CLT20 news June 26, 2012

South Africa to host Champions League

104

South Africa is set to be the host of this year's Champions League T20 in October (between October 9 to 28)*, with Cape Town, Johannesburg, Centurion and Durban as the venues. The decision is yet to be formally announced but Sundar Raman, a member of the CLT20's technical committee, confirmed it through a tweet.

This will be the second time - the first was in 2010 - in four years that the CLT20, the world's most lucrative club-cricket tournament, will be held in South Africa. India had hosted the tournament in the other two years, and were originally frontrunners to hold the competition in 2012 as well.

South Africa's summer will just be beginning in October, which means temperatures will rise into the 20s for Johannesburg and Centurion. Durban will be its usual warm self while Cape Town can be expected to be cooler, as it was for last year's Australia Test. The pitches will be fairly lively up on the Highveld (Johannesburg and Centurion), while Durban should also help quick bowlers.

The governing council of the CLT20 had met last month in an attempt to finalise the format and venue of this season's tournament, but hadn't been able to reach a decision. One confirmed change from last season is the inclusion of Sialkot Stallions, Pakistan's domestic champions.

The other teams which have made it to, at least the qualifying stage of the tournament, are: Kolkata Knight Riders, Chennai Super Kings, Delhi Daredevils, Mumbai Indians (all four from the IPL), Auckland Aces (from New Zealand), Trinidad & Tobago (from West Indies), Sydney Sixers, Perth Scorchers (both from Australia's Big Bash League), Titans, Lions (both from South Africa). The representatives from Sri Lanka and England will be decided after next month's Sri Lanka Premier League and the ongoing Friends Life t20.

The IPL teams will be treading familiar ground in South Africa but the franchises will miss out on the opportunity to keep the momentum generated by the big crowds that turned out during the 2012 IPL. Kolkata Knight Riders and Delhi Daredevils in particular benefitted from the surge in attendance and the CLT20 would have been the ideal opportunity to keep their fans engaged and coming to the stadiums, especially with Knight Riders winning it all this season.

Playing in South Africa also increases the operating costs for the IPL Teams, while reducing the exposure their sponsors get from being associated with the teams. The only potential benefit is that it gives the teams a chance to reach out to their overseas fans, something the Daredevils hope to capitalise on.

"The Indian teams that have qualified for the tournament are all familiar with the conditions there since IPL 2009 was held there," TA Sekar, Head (Cricket), GMR Sports - the owners of Daredevils - said. "The Champions League T20 being played in South Africa will [also] let the IPL teams enhance their fan base."

South African franchises, though, will not make substantial gains from hosting the tournament. The two participating franchises, Lions and Titans, will receive their participation fees and any prize money while the four unions based at the stadiums will be paid hosting fees. Any profit made by CSA, as shareholders of the event, will be credited to them and distributions to affiliates will take place out of a pool, in accordance with normal procedure.

(Additional reporting by Tariq Engineer)

* - 0700GMT, Jul 3, 2012 - The actual dates were added after they were confirmed by Cricket South Africa, Cricket Australia and the BCCI

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Htc-Android on June 27, 2012, 17:30 GMT

    thank god mumbai made it to the top 4 in this years ipl. if not they would have played 5 ipl teams with all 5 ipl teams directly qualifying to the tournament. i am sure this will happen in the future. ridiculous.

  • EnglishCricket on June 27, 2012, 14:14 GMT

    To be honest this Cricket Champions League is nothing really because most people don't even watch it and reading some articles on it financially, it loses money every year and sponsorships. Those who say this Champions League is unfair are right but have to understand that for some pathetic reason is owned by BCCI majority when really should such competitions should exist should actually be run by the governing body of Cricket ICC. This is how the Champions league of Cricket should be so that all is fair - 3 teams from Indian T20 league, 2 from England T20 league and 1 each from Australian, Bangladeshi, South African, Caribbean, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc plus the previous holders from Champions league from whatever country that way it will be an interesting and exciting tournament or something similar according to me.

  • 30-30-150 on June 27, 2012, 13:44 GMT

    @DINESHCC : LOL. Thanks for that comment. Had the laugh of the day.

  • 30-30-150 on June 27, 2012, 13:43 GMT

    @Fanatic_cricko : That's the thing. BPL has many overseas stars but not a single local player of international standards. The four you mentioned are all Pakistanis so including a BPL team would basically mean including a mini-Pakistan team.

