Sanjay Manjrekar
Former India batsman; now a cricket commentator and presenter on TV

Enough with the bowling variations

In T20 cricket, using slower balls and other variations has become an invitation to get hit into the stands

Sanjay Manjrekar

June 20, 2014

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Andre Russell sends one down, India v West Indies, Group B, World Cup 2011, Chennai, March 20, 2011
Bowling variations are meant to be a surprise, but today batsmen know exactly when the change-up delivery is going to come © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: James Tredwell

In the World T20 this year in Bangladesh, Andre Russell bowled the final over of the Sri Lankan innings in West Indies' semi-final against them. He began by bowling three fast, full-length deliveries, up to the batsmen, who scored a run each off them.

Then he decided it was time to bring in the variations. The next ball was a short delivery that ended up being called wide. He followed that up with another wide delivery. Russell was starting to get rattled. The next ball, a juicy length delivery, was walloped for six. The fifth ball was short and wide and got spanked for four.

Russell managed to get a wicket off the last ball but he conceded 15 off the over. After the first three balls had cost him only 3 runs. The over basically started to go bad when Russell tried to vary things. This is just one of many examples in recent T20 cricket where using variations has backfired on the bowler.

As limited-overs cricket has evolved and with it limited-overs batsmanship and bowling, variations have become an integral part of bowling. It has become the mandatory thing to do, to bowl an average of four different deliveries per over.

As limited-overs cricket took root, bowlers realised that bowling the same delivery over and over again was a bad idea. It made them predictable and easy to line up for batsmen. Thus the slower ball came into the game as a change-up delivery for fast bowlers.

There were many versions of it. The one that comes from the back of a seamer's hand (among its earliest exponents was Steve Waugh, and among the latest, Mohit Sharma) is for me the most fascinating. I find it quite amazing how bowlers manage to bowl this one, given that the wrist gets into almost impossible positions while delivering it. Why, Beuran Hendricks, the left-arm seamer from South Africa even bowls a bouncer like that. Unbelievable.

Then there are the slower deliveries that are easier to bowl, the offcutters and legcutters where the pace is taken off the ball, making it difficult for the modern batsman, who by now has mastered the art of hitting through the line. There is also the tennis-ball-bounce slow bouncer

That Andre Russell over I mentioned at the start has shown us that using variations in bowling today may not be as good an idea as it was 15 years ago.

Like how after Glenn McGrath's great success, the next generation of seam bowlers became obsessed with bowling in the "right areas" outside off stump, I find the seam bowlers of this T20 generation are too preoccupied with variations.

Because variations have become such an integral part of limited-overs cricket, the batsmen are sort of expecting them, so the most important purpose of variations, deception, is lost. I see the batsman thinking: Okay, he has bowled me two full-length balls, so here comes the variation. So he sets himself up for a short, quick ball or a slower length ball. And lo and behold it arrives and the poor bowler watches the ball get smacked into the stands.

I believe the time has come in limited-overs cricket where no variation can be regarded as a good variation in all circumstances. Variations came into the game to surprise the batsman with the unexpected, but modern batsmen have come to expect variations all the time, and have shaped their game accordingly. The surprise element that came from variations is now non-existent for the batsman.

It is for this reason that I find watching James Tredwell of England bowl a great deal of fun, for I see him often confuse T20 batsmen. After being hit for a six off a good-length ball just outside off stump, his next ball is exactly the same. The batsman looks visibly surprised by this, for he is expecting the typical spinner's reaction: the shorter, flatter, quicker ball as the follow-up delivery.

What I like about Tredwell is that he is quite different from most spinners. He has no mystery ball, and crucially, he does not do what most bowlers do in T20 - pre-empt the worst. Instead, he keeps challenging the batsman with what look like hittable deliveries; but he does not assume that because they are hittable, they will be hit.

Of course, bowling Tredwell, an offspinner, in the death overs is an idea fraught with too much risk, but the point is that for seamers to bowl six full-length balls in an over without variations can be a sound tactic today. Consider the advantages.

To begin with, you have the element of surprise back on your side. Secondly - and this is important - I believe that to have control over all four of your variations, in a pressure situation, you need to be, well, a bowling great. We in commentary often introduce a bowler by raving about the array of deliveries he can bowl, but what about control over all those deliveries? Can most bowlers land those variations in precisely the spot they want to under pressure? The answer is an overwhelming no.

T20 cricket is littered with instances of close matches when a variation has gone horribly wrong, giving batsmen dollies to hit fours and sixes off to win games.

Why not make the job easier for yourself as a bowler by just focusing on one delivery and getting that right? It is something worth contemplating for the limited-overs seam-bowling community - one that gets a raw deal in the limited-overs formats of the game. Just for a while, try "no variations" as the new variation. You might be surprised by the results.

Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar is a cricket commentator and presenter on TV. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Sanjay Manjrekar

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by imamol97 on (June 24, 2014, 14:23 GMT)

Bowler's mindset's are also changed. having just 24 balls to bowl in a T20 match, bowler cannot take risk to bowl at same pace and without varying deliveries. Audience expect more hitting from batsmen and doesn't understand the fact that bowler's are having the worst time. In the end things changing faster & everyone is trying to save his sport.

Posted by imamol97 on (June 24, 2014, 14:19 GMT)

Bowler's mindset's are also changed. having just 24 balls to bowl in a T20 match, bowler cannot take risk to bowl at same pace and without varying deliveries. Audience expect more hitting from batsmen and doesn't understand the fact that bowler's are having the worst time. In the end things changing faster & everyone is trying to save his sport.

