Sri Lanka in England 2011

Stiff test for Sri Lanka's bowlers

Fast bowling has been Sri Lanka's weak suit historically, but they need to step it up over the next four weeks in England

S Rajesh

May 24, 2011

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

Dilhara Fernando is thrilled after striking early, Sri Lanka v West Indies, 3rd Test, Pallekele, 2nd day, December 2, 2010
In eight Tests outside the subcontinent, Dilhara Fernando has taken 21 wickets at an average of 51.61 © Associated Press
Enlarge

Sri Lanka have never won a series of at least two Tests in England, Australia or South Africa, but over the next four weeks they'll get an opportunity to start rectifying that statistic when they take on England over three Test matches. The hosts obviously start favourites after their fantastic Ashes campaign in 2010-11, but Sri Lanka have sounded a warning by winning both their warm-up games, including a superb come-from-behind victory against England Lions last week. One of the most encouraging aspects of that win was the performance of the fast bowlers - Dilhara Fernando, Thisara Perera and Nuwan Pradeep took 15 out of 18 Lions wickets, returning combined figures of 15 for 388. They, and the other fast bowlers who play, will have to maintain those kind of figures if Sri Lanka are to win the series, especially given that this is the first half of the summer in England, when conditions are most likely to favour fast bowlers and not offer so much assistance to spin, traditionally Sri Lanka's favourite suit.

Pace could also play a bigger role in Sri Lanka's campaign this time because they can no longer fall back on the wizardry of Muttiah Muralitharan. In his absence, the spin mantle will be borne by Ajantha Mendis, Rangana Herath and Suraj Ranjiv, but it's quite likely that the series result could hinge on how well Sri Lanka's inexperienced fast bowlers fare: among their frontline fast bowlers, only two - Dilhara Fernando and Farveez Maharoof - have played Tests outside the subcontinent, and their numbers aren't flattering: together they've played 18 Tests, and taken 29 wickets at an average of 62.38 runs per wicket.

In fact, the lack of incisiveness in the bowling, especially among the fast men, has been one of Sri Lanka's biggest drawbacks on overseas tours. The bowlers' inability to take wickets and restrict opposition totals has put their own batsmen under tremendous pressure almost every time they come out to bat. Sri Lanka's overall bowling average in England since 2000 is more than 45, while their fast bowlers have conceded more than 63 per wicket - both are easily the worst among all teams except Zimbabwe. With Lasith Malinga not around either to help their cause, Sri Lanka's bowlers could be severely tested over the next month.

Bowling attacks in England in Tests since 2000
Team Tests Wickets Average Strike rate Pace - wickets Average Strike rate
Australia 17 302 29.12 49.1 205 31.85 51.2
England 76 1231 30.50 57.0 1004 29.48 54.2
Zimbabwe 4 50 34.16 72.7 45 31.93 65.8
Pakistan 12 183 34.27 63.4 139 30.58 55.3
South Africa 9 140 35.00 63.3 126 33.38 59.3
India 7 111 38.17 69.6 69 37.49 66.6
West Indies 15 200 38.84 68.9 172 35.80 63.9
New Zealand 6 72 40.34 76.6 56 42.23 78.1
Sri Lanka 6 69 45.24 85.8 33 63.42 108.0
Bangladesh 4 27 74.44 104.8 14 85.14 107.1

Usually conditions in South Africa, England and Australia are more favourable for fast bowlers, but Sri Lanka's numbers don't suggest so. In all three countries, their pace bowlers concede more than 47 runs per wicket, while in most other countries they average in the 20s or 30s. What has also hurt their cause is the sheer lack of opportunities to play Tests in these countries: in the last 11 years, Sri Lanka have played only 15 Tests in Australia, England and South Africa.

Sri Lankan bowlers in each country in Tests since 2000
Country Tests Wickets Average Strike rate Pace - wickets Average Strike rate
Zimbabwe 2 38 19.44 40.0 21 22.09 43.9
Bangladesh 4 77 23.66 46.4 29 27.96 52.2
Sri Lanka 59 998 27.06 59.0 388 30.53 58.9
New Zealand 4 62 31.77 62.0 38 33.73 62.4
Pakistan 8 114 35.93 72.8 62 37.50 71.2
West Indies 4 54 36.03 66.4 31 35.16 57.5
South Africa 5 58 40.01 76.8 31 47.83 80.5
England 6 69 45.24 85.8 33 63.42 108.0
India 6 74 48.83 82.7 26 54.57 92.5
Australia 4 48 51.12 82.7 26 58.03 92.7

The lack of matches has also hurt the batsmen, for it gives them little opportunity to acclimatise to conditions which are completely different from what they face at home. Looking at the stats of all teams in England since 2000, Sri Lanka slot in somewhere in the middle with an average of 28.10, while compared to their own record in other countries, their stats in England are fairly ordinary.