  • WickyRoy.paklover on June 27, 2012, 11:31 GMT

    @g.narisma,as i have told u few times earlier that pak has way beter record overall in all 3 formats plus far more authoritative when it comes to playng against eng,wi.AUS have been a bug bear to al asians no doubt.It was pak who used to chalenge the great windies of al times ,we nearly won d series in 87,2001 bt sufrd teribly due to bad umpirng jst like d recent match of pak vs sl,u seem too much obsesed with stats so i hope u would visit stats of results i m mentioning to.Ur team reasonably came good aftr 2000 but were used to be undrdogs mostly bfor that,unfortunatly,Ur team once again going to pre 2000 era

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 10:06 GMT

    @Harsha Veerendranath : so what if india is the highest stake holder ... and it they ahve to show it then why even bother bringing other teams .. just bring a couple of more indian teams and call it mini-ipl ... the whole concept of this tournament to see the best doemsstic team in entire international circuit and for that ther eshould be a balance ... having two teams from all interantional cricketing countries makes that balance ... and it also proves that the two teams that worked hard to reach the finals at their domestic level deserve to be in a tournament where a champion is crowned rather than ignoring hard work of many teams and just bringing in teams from their own tournament just for the sake of having higher stakes ... it is like saying ifi bring the bat to the game then i am the captain and ill bat first no matter who ever deserves it better and can do better than me ... ifyou want to arrange an internation tournament then make sure all countries are treated same

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 10:06 GMT

    @Harsha Veerendranath : so what if india is the highest stake holder ... and it they ahve to show it then why even bother bringing other teams .. just bring a couple of more indian teams and call it mini-ipl ... the whole concept of this tournament to see the best doemsstic team in entire international circuit and for that ther eshould be a balance ... having two teams from all interantional cricketing countries makes that balance ... and it also proves that the two teams that worked hard to reach the finals at their domestic level deserve to be in a tournament where a champion is crowned rather than ignoring hard work of many teams and just bringing in teams from their own tournament just for the sake of having higher stakes ... it is like saying ifi bring the bat to the game then i am the captain and ill bat first no matter who ever deserves it better and can do better than me ... ifyou want to arrange an internation tournament then make sure all countries are treated same

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 9:46 GMT

    My question is simple ... why term Champions League as an international tournament for domestic teams when majority of teams are from india only ... does this mean other countries are not good enough to give two teams atleast ... offcourse every domestic tournament has two teams in the final so why not reduce teams from india and make a balance of team qualifying for it to atleast 2 teams per country ... why ignore teams from countries which qualified to reach the final and yet brintwo teams that didnt even reach the final in one tournament ... is this a messages that indian teams that dont do too well in their domestic tournaments are still good enough to replace teams from countries which reached to the finals of their own tournaments

  • Fanatic_cricko on June 27, 2012, 8:52 GMT

    Dhaka Gladiators deserves a place in the CLT20. They have some of the world class players in the team including the likes of Afridi, Azhar Mahmood, Saeed Ajmal, Madmax Imran Nazir and can blaze away many opponents

  • on June 27, 2012, 8:01 GMT

    For all those complaining about 4 IPL teams, note that India is the single largest stake holder in CL T20 (50%).... Basically we own it... So it is our choice how many of our teams go there.....

  • Htc-Android on June 27, 2012, 17:30 GMT

    thank god mumbai made it to the top 4 in this years ipl. if not they would have played 5 ipl teams with all 5 ipl teams directly qualifying to the tournament. i am sure this will happen in the future. ridiculous.

  • EnglishCricket on June 27, 2012, 14:14 GMT

    To be honest this Cricket Champions League is nothing really because most people don't even watch it and reading some articles on it financially, it loses money every year and sponsorships. Those who say this Champions League is unfair are right but have to understand that for some pathetic reason is owned by BCCI majority when really should such competitions should exist should actually be run by the governing body of Cricket ICC. This is how the Champions league of Cricket should be so that all is fair - 3 teams from Indian T20 league, 2 from England T20 league and 1 each from Australian, Bangladeshi, South African, Caribbean, Zimbabwe, Pakistan, Sri Lanka etc plus the previous holders from Champions league from whatever country that way it will be an interesting and exciting tournament or something similar according to me.

  • 30-30-150 on June 27, 2012, 13:44 GMT

    @DINESHCC : LOL. Thanks for that comment. Had the laugh of the day.

  • 30-30-150 on June 27, 2012, 13:43 GMT

    @Fanatic_cricko : That's the thing. BPL has many overseas stars but not a single local player of international standards. The four you mentioned are all Pakistanis so including a BPL team would basically mean including a mini-Pakistan team.

