| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at the rise of a South African batsman, and the fall of many batting legends at Lord's
August 17, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: Dominating a top bowler
Players/Officials:
Jacques Kallis
| Alviro Petersen
Series/Tournaments:
South Africa tour of England
Teams:
South Africa
|
|||
He isn't as high-profile or flamboyant as Kevin Pietersen, but the other Petersen in the England-South Africa series has been doing a mighty fine job of top-order batting as well. Alviro was under some pressure after being the only batsman to miss out during the mauling at The Oval, but his riposte at Headingley was emphatic. His 182 wasn't as dominant as Kevin Pietersen's 149 later in that match, but it was critical in ensuring that South Africa didn't once again suffer the second-Test blues as they have so often in the last three years: since February 2009, South Africa have a 6-1 win-loss record in first Tests, but a 1-6 record in the second match of a series, with two losses each to Australia and India, plus defeats against England and Sri Lanka.
At Headingley, though, Petersen held South Africa's first innings together, when the second-highest score was Graeme Smith's 52 and no other batsman touched 50. It was the sixth-highest score by an opener at Headingley, and the second-highest there in 35 years, next only to Matthew Elliott's 199 in 1997.
Petersen is only into his third season of international cricket, but he has looked the part in his brief career so far. He is only the third South African to score a century on Test debut - he made exactly 100 against India in Kolkata in 2010 - and while he had his share of failures thereafter and was dropped for a year, he has returned stronger and more hungry for big runs. When he was dropped at the beginning of 2011, Petersen averaged only 33.64 in 17 innings, with no century after that debut innings. Since his return in January 2012, he has averaged 59.10 in 12 innings, with three hundreds, two of them being 150-plus scores. He has had his share of failures, as every opener must - he has been dismissed 12 times for less than 25 - but he has also shown an inclination to carry on and make a significant contribution once he has got a start.
Petersen is one of seven South African openers to score more than 1000 Test runs since their readmission into international cricket. So far in his fledgling career, his average is pretty impressive, and importantly, it is moving in the right direction.
| Batsman | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Graeme Smith | 166 | 8030 | 51.80 | 25/ 32 |
| Herschelle Gibbs | 116 | 5242 | 47.22 | 14/ 21 |
| Alviro Petersen | 28 | 1147 | 42.48 | 4/ 3 |
| Gary Kirsten | 149 | 5726 | 41.79 | 14/ 28 |
| Neil McKenzie | 35 | 1279 | 39.96 | 3/ 3 |
| AB de Villiers | 35 | 1265 | 36.14 | 3/ 6 |
| Andrew Hudson | 56 | 1855 | 35.00 | 4/ 12 |
The presence of Smith in South Africa's line-up means one half of the opening combination is a certainty - and has been for a while - but recently they have had some problems in finding a reliable partner for him: Jacques Rudolph didn't perform to expectations when given an opportunity in 2011, while Petersen himself had been patchy before that. However, over the last decade and more, South Africa have generally had strong opening batsmen - think Gary Kirsten and Herschelle Gibbs.
Since the beginning of 2000, South Africa's opening batsmen average 44.82, while their partnership average is 49.43. Both compare very well with the corresponding numbers for other teams during this period: South Africa's partnership average is the highest, marginally above Australia's, while their batting average is second only to that of Australia.
| Team | Players | Tests | Batting ave | 100s/ 50s | P'ship ave | 100/ 50 stands |
| South Africa | 14 | 130 | 44.82 | 54/ 77 | 49.43 | 26/ 50 |
| Australia | 13 | 142 | 47.03 | 65/ 98 | 49.27 | 30/ 61 |
| India | 20 | 132 | 41.12 | 45/ 89 | 45.28 | 30/ 44 |
| England | 13 | 161 | 42.80 | 65/ 104 | 44.91 | 35/ 61 |
| Pakistan | 21 | 109 | 33.48 | 25/ 69 | 37.36 | 16/ 39 |
| Sri Lanka | 16 | 119 | 37.35 | 37/ 66 | 35.94 | 14/ 38 |
| West Indies | 22 | 132 | 30.47 | 21/ 75 | 34.11 | 18/ 36 |
| New Zealand | 21 | 97 | 29.40 | 14/ 54 | 30.28 | 9/ 23 |
| Bangladesh | 14 | 73 | 23.90 | 7/ 35 | 26.02 | 4/ 15 |
| Zimbabwe | 17 | 48 | 23.18 | 4/ 27 | 22.75 | 5/ 5 |
Opening an innings means plenty of exposure to quick bowling, and a break-up of Petersen's stats reveals he has a very good record against the fast men: his overall average against pace and medium-pace bowling is almost 55. His bigger problem has been spin bowling, against which his average drops to less than 30. The two bowlers who have had the most success against him are both spinners: Harbhajan Singh has dismissed him four times at an average of 11.25 runs per dismissal, while Pakistan's left-arm spinner Abdur Rehman has done equally well, dismissing him three times at an average of 11.67. On the other hand, Petersen has impressive numbers against fast bowlers, averaging 106 against Chris Martin, 64 against Stuart Broad, and 41 against James Anderson.
