West Indies in England 2011 September 14, 2011

Five captains, but no sinking ship

Graeme Swann is as good a continuity candidate as England could have hoped to put forward
18

When Michael Vaughan was appointed as Nasser Hussain's successor in the summer of 2003, he famously declared he wanted "11 captains" to take the field in every England match. Coming off the back of a long era of English dysfunctionality, his appeal invited gentle ridicule at the time, and gave the initial impression of a leader who lacked the courage of his convictions - certainly when compared to the autocratic approach that Hussain had favoured in the preceding four years.

It didn't take long for that perception to be transformed, however, for what Vaughan had been getting at was the need for collective responsibility at the highest level. As England's standards began to rise from the nadir of the 1990s, so the team could no longer afford any mental passengers in their set-up - the sort of players who, in Hussain's day, had obliged their captain to stand at mid-off and micro-manage every detail of their performances. By the time Vaughan and England embarked on their six-series unbeaten run, up to and including the 2005 Ashes, only the most upstanding individuals were being considered for selection.

Eight years on from Vaughan's appointment, England appear to be well on their way to that 11-captain utopia. Graeme Swann's promotion for the two Twenty20s against West Indies takes the summer's tally of leaders to five, and the overall figure for 2011 to six, given that the long-forgotten Paul Collingwood led the side to a shared Twenty20 series against Australia way back in January. By rights, such a mishmash of helmsmen should be a recipe for disaster, something akin to Pakistan's shambolic summer in 2010. But right at this moment, the policy comes across as a show of strength and depth.

Perhaps that can be taken as an extension of the old truism that "team spirit is an illusion glimpsed in victory", for England's breadth of success this summer gives them licence to indulge in a bit of freestyle. But equally, the appointment of Swann is a no-brainer when you consider his status as an old head in a young and forward-looking squad, especially when you consider the long-term plans that England, under the watchful eye of Andy Flower, are keen to set in motion in all three forms of the game.

In the absence of both Stuart Broad and Eoin Morgan, the anointed captain and vice-captain of the Twenty20 operation, the easy option for the West Indies challenge would have been to recall Alastair Cook in a temporary capacity, particularly given the turn of speed that he showcased during his matchwinning 80 not out from 63 balls in the 23-over ODI against India at the Rose Bowl last week.

However, with the defence of their World Twenty20 title looming in Sri Lanka in 12 months' time, such an approach would have had awkward implications for all concerned, especially given that Broad is by no means certain to be fit to resume his leadership for the one-off challenge against India at Kolkata on October 29. That match is England's first real chance to assess their Twenty20 aptitude in subcontinental conditions, and particularly to determine the boundary-clearing potential of their preferred opening combo of Craig Kieswetter and Alex Hales.

For all his undoubted virtues as a batsman, Cook has struck a grand total of seven sixes in 13648 international deliveries to date - or barely one every 2000 balls. His record in domestic Twenty20s is considerably better than that - 15 from 642 - but the aerial route is not an option that comes naturally to him. In 2010, when England won their title in the Caribbean, Cook was not even considered worthy of a place in the preliminary 30-man squad, despite being England's Test and ODI leader in Bangladesh at the time the announcement was made.

Had Kevin Pietersen not been assigned a complete break from all cricket, it's not inconceivable he could have been offered these two games as closure for the manner in which he was stripped of the captaincy three years ago. However, England's current policies - those of selection as much as non-selection - are nothing if not rigid, and so the reins have been passed to the untested Swann, a man whose only captaincy in a professional capacity came in a pre-season friendly for Northants in 2004.

It's not an accolade he has actively sought, for Swann's reputation - aside from being a top-class spinner - is that of the class clown. With his sharp wit and his refusal to take any unnecessary aspect of his life too seriously, he is a reliable source of mirth within the dressing room, and as Andrew Strauss admitted after England's arduous Ashes campaign, a vital reason why England's morale remained unshakeable in key moments of that series.

"I don't think I could still be the light-hearted, piss-taking guy if I was in a position of authority," he told Spin magazine earlier this year. Nevertheless, Swann has a calculating brain, as shown by the thoughtful manner in which he takes on his opponents with the ball and, strangely enough, through his improbably measured comments to the media, both in press conferences and through his favourite form of communication, Twitter.