  • WickyRoy.paklover on June 27, 2012, 11:31 GMT

    @g.narisma,as i have told u few times earlier that pak has way beter record overall in all 3 formats plus far more authoritative when it comes to playng against eng,wi.AUS have been a bug bear to al asians no doubt.It was pak who used to chalenge the great windies of al times ,we nearly won d series in 87,2001 bt sufrd teribly due to bad umpirng jst like d recent match of pak vs sl,u seem too much obsesed with stats so i hope u would visit stats of results i m mentioning to.Ur team reasonably came good aftr 2000 but were used to be undrdogs mostly bfor that,unfortunatly,Ur team once again going to pre 2000 era

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 10:06 GMT

    @Harsha Veerendranath : so what if india is the highest stake holder ... and it they ahve to show it then why even bother bringing other teams .. just bring a couple of more indian teams and call it mini-ipl ... the whole concept of this tournament to see the best doemsstic team in entire international circuit and for that ther eshould be a balance ... having two teams from all interantional cricketing countries makes that balance ... and it also proves that the two teams that worked hard to reach the finals at their domestic level deserve to be in a tournament where a champion is crowned rather than ignoring hard work of many teams and just bringing in teams from their own tournament just for the sake of having higher stakes ... it is like saying ifi bring the bat to the game then i am the captain and ill bat first no matter who ever deserves it better and can do better than me ... ifyou want to arrange an internation tournament then make sure all countries are treated same

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 10:06 GMT

    @Harsha Veerendranath : so what if india is the highest stake holder ... and it they ahve to show it then why even bother bringing other teams .. just bring a couple of more indian teams and call it mini-ipl ... the whole concept of this tournament to see the best doemsstic team in entire international circuit and for that ther eshould be a balance ... having two teams from all interantional cricketing countries makes that balance ... and it also proves that the two teams that worked hard to reach the finals at their domestic level deserve to be in a tournament where a champion is crowned rather than ignoring hard work of many teams and just bringing in teams from their own tournament just for the sake of having higher stakes ... it is like saying ifi bring the bat to the game then i am the captain and ill bat first no matter who ever deserves it better and can do better than me ... ifyou want to arrange an internation tournament then make sure all countries are treated same

  • AunShak on June 27, 2012, 9:46 GMT

    My question is simple ... why term Champions League as an international tournament for domestic teams when majority of teams are from india only ... does this mean other countries are not good enough to give two teams atleast ... offcourse every domestic tournament has two teams in the final so why not reduce teams from india and make a balance of team qualifying for it to atleast 2 teams per country ... why ignore teams from countries which qualified to reach the final and yet brintwo teams that didnt even reach the final in one tournament ... is this a messages that indian teams that dont do too well in their domestic tournaments are still good enough to replace teams from countries which reached to the finals of their own tournaments

  • Fanatic_cricko on June 27, 2012, 8:52 GMT

    Dhaka Gladiators deserves a place in the CLT20. They have some of the world class players in the team including the likes of Afridi, Azhar Mahmood, Saeed Ajmal, Madmax Imran Nazir and can blaze away many opponents

  • on June 27, 2012, 8:01 GMT

    For all those complaining about 4 IPL teams, note that India is the single largest stake holder in CL T20 (50%).... Basically we own it... So it is our choice how many of our teams go there.....

  • on June 27, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    Why isn't there any team from Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. I thought it would only be fair to have at least one team from each test playing nation. This is what champions league refers to, isn't it?

  • DINESHCC on June 27, 2012, 7:13 GMT

    For this year's CL T20, KKR is the favourite team, not because of Gambhir, Yusuf, Mccullum, Lee, Manoj, Narine are playing but the legend, sir, multi talented, prodigy, super star, marvellous, gifted, athletic cricketer, No.1 bowler, No.1 batsman, No.1 fielder in any position, No.1 fielder in out of the ground, No.1 wicket keeper, No.1 12th man, No.1 umpire, No.1 commentator, No.1 spectator Shakhib is playing.

  • anver777 on June 27, 2012, 6:39 GMT

    Including of Sialkot Stallions & Dhaka Gladiators will add some flavor in this CLT20 !!

  • Shahrukhkazmi on June 27, 2012, 6:20 GMT

    Have you seen Gladiators Line-up i guess it is the perfect line-up for T-20 and of course one of the most furious line-up which can beat any team in the world easily that is why they are not in CL.

