Saad Shafqat
Saad Shafqat Saad ShafqatRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Writer based in Karachi

Zaka and Qasim's diplomatic coup

Their victories in India may have set the ball rolling for future bilaterals between the teams, but Pakistan's selection worries remain ahead of the South Africa tour

Saad Shafqat

January 8, 2013

Comments: 39 | Text size: A | A

Junaid Khan took four wickets in his first spell, India v Pakistan, 1st ODI, Chennai, December 30, 2012
Junaid Khan, along with Mohammad Irfan, was underestimated by India's batsmen © BCCI
Related Links

Being chief selector of Pakistan is a thankless job at the best of times, but in the build-up to a series with India it is almost impossibly so. Last month, when Iqbal Qasim sat down to finalise the two squads for the T20 and ODI clashes in India that were to straddle the New Year, he knew he couldn't win. If the team did poorly, he would be spared no blame, and if it did well, then he would remain unacknowledged while the entire nation rejoiced. Thanklessness didn't even begin to describe it.

When PCB chairman Zaka Ashraf was trying to make this India series a reality earlier last year, he found himself trapped in a similar bind. Thanklessness is not a concept typically associated with the position of the PCB chief, who tends to be feted and celebrated for anything even remotely positive in Pakistan cricket. Yet in the days when Ashraf was building up the courage to start lobbying his BCCI counterpart, N Srinivasan, he was mindful that even his best efforts might go unrewarded. His biggest immediate goal was successful negotiation with the BCCI, which would be nothing short of a heroic victory given the tense geopolitical climate in South Asia. But it would remain unappreciated if the team did poorly in India.

In their own distinctive ways, Ashraf and Qasim put their heads down and concentrated on the immediate task at hand. Both found success, but their styles were different. Ashraf possesses a shrewd and clever brain, but he hides it well behind a disarmingly mild, humble and soft-spoken manner.

His strategy, it has been learnt, was to invade Srinivasan's personal space during the ICC annual forum in the hopes of triggering a conversation and a breaking of the ice. Ashraf had nothing to bargain with but he realised that, deployed properly, this could be a bargaining chip in itself. He started out with some cosmetic demands - neutral venues, revenue-sharing, and the like - but yielded easily on them. A general thawing of India-Pakistan relations was the catalyst, but in the end the tour came about because Pakistan asked for nothing other than simply the opportunity to play.

Pakistan's two captains, Mohammad Hafeez and Misbah-ul-Haq, had their own burdens to worry about. India were a formidable outfit, Indian crowds tend to be massive and partisan, and India's extensive print and broadcast media can play tricks with your head. On top of that, Pakistan were entering the series as a nomadic and stigmatised team with a stature far diminished from that of the previous Pakistan sides to have visited India.

Perhaps worst of all, Pakistan's recent limited-overs form had been mediocre. They were ranked sixth in both Twenty20s and ODIs, while India were on a significantly higher perch. Pakistan's batting and wicketkeeping was a shambles, the team had never been known for its fielding, and the spin bowling of Saeed Ajmal and Hafeez was the only real threat. Among the seamers, Umar Gul was erratic, Junaid Khan had been around for a couple of years but hadn't built a reputation, and hardly anyone had heard of Mohammad Irfan.

That Pakistan had come prepared to fight was evident soon after they took the field in the opening T20, in Bangalore on Christmas Day. India were racing off with a productive opening partnership but Pakistan's body language continued to be incredibly sharp and aggressive. They lunged, leapt, charged and pounced with athleticism and accuracy. But for the green kit, you couldn't tell it was Pakistan.

What does one do with Umar Akmal, for example? Or, for that matter, Shoaib Malik? Is Kamran Akmal still the best wicketkeeping option? Will Irfan's seven-foot frame withstand the rigours of Test cricket?

A few days before departing for India, Hafeez and Misbah were interviewed together on a local TV channel. Asked about the negative circumstances surrounding Pakistan cricket, Hafeez replied that while the team had been through great difficulties, this had also made them hungry to win and prove themselves to the world. Misbah concurred. After seeing Pakistan in the field in Bangalore, you could tell that both captains had truly meant it.

Fans are ruing the embarrassing defeat in the final ODI, but it is hard not to see the tour as a spectacular success for Pakistan overall. There is the sheer audacity of overcoming India's ODI side in India, and though the T20 rubber was split 1-1, Pakistan competed well even in defeat.

The real gain for Pakistan has been the rise of young individuals. Nasir Jamshed was castled for 2 in the opening game, but thereafter he shut his critics up with scores of 41, 101 not out, 106, and 34. As for the seam-and-swing combination of Junaid and Irfan, they had plainly been underestimated by India and proved the ultimate difference between the two sides.

For Ashraf and the PCB, this tour could not have turned out any better. Pakistan pocketed the ODI series but it ended on a winning note for the hosts, which bolsters the credentials of the arrangement. The T20 honours were shared, with something in it for everyone. This tour may not advance Ashraf's proclaimed vision of restoring international cricket to Pakistani soil, but it does nicely pave the way for a Test series with India in the months ahead. That too would be a brilliant coup.