It's a leap of faith to assume that the ability to compose lucid quips in 140 characters or less marks you out as a leader of men. But rarely, if ever, has Swann fallen into the trap that has been sprung on so many sportsmen in recent times, and allowed his unguarded public utterances to become a cause of regret and embarrassment. And given how close to the wind he seeks to sail at all times, it's a remarkable balancing act he's achieved.

At the age of 32, Swann is more mature than he'd ever wish to let on, and in a squad dominated by young challengers who are sure to be urged to play their natural games, he's as good a continuity candidate as England could have hoped to put forward in the circumstances. He'd doubtless make the joke himself that he's the "stand-in's stand-in's stand-in", but unlike the situation that faced Strauss in 2006, when Vaughan and Andrew Flintoff undermined him through their absences, Swann will be doubtless have the confidence to run the show as he wishes, at least for a week. England have somehow dispensed with the angst of old, and these days back their various components to do their best for the common good.

Certainly the current vibe is vastly different from the last time England fielded such a glut of captains in a single summer. Back in 1988, the only real similarity was a Test scoreline of 4-0, but it was England who were on the receiving end of the battering from the rampant West Indians. Four official captains were used in the course of the debacle - Mike Gatting, John Emburey, Chris Cowdrey and Graham Gooch - as well as one further stand-in, Derek Pringle, who took over from Gooch for a session of the fifth Test at The Oval with the instruction: "Don't give the ball to David Capel".

Times have changed beyond recognition since that time. Even in a team that bears less than a passing resemblance to the one that stepped out at Cardiff to launch England's international summer back in May, this late-season squad exudes a sense of belonging that could never have been conferred in previous eras. It's no mean feat in the circumstances.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on September 15, 2011, 11:41 GMT

    but pakistan team in three captains and totly mantle for leeding his team.

  • Praxis on September 15, 2011, 11:14 GMT

    What I like about this English test side is that as the wickets fall, the batting seems so much more interesting. Can't wait for the SA vs ENG series, I think England is a better side with their bench strength in bowling & age of their players. But having said so, they don't have a Dale Steyn in their lineup.

  • annys on September 15, 2011, 10:31 GMT

    wonder what the media is hyping so much about lets compare the results of last one year

    india -------- Beat australia at home 2-0 in tests Beat australia at home 1-0 in odis Beat nz at home 1-0 in tests Beat nz at home 5-0 in odis drew with southafrica in sa 1-1 in tests beat sa in sa 1-0 in t20 lost to sa in sa 2-3 in odis won the icc cricket world cup beat wi in wi 1-0 in t20 beat wi in wi 3-2 in odis beat wi in wi 1-0 in tests lost to eng in eng 4-0 in tests lost to eng in eng 1-0 in t20 lost to eng in eng 2-1 in odis(as of today)

    england -------

    Beat pak at home 3-2 in odis won ashes in australia 3-1 drew with aus 1-1 in t20 lost to australia 1-6 in odis knocked out in quarterfinal in worldcup beat srilanka at home 1-0 in tets lost to srilanka 0-1 in t20 beat srilanka in eng 3-2 in odis beat india in eng 4-0 in tests beat india in eng 1-0 in t20 beat ireland 1-0 in odis beat india in eng 2-1 in odis as of today

  • jonesy2 on September 15, 2011, 10:07 GMT

    iceberg ahoy!!...........

  • on September 15, 2011, 8:43 GMT

    @Sasi Kumar - England have not lost in 8 straight test series on the trot. Not just " a beleagured India side". but 8 test series on the trot. Including beating the aussies in Oz and drawing with South Africa in South Africa.

  • on September 15, 2011, 8:41 GMT

    THis is what England have over SA. SA have two bowlers better than even Englands set up (well one better - Steyn - and one on a par - Morkel) But behind them, and behind the captain. Very little YOU need to have backups for your backups - essp when it comes to leadership and fast bowling. England are in the zone with this and have so much depth you wonder where it all suddenly sprang up from.

  • Nuxxy on September 15, 2011, 8:15 GMT

    It's also the right policy as in the captain should be chosen from a team of the best players - he should be out if he doesn't perform.