  • Blythesville on June 27, 2012, 6:19 GMT

    The sad thing is that the team that everyone loves (or is their 2nd favourite team) - Trinidad & Tobago - is the most depleted by the preference for the IPL teams. How can tournament compensate such teams for such a bias? this needs to be fixed.

  • Sakthiivel on June 27, 2012, 4:54 GMT

    @ Rezaul : Kid, all IPL teams have 4 foreign players, How do you say that they play only in flat pitches. CSK won 2010 CLT20 in SA.

  • Sakthiivel on June 27, 2012, 4:49 GMT

    A Morkel and Faf du Plessis are in good form. Yellow boyz will have a good chance of bring back CL trophy home for the second time.

  • g.narsimha on June 27, 2012, 4:45 GMT

    PAKIPASSION-TAUSEEFKHAAN-U may be aware that IPL is INDIAS DOMOSTIC LEAGUE ,the ICL is owned by three major boards IND, AUS SA , BCCI MAJOR STACK HOLDER ABOUT 50% , ICC reaping bearings from these tourments nothing to do with its affairs ,beseides providing a window , so it is up to these boards to run this ICL SO BEING MAJOR STACK HOLDER BCCI is fielding 4 IPL teams in order to get more sponsors as more INDIAN participation means HUGE VIEWERSHIP these are MONEY GAMES ,whether we are loosers or nothing it may not augur well for u people but it is realiy , if u have problems u can have u r own brand as u r board is trying for the last few years to have PPL , which is still a distance reality .

  • g.narsimha on June 27, 2012, 4:20 GMT

    OBAIDMAHMOODHUSSAIN-As bieng exposed by SL now in on going series ,pl check the stats in this web u r team is equally bad in AUS ENG

  • 30-30-150 on June 27, 2012, 4:18 GMT

    @PakiPassion : I understand your passion but if you have heard of something called UEFA Champions League of football, you wouldn't be complaining about four IPL teams taking part in CLT20.

  • RohithMedisetty on June 27, 2012, 4:00 GMT

    @Mani than , What makes you think that Dhoni will fail ? Could you tell me who won the clt20 in 2010?

  • satish619chandar on June 27, 2012, 3:10 GMT

    Utter nonsense this is .. Four teams from IPL? Atleast have a qualifier for the fourth team like they had last year?

  • satish619chandar on June 27, 2012, 3:07 GMT

    @Rezaul : Yes.. Dhaka gladiators will RULE in foreign tracks..

  • on June 27, 2012, 3:02 GMT

    Who really care about CLT20, honestly!!!

  • on June 27, 2012, 2:58 GMT

    Cricket is becoming less Global but more Indian sport which is lot to worry!!

  • cairo on June 26, 2012, 22:14 GMT

    Dhaka's team should be taken.

  • on June 26, 2012, 21:31 GMT

    Dhaka gladiators!!!! HAHAHAHA!

  • on June 26, 2012, 21:00 GMT

    Expectations will be higher as well.Cricket in SA is much more amazing than in indian damp slow pitches which host poor indian cricket . It shows that india only wants to be number 1 at home & have thinking that all cricket should held in india. They r exposed by england & aussie tours.

  • avmd on June 26, 2012, 19:31 GMT

    There should be one, and only one team from India.

  • Rezaul on June 26, 2012, 19:10 GMT

    I would like to see Dhaka Gladiator in the competition. I bet, if they play, they will cause plenty of probleblems for IPL teams as this is not going to be flat Indian track!

  • NP_NY on June 26, 2012, 18:30 GMT

    @Saahil Butt: Obviously you haven't read the earlier posts, so I am just copying and pasting my earlier comments again: "The reason is simple. CLT20 is a private league involving club teams. They want a diverse set of fans (from all cricket playing nations) watching the tournament but they also want the number of fans following the tournament to be as high as possible. The number of cricket fans in India is atleast 6 times more than Pakistan, atlesat 50 times more than SL and about 300 times more than NZ. It's simple business and simple math. You can't argue with sheer numbers." @Pakipassion: Your definition of champions league is wrong. "Countries" have nothing to do with this. This tournament cannot be run by the ICC because this is a private tournament.

  • India_Rules_Everybody on June 26, 2012, 18:09 GMT

    Everyone who is asking why Dhaka Gladiators are not there - They don't deserve to be there. As simple as that.

  • on June 26, 2012, 17:30 GMT

    Why no team from Bangladesh?

