April 1, 2012

Williamson's a star in the making

His second century drew praise from the likes of Neil Harvey and Barry Richards. New Zealand will be served well if he keeps it going
  shares 36

The acclaimed 1941 American drama Citizen Kane was said to have been "majestic, elegant and noble". Such words might well apply to New Zealand's latest batting hero, Kane Williamson. His match-saving, brave unconquered 102 against a quality South African attack at the Basin Reserve in Wellington the other day was truly magnificent.

At one stage he was hit in the nether region, his protective box split, leaving him writhing on the ground in pain and copping a few unkind words from the fieldsmen about him. But the youngster settled down and gritted his teeth, displaying a John Reid-like determination to bat on regardless.

The South Africans launched an all-out assault on Williamson. He was peppered with bouncer after bouncer and he weathered the storm stoically, every now and then launching a cover drive, savage pull or deft back-cut - shots of which the elegant Michael Clarke would be justly proud. In fact, Williamson reminds me of the young Clarke. As Clarke opened his Test account with a century on debut against India, so too did Williamson, hitting 131 in Ahmedabad in November 2010.

This week's century, his second, one that anyone at the Basin Reserve who saw it will never forget, was made with the same bat he used to flay the Wellington attack at the same venue to the tune of 284 not out last summer.

Until his latest Test hundred, Williamson had disappointed his many admirers in that he often got starts but had mostly failed to capitalise on those promising beginnings. Often he would fall when you had the feeling he was right on top. But this time the 21-year-old blossoming champion matched wits with the clever Dale Steyn, whose Test record (54 games for 272 wickets at 23.18) almost beggars belief.

Steyn has a beautifully balanced approach but he operates (England, please note) from close to the stumps all of the time, shaping the ball away. Williamson discovered, as the canny old fast bowler Alan Davidson, who sat with me at Basin Reserve, observed, that Steyn did not at any stage use the width of the crease. Had he done so, his outswing would have been far more effective, for delivering from wider of the crease would have enabled him to angle in towards the right-hander, then straighten or even go slightly away, thus luring the batsman into a forward push and giving him a greater chance of catching the edge. Similarly Vernon Philander, who operates from close to the stumps, would benefit from using the width of the crease. Too often Steyn and Philander wasted chances in Wellington because they bowled too wide of off stump.

Not so Morne Morkel. He bowled with sustained pace and took all wickets to fall, including Dean Brownlie and Daniel Vettori with consecutive balls, both deadly yorkers.

Williamson has a solid defence and an array of strokes, including flowing cover- and off drives, and an ability with shots off his pads to consistently find gaps on the on side. His old-fashioned late cuts, which surely must be a throwback to those seen in the days of Victor Trumper, Charlie Macartney, Jack Hobbs and Denis Compton, gladdened the heart of Neil Harvey, arguably Australia's greatest batman since Don Bradman. Williamson's artistry and good old-fashioned guts brought generous praise also from former South African champion Barry Richards, who was at the ground as a TV commentator.

In 12 Tests Williamson now averages a shade above 36, but those figures will rise markedly in the next few summers. New Zealand might need a bit more steel in their bowling line-up, but the batting is starting to take on a look of class and depth.

Opener Martin Guptill has a lot of ability, and can bat for long periods. However, against South Africa, while he looked as solid as a rock, he almost batted himself into a state of inertia. He wasn't going anywhere until he finally got one that kept low in the first innings, and batting a second time, he was caught in the gully when his defence had looked virtually impenetrable. To move forward as a Test match opening batsman, Guptill must learn to rotate the strike. That way he will score many more runs during his time at the crease. If a batsman gets totally bogged down against quality bowling, it is only a matter of time before the first false shot ends in disaster.

Ross Taylor is a class act with the bat, so too Brendon McCullum, although Taylor has something of a dilemma in just where to bat McCullum. His natural way is all-out attack, and Taylor needs to discover whether to use him as an opener, at No. 3 or in the middle order. On his day McCullum can flay any attack, but often his shot selection falls off the radar.

The little dynamo keeper, Kruger van Wyk, showed he can bat in a crisis; so too Doug Bracewell, who has all the attributes of the tough and talented Bracewell clan.

Vettori is having a problem with his bowling, which can be easily fixed, so watch for improved performances from the talented left-arm spinner. He provides lots of grit in the middle order with the bat.

Let us hope that coach John Wright has free rein to teach and encourage in the way he knows will be successful and that there is no interference from others close to the team, for New Zealand are heading in the right direction, and Williamson is one young gun with success in his sights.

