England v India, 1st ODI, Chester-le-Street September 1, 2011

Format raises India's hopes

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan
Despite a 4-0 loss in the Tests, India's impressive ODI record in the last two years increases the possibility of a close series
  shares 27

ODIs a challenge for England
After being completely outplayed in the Test series, India will be more than glad to resume playing a format in which they have tasted much success in recent times. They have very few positives to take from the 4-0 drubbing in the Tests, but will try to draw confidence from their World Cup triumph in the subcontinent in April. England, on the other hand, will be brimming with confidence following a terrific display in the Test series where they were so far ahead of India in every department that any result other than a whitewash looked impossible. The ODIs however present England with a fresh challenge as it has not been a format they have excelled in. They have failed to make the semi-final of the World Cup since the 1992 tournament and on the two occasions they reached the quarter-final (1996 and 2011), they were crushed by Sri Lanka. In the 2011 World Cup, England were entertaining, but highly inconsistent. They had three superb results- a tie against India in Bangalore chasing 338 and successful defences of low targets against South Africa and West Indies. On the flip side, they suffered shock defeats against Ireland and Bangladesh before managing to get through to the quarter-final stage where they were at the receiving end of a ten-wicket thrashing by Sri Lanka.

Since 2000, India have thoroughly dominated England in ODIs in the subcontinent, winning 14 matches and losing just four. In matches played in England though, the head-to-head record is 7-6 in favour of England. India's most notable wins include the final of the Natwest series in 2002 when they chased down 326 after looking down and out at 146 for 5. In the previous ODI series between the teams in England in 2007, the momentum swayed between the teams before England finally took the series 4-3 with a seven-wicket win in the final ODI. The most recent ODI played between the two teams in Bangalore during the World Cup was a cracking game with many twists. England, after fighting back in the final overs, restricted India to 338, and were in control of the chase till the 41st over. Following a mini-collapse, they eventually recovered to tie the game. England have won three of the last four series at home by a margin of 3-2 and if the record between the two sides in recent years is any indication, the series is set to be another closely-fought one.

England's record in ODIs (average, run-rate and economy-rate)
Venue Played Won Lost W/L ratio Bat avg/RR Bowl avg/ER Avg diff/RR diff
v India In England (since 2000) 14 7 6 1.16 41.79/5.65 29.49/5.21 12.30/0.44
v India in India (since 2000) 19 4 14 0.28 27.28/5.26 36.96/5.56 -9.68/-0.30
In England since start of 2008 37 19 16 1.18 31.35/5.33 28.86/5.01 2.49/0.32
Last ten matches 10 6 4 1.50 33.66/5.58 27.59/5.14 6.07/0.44

India the better ODI team in recent years
South Africa and Australia have been the best teams based on the run-rate difference in ODIs in the last two years. Both the teams have quality bowling attacks and hence a much lower bowling average when compared to most teams. Their win-loss ratios are the best among all teams (2.06 and 2.03). India, by virtue of playing most of the cricket in the subcontinent on flat tracks, have a high batting run-rate (5.58) and a fairly high economy rate (5.38). England's recent ODI form has been patchy, and as a result, the average difference and run-rate difference are very low (0.37 and 0.02 respectively). West Indies, who have the lowest win-loss ratio (0.45) and Pakistan lie at the bottom of the table with extremely low values for both the average difference and run-rate difference.