  • dulabhai on June 26, 2012, 17:08 GMT

    This is a shame! It contradicts when I hear that ICC wants to globalize cricket but they only focus on top 6/7 teams. You have 4 teams from India. Where is Dhaka Gladiators from BPL? Is this how you globalize cricket? The way things are going.. it's not far when cricket will be played just in India.

  • hpc1 on June 26, 2012, 16:52 GMT

    I think there should be 14 teams in the tournament. 2 from India, Australia & South Africa each 1 from SL, Pak, Ban, NZ, Zim, Ban each. 1 more from last year's winning country (MI was champion last year, 3rd team from IPL will be also qualified.) 6 from 14 teams will play in qualifier, 2 will be qualified and make 10 team main event. Also, according to me, this year tournament should be played in Down Under. As seen in BBL, two night matches will be played on same day in Perth & Sydney due to big time zone difference. and Qualifier round can be played in New Zealand.

    I am Indian and big fan of Indian Cricket, but I think every one should get fair chance

  • on June 26, 2012, 16:52 GMT

    Posted by Devendra Rajput on (June 26 2012, 09:33 AM GMT) Its in SA so again Dhoni will be failure overseas as well as CSK spinners.. It will be good for KKR and DD.. Would like to see the Devil's winning it...

    r u kidding mee????? last time it happ in SA csk won the trophy.. ....wake up man

  • on June 26, 2012, 16:43 GMT

    Four teams frm IPL.... What is this.... As the name says it is supposed to be the champions tournament.. Not the losers.... It,s way beyond imagination four teams from one nation on what basis... Is cricket run by ICC or BCCI it,s clearly unfair. And Team from BPL should be included. Ithink it will be fair if there is only one team from each country.

  • on June 26, 2012, 16:19 GMT

    @Prof.Cricket-have u seen the dhaka gladiators squad?just compare dhaka gladiators squad with any previous srilankan team who've participated in clt20.

  • cefur on June 26, 2012, 15:43 GMT

    4 teams from India dont make any sense, this is clearly unfair to the competition. What i would like to know on what grounds ICC has approved this biased decision? Is this tournament is ran by BCCI or ICC?

    This is one reason cricket is losing interest and favoritism is clearly shown. Shame on ICC and BCCI.

  • on June 26, 2012, 15:23 GMT

    where is dhaka gladiators. they are bpl champs.

  • on June 26, 2012, 15:02 GMT

    There should be only one two team from india and sould include BPL champs and any other team i prefer one more WI or Eng - A cricket lover from India

  • on June 26, 2012, 14:40 GMT

    why there will not any bpl team?????they have strong team,and should be able to play,if organizers are unable to add them,then the cup will be a tournament between india's and rsa.no confusion that india board is killing the cricket game

  • BRUTALANALYST on June 26, 2012, 14:29 GMT

    Also WEST INDIES provide some of the most exciting t20 players / sides 2 teams should be included from all countries finalists ! who wouldn't want to see JAMAICA here for example along with T&T . . .

  • Head_gear on June 26, 2012, 14:25 GMT

    @Faisal Jashim Uddin:Buddy Just keep in remember when Sri Lankan players are concerned in top ranks all around the world and each of them is a necessity in any international tournament of the game.I dnt mind giving chances to 1 from BPL and Zimbabwe T20s.Bt it's fact that by now they are well above BPL franchises.So don't make a Sri lankan team a bottom ranked.It's a must not.We do have brilliant players in all round departments.We will show u that in the SLPL. Hope u too will get a chance to see how brilliant they are and hope a BPL franchise too will get a representation with a Zimbabwean franchise.

  • on June 26, 2012, 14:20 GMT

    Venues other than India should be tried for one more year...

  • Head_gear on June 26, 2012, 14:17 GMT

    @Cric_fan_sam:I totally agree with Cric_fan_sam.If the tournament organizers do include 4 IPL teams and 3 teams straightly to the second stage it's a problem whether the organizers take care of all Test playing nations with same care and it will be a bad impact to the world about cricket also and it too will reduce competancy in IPL.But I'd like if they include 2 each from the main countries like Aussies,India,NZ,Eng,Pak,SL,WI,SA and Bangladesh And Zimbabwe with 1 from each.The qualifying stage comprising of the Runners up of every domestic tournament and 2-4 winners advancing the 2nd stage.

  • LALITHKURUWITA on June 26, 2012, 14:12 GMT

    Play it in Galle and Hambantota. Two beautiful cities.

