidate even though he is not amongst the youngest keepers around. At least he is safe and more rounded than the ones mentioned in the article.

  • Behind_the_bowlers_arm on May 11, 2014, 8:24 GMT

    It would have been Paine but his unfortunate hand injury seems to have interupted his career just at the wrong time and the feeling maybe is that his ship has sailed. Wade is a decent batsman but as said his keeping is sloppy. Unless he has some way of improving that I dont think he will be back. Spent the summer in Perth and must say Whiteman was the player who impressed me. Looks a natural behind the stumps and his batting was consistent and useful. I think you can forgive someone in his first full season for getting to 50 and not making a century yet but if he can break that duck you would hope he can kick on and be a regular century maker as Test keepers are required to be these days. He has the talent, that much was clear to me.

  • flickspin on May 11, 2014, 6:19 GMT

    i would straight after the world cup, i would replace haddin in 50/50 cricket, i dont know who i would replace him with, let form decide,

    gilchrist played 2-3 years of 50/50 cricket before healy retired and he got to play test.

    straight after the world cup, i would play 3 young kids in every 50/50 match, this might mean losing a few games but would be better for the team 2019

    players set to retire by 2017-2018: rodgers,watson,haddin,clarke, harris and johnson thats half the team.

    so in the next 3 years young players have to be blooded

    i would not play all 6 of the senior players in the 1 game of 50/50 cricket after the world cup, i would play 3 senior players and 3 young kids

    australia also need after the world cup is pick a new young vice captain, because of the aging side thier are only 3 candidates lyon,warner & smith

    the selectors need to organize plenty of australia-a tours and 50/50 cricket so our young kids are ready when the next mass retirement happens

  • ilovetests on May 11, 2014, 5:45 GMT

    I wonder if Ronchi is regretting moving back to NZ. He could've been playing test cricket for Australia rather than waiting to see if Watling (who is a world-class operator) will get injured.

  • JamalAJackson on May 11, 2014, 3:51 GMT

    Well, all I hope for is that they never pick Wade again. His bowling is better than his keeping.

  • on May 11, 2014, 1:28 GMT

    I think Tim Paine should be the next aussie keeper

  • Beertjie on May 10, 2014, 21:12 GMT

    There's a lot riding on Whiteman so I hope he retains his form of last season. I'm sorry for Paine but I have to agree about him probably missing the boat.

  • on May 15, 2014, 8:22 GMT

    Hartley should have been picked years ago, and still should be if Hadden falters. Wade is a shocker behind the stumps. Paine is a maybe, but not as reliable a batsman as Hartley. Keeping skills must come first though. One missed chance is more damaging than the benefit from another 10 runs on the batting average.

  • wellrounded87 on May 12, 2014, 2:48 GMT

    This article has exagerated the role of keeper astronomically. First of all Prior was abysmal in England yet they still won 3-0. Haddin was equally poor in South Africa and Australia won 2-1 despite ABD being his usual destructive best.

    Haddins form played a big role, but to say the hopes and fortunes of a test cricket side rely on the keeper is a blatant disregard for the other 10 players on the team.

    Prior didn't make the rest of the English Batsmen unable to get runs and he didn't make the English bowlers (broad and stokes excluded) unable to take wickets. Haddins form didn't unleash Dave Warner or propel Steve Smith and it certainly didn't provide MJ with the consistency we've all been wishing he could have. If you want to put it all on one position look no further than the coach. Completely different team environments of Arthur and Lehman with a painfully obvious gap in the quality of performances.

  • stormy16 on May 11, 2014, 10:37 GMT

    I must say a while back I was calling for Aus to move past Haddin mainly because he was irresponsible with the bat but credit to Aus who stuck with him and credit to Haddin who held the Aus batting togeather in the Ashes and really now there will never be a question of Haddin's spot but at the write states - life after Haddin.

    Most teams are faced with the delima - do you play the keeper with the best batting record and accept a few missed chances or do you play the best keeper and accept an average batter? Gilly offered the best of both worlds but few others have. Prior and then Boucher were also good options but most other first choice keepers are more in the Healy mould - average in the 30's but good with the gloves.

  • kuntal_cares on May 11, 2014, 9:15 GMT

    Chris Hartley has been the spine of Queensland for years. A very strong candidate even though he is not amongst the youngest keepers around. At least he is safe and more rounded than the ones mentioned in the article.

