February 16, 2014

The Mitchell Johnson effect

Whole batting line-ups have been laid to waste by the raw pace and confidence of Australia's fast-bowling leader

Mitchell Johnson: injuring bodies, minds and careers © Getty Images

So it is not just England. Phew, thinks Alastair Cook. After all, has one derailed cricket tour ever had such a fallout? The casualties are littered across the gardens of England - Jonathan Trott, Graeme Swann, Matt Prior, Andy Flower and Kevin Pietersen. It is quite a list that fell foul to the Mitchell Johnson effect. And it was not just people. It was a whole team method, a strategy and philosophy that had brought England success. The casualties are endless.

For a while now the game has been beset by the 135-142kph bracket. Exhausted bowlers, shunted across continents to play various formats of a sport, unable to resist its commercial opportunities, have settled for something that gets them through the day. Then along comes Mitch and a stellar collection of English and South African batsmen are left whimpering in defeat. From never having had it so good - bats, boundaries and the DRS - esteemed batsmen are whispering in dressing-room corners about the throat ball and its corollaries. At last! With a bit of luck, Johnson will inspire others to bowl fast, really fast, for this unique and thrilling skill is an essential part of cricket's appeal.

Johnson's extraordinary match in Centurion is simply an extension of his extraordinary matches in Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Melbourne and Sydney. Twelve wickets, valuable runs and a stunning catch amounts to a one-man show. Materially, of course it is not, but so mighty is the Johnson effect that without him one cannot imagine outcomes anywhere close. Australia are smashing good teams, thus the conclusions are unavoidable.

South Africa bowled 194 overs in the match and claimed 14 wickets for 687 runs. The Australians bowled 120 overs, taking 20 wickets and conceding only 406 runs. The collateral damage is alarming. For one thing, Michael Clarke's team will arrive in Port Elizabeth a whole lot fresher.

Graeme Smith admitted confusion but denied mental scarring. However, the stress related to such a result cannot be underestimated. Bouncing back from defeat is one thing, bouncing back from humiliation is quite another. Ask England. The fear and the self-doubt that come from it are a real issue for Smith's team. Though physical injury was somehow avoided, bad blows were taken by the batsmen and aggravating niggles emerged amongst the bowlers.

In turn, the Australians are rampant. There is something of the bully in a cricket team that boasts a proper fast bowler. From Johnson's performances alone come a soaring confidence and a peacock strut. Peter Siddle laughed at Robin Peterson's rasping square cut for four, knowing that his comeuppance, one way or the other, was nigh. It was the other as it happened, not Johnson but Siddle who burst an unplayable shooter through the Peterson defences. It has been a bad couple of weeks for chaps who are sons of Peter. Alviro and Robin are in the selector's sights. Kevin is out of view, for good they say - which, even ten days on, seems ridiculous and unbelievable. And all because of the Johnson effect.

It is well documented that Dennis Lillee played the main part in the Johnson regeneration. First the approach, then the position of bowling arm at release, then the use of the right arm in the delivery and follow-through. These are the technical things. Then there are the tactical things: what are we looking for in a batsman, what can we smell? Does swing matter? Not much if you bowl at 150kph and hit good lengths and lines consistently. Where should the bouncer be aimed and what is its purpose? How to control the new ball and profit from the old one. How to change angles. These are amongst the things Lillee and Johnson will have considered and improved. When Lillee invited chief selector John Inverarity to the nets at Hale School in Perth last year he knew his man was ready. Inverarity reacted immediately that Johnson was back. What neither of them could have known was just how quickly Johnson would reward those who had kept the faith.

It is a long time since one fast bowler caused such destruction. Think of skill and intimidation perfectly combined to ruin careers. West Indies did it as a group. Michael Holding did it on his own at The Oval in 1976. Lillee and Thomson did this together but never alone, at least not to such effect. Curtly Ambrose took 7 for 1 in Perth in 1992-93 and did something equally appalling to England a year later in Trinidad. Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis had their moments. Allan Donald was a sight in full flow but never had quite such figures so often.

You see where we are going here. Johnson's blitzkriegs are up there with anything ever produced. The "Demon" Spofforth started it all and the terrifying Johnson is continuing his legacy. In the last six Test matches he has taken 49 English and South African wickets at 13 each.

South Africa must find a way of fending him off and then playing some strokes of authority. At the moment, Johnson holds all the cards. He feels not a jot of pain, suffers not a moment of self-doubt. It is a heady place. Like Cook before him, Smith has the chance to lead the way against the new ball. But Ryan Harris is hardly a mug and finished the recent Ashes giving Cook as hard a time as the one handed out by Johnson. Smith must watch for that too. This is a monumental task, perhaps the most challenging of his career. He has the courage and the will but does his team? Can he resist the collapse of a method?