Ashley Mallett took 132 Tests wickets in 38 Tests for Australia. An author of over 25 books, he has written biographies of Clarrie Grimmett, Doug Walters, Jeff Thomson and Ian Chappell

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY vaughanw on | April 3, 2012, 19:01 GMT

    Williamson is def a star in the making! If they can sort out Ryder and move McCullum back to opener to take some pressure off Guptil, we will have a very strong top 6. Guptil, McCullum, Taylor, Ryder, Williamson, Brownlie... And with Flynn, Watling and possibly a young Rutherford and Latham coming through things are looking up!! Bring on the Windies tour. We need to play much more test cricket. Good article!! Though I disagree regarding Vetorri unless he is refering to learning to spin the ball again because he has not turned a ball for years nor has he bowled us to victory and he must be a bowler first. Though I might add that i would love to be proved wrong. And here's hoping Wright stays on and Wagner is as good as his stats suggest! Good luck boys!

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2012, 14:29 GMT

    Wow they draw 1 test after 1 1/2 days of raing and suddenly they have a world class batting lineup! Rubbish!

  • POSTED BY virendra_s on | April 2, 2012, 13:30 GMT

    Kane is a good batsmen but playing T20 might affect his Technique and concentration.

  • POSTED BY Andre117 on | April 2, 2012, 7:20 GMT

    Making a hundred on the last day of a test match against 3 of the top 10 bowlers in the world. Awesome, even though I'm a South African fan.

  • POSTED BY Clyde on | April 2, 2012, 5:57 GMT

    Any batsman who fights and can do it for a long time is very good to watch. I am in favour of Williamson. I want to see the elements of cricket on display, and Williamson keeps his end up in the regard. A hundred runs plus full marks.

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | April 2, 2012, 5:25 GMT

    alan davidson was at the basin reserve? legend. richie benauds favourite old teammate

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | April 2, 2012, 5:24 GMT

    before i even started to read the article i wa going to say that this innings reminded me of clarke. good signs for NZ, i think tom latham will be a star aswell.

  • POSTED BY youfoundme on | April 2, 2012, 3:34 GMT

    Don't forget about Dean Brownlie! He too is a great prospect for New Zealand... Add a great stroke maker in Jesse Ryder, the potential of BJ Watling as keeper-batsman, consistent lines and lengths from Neil Wagner and Trent Boult, the all out pace from a more seasoned Adam Milne and you've got a top quality team. 1. McCullum 2. Ryder 3. Williamson 4. Taylor 5. Brownlie 6. Vettori 7. Watling 8. Bracewell 9. Wagner 10. Boult 11. Milne. In a team like that you have capable batsmen right down to #9 plus the 4 pace bowlers that have worked so well for us. It's a very young team, but with the likes of McCullum, Taylor and Vettori you still have a veteran flavour. Martin Guptill has had his chance, he needs to spend some time in English county cricket. Kruger van Wyk is 32 years old, enough said. Chris Martin is 37 years old, even more enough said.

  • POSTED BY Hoady on | April 2, 2012, 3:20 GMT

    Great, he has talent, now get him out of the NZ domestic competition or he will not realise his potential. NZ produces one world-class batman a generation, it seems, and if this is the next guy, then he should follow Martin Crowe's example and go to Australia for a season or two.

  • POSTED BY Lermy on | April 2, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Thanks Ash for putting me straight about all the talent in our kiwi team... ....were we watching the same series? I wouldn't call Williamsons century much of a consolation in the midst of the train smash that is NZ cricket currently. As others have noted, he was dropped three times. The only innings that seemed to get remembered are the ones with three figure scores. I thought his 19 odd in Hobart when the ball was moving everywhere and every other batsman was playing and missing every second delivery was far better than this ton. He was caught down the leg side there trying to glance a wide delivery, the sort of dismissal that can happen to anyone anytime. Up till then he had played barely a false shot. I thought the aussie bowling in Hobart was also far quicker and harder to face than anything I've seen from SA so far this season, though that pitch was also far more lively than anything SA played on in NZ.

  • POSTED BY vaughanw on | April 3, 2012, 19:01 GMT

    Williamson is def a star in the making! If they can sort out Ryder and move McCullum back to opener to take some pressure off Guptil, we will have a very strong top 6. Guptil, McCullum, Taylor, Ryder, Williamson, Brownlie... And with Flynn, Watling and possibly a young Rutherford and Latham coming through things are looking up!! Bring on the Windies tour. We need to play much more test cricket. Good article!! Though I disagree regarding Vetorri unless he is refering to learning to spin the ball again because he has not turned a ball for years nor has he bowled us to victory and he must be a bowler first. Though I might add that i would love to be proved wrong. And here's hoping Wright stays on and Wagner is as good as his stats suggest! Good luck boys!

