News

No-ball for wicketkeeper movement sparks debate at BBL semi-final

Square-leg umpire Gerard Abood called a no-ball against the Renegades wicket-keeper Sam Harper for moving his gloves in front of the stumps, but the movement occurred after the striker had hit the ball

Alex Malcolm
Alex Malcolm
15-Feb-2019
Getty Images

Getty Images

In a BBL season that has seen plenty of attention drawn towards umpiring, another decision that sparked debate occurred in the semi-final between the Melbourne Renegades and the Sydney Sixers at the Marvel Stadium.
In the ninth over of the Sixers innings, square-leg umpire Gerard Abood called a no-ball against the Renegades wicket-keeper Sam Harper for moving his gloves in front of the stumps.
Law 27.3.1 states, "The wicket-keeper shall remain wholly behind the wicket at the striker's end from the moment the ball comes into play until a ball delivered by the bowler- touches the bat or person of the striker, or passes the wicket at the striker's end, or the striker attempts a run." Law 27.3.2 states that: "In the event of the wicket-keeper contravening this Law, the striker's end umpire shall call and signal No ball as soon as applicable after the delivery of the ball."
Harper did move his gloves forward of the stumps but it clearly occurred after Daniel Hughes, the striker, hit the ball.
Abood informed captain Aaron Finch and Harper of the decision before umpire Phillip Gillespie signaled free-hit at the non-striker's end. The free-hit only yielded two runs to Josh Philippe.
Abood was also on the field in Perth, as the square-leg umpire, when the Melbourne Stars' opener Ben Dunk was controversially given out caught via the third umpire despite Perth Scorchers fieldsman Nick Hobson initially signaling the ball didn't carry.
The Sixers were the beneficiaries of a wicket off the seventh ball of an over earlier in the tournament, also at Perth Stadium against the Perth Scorchers.

Alex Malcolm is a freelance writer based in Melbourne