  • Behind_the_bowlers_arm on May 11, 2014, 8:24 GMT

    It would have been Paine but his unfortunate hand injury seems to have interupted his career just at the wrong time and the feeling maybe is that his ship has sailed. Wade is a decent batsman but as said his keeping is sloppy. Unless he has some way of improving that I dont think he will be back. Spent the summer in Perth and must say Whiteman was the player who impressed me. Looks a natural behind the stumps and his batting was consistent and useful. I think you can forgive someone in his first full season for getting to 50 and not making a century yet but if he can break that duck you would hope he can kick on and be a regular century maker as Test keepers are required to be these days. He has the talent, that much was clear to me.

  • flickspin on May 11, 2014, 6:19 GMT

    i would straight after the world cup, i would replace haddin in 50/50 cricket, i dont know who i would replace him with, let form decide,

    gilchrist played 2-3 years of 50/50 cricket before healy retired and he got to play test.

    straight after the world cup, i would play 3 young kids in every 50/50 match, this might mean losing a few games but would be better for the team 2019

    players set to retire by 2017-2018: rodgers,watson,haddin,clarke, harris and johnson thats half the team.

    so in the next 3 years young players have to be blooded

    i would not play all 6 of the senior players in the 1 game of 50/50 cricket after the world cup, i would play 3 senior players and 3 young kids

    australia also need after the world cup is pick a new young vice captain, because of the aging side thier are only 3 candidates lyon,warner & smith

    the selectors need to organize plenty of australia-a tours and 50/50 cricket so our young kids are ready when the next mass retirement happens

  • ilovetests on May 11, 2014, 5:45 GMT

    I wonder if Ronchi is regretting moving back to NZ. He could've been playing test cricket for Australia rather than waiting to see if Watling (who is a world-class operator) will get injured.

  • JamalAJackson on May 11, 2014, 3:51 GMT

    Well, all I hope for is that they never pick Wade again. His bowling is better than his keeping.

  • on May 11, 2014, 1:28 GMT

    I think Tim Paine should be the next aussie keeper

  • Beertjie on May 10, 2014, 21:12 GMT

    There's a lot riding on Whiteman so I hope he retains his form of last season. I'm sorry for Paine but I have to agree about him probably missing the boat.

  • on May 10, 2014, 19:28 GMT

    What about Travis Head? Why has no one mentioned him? I think he should be the one to replace Haddin...

  • Jaffa79 on May 10, 2014, 19:22 GMT

    I defy anyone on these pages to come up with a worse keeper than Matthew Wade! Bairstow is pretty close I have to say!

  • on May 10, 2014, 19:02 GMT

    It has to be Hartley. Even if he only does it for 2-3 years, it gives time for one of the youngsters to emerge fully.

  • Mervo on May 10, 2014, 13:06 GMT

    Whiteman with an acreage less than 40 on the books and never a century ... try again in 5 years. Hartley is a safe hands choice in almost all ways. Great keeper technically and has 7 centuries, many in difficult circumstances+character. Go for experience every time. We should know that by now.

  • on May 10, 2014, 11:52 GMT

    It should be Whitman. He's a good lad.

  • dunger.bob on May 10, 2014, 11:45 GMT

    I'm a believer in pick your best keeper because dropped catches, missed stumpings, byes, overthrows etc just kill you. All the fielding seems to get untidy when the keeper is messy and it usually costs way more runs than any keeper can be expected to make himself.

    I reckon Ludeman or Whiteman. I haven't actually seen much of Sam but I've seen enough of Ludeman to know he's a natural behind the sticks. So is Whiteman I'm told. .. Whoever it is, I just hope they settle in quickly and don't make us suffer like Wadey did.

  • on May 10, 2014, 8:21 GMT

    As an Australian I can only hope Haddin stays up to international standard for another 12-18 months. I think he's come out and said he will be calling it a day after the ODI World Cup which should mean we are without an experienced keeper for the Ashes over in the U.K. Choosing Hartley would only result in a short-term selection, he would be 33-34 which is unfortunate given his ability. Selecting Paine is essentially choosing a specialist keeper given the fact he has only scores the one century,we could expect an average of 35 from Paine but in the 18 months it takes for him to reach the team Ludeman, a significantly better keeper (best in Aus.), could have improved his batting to the 30-33 level and at that stage you would pick the better keeper and ignore the 2-3 run difference in average. This leaves Whiteman and Nevill. Whiteman is the younger and longer term keeper on would assume whereas Nevill brings the experience of captaining and batting at 6. Both would average 40+.*Ponders*

  • Winsome on May 10, 2014, 8:14 GMT

    Whiteman and Nevill are in the A squad, they'd have to be the most logical choices, though Sam Whiteman is the front runner, he's a smart lad and CA have the hots for him.