  • kingcobra85 on September 15, 2011, 4:29 GMT

    with the moden game you gotta have more options for every position. Back up back up back up...that is where i think India misses out

  • on September 15, 2011, 4:20 GMT

    atm, England is in a 'zone'. Everything England touches turns to success. However it appears that Andy Flower seems a better coach than his compatriot Duncan Fletcher even granting it was Fletcher under whose tutelage England broke the Ashes drought for decades in 2005. Perhaps BCCI missed a trick or two in failing to rope in Flower when Kirsten left! :)

  • dsig3 on September 15, 2011, 2:09 GMT

    It doesnt take much to lead a side so high in confidence and form even though there are some new faces in it.

  • on September 15, 2011, 11:41 GMT

    but pakistan team in three captains and totly mantle for leeding his team.

  • Praxis on September 15, 2011, 11:14 GMT

    What I like about this English test side is that as the wickets fall, the batting seems so much more interesting. Can't wait for the SA vs ENG series, I think England is a better side with their bench strength in bowling & age of their players. But having said so, they don't have a Dale Steyn in their lineup.

  • annys on September 15, 2011, 10:31 GMT

    wonder what the media is hyping so much about lets compare the results of last one year

    india -------- Beat australia at home 2-0 in tests Beat australia at home 1-0 in odis Beat nz at home 1-0 in tests Beat nz at home 5-0 in odis drew with southafrica in sa 1-1 in tests beat sa in sa 1-0 in t20 lost to sa in sa 2-3 in odis won the icc cricket world cup beat wi in wi 1-0 in t20 beat wi in wi 3-2 in odis beat wi in wi 1-0 in tests lost to eng in eng 4-0 in tests lost to eng in eng 1-0 in t20 lost to eng in eng 2-1 in odis(as of today)

    england -------

    Beat pak at home 3-2 in odis won ashes in australia 3-1 drew with aus 1-1 in t20 lost to australia 1-6 in odis knocked out in quarterfinal in worldcup beat srilanka at home 1-0 in tets lost to srilanka 0-1 in t20 beat srilanka in eng 3-2 in odis beat india in eng 4-0 in tests beat india in eng 1-0 in t20 beat ireland 1-0 in odis beat india in eng 2-1 in odis as of today

  • jonesy2 on September 15, 2011, 10:07 GMT

    iceberg ahoy!!...........

  • on September 15, 2011, 8:43 GMT

    @Sasi Kumar - England have not lost in 8 straight test series on the trot. Not just " a beleagured India side". but 8 test series on the trot. Including beating the aussies in Oz and drawing with South Africa in South Africa.

  • on September 15, 2011, 8:41 GMT

    THis is what England have over SA. SA have two bowlers better than even Englands set up (well one better - Steyn - and one on a par - Morkel) But behind them, and behind the captain. Very little YOU need to have backups for your backups - essp when it comes to leadership and fast bowling. England are in the zone with this and have so much depth you wonder where it all suddenly sprang up from.

  • Nuxxy on September 15, 2011, 8:15 GMT

    It's also the right policy as in the captain should be chosen from a team of the best players - he should be out if he doesn't perform.

  • kingcobra85 on September 15, 2011, 4:29 GMT

    with the moden game you gotta have more options for every position. Back up back up back up...that is where i think India misses out

  • on September 15, 2011, 4:20 GMT

    atm, England is in a 'zone'. Everything England touches turns to success. However it appears that Andy Flower seems a better coach than his compatriot Duncan Fletcher even granting it was Fletcher under whose tutelage England broke the Ashes drought for decades in 2005. Perhaps BCCI missed a trick or two in failing to rope in Flower when Kirsten left! :)

  • dsig3 on September 15, 2011, 2:09 GMT

    It doesnt take much to lead a side so high in confidence and form even though there are some new faces in it.

  • bumsonseats on September 14, 2011, 23:11 GMT

    it does not mean much how many captains they have, due to injuries they just have to pick a guy who deserves his place and thats swann. i would have still picked him but more of the up and coming young guys lets see how they do against a WI team of less known guys. dpk

  • Valavan on September 14, 2011, 21:35 GMT

    hilarious comments sasikumar chandran, what are you trying to say, England drew test series and won ODI series vs SA in Dec 2009 in SA, Won the ashes but lost ODIs to Australia in 2010 in OZ, and what happened this summer is known, ofcourse they won NZ test series back in 2008 in NZ, what more to prove, it is all about maintaining it, Why dont you ask this question to yourself, havent won a test series in OZ, havent won a test series in SL since 1993, havent won more than 1 test in any away series, are you guys showing agony or jealous, India played with atleast top 9 of whom were in their great against England in tests, if you dont have depth, dont chest thump as invincibles, even we ENGLAND are not invincibles and we know it.