Posted by   on (June 22, 2014, 12:00 GMT)

2 SOLUTIONS HAVE ALWAYS PRODUCED <8 RPO IN DEATH OVERS

1). Fast full wide yorkers/half vollies with long on, long off, deep midwicket & 3rd man.

2). Fast short of good length on off stump with fine deep third man, midwicket & sq leg.

2nd solution has produced on avg even <6 rpo

As a bowler always set your bowling strategy based on your strength & batsman's weakness, then u got to have appropriate field for that bowling plan. If u bowl yorkers & set square field u r gonna go for 15+ no matter how perfect yorkers u bowl & batsman is a mug..Similarly if u bowl perfect short of good length fast rising deliveries to a batsman who has no back foot play without a deep fine 3rd man he will score 15+ runs of edges.

Most batsman don't have an attacking short of good length ball. All they can do is edge the ball or take single. So bowling good length with deep third man, short mid wicket & short cover stops the boundary, single & keeps batsman honest. As spinner set point deep & 3rd man in.

Posted by   on (June 22, 2014, 11:51 GMT)

But as a spinner u got to bowl 2 doosras per over otherwise even a pathetic batsman will trace trajectory of your ball in his mind & will start treating u like a slow bowler.

Posted by   on (June 22, 2014, 11:39 GMT)

@Monty Ross Malinga's yorkers have failed but only against Kohli..........

There is a very small league of super talented batsmen (Sehwag Sachin Devilliers Jayasuria Maxwell Hayden Gayle Kohli ) THE OUTLI?ER against whom these strategies fail bcz for them all balls no matter how good or how bad they are, are equally hitable. Only these batsmen are prone to variations.

But as a captain & as a bowler you should plan for major lot not for these outliers. These super talented ones themselves make some mistake & get out.

Posted by   on (June 22, 2014, 10:33 GMT)

2 SOLUTIONS HAVE ALWAYS PRODUCED <8+ RPO IN DEATH OVERS

1). Fast full wide yorkers/half vollies with straight long on long off & straightish midwicket.

2). Fast short of good length on off stump with fine deep third man, midwicket & sq leg.

2nd solution has produced on avg even <6 rpo

As a bowler always set your bowling strategy based on your strength & batsman's weakness, then u got to have appropriate field for that bowling plan.

If u bowl yorkers & set square field u r gonna go for 15+ no matter how perfect yorkers u bowl & batsman is a mug...Similarly if u bowl perfect short of good length fast rising deliveries to a batsman who has no back foot play without a deep fine 3rd man he will score 15+ runs of edges.

Most batsman don't have an attacking short of good length ball. All they can do is edge the ball or take single. So bowling good length with deep third man & short mid wicket & short cover stops the boundary & single. As spinner keep point deep instead & 3rd man in.

Posted by   on (June 21, 2014, 0:54 GMT)

I disagree with the article because the people named in the article are not top notch bowlers in international cricket. I agree we should stick to basics but variations can only be used if you pull them off with consistency and practice. You have to master the art. At the moment Malinga does it best, in t20 when steyn doesnt he gets wacked around for runs as well and same goes for johnson. In 90s waseem akram had the most variation one can ever come with. He use to bowl 6 different deliveries and mastered them same goes for saeed ajmal at the same time he has the answers to most of the batsmen same like in the past shane who use to play with the batsmen rather than the other party excalating. Bowlers these days are not mentally strong, aggressive and doesnt come up to take wickets. Main priority is these days only to contain and thats shouldnt be the mindset at all.

Posted by flickspin on (June 20, 2014, 13:19 GMT)

as a bowler thier is nothing better than getting a batsmen with variation

after reading about bill o rielly (bradman called the greatest bowler ever) bowlers should have variation, he bowled, leg breaks,top spinner,wrong uns and bounces at medium pace, if he were playing 20/20 he would be the best bowler and would be worth $1000000.

if a fast bowler were to develop the skills o rielly had, they would be unplayable

i have tried to emulate o rielly, but i dont think i have the control or pace he had

as off spinner i bowl the flick spin off break, tradional off break gleeson ball, doosra, top spinner, arm ball, and side spinner

as a leg spinner i bowl leg breaks, top spinners, wrong uns, flippers and a shihad afridi fast ball

i get told all the time by team mates to stop variations and put the ball on a dime, but using variations is great fun and makes bowling more enjoyable

bowling the same ball over & over is boring, variations dont work 85% of the time, 15% of the time they do

Posted by   on (June 20, 2014, 10:23 GMT)

Does anyone have any sort of statistics backing up the assertions one way or the other that variations are bad? At the moment, what we have here is a collection of anecdotes - which does not make data.

Posted by teju666 on (June 20, 2014, 9:49 GMT)

Very good observation and I like Sanjay's analysis as always. I dont think Steyn or Johnson fiddle with this variation. They do what bowlers do best - fast, hostile bowling, short pitched stuff for good measure and then that occasional slower ball or yorker. Predictable but unplayable. So when Sanjay talks about control, he is right. Deception is an art and you need to be skillful when doing so. So best be skilled at a few variations and master your core strengths

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sanjay ManjrekarClose

    "As you get older, you come to appreciate the tough times"

Jimmy Adams talks about the West Indian love for fast bowling, batting with Lara, and living a dream for nine years

    Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Numbers Game: Only 15 times has a player achieved 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Bhuvneshwar could be the 16th

    Time to pension off the seniors?

Rob Smyth: If England are going to win nothing, history suggests it might be worth their while to win nothing with kids

'Smith's record in India is an aberration'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Graeme Smith's terrific record in different conditions

Do India stick with the same team?

V Ramnarayan: Binny did well at Trent Bridge, but surely he must make way for Ashwin now?

News | Features Last 7 days

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

News | Features Last 7 days