    Haddin's keeping isn't all that though he looked fantastic in comparison to Wade but then who doesn't? Paine is one hand injury away from retirement.

  • FAB_ALI on May 10, 2014, 6:50 GMT

    What if Steve Smith seriously starts working on wicket-keeping? He has the talent and ability to learn the skills, I think two-three years should be enough for him. That will be great for the Aussies.

  • landl47 on May 10, 2014, 5:50 GMT

    I can't comment on the keeping of anyone but Wade and Paine (and Paine is streets ahead, in my opinion), but I have to suggest that the next keeper needs to be able to bat given the lack of young batsmen coming through.

  • Timmuh on May 10, 2014, 3:26 GMT

    I don't believe age should be a factor at all in Test selections The best gloveman in Shield cricket is Hartley. He should be next in line. Ludeman is good with the gloves as well and Whiteman looks neat. He does something a bit strange (seems to rise dip and rise just a little with his hands) as the bowler delivers but it doesn't impact on his taking the ball so who cares.

    Wade should drop the gloves, just as he drops everything else. He might be able to make the side as a specialist batsman, but his keeping is so bad it actually drops his credentials for a Test cap. Barely adequate to pace and utterly horrendous to spin. I wouldn't even have him fielding in slips.

    Paine has not been the same since his finger injuries. I barely saw him the summer just gone but by all accounts he is getting back again, but for mine others should have overtaken him.

  • Moppa on May 10, 2014, 1:30 GMT

    Judging by this article every gloveman in Australia and some non-glovemen (e.g. Carters) are contenders! Nice summary of the various players, but no real judgment as to where things are heading. For mine, Sam Whiteman is a stand-out. Hartley is too old (and unfashionable - should be the short-term stopgap), Paine has had too many troubles with bat and gloves, Wade is horrible keeping to (and batting against) spin and that is a deal-breaker (despite his batting ability against pace). I saw Whiteman in the Shield final and he has smooth footwork and great hands. Looks a handy bat too. @Ayem Gillani, by contrast, Nevill looked shaky in the Shield final and dropped a couple of sitters. @choo_for_twenty_choo, I think the leadership succession is very clear - Smith is just about a lock, barring a most outrageous loss of form. He has leadership credentials and, importantly is comfortable batting against pace and spin - an all conditions player, rare amongst young Australian batsmen.

  • Markdal on May 10, 2014, 1:04 GMT

    I'm a big fan of Ludeman, and his batting is improving, but I'd be happy with Peter Nevill - good keeper and better bat. Hartley would be a great pick, but his age is against him, while Paine has missed the boat as well.

  • MrPud on May 9, 2014, 21:22 GMT

    It has always been said that the wicketkeeper is like the drummer in a band - sitting up the back, holding things together, rarely getting the attention of the vocalist or guitarist. That last statistic blew me away. 32 keepers and 44 captains in Australia's test history, THAT's how important the position is. Luckily the right person will be selecting the next one in Rod Marsh. His impact on modern Australian cricket is starting to rival that of Bob Simpson. There are talented keepers in every state which means the promoted one will deserve the position.

  • yorkshire-86 on May 9, 2014, 19:28 GMT

    Johnny Bairstow was Yorkshire's first choice wicketkeeper for 5 years before he played against Australia, so hes hardly 'a guy who wasn't really a keeper'

  • on May 9, 2014, 17:50 GMT

    tim Paine and Peter Neville are both great

  • JJJake on May 9, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    Smith has strong leadership qualities. Haddin's fierce attitude ensures Australia is always in the game. Similar to England's Matt Prior. Those characters are not easily replaced. Hopefully we don't go through as many wicket keepers as we did spinners because settling on Lyon.

  • on May 9, 2014, 11:55 GMT

    If you actually watched Shield Cricket you would KNOW Ludeman has sharp glove work.......

  • spongebat_squarestumps on May 9, 2014, 11:19 GMT

    This begs the question of the overall leadership succession planning of the Aussie side because Pup, too, will doubtless retire or relinquish the captaincy during Marsh's chief selector tenure - if only because Pup's back could infamously flare up at any time. The captaincy succession candidate is just as vital but just as muddy and wide open as wickie selection.