  • on September 14, 2011, 19:30 GMT

    5 captains this summer is only because of injuries and resting key players so I don't have a problem its not a panic selection, just continuity of selection.

  • m0se on September 14, 2011, 18:04 GMT

    I thought Collingwood would make it to the T20 or ODI side soon. I always fondly remember him winning England the triangular ODI series in Australia after the 5-0 ashes drubbing where he scored centuries and was the highest contributor in the last few matches up to the final. It was a great ending to such a dismal ashes.

  • on September 14, 2011, 17:45 GMT

    England have won a series against a beleaguered Indian side.They have to play against few other better sides to know how good they really are.Till then it doesn't really matter how many people captain the side.What's the point of having so many captains. A case of too many cooks i may add.

  • zico123 on September 14, 2011, 16:29 GMT

    England showed snub to Cook by not gving him the T20 captaincy even though he deserves it. but before that Peterson should have got ODI captaincy when Strauss stepped down.

  • licec on September 14, 2011, 15:17 GMT

    The title of the article explains it all. It goes to show the feeling of oneness in the team and also proves how wonderfully the board has been functioning. However, associating the term "long-forgotten" with Paul Collingwood made me feel a bit sad.

  • on September 14, 2011, 14:10 GMT

    This is known as Flexibility

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on September 14, 2011, 14:10 GMT

    This is known as Flexibility

  • licec on September 14, 2011, 15:17 GMT

    The title of the article explains it all. It goes to show the feeling of oneness in the team and also proves how wonderfully the board has been functioning. However, associating the term "long-forgotten" with Paul Collingwood made me feel a bit sad.

  • zico123 on September 14, 2011, 16:29 GMT

    England showed snub to Cook by not gving him the T20 captaincy even though he deserves it. but before that Peterson should have got ODI captaincy when Strauss stepped down.

  • on September 14, 2011, 17:45 GMT

    England have won a series against a beleaguered Indian side.They have to play against few other better sides to know how good they really are.Till then it doesn't really matter how many people captain the side.What's the point of having so many captains. A case of too many cooks i may add.

  • m0se on September 14, 2011, 18:04 GMT

    I thought Collingwood would make it to the T20 or ODI side soon. I always fondly remember him winning England the triangular ODI series in Australia after the 5-0 ashes drubbing where he scored centuries and was the highest contributor in the last few matches up to the final. It was a great ending to such a dismal ashes.

  • on September 14, 2011, 19:30 GMT

    5 captains this summer is only because of injuries and resting key players so I don't have a problem its not a panic selection, just continuity of selection.

  • Valavan on September 14, 2011, 21:35 GMT

    hilarious comments sasikumar chandran, what are you trying to say, England drew test series and won ODI series vs SA in Dec 2009 in SA, Won the ashes but lost ODIs to Australia in 2010 in OZ, and what happened this summer is known, ofcourse they won NZ test series back in 2008 in NZ, what more to prove, it is all about maintaining it, Why dont you ask this question to yourself, havent won a test series in OZ, havent won a test series in SL since 1993, havent won more than 1 test in any away series, are you guys showing agony or jealous, India played with atleast top 9 of whom were in their great against England in tests, if you dont have depth, dont chest thump as invincibles, even we ENGLAND are not invincibles and we know it.

  • bumsonseats on September 14, 2011, 23:11 GMT

    it does not mean much how many captains they have, due to injuries they just have to pick a guy who deserves his place and thats swann. i would have still picked him but more of the up and coming young guys lets see how they do against a WI team of less known guys. dpk

  • dsig3 on September 15, 2011, 2:09 GMT

    It doesnt take much to lead a side so high in confidence and form even though there are some new faces in it.

  • on September 15, 2011, 4:20 GMT

    atm, England is in a 'zone'. Everything England touches turns to success. However it appears that Andy Flower seems a better coach than his compatriot Duncan Fletcher even granting it was Fletcher under whose tutelage England broke the Ashes drought for decades in 2005. Perhaps BCCI missed a trick or two in failing to rope in Flower when Kirsten left! :)