Champions League T20 2012

Threat of quick-fire exit looms for qualifiers

For some teams the Champions League T20 will be a case of blink-and-you-miss-it but, as expected, those sides needing to qualifying were not about to start moaning

Firdose Moonda

October 7, 2012

Comments: 51 | Text size: A | A

Hampshire celebrate their Friends Life t20 title, Yorkshire v Hampshire, Friends Life t20 final, August 25, 2012
Being domestic champions does not get every team straight into the Champions League T20 © Getty Images
Enlarge

Cricket has found a lot of ways to make itself shorter. The bowl-out, the super-over, the seven-over match if it rains in a 20-over one and now the three-day tournament.

Between Tuesday and Thursday, six teams will play six matches at two different venues on South Africa's Highveld. At the end, nobody wins anything. Two of them will earn the right to play in the Champions League T20, a tournament so obviously skewed in favour of the three shareholding countries that its actual name as a competition for champions is questionable. It's more of a tournament for some champions, some runners-up and some IPL mid-tablers - who do not have to go through the same qualification stage winners of other countries' competitions do.

Rather like Zimbabwe's participation at the World Twenty20, some domestic 20-over trophy-holders will have made their last appearance in the tournament before others even arrive in South Africa. Such is the nature of an event that guarantees some teams a place but requires others to qualify for it.

Luckily for the organisers, the people who should take issue with the format of the tournament do not seem to have too much of a problem with it. There was not one complaint to be heard from any of the four teams who addressed the media on Sunday. Sialkot Stallions and Uva Next were absent - they will have their arrival press conferences on Monday - but are unlikely to raise any fuss either.

After all, Sialkot are the first Pakistan side to take part in the CLT20 and Uva Next are making their debut, hoping to fare better than Wayamba and Ruhuna before them. Yorkshire and Hampshire have not played in the tournament before and could be enjoying the novelty of the occasion while Auckland and Trinidad and Tobago have been here before and seem happy enough to be back.

Not that they actually can say any different, of course. They already get the short end of the stick by having to qualify while the shareholders' teams go straight through and moaning may see them end up with nothing at all. The cynic would think the teams are just toeing the line but anyone who spends time with them will be able to see the genuine interest and excitement at the chance to compete in a tournament that many of them as see as only one shade away from international cricket.

"We are tremendously excited to be here. We know there are challenges, but they are nice challenges," Paul Strang, the coach of Auckland, said. For the New Zealanders, there are eyes to catch - national and IPL selectors and even if they only have two matches in which to do that, they'll take it.

Instead of mull over the unfairness, both Auckland and T&T know what they have to do. The former is determined to get it right, after failing last year. "We've understood that that's how it is, that's how it's been set up. And we've been living with that fact for the last nine months," Gareth Hopkins, the Auckland captain, said. The latter have done it before and coach David Williams sees no reason why they cannot do it again. "We're in good stead, we've played a lot of T20 cricket in the lead up to this," he said.

And, in keeping with the theme of avoiding controversy, Williams also flat-batted questions about T&T's last-minute issues which nearly led to them not arriving. "We're not aware of anything, as far as we are concerned, we're all in South Africa," he said.

 
 
For many of us this is potentially the highest standard we will reach Jimmy Adams is eager to sample the big stage
 

The English sides have a different sense of the realities of qualifying. None of the counties will have the chance to play in the tournament next year after the ECB decided that their teams will not participate in the 2013 CLT20 because of too much of an overlap with their season. Knowing that this could be one of their only chances to shine in this tournament is spurring both on.

"That's a shame for us. We're here and we're going to try and make the most of it," Dimitri Mascarenhas, the Hampshire captain said. "You never know when these things are going to come around again so we want to give ourselves a huge chance to do well."

Despite Mascarenhas' enthusiasm for the tournament, he was also the only person who hinted that the current format could have consequences for the future of the tournament. He said the issue of qualifying could be "one of the reasons the ECB has decided we won't be in it next year."

Other boards may agree, although the opportunities may outweigh the disadvantages as Yorkshire coach Jason Gillespie explained. "You just have to ask any of our players, they are very excited to play in a tournament like this," he said. "In an ideal world, it would be fantastic to have English county sides involved and we'd love to be in a position to play CLT20 again, although at this stage, it looks like it's unlikely."

For many the chance to play against cricketers from other countries and to have television cameras beaming that image all over the world is a dream come true. "For many of us this is potentially the highest standard we will reach," Jimmy Adams, Hampshire's opening batsman, said. "It's a chance to test yourself against the best and trying to push your career."