  • TheCricketEmpireStrikesBack on May 9, 2014, 8:58 GMT

    A lot of quality with the names mentioned above and I am pleased to see Aus first-class cricket producing this dilemma the way it is meant to. From Marsh, Healey and Gilchrist to Haddin the role has been highly influential within the team and over the decades has been as much about leadership and experience as catches, stumpings and runs. Because of this Tim Paine would be my current choice.

    If there was a similar dilemma with the batsmen, Aus cricket would be seriously healthy.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • TheCricketEmpireStrikesBack on May 9, 2014, 8:58 GMT

    A lot of quality with the names mentioned above and I am pleased to see Aus first-class cricket producing this dilemma the way it is meant to. From Marsh, Healey and Gilchrist to Haddin the role has been highly influential within the team and over the decades has been as much about leadership and experience as catches, stumpings and runs. Because of this Tim Paine would be my current choice.

    If there was a similar dilemma with the batsmen, Aus cricket would be seriously healthy.

  • spongebat_squarestumps on May 9, 2014, 11:19 GMT

    This begs the question of the overall leadership succession planning of the Aussie side because Pup, too, will doubtless retire or relinquish the captaincy during Marsh's chief selector tenure - if only because Pup's back could infamously flare up at any time. The captaincy succession candidate is just as vital but just as muddy and wide open as wickie selection.

  • on May 9, 2014, 11:55 GMT

    If you actually watched Shield Cricket you would KNOW Ludeman has sharp glove work.......

  • JJJake on May 9, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    Smith has strong leadership qualities. Haddin's fierce attitude ensures Australia is always in the game. Similar to England's Matt Prior. Those characters are not easily replaced. Hopefully we don't go through as many wicket keepers as we did spinners because settling on Lyon.

  • on May 9, 2014, 17:50 GMT

    tim Paine and Peter Neville are both great

  • yorkshire-86 on May 9, 2014, 19:28 GMT

    Johnny Bairstow was Yorkshire's first choice wicketkeeper for 5 years before he played against Australia, so hes hardly 'a guy who wasn't really a keeper'

  • MrPud on May 9, 2014, 21:22 GMT

    It has always been said that the wicketkeeper is like the drummer in a band - sitting up the back, holding things together, rarely getting the attention of the vocalist or guitarist. That last statistic blew me away. 32 keepers and 44 captains in Australia's test history, THAT's how important the position is. Luckily the right person will be selecting the next one in Rod Marsh. His impact on modern Australian cricket is starting to rival that of Bob Simpson. There are talented keepers in every state which means the promoted one will deserve the position.

  • Markdal on May 10, 2014, 1:04 GMT

    I'm a big fan of Ludeman, and his batting is improving, but I'd be happy with Peter Nevill - good keeper and better bat. Hartley would be a great pick, but his age is against him, while Paine has missed the boat as well.

  • Moppa on May 10, 2014, 1:30 GMT

    Judging by this article every gloveman in Australia and some non-glovemen (e.g. Carters) are contenders! Nice summary of the various players, but no real judgment as to where things are heading. For mine, Sam Whiteman is a stand-out. Hartley is too old (and unfashionable - should be the short-term stopgap), Paine has had too many troubles with bat and gloves, Wade is horrible keeping to (and batting against) spin and that is a deal-breaker (despite his batting ability against pace). I saw Whiteman in the Shield final and he has smooth footwork and great hands. Looks a handy bat too. @Ayem Gillani, by contrast, Nevill looked shaky in the Shield final and dropped a couple of sitters. @choo_for_twenty_choo, I think the leadership succession is very clear - Smith is just about a lock, barring a most outrageous loss of form. He has leadership credentials and, importantly is comfortable batting against pace and spin - an all conditions player, rare amongst young Australian batsmen.

  • Timmuh on May 10, 2014, 3:26 GMT

    I don't believe age should be a factor at all in Test selections The best gloveman in Shield cricket is Hartley. He should be next in line. Ludeman is good with the gloves as well and Whiteman looks neat. He does something a bit strange (seems to rise dip and rise just a little with his hands) as the bowler delivers but it doesn't impact on his taking the ball so who cares.

    Wade should drop the gloves, just as he drops everything else. He might be able to make the side as a specialist batsman, but his keeping is so bad it actually drops his credentials for a Test cap. Barely adequate to pace and utterly horrendous to spin. I wouldn't even have him fielding in slips.

    Paine has not been the same since his finger injuries. I barely saw him the summer just gone but by all accounts he is getting back again, but for mine others should have overtaken him.