India in New Zealand 2008-09

Axed practice game draws flak from former players

Nagraj Gollapudi

January 15, 2009

Comments: 19 | Text size: A | A


The extra Twenty20 game on the tour was added after a request from the New Zealand side © AFP
Enlarge
 

India's schedule for next month's New Zealand series, announced today, has raised questions over the lack of any practice match through the 48-day tour. An extra Test was included in the revised schedule - comprising three Tests, five ODIs and two Twenty20 matches - in place of the practice game that was originally scheduled, leaving no opportunity for India to acclimatise to unfamiliar conditions.

Former India captains Dilip Vengsarkar, the previous chief selector, and Bishan Bedi, who was manager of the team that lost the 1990 series in New Zealand, criticised an itinerary that will not allow the team to acclimatise to the conditions - cold, windy and conducive to swing bowling, and vastly different from those in the subcontinent, where the team played for most of last year - in a match situation.

"It is very important to play not one but at least two practice games to acclimatise to the conditions and the pitches because it takes time to settle," Vengsarkar said. "Practice is different compared to spending time in the middle. In New Zealand, the weather conditions and pitches are different to what we experience here. The ball moves around a lot, the pitch is spongy and you take time to adjust to that. The Test players could have done with at least a two-day practice game."

Bedi said the current schedule presented a no-win situation for India. "A practice game is meant for the visiting team to get familiar with the local conditions before the real contest," he said. "So, it (scrapping the practice game) is not a very healthy development. New Zealand is very much like England, and it is very cold. Going from the comparatively dry weather in India to New Zealand is always difficult. It is a no-win situation for India. If they do well, it will be deemed as expected, and if they don't, it will be said that they are not professionals."

Sanjay Bangar, a member of the Indian team that lost both Tests on their last tour of New Zealand, in 2002-03, said the players, particularly the Test specialists, needed more time to adapt to the extreme conditions there. "The last time, the conditions were pretty extreme and I guess they will be similar this time too," he said. "The Test-only players will need more time to adapt."

 
 
India played one practice match in Sri Lanka last year, one in Australia before the Melbourne defeat, and two in England a few months before that. In fact, the only away bilateral series in the recent past in which India did not play a warm-up game, was in Bangladesh in 2007
 

Lalchand Rajput, who was coach of the Indian team in Australia last season, said a similar lack of match practice during the 2007-08 series, after rain marred the team's only three-day warm-up game, contributed to the 337-run defeat in the first Test in Melbourne.

"Not even one full day's play was possible (India batted for 48 overs against Victoria) and that had a role in our subsequent defeat in the first Test," Rajput said. "The practice game allows you to get used to the prevailing conditions as quickly as possible and to do that, you require at least one or two games."

Ratnakar Shetty, the BCCI's chief administrative officer though, said due diligence had been carried out before the schedule was finalised. Asked whether the players were consulted on the schedule, he said: "We looked at all issues before finalising the itinerary."

New Zealand Cricket (NZC) said it was committed to providing the best practice facilities for the Indian team, especially the Test players, under the supervision of John Wright, the former India coach. Justin Vaughan, the NZC chief executive, said the extra Twenty20 game was added after a request from the New Zealand side.

"I spoke to the BCCI and made a very strong committment that we will provide, particularly for the Test-only players, the very best practice opportunites in New Zealand," Vaughan said. "John Wright, the former Indian coach, who now works with NZC, will take the responsibility to make sure that the players get adequate practice arrangements."

India played one practice match in Sri Lanka last year, one in Australia before the Melbourne defeat, and two in England a few months before that. In fact, the only away bilateral series in the recent past in which India did not play a warm-up game, was in Bangladesh in 2007.

The original New Zealand tour schedule did have a practice match but that was later scrapped to accommodate an extra Test on a request from the BCCI after it was forced to cancel its January tour to Pakistan following a government directive.