These are still very early days for Petersen, though, and the challenge will be to keep up his stats against quick bowling, and to improve against spin. If he consistently sees off the new ball, like he has done this year, he'll surely get plenty of opportunities to work on his stats against spin as well.
| Bowler type | Runs | Dismissals | Average | Run rate |
| Pace/ medium pace | 868 | 16 | 54.25 | 3.28 |
| Spin | 649 | 10 | 29.40 | 2.71 |
The Lord's jinx
Jacques Kallis was done in by a poor decision in the first innings of the Lord's Test, but that continued his poor run in Lord's Tests. In four Test innings here, going all the way back to 1998, Kallis has managed scores of 0, 7, 13, and 3. His aggregate of 23 runs is the fourth-lowest for any top-order overseas batsman who has played at least four innings in the top seven at Lord's, and the lowest since 1960.
In a weird way, though, that's quite fitting, for Kallis joins most of the top names of his era in suffering from the Lord's jinx. The table below lists the top overseas batsmen who have struggled at Lord's, and the list is an illustrious one: Ricky Ponting, Brian Lara, Sachin Tendulkar and Kumar Sangakkara all feature prominently. Among these five, who are five of the greatest batting names since 1990, they've batted a total of 31 innings and scored 593 runs at an average of 19.77, with two half-centuries in those 31 innings. Going back a little further, there are more prominent names: Javed Miandad, Alvin Kallicharran, Zaheer Abbas and Sunil Gavaskar all had their problems at the ground, with Zaheer's 75 the highest by any of them. Miandad's highest in six innings was an unbeaten 26 - in his other knocks at Lord's he scored 9, 0, 6, 0 and 22. In all, the batsmen in the table below played 60 Test innings at Lord's and managed just five fifties, with no one scoring more than 75 in an innings. Apparently the effect of the slope was all downhill for these batsmen. (Gavaskar did finally conquer Lord's, but not in a Test match: playing for the Rest of the World against MCC in a first-class match after his retirement in 1987, he scored a monumental 188 in 404 minutes, against an attack that included Malcolm Marshall and Richard Hadlee.)
| Batsman | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Jacques Kallis | 4 | 23 | 5.75 | 0/ 0 |
| Ramnaresh Sarwan | 5 | 54 | 10.80 | 0/ 0 |
| Javed Miandad | 6 | 63 | 12.50 | 0/ 0 |
| Alvin Kallicharran | 4 | 63 | 15.75 | 0/ 0 |
| Ricky Ponting | 6 | 109 | 18.16 | 0/ 0 |
| Brian Lara | 6 | 126 | 21.00 | 0/ 1 |
| Sachin Tendulkar | 9 | 195 | 21.67 | 0/ 0 |
| Kumar Sangakkara | 6 | 140 | 28.00 | 0/ 1 |
| Zaheer Abbas | 4 | 117 | 29.25 | 0/ 1 |
| Sunil Gavaskar | 10 | 340 | 34.00 | 0/ 2 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
'Being an NZ fan is like being in an abusive relationship'
Beige Brigade: Taylor Swift's songs would speak to any Kiwi cricket fan right now
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (55)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (41)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Great article, thanks.
Posted byWhat is Ramnaresh Sarwan doing in that sort of company in your final table? He never approached anything like the sort of class the rest of them obviously have. Nice analysis for Peterson though. He won't be the first or last opener who doesn't deal that well with spin.
Posted by 4test90 on (August 18, 2012, 10:45 GMT)Nadeem 1976 may have a point - Australia only lost one Test in the 100 years of the 20th century at Lord's, so maybe it was the same pitch !!!!!!!!
Posted by padmural on (August 18, 2012, 8:19 GMT)Regarding the score of Sunil Gavaskar's 188, he actually announced his retirement from Test Cricket after that knock. He wanted to retire on high note and promptly announced his retirement after that knock. In the last Test at Bangalore against Pakistan earlier in that year, he called a press conference at the end of last day probably to announce his retirement on a winning note. Unfortunately Sunil could not take India to victory and he didn't make any announcement. Subsequently it turned out to be his last Test. He did play later in the World Cup which India lost in semi final and retired.
Posted by rayfanatics on (August 18, 2012, 1:56 GMT)It is just a coincidence, a freaky one at that these top batsmen haven't scored here.
Posted by Shan156 on (August 18, 2012, 1:22 GMT)@Romanticstud, "Kapil Dev 52 runs at Chennai", are you sure about this? I remember Kapil scored a century in the first innings of the 2nd tied test to rescue India from a follow-on position. That test was played in Chennai.
Posted by allblue on (August 17, 2012, 23:56 GMT)@Nadeem1976 I can't let this insult stand. Firstly, it's not the ECB's pitch, it's the MCC's pitch and they along with Middlesex supporters and the wider cricketing public in England are quite happy with the excellent cricket wicket it is. The current Test is being played on a fantastic cricket wicket which has a bit in it for everyone - seam, spin, bat and spectators alike. To do well on it you have to play good cricket. The reasons behind the anomaly this article is about is nothing to do with the playing surface, plenty of runs are scored there, may be it's the history of the place that gets to some players, maybe it is just a coincidence. Perhaps you missed my earlier post where I pointed out that a 21 year old Kallis averaged over 42 on the ground when playing for Middlesex.
Posted byVery surprised Kallis has not at all been in the honours board for batting or bowling.
Posted by Nadeem1976 on (August 17, 2012, 21:21 GMT)Terrible record by Kallis at Lords. I hope he score some runs in next innings. ECB is so stubborn that they have not changed Lords pitch in 100 years even though it's on record that it's a bad pitch. Hats off to ECB for being so stubborn.
Posted by Shafaet_001 on (August 17, 2012, 18:15 GMT)Why the lords pitch have that terrible slope?? is it too hard to make the ground planer?