England v SA, 1st Investec Test, The Oval

Top in touching distance for Smith

After 10 years as captain, Graeme Smith has another chance to take South Africa to the top of the world

Firdose Moonda

July 18, 2012

Comments: 25 | Text size: A | A

Mark Boucher celebrates the fall of Mohammad Ashraful from a direct hit from Hashim Amla, South Africa v Bangladesh, 2nd Test, Centurion, 3rd day, November 28, 2008
Mark Boucher was a core member of South Africa's squad and will be missed © Getty Images
Enlarge

It looks as though Graeme Smith can barely believe it. Years of being second best could end in five weeks' time in England. It will present other problems, like figuring out how to stay on top, but that's something Smith can worry about another day. For now, the reality that the top is within touching distance has sunk in and the dream of actually touching the top is three Tests away from coming true.

South Africa have walked this road so many times before it has become a circle. They could have become the No.1 team twice in the last two years - if they had beaten India at home in 2010-11 or whitewashed New Zealand away in the three-Test series in March - and both times they fell short. They have been at the top for brief periods, sometimes after big series wins such as in 2008 against England, and other times not of their own doing but because a convolution of other results conspired to put them there.

They would have us believe it does not matter. Gary Kirsten has taught every member of the squad to repeat that rankings don't actually matter to them, but it is a thinly disguised statement. Having always come short, in World Cups and on standings for as long as either have existed, being the best is something that matters dearly to those involved in South African cricket. It will be represent a final coming of age and a completion of something they have heard said about them but have no proof of: that they have it in them to be called the world's top team.

Smith knows that South Africa have done all the hard work in all the right places to put themselves in a position where they can rightfully claim to the best. "We've been really consistent," he said. "In all conditions, it's fair to say, we've been the most consistent team over the last period of time." He's not wrong. South Africa have gone six years and nine series without losing away from home. In that time, they have won in Pakistan, Bangladesh, England, Australia, West Indies and New Zealand and drawn in India, twice, and the United Arab Emirates.

The core of the squad from those trips have remained. Smith, Hashim Amla, Jacques Kallis, AB de Villiers, Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel were all part of teams that have conquered every corner. The remaining five spots in the starting XI have rotated between opening partners for Smith, different No. 6 batsmen, a third seamer, and Paul Harris, who was in the spinner's position as recently as a season ago.

Some of those have settled now, particularly in the bowling department. Vernon Philander arrived moulded into the third seamer's role as though he was born to do it and Harris has permanently discarded for Imran Tahir. As a unit, Smith rates this bowling attack as the most dynamic he has captained in nine years in the job.

"Morne and Dale are further along with their skills and development from the last time we played England but they still have the same pace," he said. "On a number of those tours, our third seamer was new, whereas Vernon has come in and established himself quite well. With Imran developing really well, there is a lot to look forward to and a lot to work with." The secret to South Africa's bowling success is that those four front-liners do not represent their entire bowling reserves. Jacques Kallis is used in short bursts as an additional, fifth bowler. Smith called it a "massive blessing to have a batsman at No.4 who can bowl the way he does." Andrew Strauss weighed in by saying England have only needed four bowlers to take 20 wickets, Kallis' role is something that could prove the difference between the attacks.

Cruel as it is, Mark Boucher, who was the core of the core until last week, is no longer part of the squad. His exclusion gives South Africa more options for now. With AB de Villiers set to keep wicket until the management have found the right time (read: an easier series) to blood Thami Tsolekile, South Africa can play an extra batsman or an extra bowler or someone who is both. JP Duminy is that someone. With his improved technique in longer forms of the game and his offspin, he becomes the person who could "offer something different" as Smith put it.

South Africa have spent years searching for the "something different" that will set them apart from other teams. They have been criticised for being too predictable, lacking in variety and being a team that can dominate until the big occasion. Now that one of the biggest occasions is upon them, Smith believes they are ready to deliver.

England is no longer the unchartered territory it was four years ago. South Africa have been here and won here. Although the England team they will come up against is, according to Smith, "a better team than they have had for a long time," they face their own demons, which include holding on to that No.1 ranking, "being chased by a pack comes with its own pressure and this being the first major defence of their title," Smith said.