Rodney Hogg, who bowled fast and well for Australia in the period during and post Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket - a period of extreme fast bowling around the world - reckons that Johnson and Harris are right up there with Thomson and Lillee. Enough said. Good luck Graeme, go well.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • pete on February 19, 2014, 16:41 GMT

    Well no doubt MJ has become a better bowler. his speed accuracy and consistency have all gone up a level. But to simplify it as just this is being very unfair to the rest of the team. The captain has been a complete revelation to me, his tactics have been extraordinary from his field placements to his exemplary use of his best bowler MJ. No doubt this has come from consultation with boof Lehmann during pre match planning. I have no doubt all teams "go to school" on their opposition, but imo there is a science AND an art to this aspect. Micky arthur was all science Boof brings the art back into it. Like all good coaches he realizes that it is really important to understand your players and what makes them tick, equally he has a real ability to understand the opposition players and find not just their technical flaws but also their psychological weakness. he is the new breed of coach in cricket. The bowlers supporting MJ have also played their part. Harris and Siddle are to be congrat

  • Graham on February 19, 2014, 4:27 GMT

    AltafPatel; I did some research and it appears in the first test Morkel bowled a higher percentage of short balls than Johnson. Steyn bowled a similar percentage. As such this bodyline call seems to be way off the mark, the only difference with Mitch bowling a short ball compared to Morkel is he is very good at it, and it seems the pathetic spectators such as yourself begrudge that Johnson is simply better at it. I've never seen any international sport where you ban someone simply because they are too good. Also, I believe there was a patch in the last series where Broad and Andeson had a crack at turning the tables, Morkel bowled a couple of good bouncers at Johnson in this test, again Johnson is just better at bowling it and better at facing it - A similar response from South Africa will just play into Australias hands.

  • John on February 19, 2014, 2:14 GMT

    The posters suggesting that the Australian batsmen will soon face 'bodyline' clearly have no idea what leg theory was. It consisted of fast short pitched balls directed at a leg stump line with fielders clustered behind square. As only two fielders can be behind square and batsmen now have helmets, arm guards, decent boxes, decent gloves, thigh pads and arm guards bodyline is a thing of the past. Johnson's short deliveries had batsmen fending toward slip while the short leg catches were taken from balls played off the hip. Besides, a fast medium bowler trying to bowl as Johnson does would be cut and pulled to ribbons.

  • James on February 18, 2014, 23:53 GMT

    AltaPatel, so today's game is more analysed and planned, and because Australia are using body line they won't be successful long? If you actually paid any attention to the team you'd know that the very reason for their current success is their brains trust - Clarke, Lehman and McDermott. They are way ahead of any other team in terms of smarts. That above all else is why they have turned the corner. They got rid of Arthur, who just didn't gel with the team, and the turnaround has been massive.

  • IFTIKHAR on February 18, 2014, 13:32 GMT

    There was no need to run comparison between Clarke and de Villiers because what i argued about was Clarke being the ONLY world class batsman around!Besides de Villiers there are good cases for Sangakarra,Hashim Amla,Kohli,Jayawardene etc.Kallis was a class in himself but it would not have escaped the discerning cricket fan that later in his career he too become vulernable to the short pitched ball.As i said before How good a batsman is against Johnson can only be found out when he faces him.De Villiers has played him better than anyone in his team but remember the new English find Stokes too played him excellently even on the broken Perth pitch!

  • clair on February 18, 2014, 12:33 GMT

    @AltafPatel Australia wont have a problem with short pitched bowling on fast tracks, just stick with spin on dustbowls that's where they become unstuck.

  • Master on February 18, 2014, 12:33 GMT

    I suspect Johnson's wrist position is behind the chaos he is causing.

    In kph he is quick but not as quick as Lee and Akhtar. But with a round arm delivery and flicking the wrist forward at point of release he may be skimming the ball off the pitch. Rather like when boys make stones bounce off water.

    I'd be interested to hear if the reaction time for the batter is shorter with Johnson because the ball is in contact with the pitch for less time (which is more relevant measure of pace than how fast it is moving when the bowler lets the ball go)

  • Altaf on February 18, 2014, 11:18 GMT

    Aus should realize what their inexperienced batsmen will do when rest of the world will start bodyline against them.

  • Altaf on February 18, 2014, 11:17 GMT

    Aus might be thinking their negative bodyline bowling for desperate comeback to test cricket will reach the height again but should realize that today's game has been more analyzing and planned. See what time shows next in rest of the tour.

  • clair on February 18, 2014, 9:29 GMT

    @ greatest_game you have either a very short memory or a very selective one I suspect the latter, Michael Clarke was the top rated test batsman last year and he is having a form slump, saying he is not in the same class as the other two is ridiculous and just shows your bias, he has been found out a couple of times by the short ball but he did overcome it in Aus and hit Broad out of the attack(while on he's way to a hundred) when Broad tried to bowl short. He will find form again, a player as good as Clarke always does.