Top teams in ODIs since 2009 in terms of run-rate difference
Team Wins/Losses W/L ratio Batting avg/Bowling avg Avg diff RR/ER Run-rate diff
South Africa 31/15 2.06 38.52/26.96 11.56 5.64/5.14 0.50
Australia 55/27 2.03 36.76/27.68 9.08 5.30/4.97 0.33
India 46/26 1.76 36.95/32.09 4.86 5.58/5.38 0.20
Sri Lanka 40/28 1.42 33.48/29.61 3.87 5.27/5.09 0.18
New Zealand 23/31 0.74 28.18/30.44 -2.26 5.18/5.03 0.15
England 31/27 1.14 31.26/30.89 0.37 5.25/5.23 0.02
West Indies 17/37 0.45 27.33/30.66 -3.33 4.97/4.99 -0.02
Pakistan 27/31 0.87 27.73/30.49 -2.76 4.93/4.96 -0.03

India's strength remains the batting
Although the Indian batting line-up will miss the attacking prowess of Virender Sehwag and Yuvraj Singh, there is still enough firepower in the top order to trouble any bowling attack. MS Dhoni's strike rate has fallen in the last few years, but he remains a vital part of the line-up as he demonstrated in the World Cup final when he promoted himself and scored a match-winning 91. While Sachin Tendulkar will aim to score his 100th international century and move forward after a below-par show in the Tests, Suresh Raina and Virat Kohli will look to extend their impressive ODI record to matches outside the subcontinent. India will, however, miss the services of the consistent Gautam Gambhir, who has scored close to 2000 runs at an average of 50.28 in ODIs since the start of 2009.

India's top batsmen in ODIs since start of 2009 (min 1000 runs scored)
Batsman Innings Runs Scoring rate Average Boundary % Dot-Ball %
MS Dhoni 54 2114 4.91 55.63 37.65 48.23
Virat Kohli 50 1994 5.00 47.47 40.42 49.10
Gautam Gambhir 46 1911 5.48 50.28 42.49 46.58
Sachin Tendulkar 33 1689 5.74 58.24 53.04 50.93
Suresh Raina 55 1503 5.76 36.65 46.17 45.29

Settled look to England's line-up
England's ODI squad has seen quite a few changes after quarter-final exit in the World Cup. The most notable one is the absence of Andrew Strauss who scored a brilliant 158 against India in the tied game in Bangalore. Despite Kevin Pietersen being rested, the batting order has a strong look to it. Jonathan Trott has averaged over 53 in ODIs since 2009, and his consistency is complemented by Eoin Morgan's aggression. However, on an average, most English batsmen tend to score at a lower rate than their Indian counterparts.

England's top batsmen in ODIs since start of 2009 (min 600 runs scored)
Batsman Innings Runs Scoring rate Average Boundary % Dot-Ball %
Eoin Morgan 46 1497 5.43 40.45 44.22 47.94
Jonathan Trott 30 1485 4.66 53.03 29.89 47.25
Ravi Bopara 27 682 4.46 28.41 40.17 56.11
Matt Prior 31 645 4.78 26.87 40.00 52.22
Ian Bell 21 619 4.43 30.95 27.78 47.73

Conditions facour England bowlers
For the ODIs, England have retained the core of the Test attack which gave India a torrid time. Almost all England bowlers have a far better ODI record in England as compared to their record outside home. Graeme Swann, in particular, has been superb in home ODIs since 2009 with 38 wickets at just 20.28. Swann has a very low boundary percentage (30.83) and a high dot-ball percentage (56.17) making him a vital part of the attack. Stuart Broad, who won the player-of-the-series award in the Tests, has also been impressive in the last two years with an average of 28.89 with four four-wicket hauls. James Anderson has struggled in away ODIs conceding over 90 runs in ten overs on two different occasions. His average at home (27.59) is much better than his record overseas where he averages 35.94. Tim Bresnan, who picked up 5 for 48 in the World Cup game against India, has been in great form in the Tests, and his presence rounds off a highly-competitive bowling attack.