Among the batsmen in the current squad, Mahela Jayawardene is the only batsman to score a century - he has scored one in each Lord's Tests on the last two tours, and averages more than 45 in six Tests. In fact, his four innings at Lord's reads 107, 14*, 61 and 119. However, Kumar Sangakkara has been a huge disappointment, with a highest of 66 in 12 innings, and an average of 30.54, which is almost 27 fewer than his overall career average.

Sri Lankan batsmen in Tests in England since 2000
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Mahela Jayawardene 6 502 45.63 2/ 2
Tillakaratne Dilshan 3 195 32.50 0/ 2
Kumar Sangakkara 6 336 30.54 0/ 2
Thilan Samaraweera 2 17 4.25 0/ 0

The good news for Sri Lanka, though, is that they have won Tests in England, unlike in Australia and South Africa, where they haven't won any. They won the one-off Test in 1998 on the back of outstanding performances from Sanath Jayasuriya and Muralitharan. On their most recent tour, they lost at Edgbaston, but fought back superbly to level the series at Trent Bridge, with Muralitharan again winning the Man-of-the-Match award for an 11-wicket haul. Both their wins in England have thus been engineered by Murali; in his absence, it remains to be seen who will take on the mantle of strike bowler.

Tests between England and Sri Lanka
  Tests Eng won SL won Draw
Overall 21 8 6 7
In England 10 5 2 3
Since 2000 15 5 4 6
In England since 2000 6 3 1 2

England will be full of confidence coming into this series: their last series was a magnificent triumph in Australia, and they also have an outstanding home record in the last decade. Since 2000, they've lost only three home series out of 22 - once each to Australia (2001), India (2007) and South Africa (2009). During this period, their win-loss ratio at home has been 2.68 (43 wins, 16 defeats), which is third only to Australia and India.

England's batsmen were in fine form in the Ashes, and they'll want to continue that run. Among those in England's current squad, only three have played a home Test against Sri Lanka: Kevin Pietersen has enjoyed himself, with two hundreds in three matches, but Andrew Strauss only managed a highest of 55 in five innings.

England's batsmen at home against Sri Lanka
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Kevin Pietersen 3 360 72.00 2/ 0
Alastair Cook 3 175 43.75 0/ 1
Andrew Strauss 3 156 31.20 0/ 1

England's partnerships for the top five wickets, though, have almost all been productive, and that's helped them stay on top in most home Tests against Sri Lanka since 2000. The average stands for the top three wickets are all more than 60, with the average for the first wicket being 72.55, which again illustrates Sri Lanka's lack of fast-bowling firepower. On the other hand, Sri Lanka's average first-wicket stand is 23.25, with a highest of 59, which is significantly lower than England's average partnership.

Partnership stats in Eng-Sri Tests in England since 2000
Wicket SL - Ave stand 100/ 50 p'ships Highest stand Eng - Ave stand 100/ 50 p'ships Highest stand
1st 23.25 0/ 1 59 72.55 1/ 6 168
2nd 45.54 1/ 3 109 66.55 3/ 0 202
3rd 54.95 2/ 4 206 62.22 2/ 2 159
4th 37.54 2/ 1 146 31.55 0/ 2 60
5th 41.81 1/ 2 125 52.62 1/ 3 173
6th 17.00 0/ 1 68 30.28 0/ 2 58
7th 17.90 0/ 0 44 26.83 0/ 0 49*

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by cricket_for_all on (May 27, 2011, 4:24 GMT)

I don't how come Rajesh didn't notice about DRS decision on Sanga. There was no nick rather it was path of the ball (If you consider that is a nick then there was around four nicks in that path). It was basied ridiculous decision. Sanga is very honest guy and He would have walked away if there was a nick (We all know how good Aleem Dar is).

Posted by metrojonesy123 on (May 26, 2011, 7:53 GMT)

The defeat against South Africa at home was 2008 not 2009!!

Posted by Swidwood on (May 26, 2011, 6:51 GMT)

YOU'RE WRONG- IT'S 21 MATCHES BETWEEN SL AND ENG :P

Posted by kasyapm on (May 25, 2011, 15:12 GMT)

Overall tests between SL and Eng are only 15? need more!! Looking for a good contest

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
Tour Results
Scotland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 13, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 183 runs
Ireland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 11, 2011
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
England v Sri Lanka at Manchester - Jul 9, 2011
England won by 16 runs
England v Sri Lanka at Nottingham - Jul 6, 2011
England won by 10 wickets (with 145 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jul 3, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
More results »
Video / Audio
Press Conference: 'I have to maintain high standards' - Chanderpaul
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days