  • on June 26, 2012, 14:02 GMT

    y there are four IPL teams in this tournament,and y there is going to be a qualifying round for the other national champions and not for few other teams,is there any ranking system for the teams,everybody knows that there is nothing like that,so every national T20 champion side should play the main round

  • bala2rahul on June 26, 2012, 13:57 GMT

    @cric_fan_sam :- Spot on bro, totally agree with you, Mumbai indians inclusion is ridiculous. Also reduction of teams in the main group stage from 10 to 8 is puzzling. If 8 is the way to go then Include 2 teams from india, australia, and south africa. The remaining 2 spots is up for grabs. 6 teams for qualifiers ie, champions of Sl,pak,ban,wi,nz and eng.

  • YS_USA on June 26, 2012, 13:44 GMT

    Felllows, They don't hold CL matches in Australia because then matches would be in a different time zone and nobody from India will watch them. Also, 4 IPL teams because the biggest cricket market (Indians) will watch. Each home team gets US$500,000 for each of their players who plays for IPL team.

  • PakiPassion on June 26, 2012, 13:38 GMT

    Champions league means "CHAMPIONS" from each domestic league should represent their country. 4 IPL teams!!! Does India have four champions???? .... ICC SHOULD RUN THIS & MAKE IT ONE TEAM FROM EACH COUNTRY.. keep it short & Sweet & FAIR

  • chad_reid on June 26, 2012, 12:45 GMT

    @indiasupbangalore Australians don't care about IPL or CL hardly anyone watches it its not even shown on any tv channel if CL is played here they'll only be a 1000 people in the stadium

  • cric_fan_sam on June 26, 2012, 12:45 GMT

    Though I am from India, I don't like 4 ipl teams participating in CLT20. If you are saying ipl teams are better than teams from other countries, then what is the point of this tournament? BPL winners (Dhaka warriors if I am not wrong) should've been playing instead of Mumbai Indians (on the basis of them finishing 4th in the ipl) and DD should be in the qualifiers (coz they didn't make the final)

  • phendel on June 26, 2012, 12:07 GMT

    the BPL definitely shud be included.....im really glad they included Sialkot Warriors though....& does anybody knw the regulations for who gets directly into the main tournament & who has to play the qualifiers (it seems only the 3 governing countries gets 2 teams into the main draw while other countries have to risk early elimination)

  • rahulcricket007 on June 26, 2012, 12:03 GMT

    WHY NOT AUSTRALIA HAS BEEN CHOSEN ONCE FOR THE CLT20 VENUE ?

  • py0alb on June 26, 2012, 11:58 GMT

    Why do India get 4 teams and some others only get 1? Talk about a farce. Should be the top 2 from each league.

    Players registered for more than one qualifying team should play for their domestic team.

  • vak1997 on June 26, 2012, 11:49 GMT

    why 4 teams from India? only 2 were enough. 3 at the max,

  • Abdulhay on June 26, 2012, 11:46 GMT

    Afghan players should be given a chance in CLT20..

  • on June 26, 2012, 11:33 GMT

    Well, if they include SLPL I dont think it would be a bad idea including BPL's team as well, at least 1 team should get the chance

  • Kazakhstan on June 26, 2012, 11:27 GMT

    For Pakistani t20 champions I still have dougt as still 100's of day to be held this cl and pakistan has to have good relation till 1st day of cl with India... Joking but it's real yeas?

  • Fast_Track_Bully on June 26, 2012, 11:26 GMT

    No, BPL team pls. bringing BPL team to CLT20 will downgrade the event.

  • on June 26, 2012, 11:05 GMT

    Wonder who the winner is, I mean assuming it is a predetermined outcome ;-)

    Has to be IPL team, just which one....

  • 30-30-150 on June 26, 2012, 10:57 GMT

    @karthik666 : You are joking right? Last time when CLT20 was held in SA, it was Dhoni's CSK who won it. Spinners flop? It was R.Ashwin who was the leading wicket-taker of that tournament. Haha.

  • Stark62 on June 26, 2012, 10:55 GMT

    Get Dhaka warriors to participate too!!

    They have a very strong squad and I would bet on them beating most of the teams named in the article.

  • karthik666 on June 26, 2012, 10:42 GMT

    Its in SA so again Dhoni will be failure overseas as well as CSK spinners.. It will be good for KKR and DD.. Would like to see the Devil's winning it... --- Lol r u out of ur mind ? CSK won their only Champions league in SA .. Lol .. Pls thing then make such comments

  • 512fm on June 26, 2012, 10:42 GMT

    Why isn't it being held in India? Surely it would be more lucrative to stage it their instead of SA although you will likely get better matches in SA as the pitches won't be low, slow and a spinners paradise.