England bowlers in ODIs since start of 2009
Bowler Innings Wickets Economy rate Average Boundary% Dot-ball%
James Anderson 46 72 5.23 29.55 48.59 56.04
Stuart Broad 38 70 5.48 26.12 54.12 59.90
Graeme Swann 39 62 4.33 23.22 30.83 56.17
Tim Bresnan 42 53 5.20 35.11 50.29 48.67

Bowling India's weak link
With injuries to Harbhajan Singh and Zaheer Khan, the Indian bowling attack is severely depleted. The return of Munaf Patel does add some consistency to the bowling. Along with Praveen Kumar, who picked up 15 wickets in the Test series, Munaf brings the much-needed experience to the attack. R Ashwin has impressed in the limited opportunities he has got so far, and together with Amit Mishra, will lend the variety to a bowling attack that does need to step up to be able to contain the England batting.

Indian bowlers in ODIs since start of 2009
Bowler Innings Wickets Economy rate Average Boundary% Dot-ball%
Praveen Kumar 36 41 5.07 35.26 53.80 59.45
Munaf Patel 27 38 5.21 28.57 49.72 55.24
R Ashwin 11 19 4.78 26.68 39.05 53.14
Amit Mishra 12 17 4.48 29.88 41.33 60.08

Batting first a slight advantage
Lord's (5) and The Oval (4) have hosted the most ODIs in England since the start of 2009. England, however, have failed to win any of the five matches at Lord's and have won just one out of the four played at The Oval. In 15 ODIs played at the five venues since the start of 2009, teams have won nine batting first. In eight day-night games played at The Oval, the Rose Bowl and Cardiff since the start of 2009, teams batting first have been more successful winning five and losing three matches.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on September 3, 2011, 13:11 GMT

    let us talk about england and the english team..... Craig Kieswetter, Ian Jonathan Leonard Trott, Benjamin Andrew Stokes, Jade Winston Dernbach, Matthew James Prior, Kevin Peter Pietersen, Andrew John Strauss - Calling it a english team is a JOKE!

  • 5wombats on September 3, 2011, 8:25 GMT

    Hey - @pom_don - I hadn't spotted that comment from @World_Champion! When we banter with the Aussies, at least we get a bare knuckle fight, and it's fun - but with one or two of the indian posters.....!? The wombats have been running around for weeks sinking their teeth into ridiculous boasting, history lessons and nonsense. But it's getting a bit boring and samey now. I'm looking forward to the end of the series and a bit of peace and quiet!

  • on September 3, 2011, 7:53 GMT

    Okay we lost 4-0 in tests,bad , agreed. But England, they have not won a single ODI world cup. You can keep crying hoarse that only tests are nor the real form, but they started performing okay in tests also recently. It is not that they have been dominating tests for years. Their reign as No 1 may last a year or max 2 years

    Let them crow about the recent success for a short time

  • on September 3, 2011, 7:22 GMT

    all the best to INDIAN TEAM,i expect 5-0 win to india which requires powerful batting and unexpected bowling... hope VIRAT KOHLI stands on the top and praveen too in bowling

  • YorkshirePudding on September 3, 2011, 6:59 GMT

    First of all Test Cricket is the only real form of International cricket, ODI's and T20's are watered down formats, that have rules biased towards Batting (Power plays, Change of ball at 34 overs, fielding restrictions, bowling restrictions) and are at best aimed at the ADHD generation. As for England losing, do I need to remind the Indian fans that they held the Mighty India to a Tie in the WC in Indian conditions. India are also without Gambhir, Sehwag, and Zaheer this time round.

  • johnathonjosephs on September 3, 2011, 6:38 GMT

    I think Indian fans and the Indian team are making a similar mistake as they did to the beginning of the Test series... And that is underestimating England. England is no pushover when it comes to any format these days. I remember the time when people would laugh and declare you mentally incapacitable if you said England had a strong ODI team, but don't fall to the tricks of reciprical memory. England is very very strong at the moment and I think both sides have EQUAL chances of winning the series.

  • sifter132 on September 3, 2011, 0:40 GMT

    " settled look to England's lineup"?? Surely not - they've got Trott, Morgan and a whole lot of question marks...