  • POSTED BY on | April 2, 2012, 14:29 GMT

    Wow they draw 1 test after 1 1/2 days of raing and suddenly they have a world class batting lineup! Rubbish!

  • POSTED BY virendra_s on | April 2, 2012, 13:30 GMT

    Kane is a good batsmen but playing T20 might affect his Technique and concentration.

  • POSTED BY Andre117 on | April 2, 2012, 7:20 GMT

    Making a hundred on the last day of a test match against 3 of the top 10 bowlers in the world. Awesome, even though I'm a South African fan.

  • POSTED BY Clyde on | April 2, 2012, 5:57 GMT

    Any batsman who fights and can do it for a long time is very good to watch. I am in favour of Williamson. I want to see the elements of cricket on display, and Williamson keeps his end up in the regard. A hundred runs plus full marks.

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | April 2, 2012, 5:25 GMT

    alan davidson was at the basin reserve? legend. richie benauds favourite old teammate

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | April 2, 2012, 5:24 GMT

    before i even started to read the article i wa going to say that this innings reminded me of clarke. good signs for NZ, i think tom latham will be a star aswell.

  • POSTED BY youfoundme on | April 2, 2012, 3:34 GMT

    Don't forget about Dean Brownlie! He too is a great prospect for New Zealand... Add a great stroke maker in Jesse Ryder, the potential of BJ Watling as keeper-batsman, consistent lines and lengths from Neil Wagner and Trent Boult, the all out pace from a more seasoned Adam Milne and you've got a top quality team. 1. McCullum 2. Ryder 3. Williamson 4. Taylor 5. Brownlie 6. Vettori 7. Watling 8. Bracewell 9. Wagner 10. Boult 11. Milne. In a team like that you have capable batsmen right down to #9 plus the 4 pace bowlers that have worked so well for us. It's a very young team, but with the likes of McCullum, Taylor and Vettori you still have a veteran flavour. Martin Guptill has had his chance, he needs to spend some time in English county cricket. Kruger van Wyk is 32 years old, enough said. Chris Martin is 37 years old, even more enough said.

  • POSTED BY Hoady on | April 2, 2012, 3:20 GMT

    Great, he has talent, now get him out of the NZ domestic competition or he will not realise his potential. NZ produces one world-class batman a generation, it seems, and if this is the next guy, then he should follow Martin Crowe's example and go to Australia for a season or two.

  • POSTED BY Lermy on | April 2, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Thanks Ash for putting me straight about all the talent in our kiwi team... ....were we watching the same series? I wouldn't call Williamsons century much of a consolation in the midst of the train smash that is NZ cricket currently. As others have noted, he was dropped three times. The only innings that seemed to get remembered are the ones with three figure scores. I thought his 19 odd in Hobart when the ball was moving everywhere and every other batsman was playing and missing every second delivery was far better than this ton. He was caught down the leg side there trying to glance a wide delivery, the sort of dismissal that can happen to anyone anytime. Up till then he had played barely a false shot. I thought the aussie bowling in Hobart was also far quicker and harder to face than anything I've seen from SA so far this season, though that pitch was also far more lively than anything SA played on in NZ.

  • POSTED BY SladeR on | April 2, 2012, 1:36 GMT

    @ Sudhir Udiajoo "Nz have always produced bits & pieces cricketers and will continue to do so, i dont expect much from this guy"

    On the contrary, NZ have produced some (not many), world class players. R.Hadlee and M.Crowe for example. If you knew anything about Kane Williamson (and clearly you do not), then you will know that he is a phenominal talent, with a single minded dedication to the game, coupled with an unassumed modesty. He is thankfully not one of these players who has to 'Hoorahh" up and down the pitch when scoring a 50 or a 100.

    Those who know Kane, know from his days as a high school cricketer how truly talented he is.

  • POSTED BY SPKosgoda on | April 2, 2012, 1:21 GMT

    According to The selectors Chandimal wasn't matured enough at the time of WC but he proved them wrong with his consistent performances in SA &Aus. Now the World could see he is 10 times better than the seniors who are yet to learn the ways of playing risk free innings at consistent basis. It is total ignorance of selectors that players like Jayasuriyas, Mahelas, and Sangakkaras were able to play 500- 600 International innings while World's Top Grade batsman the Class of Samaraweera has been given only 160 odd Internationals.

