Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

England's selection errors could lead to series defeat

Their decision to persist with Alastair Cook as captain, and to pick batsmen who can only score runs against weak attacks, will hurt them

Ian Chappell

July 27, 2014

Comments: 31 | Text size: A | A

England are being led by an impotent captain who is struggling for form © PA Photos

Selection and tactics are critical to winning Test matches and series. So far neither side in the England-India series has come close to getting their selections right, but India have at least displayed some tactical nous to go one up over England. If India alleviate the selection blunders and their fast bowlers stay fit, they have every chance of completing a rare overseas series win against an England side bordering on disarray.

Choosing an international team is about selecting the right type of players and finding the best combination. From the outset India spoke of playing five bowlers, but that's not what they chose. For the first two Tests they played three seamers, a steady slow bowler, and a bits-and-pieces cricketer.

India either need to revert to four frontline bowlers and strengthen the batting, or choose a genuine fifth bowler in R Ashwin, a far superior bowler to Stuart Binny, and one who will also provide some lower-order runs with his skill and temperament.

Apart from the fact that few of the England batsmen are in form, they only have Ian Bell who can take control of an opposing attack. Currently England's batting is unbalanced with too many grafters, and, in addition, MS Dhoni has cleverly implanted the peril of the short-pitched delivery in the minds of batsmen who are uncertain against it. If India don't overdo that tactic it could continue to prove fruitful.

England's selection mistakes are many but they revolve around the misguided assumption that Alastair Cook is the man to lead them in a "brave new world". It should have been obvious following the Ashes disaster that Cook is not the leader to pit against the aggressive Australian Michael Clarke. While England aren't tackling Australia in this series, they will be next season, and part of smart selecting is planning ahead as well as choosing for the present.

England are now stuck with Cook, because the hierarchy has unwisely invested too much in "their man" and they have few alternatives. Consequently, the team continues to falter when they get into a strong position. While Cook maintains that "a captain is only as good as his team", the job of a leader is to make his side better and that's not happening with England.

Cook runs out of ideas very quickly and this shows up alarmingly when the opposition starts to take control. Also, his lack of influence over the bowlers is palpable, as they appear to go on a bouncer spree at the first hint of frustration and Cook is then unable to stop the situation spiralling out of control. Contrast that with Dhoni, who successfully cajoled his experienced fast bowler Ishant Sharma into bombarding the England lower order with short-pitched deliveries.

Opponents are now aware of Cook's inadequacies and are quick to take advantage. If an England team that is in denial could spare a moment of brutal honesty, they would probably admit they too are aware of Cook's fatal flaw. His ineffective leadership is having a debilitating effect on the team and the hierarchy will be doing him a favour if they relieve him of the burden of captaincy. It has now reached the stage where the captaincy is weighing heavily on Cook's mind when he's batting, so not only are England led by an impotent captain, they also have one who is in poor form.

The England selectors are also guilty of picking batsmen who might experience success against lesser sides but will struggle against the stronger attacks. Sam Robson looks very limited; Gary Ballance is a fighter with the right spirit but he's too restricted in his strokeplay to bat at three against a strong attack; and it's hard to believe Moeen Ali has made it to the highest level with a glaring weakness against the short-pitched ball. His habit of taking his eye off the short ball will lead to further trouble against pacier attacks.

India won against the odds at Lord's after losing the toss. They now have the winning of the series in their own hands if they pick the right combination and continue to play smart cricket.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator for Channel 9, and a columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by cricketsubh on (July 30, 2014, 8:32 GMT)

both team got selections errors ind playing with 3 bowlers eng also played with 3 bowlers

Posted by   on (July 29, 2014, 8:46 GMT)

Ian is absolutely right.India should have played Gambhir and Ashwin instead of Dhawan and Binny respectively. The team should be: 1.MURALI 2.GAUTAM 3.CHET 4.VIRAT 5.ROHIT 6.MSD 7.ASHWIN 8.JADEJA 9.BHUVI 10.PANKAJ 11.VARUN-BECAUSE ISHANT IS INJURED ................................................. We need Pankaj and Varun to bowl short pitched deliveries at the English a la Ishant.They have the pace to do so.Shami on form is good but right now he's struggling.

Posted by indianzen on (July 28, 2014, 18:54 GMT)

It would have been a 5-0 whitewash of England had India had Zaheer in the team... England are surviving because of the in experienced Indian bowling period.

Posted by CricketChat on (July 28, 2014, 13:23 GMT)

With several of the top order Eng batsmen short on confidence after multiple failures and rest of batsmen scoring rather too slowly, Eng is not generating any momentum to put pressure on Ind batsmen. Jimmy and Broad are also guilty of not making Ind tail enders play most of the ball early in their innings allowing them to settle easily.

Posted by   on (July 28, 2014, 10:40 GMT)

What England need is someone to really take the attack to the Indians and play an innings which can lift the entire team, Cook's 95 was a knock of grt resilience yesterday and Ballance is making the most of his chances, though i feel Joe Root is a waste at number5 where he has to rescue the team, instead he should bat at 3 or 4 since he is an innings building player. They need a good genuine spinner to strengthen their attack.

Posted by   on (July 28, 2014, 9:33 GMT)

Clark is a better captain than Cook and Dhoni merely for the reason that he will try anything if his original plans don't work, and you can see thought behind those changes.

Posted by harekare on (July 28, 2014, 9:18 GMT)

One fluke loss ...and he is talking about losing the series. It is going to be 3-1 or 2-1 for England. No way India can win with oneman bowling.

Posted by rising_phoenix on (July 28, 2014, 1:05 GMT)

I don't get why people keep calling for Ashwin's inclusion. May be because they haven't seen him for a while and confuse his T20 bowling with Test match bowling. Agreed Jadeja's line of attack on the first day didn't make much sense, but Ashwin would have been utterly useless. However, I do agree India needs 5 bowlers. With the tail batting like that, if India is still scared of getting out for a low total, then it'll happen anyway, with or without Rohit Sharma.....

Posted by Aussasinator on (July 27, 2014, 16:48 GMT)

The indian bowling will nurse Cook back to big scoring not to worry. If the bowling doesnt do it then the fielding will. Remember how a finished Ponting got a new lease of life after playing the indian bowling down under.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (July 27, 2014, 16:36 GMT)

Number three may not be his natural position, but have a look at Ballance's scoring waggon wheel from this latest innings and tell us again he's "restricted in his strokeplay". Runs virtually equal around the ground, and yet another ton and beyond as I write. What a player.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

'Chanderpaul was always out to prove himself'

Modern Masters: Playing in a weak team, his single-minded focus is to be the best he can be

    The Bangladesh album

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at the side's international highlights: from shocking Pakistan in 1999 to whitewashing New Zealand

South Africa's domestic spinners eye their chance

Firdose Moonda: Ahead of the first-class season, we look at the players the selectors will be watching closely

    Catch dodgy actions early

Ian Chappell: Kids mimic the cricket heroes of the day, so the problem of throwing must be tackled below the first-class level

Four Pakistan women to watch in the Asian Games

Ahmer Naqvi: A look at two bowlers and two batsmen who could be crucial to their campaign in Incheon

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

Automaton, man, inspiration

Twenty years on, Shivnarine Chanderpaul continues to be understated, underestimated. And that doesn't bother him. What's not to like?

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

85 Tests, 70 defeats

Of the 85 Tests that Bangladesh have played so far, they've lost 70 and won just four. Those stats are easily the worst among all teams when they'd played as many Tests

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

News | Features Last 7 days