Whether that pressure will make England a more difficult prospect or an easier target is yet to be seen. Either way, South Africa may not even notice. They have prepared for this series with the focus solely on themselves and their processes because they know that what is at stake is bigger than anything they have had to tussle over before.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by madras_boy on (July 19, 2012, 14:01 GMT)

@Front-Foot-Lunge : Cool down. I am an Indian Fan. England whitewashed a depleted Australia this year. So, cannot count. I have to accept that they played against former No.1 India last year but that is in England under Home Conditions. Don't forget, England was whitewashed by India in ODI last year and a test series is not far away this year in India... Also England is going to play Oz this year and I am sure England will loose its numero one !!! Infact SA will win this series easily !!!

Posted by JG2704 on (July 19, 2012, 11:12 GMT)

@Hazeyrocks on (July 19 2012, 08:45 AM GMT) There are plenty underestimating England too. Your post is hardly giving England a chance

Posted by klempie on (July 19, 2012, 11:01 GMT)

HAHA. Loving the comments by the pasty Poms here. The over-inflated opinions of their team's capabilities are a typical before the inevitable Pommie fall. Proteas to win 2-0. Same as the rugby.

Posted by Front-Foot-Lunge on (July 19, 2012, 10:44 GMT)

No question that England are world number 1 and have been for an age now. But can SA pull off a shocker? It'll come down to injuries, and who performs best on the day. Could go either way. Ask an Indian or Australian fan, however, and they'll say England. They know what they're like, having been whitewashed and pummelled famously in the last year.

Posted by A_Vacant_Slip on (July 19, 2012, 10:32 GMT)

@Hammond Agree mate. All the hater come here but they whistle in the wind....

Posted by StaalBurgher on (July 19, 2012, 10:23 GMT)

It is definitely amusing how the England fans think SA is an "average" side. This is arguably the strongest team we have had since readmission. Last time we beat England in England Steyn was not even playing due to injury.

Both teams have improved since then and both teams have been inconsistent at times. England are 1-2 points ahead. SA would've beaten NZ 3-0 if not for rain delays which would've put us 1-2 points ahead of England. So there is not mucn in it. Not making excuses but it is clear to any objective viewer that Eng and SA are very evenly matched. This should be a cracker of a series.

My only concern for SA is whether our batsmen will adapt to Test batting quick enough. Cavalier batting (oh, and the selection of Ntini when he average 100 in the domestic 4-day comp) is what cost us home wins against India and England.

That said, I don't know why I am surprised. England always get arrogant and over confident the moment they have a little bit of success.

Posted by Hazeyrocks on (July 19, 2012, 9:45 GMT)

Love how people are underestimating Saffas :). In for a nasty shock. Only person I'm worried about in the batting line up is Cook. Trott is Steyn's bunny, so is Strauss. And ENG @ 20/2 with pietersen coming in is 25/3 either through a suicidal KP run out or a beauty from Vern. Can't wait. Go SA

Posted by mcsdl on (July 19, 2012, 9:14 GMT)

All I can say to England is "Pakistan 3-0"

Posted by alexbrn on (July 19, 2012, 8:44 GMT)

It's fairly clear how Fate dictates this series will play out. It will be 1-1 going into the final match, SA will get into a match-winning position and then spectacularly "choke", handing an unlikely victory (and retention of the #1 spot) to ENG ;-)

Posted by JM_RSA on (July 19, 2012, 8:30 GMT)

To all the England fans who believe that their team are mighty and invincible in England, they will be shocked after the end of the 1st test. Cant wait. Steyn, Morkel and Philander. Cant get any better!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tour Results
England v South Africa at Birmingham - Sep 12, 2012
England won by 28 runs
England v South Africa at Manchester - Sep 10, 2012
No result
England v South Africa at Chester-le-Street - Sep 8, 2012
South Africa won by 7 wickets (with 6 balls remaining)
England v South Africa at Nottingham - Sep 5, 2012
South Africa won by 7 wickets (with 93 balls remaining)
England v South Africa at Lord's - Sep 2, 2012
England won by 6 wickets (with 20 balls remaining)
More results »
Video / Audio
News and Analysis: England prepare to face South Africa without Pietersen
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days