  • POSTED BY marts30 on | April 2, 2012, 0:49 GMT

    To the nay-sayers, give him a bit longer he's only 21, and still handling it better than a lot of our senior players. Kallis's record after a similar amount of tests weren't the awe-inspiring figures of today.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 21:19 GMT

    Just a note. Williamson's 284* against Wellington was made on the second ground at Lincoln University, Canterbury, and not at the Basin Reserve. I saw that innings, and his 102*, and I think his uncomplicated style will mix well with the stroke-makers around him. I think Williamson, McCullum, Taylor and Ryder are the four New Zealand batsmen with the hand-eye co-ordination to handle a ball swinging at 140kp/h. I have yet to be convinced that Guptill, in particular, has this ability.

  • POSTED BY truguynese on | April 1, 2012, 20:19 GMT

    Maybe, BUT he needs to work on his integrity.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 16:28 GMT

    I have seen him scoring a century in mirpur stadium in the series which nz got whitewashed against bangladesh,williamson fought alone while wickets fell around him,he was injured and weather was extremely hot,but he kept playing and scored 100+ runs. That day i told my friends that williamson is going to be a special player and its turning out to be true. Facing steyn-morkel-philandar for so long is not a walk in the park.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 15:10 GMT

    Nz have always produced bits & pieces cricketers and will continue to do so, i dont expect much from this guy

  • POSTED BY prksandeep on | April 1, 2012, 14:27 GMT

    I've been a fan of the NZ team for a long time. It would be great to see a legendary cricketer from their team whose statistics and win-loss ratio match his efforts.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 12:43 GMT

    There is no doubt that the boy has talent but would anyone be talking about him in this fashion if he had not been dropped about 3 times during this particular innings?? We'd be hearing that he's not fulfilling his God given talent! Or something on those lines anyway.

  • POSTED BY S.N.Singh on | April 1, 2012, 12:38 GMT

    I HAVE THE SMAE OPINION OF WILLIAMSON, HE HAS THE POTENTIAN IN BEEING IN THE NUMBER ONE SPOT AS A WORLD LEADING PLAYERS. THERE ARE PLAYERS LIKE KHOLI, RAINIA ( THE WORLDS' BEST FILEDIMANS) CHANDIMAL AND WILLIAMSON. THESE PLAYERS WILL MAKE WORLDS' CLASS. THERE ARE OTHERS PLAYERS OF WORLD CLASS PONTENTIAL THAT HAVE CLASS IN TAMIM FROM BANGLADESH AND AJMAL (BOWLER) FROM PAKISTAN. S.N.SINGH

  • POSTED BY FieryFerg on | April 1, 2012, 10:30 GMT

    Good article, but if it wasn't for a blind third umpire the article would have been about yet another wasted start. Peterson's was a clear catch and more comments could perhaps have been made about yet another failure of the review system.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 10:17 GMT

    Infact i have observed that potential in his first outing in india only. He will become a fantastic player for kiwi. Who know he may be the next sachin to newzealand. All the best boy. keep goinggggggggggggg

  • POSTED BY rustyryan on | April 1, 2012, 8:36 GMT

    22 years ago, a little man of tender age scored a similar match-saving century against England at Old Trafford and from then on he has single-handedly shouldered the burden of one billion ppl. It seems Kane is the answer for Kiwi's quest of Tendulkar. Way to go, lad.

  • POSTED BY Ganan18 on | April 1, 2012, 8:29 GMT

    Only had a real good look at him last season playing for gloucs and he looks very promising. keep him at number 4

  • POSTED BY Alexk400 on | April 1, 2012, 8:26 GMT

    what NZ need is players who can occupy crease. NZ always play 150% of ability. Over achievers. They need better talent in batting. Bowling and fielding they do with discipline. They just need one monster batter.

  • POSTED BY muski on | April 1, 2012, 8:20 GMT

    Yeah Nuture him well. His debut 100 was impressive against India. NZ have not had any real world class player for a long time who can turn the game on its head either wth the bat or with the ball. May be this lad was the one we are looking to. All the best to you

  • POSTED BY Mervo on | April 1, 2012, 8:07 GMT

    Moderate ability. No world beater. Being dropped and so much time lost to the weather were really the deciders of the match.

  • POSTED BY mukesh_LOVE.cricket on | April 1, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    Good article , i really loved his batting right from the moment i first saw him making that debut century against India , young , talented , good technique and even uses the feet well against spinners , i am sure he has a great future ahead of him , definitely one of the best next gen batsman along with kohli

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 7:03 GMT

    Wait, so it's the bowling and not the batting that needs working on? That's odd? I don't recall our batsman putting us into winning situations this summer. Our bowlers however did regularly!

  • POSTED BY Min2000 on | April 1, 2012, 5:44 GMT

    I just hope that they let him stay in the middle order for a year or two. NZL's top order is still not settled and some are saying that Williamson should bat at 3.