  • indiasupbangalore on June 26, 2012, 10:31 GMT

    Why is'nt that australia not interested to host the tournament is the weather the reason not hosting in the month of oct in australia ?

  • on June 26, 2012, 10:30 GMT

    BPL team should definitely be included too. Their team would give most of the other teams a run for their money. Even if it is just at the qualifying stage. To have 4 IPL teams seems overkill in my opinion. South Africa is a great place to host this tournament

  • on June 26, 2012, 10:28 GMT

    more teams will boost the clt20 popularity...so include at least one team frm BPL.

  • Geeva on June 26, 2012, 10:27 GMT

    @Pressen: Morne Morkel plays for the Titans!!if he is patrotic he will play for Titans and not Delhi!!Seriously a billion people ??

  • on June 26, 2012, 10:22 GMT

    we want to see bangladesh's Dhaka Warriors chap of bpl, in CLT20

  • LALITHKURUWITA on June 26, 2012, 10:08 GMT

    PAK needs a couple of first innings specialist batsmen. They got a couple of second innings batsmen in Younis Khan and Asad Shafiq.

  • on June 26, 2012, 10:08 GMT

    Why ain't this year's BPL champion Dhaka Gladiators included in CLT20??

  • Pressan on June 26, 2012, 10:07 GMT

    Delhi to win it! They have the most complete fast bowling line up: Morkel will dominate again, Aaron and Yadav Indias best quicks and Pathan a handy left arm fast medium option.

  • LALITHKURUWITA on June 26, 2012, 10:04 GMT

    Can we get SJ Davis (Australia) and IJ Gould (England) appointed as umpires?

  • on June 26, 2012, 9:45 GMT

    ur rt @np_ny but even some people 4m Bangladesh vl b egar to c a team 4m BPL. So i request in behalf of cricketing fans to introduce a team 4m BPL.

  • satish619chandar on June 26, 2012, 9:44 GMT

    Good thing to happen.. SA have a good knowledgeable crowd and they support cricket in general especially T20.. IPL-2 was a good hit in SA and there would be a good response for CLT20 too..

  • on June 26, 2012, 9:33 GMT

    Its in SA so again Dhoni will be failure overseas as well as CSK spinners.. It will be good for KKR and DD.. Would like to see the Devil's winning it...

  • Geeva on June 26, 2012, 9:31 GMT

    Not to sure for cape twon as a venue as we may have rain during the October period!My only problem with CL20 is that all home based players should play for there home team!!Note to Indian fans eg: Albie Morkel is a Titan/Northerns player 1st and then Chennai Super Kings Player!!a billion people and not one IPL team with 11 indian born players in a starting line up!!!!

  • on June 26, 2012, 9:29 GMT

    I'm eagerly waiting for it!! I'm glad that South Africa is hosting the Champions League as we'll know that the pitches are well taken care by the groundsmen and could always produce some bounce at any time.. I hope Chennai plays well and win the Super Tournament..

  • getsetgopk on June 26, 2012, 9:07 GMT

    A useless non even really, Pakistan should just refuse to send their team!!

  • JesseChuck on June 26, 2012, 9:00 GMT

    That is Stupid thay are not playing in East Londen

  • NP_NY on June 26, 2012, 8:53 GMT

    @ada007: The reason is simple. CLT20 is a private league involving club teams. They want a diverse set of fans (from all cricket playing nations) watching the tournament but they also want the number of fans following the tournament to be as high as possible. The number of cricket fans in India is atleast 6 times more than Pakistan, atlesat 50 times more than SL and about 300 times more than NZ. It's simple business and simple math. You can't argue with sheer numbers.

  • on June 26, 2012, 8:47 GMT

    There should be atleast 2 teams from West Indies. Trinidad is so much better than any other team in the world , its ridiculous

  • MasudRUETeee091040 on June 26, 2012, 8:33 GMT

    We will see a T-20 series in first bowling pitch condition.I am doubtful about scores of the matches.

  • on June 26, 2012, 8:16 GMT

    Can we see Gale in WI team

  • androyuvi on June 26, 2012, 7:58 GMT

    Awesome.. gonna see the CSK team together, once again! Naicee.. i wish they play good from the beginning! CLT20 packed with champions from all over the world, will be tough and interesting tournament to watch!