  • pom_don on September 2, 2011, 23:21 GMT

    @World_champion_2011 England won the test series by luck....you are deluded! Plus England didn't field their first choice side either but that's life & you just have to get on with what you have. @Jyotishman Sharma before a ball is bowled in the 50 over cricket I would still say tests are'real' cricket even though we are t20 champs it's not the same game....not 'proper' cricket, 50 over cricket is a bit better but again not a real 'test' of ultimate player skills......that's why test cricket has that name....it does what it says on the tin & tests the true abilities of players. I still hope England put up another good showing here.

  • ns1000 on September 2, 2011, 23:07 GMT

    India also had a healthy record in Test Matches in the last two years. I think England will take this 3-2 or 4-1 at best.

  • on September 2, 2011, 21:13 GMT

    Trotsky - well said..... the fact is that world cup was played in the subcontinent where the local teams have usually been invincible... 1) good like it.... same can be said of Englands latest test no.1.... useless to win at home in your own opinion.....

    2. 1975, 1979, 1983, 1999 - all played in England..... how many world cups has england won...... ahh i know where you are going 1966! lol the only one you will talk about for a while..... respect!

  • on September 3, 2011, 13:11 GMT

    let us talk about england and the english team..... Craig Kieswetter, Ian Jonathan Leonard Trott, Benjamin Andrew Stokes, Jade Winston Dernbach, Matthew James Prior, Kevin Peter Pietersen, Andrew John Strauss - Calling it a english team is a JOKE!

  • 5wombats on September 3, 2011, 8:25 GMT

    Hey - @pom_don - I hadn't spotted that comment from @World_Champion! When we banter with the Aussies, at least we get a bare knuckle fight, and it's fun - but with one or two of the indian posters.....!? The wombats have been running around for weeks sinking their teeth into ridiculous boasting, history lessons and nonsense. But it's getting a bit boring and samey now. I'm looking forward to the end of the series and a bit of peace and quiet!

  • on September 3, 2011, 7:53 GMT

    Okay we lost 4-0 in tests,bad , agreed. But England, they have not won a single ODI world cup. You can keep crying hoarse that only tests are nor the real form, but they started performing okay in tests also recently. It is not that they have been dominating tests for years. Their reign as No 1 may last a year or max 2 years

    Let them crow about the recent success for a short time

  • on September 3, 2011, 7:22 GMT

    all the best to INDIAN TEAM,i expect 5-0 win to india which requires powerful batting and unexpected bowling... hope VIRAT KOHLI stands on the top and praveen too in bowling

  • YorkshirePudding on September 3, 2011, 6:59 GMT

    First of all Test Cricket is the only real form of International cricket, ODI's and T20's are watered down formats, that have rules biased towards Batting (Power plays, Change of ball at 34 overs, fielding restrictions, bowling restrictions) and are at best aimed at the ADHD generation. As for England losing, do I need to remind the Indian fans that they held the Mighty India to a Tie in the WC in Indian conditions. India are also without Gambhir, Sehwag, and Zaheer this time round.

  • johnathonjosephs on September 3, 2011, 6:38 GMT

    I think Indian fans and the Indian team are making a similar mistake as they did to the beginning of the Test series... And that is underestimating England. England is no pushover when it comes to any format these days. I remember the time when people would laugh and declare you mentally incapacitable if you said England had a strong ODI team, but don't fall to the tricks of reciprical memory. England is very very strong at the moment and I think both sides have EQUAL chances of winning the series.

  • sifter132 on September 3, 2011, 0:40 GMT

    " settled look to England's lineup"?? Surely not - they've got Trott, Morgan and a whole lot of question marks...

  • pom_don on September 2, 2011, 23:21 GMT

    @World_champion_2011 England won the test series by luck....you are deluded! Plus England didn't field their first choice side either but that's life & you just have to get on with what you have. @Jyotishman Sharma before a ball is bowled in the 50 over cricket I would still say tests are'real' cricket even though we are t20 champs it's not the same game....not 'proper' cricket, 50 over cricket is a bit better but again not a real 'test' of ultimate player skills......that's why test cricket has that name....it does what it says on the tin & tests the true abilities of players. I still hope England put up another good showing here.