  • POSTED BY maitland on | April 1, 2012, 5:08 GMT

    Very astute article. Good to see something so well written from someone impartial. I don't really think Guptill is a test opener, but sadly there is no one else at present and no sign of anyone coming through. Flynn could well make a place for himself for some time as well. Wright is crucial if the team is to continue to show some guts. He now needs to get the more naturally talented players to show the same application as their less talented but more determined team mates.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 5:07 GMT

    I am really glad to see a great batsman in the making in Kane Williamson. Like the author said, he had starts but had been giving them away when looking well set. Hope NZ can build around him. The first time I read that he is like Martin Crowe in his early days, I was thinking that is exactly what NZ needs, a stable class batsman. Williamson will learn and start executing better. I hope Taylor, Guptill and others can play well to lead NZ into a very competitive team in the near future. Test cricket needs that badly.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 5:04 GMT

    Kane SHOULD end up averaging between 45-50 for NZ. He has such ability.

  • POSTED BY nskaile on | April 1, 2012, 4:56 GMT

    The way he bats, reminds me of Rahul Dravid a lot. NZ needs more player like him who like to enjoy batting in middle for long time, only then we will improve our ranking and also Adan Milne should get a shot in test since he bowls around 145-150

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 4:54 GMT

    The first time when i saw Kane Williamson, the instant statement was of the lack of Footwork and of a question on adaptability to play in sub- continent. But that young lad blossomed at Ahmedabad that day , scoring 134 on a hot and humid day. I am more prospective and perspective about Kane Williamson to be a new cricketing hero of modesty and grantsmanship.

  • POSTED BY Mob_King on | April 1, 2012, 4:42 GMT

    Thank you for the well-written, thoughtful analysis Ashley and CricInfo.

    Maybe it's his relatively compact size and technique, but he reminds me of M.D. Crowe

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY Mob_King on | April 1, 2012, 4:42 GMT

    Thank you for the well-written, thoughtful analysis Ashley and CricInfo.

    Maybe it's his relatively compact size and technique, but he reminds me of M.D. Crowe

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 4:54 GMT

    The first time when i saw Kane Williamson, the instant statement was of the lack of Footwork and of a question on adaptability to play in sub- continent. But that young lad blossomed at Ahmedabad that day , scoring 134 on a hot and humid day. I am more prospective and perspective about Kane Williamson to be a new cricketing hero of modesty and grantsmanship.

  • POSTED BY nskaile on | April 1, 2012, 4:56 GMT

    The way he bats, reminds me of Rahul Dravid a lot. NZ needs more player like him who like to enjoy batting in middle for long time, only then we will improve our ranking and also Adan Milne should get a shot in test since he bowls around 145-150

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 5:04 GMT

    Kane SHOULD end up averaging between 45-50 for NZ. He has such ability.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 5:07 GMT

    I am really glad to see a great batsman in the making in Kane Williamson. Like the author said, he had starts but had been giving them away when looking well set. Hope NZ can build around him. The first time I read that he is like Martin Crowe in his early days, I was thinking that is exactly what NZ needs, a stable class batsman. Williamson will learn and start executing better. I hope Taylor, Guptill and others can play well to lead NZ into a very competitive team in the near future. Test cricket needs that badly.

  • POSTED BY maitland on | April 1, 2012, 5:08 GMT

    Very astute article. Good to see something so well written from someone impartial. I don't really think Guptill is a test opener, but sadly there is no one else at present and no sign of anyone coming through. Flynn could well make a place for himself for some time as well. Wright is crucial if the team is to continue to show some guts. He now needs to get the more naturally talented players to show the same application as their less talented but more determined team mates.

  • POSTED BY Min2000 on | April 1, 2012, 5:44 GMT

    I just hope that they let him stay in the middle order for a year or two. NZL's top order is still not settled and some are saying that Williamson should bat at 3.

  • POSTED BY on | April 1, 2012, 7:03 GMT

    Wait, so it's the bowling and not the batting that needs working on? That's odd? I don't recall our batsman putting us into winning situations this summer. Our bowlers however did regularly!

  • POSTED BY mukesh_LOVE.cricket on | April 1, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    Good article , i really loved his batting right from the moment i first saw him making that debut century against India , young , talented , good technique and even uses the feet well against spinners , i am sure he has a great future ahead of him , definitely one of the best next gen batsman along with kohli

  • POSTED BY Mervo on | April 1, 2012, 8:07 GMT

    Moderate ability. No world beater. Being dropped and so much time lost to the weather were really the deciders of the match.