S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

England's starting problems overseas

England have lost nine out of 13 first Tests of overseas series (excluding Bangladesh). A look at the batsmen and bowlers who've underperformed

S Rajesh

March 15, 2013

Comments: 5 | Text size: A | A

Jonathan Trott plays to the leg side, New Zealand v England, 2nd Test, Wellington, 1st day, March 14, 2013
Jonathan Trott averages less than 22 in the first innings of overseas Tests, but in the second innings his average goes up to 86.80 © Getty Images
Enlarge

Playing the first Test of an overseas series is often fraught with danger. In today's age of condensed tours, visiting teams generally have little time to get accustomed to the pitches and the conditions before going into a Test series. The challenge for both batsmen and bowlers is thus to adapt quickly and make the adjustments required to conquer the opposition and the conditions. Going by their record over the last eight years or so, it can safely be said that England haven't made those adjustments particularly well.

In their last 13 first Tests in overseas conditions (excluding tours to Bangladesh), and going back all the way to 2005, England have lost nine and drawn four, which means most often they've left themselves with much catching up to do after the first game. During this period, they've lost the opening Tests twice each against Pakistan (in Multan and in Dubai), India (Chennai and Ahmedabad) and Sri Lanka (Kandy and Galle), and once each against West Indies (Kingston), New Zealand (Hamilton) and Australia (Brisbane). They made a pretty good effort to lose the first game of their ongoing series in New Zealand too, before lifting their game in the second innings.

In fact, England and New Zealand have almost identical stats in opening Tests of away series during this period (excluding tours to Bangladesh and Zimbabwe). Both have 0-9 win-loss records, though England have played 13 Tests to New Zealand's 11. Even West Indies have done better, winning a Test: they surprised South Africa in Port Elizabeth in 2007, which remains their only overseas win during this period.

A couple of other teams have much better first-Test records than England: South Africa have won five and lost just one, with victories in India, Pakistan, Australia, England and the West Indies. Their win-loss ratio is much better in first Tests than in other games. Australia, too, have been similarly successful, with a 9-3 record in first Tests, which is much better than their overall ratio.

England, on the other hand, have been a much stronger team on tours once the first Test is out of the way. They're 0-9 in the opening Tests, but 11-11 in other matches. Both their batting and bowling pick up steam once the opening game is done with.

England in overseas Tests since Jan 2005 (excl. B'desh and Zimbabwe)
  Matches Won/lost Ratio Bat ave Bowl ave
1st Tests 13 0/ 9 0.00 30.08 41.26
2nd Tests 12 5/ 3 1.66 39.48 32.48
3rd Tests 11 3/ 5 0.60 28.88 35.37
4th Tests 6 2/ 2 1.00 39.16 39.71
5th Tests 4 1/ 1 1.00 41.01 34.39
Overall 46 11/ 20 0.55 33.62 36.50
How other teams have fared in first Tests of series since Jan 2005 (excl. B'desh and Zim)
Team 1st Tests Won/lost Overall away Tests Won/lost
South Africa 13 5/1 37 15/8
Australia 14 9/3 42 18/13
India 12 3/6 40 9/17
Sri Lanka 12 1/5 31 4/17
Pakistan 18 2/11 51 13/24
West Indies 12 1/8 34 1/22
New Zealand 11 0/9 25 2/19

Even within the first Test, England's batting has generally tended to pick up in the second innings, as was the case in Dunedin as well, when they were bundled out for 167 in the first innings but then picked themselves up to post 421 for 6 in the second. Not so long ago, it was a similar story against India in Ahmedabad, though the second-innings resistance couldn't prevent a Test defeat then. In the Ashes opener at the Gabba too, England had folded for 260 in the first innings, and then responded with a scarcely believable 517 for 1 in the second.

There've been a few instances of the reverse happening too, most notably when they were routed for 51 in the second innings after scoring 318 in the first in Kingston, but their overall batting average in the second innings is about 20% better than the first-innings average. That's a fairly significant difference, given that pitches generally tend to deteriorate later in the game.

A significant difference is also the number of centuries England's batsmen have managed in the second innings, compared to the first. In 13 Tests, England have only three first-innings centuries - one each by Marcus Trescothick (193 against Pakistan in Multan), Paul Collingwood (134 not out in Nagpur), and Andrew Strauss (123 in Chennai). In the second innings, there've been nine centuries, three of them in one match, at the Gabba in 2010. Clearly, the batsmen have flourished once they've got more accustomed to the conditions.

England in each innings of 1st Tests of an overseas series, since 2005 (Excl B'desh and Zim)
  Runs Wickets Average 100s
1st innings 3590 130 27.62 3
2nd innings 3571 108 33.06 9

The next table breaks down the stats for each batsman who's played more than 2o away Tests during this period. The averages in the first and second innings of the first Tests are listed separately, as also the batsman's overall first-Test average, his average in Tests other than the opening one on tours, and his overall away average during this period. (All these stats exclude tours to Bangladesh, and include matches played in neutral venues.)

The batsmen who've struggled the most in the series opener are Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell. Both have been ordinary in each innings of the Test, and have been guilty of not converting their starts: between them they've scored 11 fifties but no centuries. In 25 innings Pietersen has only four half-centuries and an average of 26.56 in first Tests, while Bell isn't much better, averaging 29.47. Both batsmen do much better in other Tests of overseas tours: Pietersen averages almost 50 after the first Test, while Bell averages 41.15.

On the other hand, Alastair Cook and Jonathan Trott have been batsmen who've performances in the second innings of first Tests are significantly better than in the first innings of series openers. Cook averages 49.60 in the first Tests, but most of his runs have come in the second innings. In first innings he has three half-centuries, and a highest of 67; in the second, he has four 50-plus scores, and they're all centuries, including 235 not out at the Gabba, 176 in Ahmedabad and 116 in Dunedin.