  • ns1000 on September 2, 2011, 23:07 GMT

    India also had a healthy record in Test Matches in the last two years. I think England will take this 3-2 or 4-1 at best.

  • on September 2, 2011, 21:13 GMT

    Trotsky - well said..... the fact is that world cup was played in the subcontinent where the local teams have usually been invincible... 1) good like it.... same can be said of Englands latest test no.1.... useless to win at home in your own opinion.....

    2. 1975, 1979, 1983, 1999 - all played in England..... how many world cups has england won...... ahh i know where you are going 1966! lol the only one you will talk about for a while..... respect!

  • on September 2, 2011, 21:04 GMT

    BravoBravo - I will have to totally agree on the statistical fact that Ind win to loss ratio in ODIs is worse than other major teams (AUS, SA, ENG, PAK, WI)..... remember the ODI world champions are INDIA and none of the other major teams can come close to it for another 4 years...... Talk of Englands recent test win if you will and also talk of Englands recent ODIs stats.... good and rubbish respectively.... GL

  • 5wombats on September 2, 2011, 20:59 GMT

    @Kaundinya Sistla; "English fans have been equally vocal"...er... no.. they haven't. You are new here, so let me fill you in; England fans are outnumbered here by a ratio of around 8 to 1 at the moment. At the start of the tour it was 15 - 20 to 1. There has been weeks and weeks of, well, frankly - nonsense from certain india fans. But luckily a lot of them aren't here any more. Perhaps they had run out of excuses. Meanwhile, I should have thought that it was statistically obvious that when a team loses, say 4-0 or 5-0 - the team with the 0 cannot with any justification say that they "remain the better team". Call me old fashioned - but I reckon that's nonsense. It's not credible.

  • on September 2, 2011, 20:23 GMT

    I think england will be going to take the beating this time n will taste their own medicine.I feel if indian batsmen thrash the trioka(broad,bresnan n anderson)'s ruthless bowling spree then it'll be a 5-0 or 4-1 win for india.To do so they desperately need the consistency of praveen n munaf.hope it will be an entertaining series n all the good luck for team india.

  • on September 2, 2011, 20:23 GMT

    I think england will be going to take the beating this time n will taste their own medicine.I feel if indian batsmen thrash the trioka(broad,bresnan n anderson)'s ruthless bowling spree then it'll be a 5-0 or 4-1 win for india.To do so they desperately need the consistency of praveen n munaf.hope it will be an entertaining series n all the good luck for team india.

  • on September 2, 2011, 19:19 GMT

    I like it, this continous banter by both countries out here, but lets just wait and see, if India wins, the noise will only get louder and the English would love to hail test cricket as the 'real' cricket then. So lets just wait.

  • on September 2, 2011, 18:25 GMT

    @5wombats: English fans have been equally vocal.You need not talk as if only the Indians have been boasting. England did very well and have beaten India convincingly. But don't expect fans to say England will bet our team 5-0. That won't happen with us. That won't happen with you. numbers say England are marginally better at home. Hope this is a close contest.

  • RK.Chandru on September 2, 2011, 17:49 GMT

    Indian team is the clear favourites. (to lose, I mean...)

    We saw how well Parthiv attempted that catch, how good was our running between the wickets and how well (like a 60 or 70 year old) Ashwin moved around in the field... We're pretty sure that, fortune is not going to change overnight and it's going to be 5-0 or, 4-1 in favour of England. The captain is expected to perform, set an example to others and lead from the front. Stop your blame game and contribute towards the team's cause first. It's time, India too emulates Ausie's and English's formula of 'horses for courses' principle of team selection and fields three distinct teams for the tests, ODIs and TTIs. This will avert the fatigue / overwork on the players and injuries too by giving time to rest / heal. This will also guarantee talented younger lot much needed international exposure and avenue to exhibit their talent in a much bigger stage. In the present system only a select bunch of fortunate few hog all the limelight...