  • Blythesville on June 26, 2012, 7:55 GMT

    As IPL teams have the right to recruit players from other teams, shouldn't other teams be allowed to recruit players from other regional teams to fortify their loss of key players? This tournament automatically favours IPL teams on that basis. This needs to be rethought to compensate teams like Trinidad & Tobago, Auckland and Sydney for the IPL depleting their superstars.

  • on June 26, 2012, 7:53 GMT

    I think Gauti and Viru will be seething.... on SA pitches, they cant go after the bowling like they do on the flat wickets and India, and they will have to work fr their runs. CSK to win the tourney!!!!

  • Blythesville on June 26, 2012, 7:51 GMT

    Poor Trinidad & Tobago... gutted of their superstars. But wait and see. There will be a batch of newcomers that will surprise the world yet again.

  • jmcilhinney on June 26, 2012, 7:49 GMT

    It would be very interesting to see how the IPL teams went in the CL if their overseas players played for their own "home" teams instead. It's a bit of a farce but I guess money talks and T20 cricket is about nothing if not money. It might be considered unfair when some IPL teams would lose overseas players and others wouldn't because their home teams weren't playing it's even less fair for the home teams lose players. Obviously no rule will ever be introduced to ensure a player plays for their home team in case of a conflict because the IPL teams have the most leverage. I wonder whether the players themselves could negotiate that if they wanted to. I wonder whether they'd want to, if it meant possibly less money.

  • on June 26, 2012, 7:34 GMT

    Is Mumbai Indians have to play qualifying matches or they are to play directly in main event???

  • on June 26, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    most of aus's grounds are out due to the footy ;)

  • RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on June 26, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    most overrated tourney

  • asithaSL on June 26, 2012, 7:05 GMT

    Another version of IPL, Really like to watch Global T20 series from each test playing country participation with domestic t20 team. but, CLT20 isn't like that, it's boring.. coz, it's a kind of mini IPL.

  • ada007 on June 26, 2012, 6:58 GMT

    why are there 4 teams from IPL, ridiculous!!!! should be the top 2 teams from each league.

  • aRahmanS29 on June 26, 2012, 6:57 GMT

    Sorry, its Dhaka Gladiators!

  • aRahmanS29 on June 26, 2012, 6:56 GMT

    where is the BPL's champion Dhaka Warriors? I heard they may get a chance to play qualifying round to enter the main event...

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:51 GMT

    Why Australia didnt get to host the CLT20 even once??

  • AkDoN on June 26, 2012, 6:33 GMT

    CSK again ...I Bet..No other can be the winner

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:28 GMT

    its like India and South Africa hosting Champions League T20 alternatively it will be the second time South Africa will be hosting the Champions League T20 while India have hosted it twice before

  • mihir_nam on June 26, 2012, 6:20 GMT

    Why not Australia, They are also members. Just because of Timings

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:12 GMT

    Cricket Australia also holds a share in the CLT20 yet Australia is the only country out of those shareholders not to host the tournament. Fair go please!!

  • 30-30-150 on June 26, 2012, 6:09 GMT

    Good. We can have it in places like UAE and Sri Lanka in the future.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • 30-30-150 on June 26, 2012, 6:09 GMT

    Good. We can have it in places like UAE and Sri Lanka in the future.

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:12 GMT

    Cricket Australia also holds a share in the CLT20 yet Australia is the only country out of those shareholders not to host the tournament. Fair go please!!

  • mihir_nam on June 26, 2012, 6:20 GMT

    Why not Australia, They are also members. Just because of Timings

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:28 GMT

    its like India and South Africa hosting Champions League T20 alternatively it will be the second time South Africa will be hosting the Champions League T20 while India have hosted it twice before

  • AkDoN on June 26, 2012, 6:33 GMT

    CSK again ...I Bet..No other can be the winner

  • on June 26, 2012, 6:51 GMT

    Why Australia didnt get to host the CLT20 even once??

  • aRahmanS29 on June 26, 2012, 6:56 GMT

    where is the BPL's champion Dhaka Warriors? I heard they may get a chance to play qualifying round to enter the main event...

  • aRahmanS29 on June 26, 2012, 6:57 GMT

    Sorry, its Dhaka Gladiators!

  • ada007 on June 26, 2012, 6:58 GMT

    why are there 4 teams from IPL, ridiculous!!!! should be the top 2 teams from each league.

  • asithaSL on June 26, 2012, 7:05 GMT

    Another version of IPL, Really like to watch Global T20 series from each test playing country participation with domestic t20 team. but, CLT20 isn't like that, it's boring.. coz, it's a kind of mini IPL.