The real gains can probably only come in the tournament proper, where the likes of Kieron Pollard and Davy Jacobs earned themselves IPL deals and caught the attention of their national selectors. But the only way for some teams to get into the tournament is to qualify. Even though popular sentiment is that they should have already done that by winning their home competition, these teams don't seem to mind a bit of extra work to get there.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by lousy_cricketer on (October 10, 2012, 7:47 GMT)

i even dont knw y this tournament takes place in first place...isnt ipl bpl ppl big bash not enuf tht this useless tourney also been added...i believe money does make everyone dance..these same players will b having issues with burn out when international matches r to b playd.

Posted by skdev on (October 10, 2012, 6:04 GMT)

it's really unfair that four Indian teams get through, but the only Sri Lankan team still has to qualify....

Posted by ProdigyA on (October 9, 2012, 21:41 GMT)

The simple fact is IPL not only bears the cost but also provides each and everybody connected to CL, from teams to players to officials to security to waiters. So instead of cribbing that is not fair just be happy with the fact that you are at least there, else everybody can pack their bags and go home to play their 3rd class domestic events.

Posted by MunafAhmed811 on (October 9, 2012, 20:04 GMT)

Kyle Mills sets up Auckland's crushing win over so called champion team - SIALKOT STALIIONS

Posted by vissu295 on (October 9, 2012, 16:34 GMT)

Until and unless the viewership for domestic T20 teams outside India/subcontinet increases, the format will be heavily skewed towards India. The league gets most of it's money from India and they had to put one more team this year as the TRP ratings last year weren't as expected considering it was played in INDIA and not RSA!! I agree it's SKEWED heavily towards IPL teams, but that's for sustaining the league. Sadly weren't living in a perfect world.

Posted by CricketingStargazer on (October 9, 2012, 7:57 GMT)

People should remember that the IPL francises made it a condition of participating that they would have first pick of all players! Unlike the football Champions League where participation is decided by coefficients and qualifying over a year this tournament was set up to protect the interests of the IPL. Personally, I would agree with the suggestion that the top 8 Test sides should have one team automatically qualified and the top 4 should have two. The remaining Test sides get one team automatically into qualifying, who join the national sides of the two highest ranked Associates in T20 and one additional side from each of the top 8 Test sides. 12 sides qualify automatically. 4 come through qualifying, which could be done regionally. It becomes a genuinely international tournament of champions.

Posted by Meety on (October 9, 2012, 3:00 GMT)

At the end of the day, this is not an ICC run event. The concept of this tournament is really designed to give further market penetration for the sponsors of the IPL franchises, & increase some revenue streams for Sth Africa & Oz. The only reason why Yorkshire would travel half way around the world for this event is because it is lucrative financially speaking. The Champ League concept is a great one, unfortunately since it is not an ICC event, it is not all that it COULD be. My biggest gripe about the rules is, that a player should be MADE to play for his home domestic team. Last year NSW had about 3 or 4 frontline players taking the money & playing for IPL franchises. What is wrong about this, IMO, is that it says nothing about the respective strengths of the teams in trems of native talent. (T & T is another side that gets depleted).

Posted by drnaveed on (October 8, 2012, 23:10 GMT)

i think, if " it is just a matter of spending to much money by bcci, as a result, they are giving more chance to the indian teams" , is concerned .than better the organizers should change the name of champions league , and give some other name to this tournament.if you call it Champion's League than ideally you should make sure that only one top team from each cricket playing country should participate in it. investing too much money should not give license to any country to allow its 4 teams to participate in a one particular tournament.what will happen, if a country hosting a World Cup, hence spending too much money on it, will it send more than 2 sides to participate in the world cup , and will ICC allow it to do so, only on basis that it has spent too much money on organizing the world cup. if the answer is no , than icc should do the same here ,i mean international cricket council, and not indian cricket council.............

Posted by siddiqi on (October 8, 2012, 18:41 GMT)

Well its a private league to make money and that's fine but please stop calling it as champions league. Without a fair chance for all the champions to win this league should be called Super IPL league or something like that...

Posted by BRUTALANALYST on (October 8, 2012, 17:45 GMT)

@Junior Mitchell GOOD point bro also I would add India side domestically outside of IPL as it is the Indians that funnily enough loose out most with these CLT20 format as the domestic Indians don't get to learn from these good quality games as they rely on superstars from around the world to play the pressure situations be it with bat or ball. India has the most cricketers with the most cricket mad nation it's sad for the CLT20 they can't field a side outside of IPl or at least without the IPL superstars so they can actually learn and improve.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tournament Results
Lions v Syd Sixers at Johannesburg - Oct 28, 2012
Syd Sixers won by 10 wickets (with 45 balls remaining)
Syd Sixers v Titans at Centurion - Oct 26, 2012
Syd Sixers won by 2 wickets (with 0 balls remaining)
Daredevils v Lions at Durban - Oct 25, 2012
Lions won by 22 runs
Daredevils v Titans at Centurion - Oct 23, 2012
No result (abandoned with a toss)
Auckland v Scorchers at Centurion - Oct 23, 2012
Scorchers won by 16 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days