India have not won a Test in New Zealand in over three decades, and apart from the loss in the Test series last time, they were beaten 2-5 in the ODIs.

Nagraj Gollapudi is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nagraj Gollapudi

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Munsta101 on (January 17, 2009, 1:15 GMT)

Steady on there my Indian friends. It is actually summer at the moment in NZ, with temperatures reaching 30 on a good day. Sure, we can have the odd horribly cold day, but on the whole the weather in Feb/Mar should be pretty good.

Sure a practise match would have helped, but with the extra test added, India can lose the first test and then come back and take the series 2-1.

It should be a cracking series. I only hope the NZ selectors pick the right guys.

Posted by sunnimanz on (January 16, 2009, 14:50 GMT)

I understand all this talk about warmups but this criticism has come around too late for me. People say the Indians need warmup matches in New Zealand but i think people should have been on the BCCI case when the original schedule was made with just one game. In theory, Dravid couldve got out 1st ball in the warm-up game then the rain takes over. The original schedule shouldve included at least 2 warmups. I think the most sensible thing for the Indian team to do is play a 50 over match before the first test. Its gauranteed batting and bowling in one day just as SA did to start their tour in Australia.

Posted by bgately22 on (January 16, 2009, 12:27 GMT)

I would have to say, well played NZC, well played. We've upgraded to a 3 test series and weakened India's test squad by removing their warm up. It goes some way to making up for the BCCI removing Shane Bond.

Posted by southlandstags on (January 16, 2009, 9:06 GMT)

too much has been made of these 'green seaming wickets'. Hamilton and espicially will provide excellent opportunity for the batters to score big runs. A combination of India's last tour and the fact that NZ score low totals in tests on most pitches have led to a general thinking that all pitches will seam around crazily. That is simply not the case anymore

Posted by HarishVS on (January 16, 2009, 7:36 GMT)

I think few people out here lack the wholesome knowledge of the game or as Farook Engineer used to say during the NeoCricket TV shows, they dont know their cricket properly. Cricket is not a mechanical game and is not played by pressing some buttons and some human beings go to play that game. When one travels to cold countries abroad, to do anything, one needs to be acclimatised to the new weather, especially like in India, February/ March will be the start of summer. Our cricket team suddenly taking to biting cold fields in NZ will surely miss for few days the natural fitness from within. Vengsarkar and Bedi are among the greatest cricketers ever representing India with distinction and I dont see anything wrong in their opinion. Past records show that past Indian teams with more practice games on tours have done well than those without.

Posted by ruvvy on (January 16, 2009, 5:36 GMT)

There is no one stopping people from what Mathew Hayden did before touring India. Test players can visit the country ahead and play couple of matches with the local team. It may not count as 'first class' match practice, but would certainly reflect on the how much hunger and pride these 'pampered fools in flannels' have for success. I believe that they can fly (max of 12hrs) and dont have to sail as they previously did for a month.

Posted by popcorn on (January 16, 2009, 2:26 GMT)

Stupidity of the highest order. This is what happens when you have money-minded administrators who have never played cricket to run a cricket organization. Nor will they have the common sense to consult cricketers.

Posted by Stony_Grangey on (January 16, 2009, 2:25 GMT)

I think maybe people are a bit too caught up with the idea of New Zealand being 'cold and wed and windy.' Sure the conditions aren't those of the subcontinent, but that's not to say it will be disastrous. When England played at the same time last year, the weather was perfect and produced three good test matches. Maybe Indian fans think too heavily of their tour here before the 2003 World Cup, which was played on pitches that were green and favoured bowlers- but New Zealand pitches have flattened out dramatically since that time. One of the tests is to be played in Napier, one of the flattest grounds in the world! Hamilton too has proved a good batting surface; in the last few years these grounds have had one day scores in excess of 300 and test scores in the 400s and 500s. So while the Indian Test Team may not have a warm up game, the conditions shouldn't be as disastrous as many think. And besides, isn't their batting line up supposed to be the best in the world?

Posted by vswami on (January 16, 2009, 1:33 GMT)

Its an extraordinary situation and I suppose BCCI is in a difficult position of having to honor its commitment to its sponsors of delivering a minimum number of international match days. I wouldnt blame BCCI too much for it. Its all very easy for the likes of Bedi to comment from the sidelines when he has no commitment at stake. India's overseas record is not pathetic as some people seem to be fond of reminding. They are frozen in early 90s and havent seen the record in the last 10 years. On the contrary I feel India's chances of winning are far better abroad than in India where they look more vulnerable. The bowlers in particular will enjoy bowling in cooler conditions and the opportunity to take 20 wickets without slogging it out, while the batsmen have sufficient ability and experience to cope. The players need to do something creative to prepare for the series without an official game.

Posted by _IndianCricketFan on (January 15, 2009, 21:48 GMT)

India's record overseas is pathetic as it is, on top of that, no practice games will make them even less sharp. With a bad record overseas, the BCCI should have considered something that would increase their chances (practice games). I get the feeling the board is trying to make up the lost cash from the canceled Pakistan series. But I am not sure.

Posted by SurgeInWelly on (January 15, 2009, 21:17 GMT)

Is there any reason the test-only players can't play a practice match (or two) concurrently to the T20/ODI's being played? This would also give NZ's 2nd tier and test specialist players (ie: Tim McIntosh) an opportunity to play some (higher) quality cricket beforehand also. They needn't be first class matches - just a couple of 'selection' elevens playing one another... the Indian team could be topped up by local players as necessary.

Posted by SRTRDXSCG on (January 15, 2009, 19:27 GMT)

YoBro - Yes you are indeed missing something.

Teams for T20/ODIs differ significantly to the Indian test side. A Laxman, A Dravid, and some front line bowlers and to some extent Sachin Tedulkar will be playing the first day of the test match without much match practice in NZ conditions. Also due to rotation policy Indian strike bowlers who are regulars in the test side, like Zaheer and Ishanth might not get to play all one days and T20s. Only players who will get to spend time in the middle and get practice people like Gambhir, Sehwag (he doesnt need it :-), Dhoni who are must haves for all forms of the game at this moment.

Posted by sunnimanz on (January 15, 2009, 18:43 GMT)

Im not too sure where all this talk about acclimatising is coming from. Before the revised schedule, India were due to play a 3 day match as preperation. Personally i think that is no fit preperation for what is an important series for India. If we were sitting here today adn the BCCI has axed 2/3 warm up matches in favour of revenue then we would have something to worry about. They are only human, they have lost money and are trying to make it vack. Wuoldnt you do the same? There is no problem for me with this tour schedule but as i say there would have been a problem if the BCCI has cancelled 2/3 wam-up matches. One match is surely not great preperation.

Posted by Adhil.mothie on (January 15, 2009, 16:27 GMT)

Hi! I think a warm up game should of been included but i also realized we will have problematic indians on our door step soon that complaints for everything that doesnt go their way,very similar to England but i think indian ex-players an fans must understand that the indian board has approved it.i would be dissappointed if nzc had to change it yet again at india's request but its good india are expressing concerns over warm up matches because we dont have that team that trashed india the last time & made the south africans look like puppets but they slightly better settled now than playing england last year so it would be wrong to underestimate us at home.

Posted by fishlock on (January 15, 2009, 16:09 GMT)

Yet again we have a situation that makes it quite impossible for a visiting team to aclimatise to local conditions.Bradman's 1948 side had the benefit of playing at least 4 counties prior to the first Test Match taking place Worcestershire,being the First Game for most visiting sides,at that period of time.Then during the late 70s & 80s the Counties began to fill their sides with up & coming 2nd XI players, which in retrospect was a insult to visiting teams.It was no longer deemed an honour for a County to beat the visiting overseas team! Youngsters no longer have the chance to see the visiting side,unless they are willing to pay large sums of money ,in order to see them at a Test Match or 1 Day Game.This is hardly encouraging for the future of the Game. Quick money,without any consideration for the Players & Spectators alike,will in all likelihood destroy the Game as we know it,& may end up as yet another victim similar to the credit crisis we are at present all facing!Reg

Posted by YoBro on (January 15, 2009, 15:34 GMT)

Am I missing something here? The team is playing 7 "practice" games before the darned series starts (read 2 inconsequential T20's and 5 ODI's). Treat those T20s and ODIs as practise and they'll do just fine. The way the series is scheduled, its perfectly suited to a visiting team - so if we lose, we're just plain incompetent. I can't believe Bedi and Vengsarkar are whining - have they even looked at the schedule?

Posted by pashya on (January 15, 2009, 15:13 GMT)

Again a stupid move by richest cricket board in the world.Now who is responsible if India doesn't perform well in Test matches? This will have effect on only players' performance and they are the ones who will suffer. Board officials will get their money anyway.Either India lose 3-0 or win by 3-0.

Posted by Bullet1982 on (January 15, 2009, 14:04 GMT)

I agree , not having good practice games away from subcontinent is inviting trouble . I wont be surprised if Indian great batting line up crumbles to the swing of New Zealand .I am sure our bowlers will do great .Ishant ,Zaheer ,RP Singh and praveen kumar will be very diff to handle .But the worry is always been our batting in this wet and cold country down under .

Posted by SwissKiwi on (January 15, 2009, 13:45 GMT)

The chinese have a proverb which goes somewhat along the lines, "When the winds of change blow, some put up walls to shelter behind, whilst others build windmills..". I am sure there are many cricket purists, like me, who can drive our partners to distraction by spending hours glued to the fascination of "boring test cricket", but who have also embraced the bawdy game (or bordel 20 for those who think it is the final sell out!). Where better than windy New Zealand to blow in a change and some much needed PR for the bullying BCCI: Prior to the first test, there is a round of first class games. Why not give the "purist" public a glimpse of the Indian test players by a series of guest appearances for State teams? This generous gesture by NZ cricket could be repayed in kind by the removal of the ban on Bond & co. What a contest that would be, for all of us! The only question being, is the game being run by cricket boards or cricket millers?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nagraj GollapudiClose
Related Links
Country Fixtures Country Results
Group A: Baroda v J + K at Vadodara - Dec 21-24
J + K 497 Baroda 116/0
Group B: Delhi v Rajasthan at Delhi - Dec 21-24
Rajasthan 141 Delhi 201/3
Group C: Goa v H. Pradesh at Porvorim - Dec 21-24
Goa 357 H. Pradesh 172/3
Group B: Haryana v Vidarbha at Rohtak - Dec 21-24
Vidarbha 154 Haryana 60/2
Group C: Jharkhand v Tripura at Dhanbad - Dec 21-24
Jharkhand 142 Tripura 227/6
Group C: Kerala v Hyderabad at Wayanad - Dec 21-24
Hyderabad 270 Kerala 179/6
Group B: Maharashtra v Punjab at Pune - Dec 21-24
Maharashtra 210 Punjab 370/8
Group A: Railways v Karnataka at Delhi - Dec 21-24
Karnataka 247 Railways 105/4
Group B: Saurashtra v Gujarat at Rajkot - Dec 21-24
Saurashtra 207 Gujarat 248
Group C: Services v Andhra at Delhi - Dec 21-24
Andhra 234 Services 53/1
Group A: Tamil Nadu v M. Pradesh at Chennai - Dec 21-24
M. Pradesh 432 Tamil Nadu 112/4
Group A: U. Pradesh v Mumbai at Kanpur - Dec 21-24
U. Pradesh 206 Mumbai 42/3
Complete fixtures » | Download Fixtures »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days