  • 5wombats on September 2, 2011, 17:40 GMT

    As has always been the case on this tour, the crowing, trolling, history lessons and rubbish begins just before a series/match. @Gupta.Ankur. So - by your logic of; "we (india) will remain the better team even if we lose 5-0" - no matter how much of a thrashing England give india - they'll still be the better side. Yeah right. Hear that bang sound? That was your credibility. It's because of comments like that I hope England win the Test series 4-0, oh! they have, win the T20, oh! they have, and win the ODI series 5-0...... to be continued....

  • Testcricfan on September 2, 2011, 17:38 GMT

    Please dont write a meaningless stats article for the sake of it. This is not the WC winning Indian side, and hence all the stats are of no use. India is missing its most destructive batsman(Sehwag), Anchor (Gambhir), All rounder (Yuvraj), Lead Spinner (Bhajji) and Only Strike bowler (Zaheer). Point to note all were star performers in the WC. So, India would be hard pressed for a victory, and would be happy with a 2-3 result. I am not even considering the current form of the English before arriving at the result. If Eng keep playing as well as they did in the Tests, we might have 2 Dead matches.

  • World_champion_2011 on September 2, 2011, 17:30 GMT

    What nonsense? we are the odi world champions for 4 more years.. england won the test series by luck + injuries to our key players.. we will be test champions again in few months.. we are number 1..others are below us

  • BanglaChild on September 2, 2011, 17:01 GMT

    More Stats? Wasn't Team India the Number One Test Team- now Number Three? You're only as good as you are on the day in limited overs. Go England Go for the "Final Frontier"- a THIRD WHITEWASH in an Indian Summer

  • BravoBravo on September 2, 2011, 16:57 GMT

    We will know in less than 24 hrs that how relevant or irrelevant this article is when it comes to live performance at a particular given day. To add to the article, there is another statistical fact that IND win to loss ratio even in ODI is worse than other major teams (AUS, SA, ENG, PAK, WI).

  • NairUSA on September 2, 2011, 16:56 GMT

    Statistics and more statistics! It does not matter when the Indian players themselves do not seem to harbor any hopes of winning. It is a mental thing. However, best of luck to Team India!

  • SenorPepper on September 2, 2011, 16:49 GMT

    '...remain the better team even if we lose 5-0...' What an incisive insight! Must be someone on the Indian team trying to purchase some self-esteem. India's performance in England has thus far been pathetic and but for Dravid's gutsy batting, there is nothing to appreciate. Hopefully, some of that legendary Indian pride will manifest itself and the Indian team will avoid another white-wash.

  • Rakim on September 2, 2011, 16:36 GMT

    World Cup was nothing but a tournament. India is an overrated team, and recent losses against England are proving it. (you can't be no.1 with this bowling attack and with batsman who can't play bounce/seam/pace). I'm not disrespecting "great and champion" Indian team, just saying plane facts ;)

  • Percy_Fender on September 2, 2011, 16:20 GMT

    It is ridiculous to even suggest that because of India having won the last World Cup and because England's exit in the same was ignonimous, India is the favourite here. The fact is that the World Cup was played in the subcontinent where the local teams have usually been invincible and secondly, that this series is going to be played in England where England have always been pretty good. The other small matter is that nearly all the matchwinners are missing either thrugh injury or loss of form. The latter category includes the captain himself, who, quite surprisingly has presently been blessed with the opposite of the midas touch. Namely, whatever he does seems to be the wrong thing to do. So England are definitely the favourites. India have probably got nothig to lose. I only wish Dhoni steps down captaincy for this series at least or till he gets back to his winning ways. In his present state of luck he will lose again.

