New Zealand news June 20, 2012

Gillespie misses out on New Zealand contract

  shares 18

The fast bowler Mark Gillespie has missed out on a national contract despite being New Zealand's leading wicket taker in their most recent Test series. New Zealand have named their 20 contracted players for 2012-13 and five new names have appeared on the list for the first time - Dean Brownlie, Doug Bracewell, Andrew Ellis, Tarun Nethula and Kruger van Wyk - while James Franklin has regained his deal after being cut last year.

But the inclusions meant there was no room for Gillespie, 32, who made his return to international cricket in March having not played for New Zealand in more than three years. He proved the value of his recall by collecting 11 wickets in the Test series against South Africa, despite playing only two of the three Tests, and only South Africa's Vernon Philander had a more productive series.

New Zealand Cricket uses a set criteria to rank its players across all three forms of the game, with Test cricket given twice the weighting of ODIs and Twenty20 internationals. But that wasn't enough to put Gillespie, who is currently battling an ankle injury, in the top 20.

Kim Littlejohn, the national selection manager, said the contracted players were those likely to add the greatest value to the national side over the next year. Littlejohn and the NZC director of cricket John Buchanan were the men in charge of awarding contracts this year, with the outgoing coach John Wright not taking part in the process.

As reported last month, Jesse Ryder did not have his contract renewed, and the other men who lost their existing deals were Hamish Bennett, who missed all of last season due to back surgery, Neil Broom, Andy McKay, Luke Woodcock and Reece Young. Michael Bates, Ronnie Hira, Graeme Aldridge, Brent Arnel, Colin de Grandhomme, Jeetan Patel and Tom Latham all played for New Zealand during the past year but did not win a contract.

"We have five new contracted players and their addition reflects the strong performances they have put in over the past 12 months and the value they are expected to bring to the Black Caps this coming year," Littlejohn said. "It's an exciting time for the Black Caps with a number of important series in the 2012-13 season including the ICC World Twenty20 tournament.

"We believe the contracted players will be integral to the success of the team in what will be a demanding period against highly ranked opposition. There were some difficult decisions and it's disappointing for the players who did not have their contracts renewed. We are confident they will continue to work hard and look to force their way into the team through performance."

The players who missed out on national deals will now have to wait for major association contracts, which will be announced on July 22.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • ForgeNZ on June 23, 2012, 5:38 GMT

    Rob Nicol is looking increasingly like a one innings wonder

  • on June 21, 2012, 7:42 GMT

    Oram is past his used by date and cannot hold a bat to save himself over the last year. Unfortunately NZ still has to put up with his poor chat on The Cricket Show. Ellis offers nothing to NZ cricket in the long term and likely at best will result as a C Grade Scott Styris contributor. Gillspie at least takes wickets, despite being expensive, unlike Ellis who offers 120kph nothings. Harry Boam will be in the squad within the next two years, heard it here first.

  • on June 21, 2012, 6:52 GMT

    Give Wagner a year before you give him a contract, he hasn't even played a game yet. Boult has earned his place in my eyes, he was a vital part of securing the first innings lead against Aus when we won, and only really had one bad innings, which was against SA. Plus, he's scored a lot of bonus runs. And I can see why Oram is still there, he is worth a lot with his bowling and can groom Ellis and Latham for the allrounder spots for the 2015 world cup.

  • anver777 on June 21, 2012, 5:03 GMT

    After an excellent comeback, he should be awarded this contract...... at least for a year !!!

  • on June 21, 2012, 4:02 GMT

    Strange no Jesse Ryder..

  • on June 20, 2012, 21:50 GMT

    Scanning the results of Rob Nicol's last ten performances screams, 'give that man a contract'. Fairy godmothers are real? who knew.

  • on June 20, 2012, 19:44 GMT

    YES! James Franklin gets a contract!

  • wiseshah on June 20, 2012, 13:59 GMT

    tarun nethula and andrew ellis is surprising. gillespie and ryder should get contract

  • Tillso on June 20, 2012, 8:58 GMT

    Sounds about right for a Buchanan team, rely on numbers and not performances. