Bat second, finish first
Despite teams chasing down stiff targets far more easily this season, the absence of huge scores suggests a fairly even contest between bat and ball
From the results of the matches played in the first ten days, IPL 2011 has been the most successful one for teams chasing. Thirteen out of 17 matches have been won by the teams batting second, an even better record than the first season, when chasing teams won ten of the first 14 games. The 2010 season in India was far more even, with teams batting first winning eight and losing seven of the first 16 games. The IPL 2008 and 2011 seasons have been quite similar in terms of successful chases of 150-plus scores: in 2008 a 150-plus target was chased successfully six times in the first ten days, compared to seven in the current tournament so far; in 2010, this happened only three times in the first ten days. From the table, it can be seen that both the average and run-rate for chasing teams have been significantly better than those of the teams batting first in the IPL 2008 and 2011 seasons. The stats for the first and second innings are however much closer in the 2010 season.
Season | Matches | Batting first (wins) | Chasing (wins) | Batting first (avg, RR) | Chasing (avg, RR) | 200-plus scores | Successful 150-plus chases |
2008 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 23.72, 8.51 | 34.07, 8.73 | 7 | 6 |
2010 | 16 | 8 | 7 | 25.87, 8.25 | 25.88, 8.02 | 5 | 3 |
2011 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 25.80, 7.75 | 35.88, 8.19 | 0 | 7 |
The overall run-rate in the first season (8.61) remains the highest among the three editions played in India. The run-rate in the 2011 edition (7.96) is the lowest and only marginally higher than the overall run-rate in the first ten days of IPL 2009 played in South Africa (7.76). While the run-rate for the first-six over period in IPL 2011 is the lowest, the average is much better. The percentage of runs scored in boundaries has also decreased considerably in the later editions when compared to the first season.
Season | Period of innings | Run rate | Average | Boundary% |
2008 | Overall | 8.61 | 27.72 | 61.96 |
2010 | Overall | 8.14 | 25.87 | 56.83 |
2011 | Overall | 7.96 | 29.98 | 55.18 |
2008 | First six overs | 8.07 | 27.20 | 71.61 |
2010 | First six overs | 7.98 | 31.30 | 63.10 |
2011 | First six overs | 7.21 | 31.95 | 62.85 |
2008 | Last six overs | 10.36 | 24.61 | 63.86 |
2010 | Last six overs | 8.94 | 20.07 | 56.06 |
2011 | Last six overs | 9.88 | 24.18 | 59.31 |
The role of spinners has steadily gained importance after the first season when they were ineffective and sparingly used. In IPL 2008, they picked up only 36 wickets and conceded 8.12 runs per over. Despite not taking too many wickets in the second season in South Africa, their economy rate (6.62) was far better than that of the fast bowlers (8.04). In the 2011 season so far, spinners have picked up 57 wickets at 33.87. Although spinners have a better economy rate (7.55) than fast bowlers (7.94) in 2011, their average and economy rate are much higher than their corresponding numbers in the 2010 season.
Season | Pace (wickets) | Pace (avg, ER) | Spin (wickets) | Spin (avg, ER) |
2008 | 109 | 29.86, 8.40 | 36 | 28.50, 8.12 |
2010 | 104 | 31.11, 8.31 | 56 | 28.60, 7.43 |
2011 | 98 | 31.44, 7.94 | 57 | 33.87, 7.55 |
Season | Number of 100s | Number of 50s | 100-plus stands |
2008 | 4 | 16 | 6 |
2010 | 1 | 27 | 6 |
2011 | 2 | 26 | 6 |