The trip to India provided some comforting answers, but raised some uncomfortable questions too. What does one do with Umar Akmal, for example? Or, for that matter, Shoaib Malik? Is Kamran Akmal still the best wicketkeeping option, despite his horrible batting failures in India? Will Irfan's seven-foot frame withstand the rigours of Test cricket? And what about the bench? Do you stick with untried youngsters like Haris Sohail, Anwar Ali, Asad Ali, and Zulfiqar Babar, who were sent to India but didn't get a game, or do you bring in someone new? There are no perfect answers, but decisions will have to be made. Thanklessness doesn't even begin to describe it.

Saad Shafqat is a writer based in Karachi

RSS Feeds: Saad Shafqat

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 10, 2013, 2:12 GMT)

Umar should be rested for at least a year. guys like him promote immaturity and affect discipline

Posted by avmd on (January 10, 2013, 1:50 GMT)

Umar Akmal, is unlucky to have a negative captain with him in ODI, Misbah. I'm sure Misbah forced Umar to play a pathetically slow inning like him in last ODI. Umar is not ready for test yet but should not be dropped from limited over format, yet. Misbah is a real problem, he actively participates in losing ODIs, should be discarded. Asad Shafiq, deserves a permanent spot in middle order in ODI and tests now and time to through talented new comers Haaris and Umar Amin in deep now to face the nest fast bowling combination in SA. Wahab Riaz, due to his pace and supreme fitness, should be in tests agains SA, hope he had learnt to bring the ball in for right handers, which he has been lacking.

Posted by avmd on (January 10, 2013, 1:36 GMT)

Not many people would have remember the background of Salim Malik's Calcutta innings. Malik, until then was going through a bad patch, even prior to the tour. Just before the Calcutta ODI, he was announced to leave the touring party due to poor form and supposed to lead a Pak A team to Zimbabwe ( or Kenya ? ) to regain some form. Malik was very disappointed and was visibly angry at the start of that match and poor Kapil Dev became his victim. After his heroic knock, everything changed, Malik was kept in the touring party and from then onward, hit a purple patch for some time. It was the most important inning of Malik's career.

Posted by   on (January 10, 2013, 0:05 GMT)

There should be no questions about Akmal Brothers. Without doubt, Kamran Akmal is the worst wicketkeeper in the History of Pakistan. Yes worse than Moin Khan, who at least got us the WC 92, not lost WC 2011. As for Umar Akmal, his attitude is worse than his batting and there are more talented players like Haris Sohail who deserve the chance.

Posted by manizee on (January 9, 2013, 19:02 GMT)

The Akmal bros. must go. Kamran has lost many a series and matches for Pakistan and destroyed promising careers of talented bowlers. Consequently they were dropped yet he retained his spot. Umar has faked injuries and the bubble surrounding his hype has burst... a more deserving middle order batsman's potential is being wasted. Both brothers have serious questions over their characters as well. Their selection brings a bad omen to the green kits.

Posted by   on (January 9, 2013, 11:19 GMT)

Excellent Usman ! Brilliently crafted Artical, way to go. As far as Umar Akmal is concern, he sould be sent back to domestic Cricket, where he can remember and learn some of the very basics of Cricket. He is way too away from some of the basics which are required for a professional cricketer at that level. Shoiab Malik deserve a place for some time if he still continues to play like the way he did in India. Finally PCB need to find a proper Wicket Keeper who can bat aswell, i know there is a lot of wicker keeping talent in Pakistan just like Bowling talent.

Posted by RaadQ on (January 9, 2013, 7:10 GMT)

SA suggestions: T. Umar & A. Ali as openers, then Younis, Hafeez, Misbah & A. Shafiq, A. Akmal, Umar Gul, Saeed Ajmal, Anwar Ali/Wahab Riaz & J. Khan. Mohammad Hafeez to be demoted to #4, because just like Watson, he struggles against quality attacks with new ball. If Taufeeq also struggles, replace him with Jamshed, although Jamshed needs to adjust to Test matches (footwork, fitness), and this tour might not be the best for his introduction. M. Irfan cannot bowl in Test conditions I've heard, so Wahab Riaz should bowl, and if he fails in 2 matches, the third one Anwar Ali should be trialled. No more Cheema or other failed experiments. Rehman is banned anyways, so no selection dilemma there.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Saad ShafqatClose

    'I'd get rid of warm-ups in cricket'

Samit Patel also doesn't like hotel rooms without WiFi and running singles

    An order for an overhaul

Sambit Bal: The tenor of the Supreme Court verdict on the IPL corruption case is unambiguous, and it makes clear that it's time for the BCCI to look within

    Around Asia with a press pass

Diary: It's a subcontinent and Middle East special in part four as our correspondent takes in the UAE, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh on his world cricket tour

Fast train from  Chakdaha

The Cricket Monthly: From small-town Bengal to one of India's greatest cricketers: we return to where Jhulan Goswami's journey began
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

A different ball, a different result

Anantha Narayanan: A look at the closest matches in Test history

News | Features Last 7 days

44 balls, 16 sixes, 149 runs

Stats highlights from an incredible day in Johannesburg, where AB de Villiers smashed the record for the fastest ODI ton

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

'The definition of a cricketing genius'

Twitter reactions to AB de Villiers' record-shattering 31-ball ODI hundred

Why cricket needs yellow and red cards

David Warner's repeated transgressions tell us that the game has a discipline problem that has got out of hand

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

News | Features Last 7 days