  • Gupta.Ankur on September 2, 2011, 15:39 GMT

    What hope? another dull article..........We are World Champions and we will remain the better team even if we lose 5-0......

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Gupta.Ankur on September 2, 2011, 15:39 GMT

    What hope? another dull article..........We are World Champions and we will remain the better team even if we lose 5-0......

  • Percy_Fender on September 2, 2011, 16:20 GMT

    It is ridiculous to even suggest that because of India having won the last World Cup and because England's exit in the same was ignonimous, India is the favourite here. The fact is that the World Cup was played in the subcontinent where the local teams have usually been invincible and secondly, that this series is going to be played in England where England have always been pretty good. The other small matter is that nearly all the matchwinners are missing either thrugh injury or loss of form. The latter category includes the captain himself, who, quite surprisingly has presently been blessed with the opposite of the midas touch. Namely, whatever he does seems to be the wrong thing to do. So England are definitely the favourites. India have probably got nothig to lose. I only wish Dhoni steps down captaincy for this series at least or till he gets back to his winning ways. In his present state of luck he will lose again.

  • Rakim on September 2, 2011, 16:36 GMT

    World Cup was nothing but a tournament. India is an overrated team, and recent losses against England are proving it. (you can't be no.1 with this bowling attack and with batsman who can't play bounce/seam/pace). I'm not disrespecting "great and champion" Indian team, just saying plane facts ;)

  • SenorPepper on September 2, 2011, 16:49 GMT

    '...remain the better team even if we lose 5-0...' What an incisive insight! Must be someone on the Indian team trying to purchase some self-esteem. India's performance in England has thus far been pathetic and but for Dravid's gutsy batting, there is nothing to appreciate. Hopefully, some of that legendary Indian pride will manifest itself and the Indian team will avoid another white-wash.

  • NairUSA on September 2, 2011, 16:56 GMT

    Statistics and more statistics! It does not matter when the Indian players themselves do not seem to harbor any hopes of winning. It is a mental thing. However, best of luck to Team India!

  • BravoBravo on September 2, 2011, 16:57 GMT

    We will know in less than 24 hrs that how relevant or irrelevant this article is when it comes to live performance at a particular given day. To add to the article, there is another statistical fact that IND win to loss ratio even in ODI is worse than other major teams (AUS, SA, ENG, PAK, WI).

  • BanglaChild on September 2, 2011, 17:01 GMT

    More Stats? Wasn't Team India the Number One Test Team- now Number Three? You're only as good as you are on the day in limited overs. Go England Go for the "Final Frontier"- a THIRD WHITEWASH in an Indian Summer

  • World_champion_2011 on September 2, 2011, 17:30 GMT

    What nonsense? we are the odi world champions for 4 more years.. england won the test series by luck + injuries to our key players.. we will be test champions again in few months.. we are number 1..others are below us

  • Testcricfan on September 2, 2011, 17:38 GMT

    Please dont write a meaningless stats article for the sake of it. This is not the WC winning Indian side, and hence all the stats are of no use. India is missing its most destructive batsman(Sehwag), Anchor (Gambhir), All rounder (Yuvraj), Lead Spinner (Bhajji) and Only Strike bowler (Zaheer). Point to note all were star performers in the WC. So, India would be hard pressed for a victory, and would be happy with a 2-3 result. I am not even considering the current form of the English before arriving at the result. If Eng keep playing as well as they did in the Tests, we might have 2 Dead matches.

  • 5wombats on September 2, 2011, 17:40 GMT

    As has always been the case on this tour, the crowing, trolling, history lessons and rubbish begins just before a series/match. @Gupta.Ankur. So - by your logic of; "we (india) will remain the better team even if we lose 5-0" - no matter how much of a thrashing England give india - they'll still be the better side. Yeah right. Hear that bang sound? That was your credibility. It's because of comments like that I hope England win the Test series 4-0, oh! they have, win the T20, oh! they have, and win the ODI series 5-0...... to be continued....