Similarly, Trott has pretty ordinary numbers in the first innings of first Tests - his highest in six innings is 45, but in the second innings he has two hundreds, two fifties, plus a 49 in six innings. His overall first-Test average is thus an impressive 51.36. The other three batsmen have somewhat middling numbers, with Collingwood being the most consistent across all Tests of a series.

England batsmen in each innings of 1st Test
Batsman 1st inngs-Runs Average 100s/ 50s 2nd inngs-Runs Average 100s/ 50s 1st Test ave Other Tests* Overall^
Jonathan Trott 131 21.83 0/ 0 434 86.80 2/ 2 51.36 40.75 44.51
Alastair Cook 301 25.08 0/ 3 731 73.10 4/ 0 46.90 54.69 52.13
Paul Collingwood 339 42.37 1/ 2 288 48.00 1/ 1 44.78 46.14 45.76
Matt Prior 269 38.43 0/ 3 255 36.43 0/ 2 37.43 45.81 42.45
Andrew Strauss 313 31.30 1/ 0 343 34.30 2/ 0 32.80 41.60 38.97
Ian Bell 440 33.85 0/ 5 238 23.80 0/ 2 29.47 41.15 36.95
Kevin Pietersen 315 24.31 0/ 1 349 29.08 0/ 3 26.56 49.23 41.46
List includes batsmen who've played 20 or more overseas Tests (excluding Bangladesh) during this period.
* Average in other Tests of those series
^ Overall average in those overseas series

However, it wouldn't be fair to blame the batsmen alone for England's first-Test debacles. The bowlers have gone missing too, none more than James Anderson, who has averaged a generous 47.08 runs per wicket, with 24 wickets in nine matches. His stats improve considerably once the first Test is out of the way: in other games in those series he averages 30.64, bringing his overall average down to 34.22. Similarly, Stuart Broad and Monty Panesar average more than 40 runs per wicket in first Tests, but then improve to the mid-30s in the remaining matches. Graeme Swann has been the best bowling bet for England in first Tests (as indeed in other matches as well). His first-Test average is 36.22, with 27 wickets in six matches, though he improves significantly on that as well as the series goes on.

England's bowlers, in 1st Tests and other Tests overseas since Jan 2005 (Excl B'desh)
Bowler 1st Tests-wkts Average Strike rate Others*-wkts Average Strike rate Overall ave^
Graeme Swann 27 36.22 67.3 85 26.20 58.52 28.61
Stuart Broad 17 42.23 82.4 39 35.10 76.13 37.26
Monty Panesar 20 46.80 99.6 59 34.02 72.69 37.25
James Anderson 24 47.08 80.8 86 30.64 59.38 34.22
List includes bowlers who've played 20 or more overseas Tests (excluding Bangladesh) during this period.
* Stats in other Tests of those series
^ Overall average in those overseas series

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Sinhaya on (March 17, 2013, 2:52 GMT)

Very good analysis. England did well to win the 2nd test against Sri Lanka last year. Our fault too for planning a 2-0 win against the number 1 test team back then. If we prepared a road like surface at the P Sara, we could have prevented England winning and won the series 1-0. But our ego meant we had to settle for a 1-1.

Posted by   on (March 16, 2013, 15:25 GMT)

@soso: I dont think thats not true at all. Right that they are winning series back to back.Tthere is a big worry about their performance in Middle East when they play Pakistan, later this year. By their own admission this is the first time in last few years that they really feel themselves strong. For SA to be the best team, atleast let them win one World Cup atleast, a T20 or a T50.

Posted by mattthomas on (March 16, 2013, 7:39 GMT)

Fieryferg,

perhaps you should read this as it justifies the UK press

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/559986.html

Posted by FieryFerg on (March 15, 2013, 20:08 GMT)

More proof of how overrated Anderson is by the UK press. They still rate him up with Steyn when the stats conclusively show he's not anything like the same class. Although he's got better in recent years his average is still well over 30. He can swing it miles, which looks clever, but as Philander shows it's the balls that swing 2" - half a bat width - that are lethal.

Posted by Soso_killer on (March 15, 2013, 12:26 GMT)

South Africa has been the best team in the world for 7 years now. It just shows you what a fuss these world rankings are.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Four in four, and stands by Nos. 10 and 11

Ask Steven: Also, most balls faced in a T20, highest limited-overs score at Lord's, and long lives after Test debut

    England seem to have forgotten about personality

Mark Nicholas: They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

    'Wouldn't mind being reborn as Imran'

My Favourite Cricketer: Sanjay Manjrekar on his first sighting of Imran Khan's magnetic personality

'Smith always backed himself to win a Test for SA'

Modern Masters: Graeme Smith's fourth-innings stats are a testament of his tremendous mental strength

Are Test batsmen maturing quicker these days?

Michael Jeh: Does Rahane, Robson, Ballance and Stokes making hundreds in their first five Tests point to a larger trend?

News | Features Last 7 days

India out-reversed on dry pitch

England consigned India to two reverse-swing-induced collapses whereas India bowlers mainly relied on the new ball's movement and uneven bounce by hitting the deck hard

Bigger concerns for England than Lord's pitch

While the pitch took most of the blame at Trent Bridge, at Lord's England will need to get more controlling overs from their spinners. The reality is there is no quick fix

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

'The more fielders think for themselves, the better for the team'

Paul Collingwood talks about how fielding has evolved over time, manning backward point, the amazing AB de Villiers, and his fielding dream team

News | Features Last 7 days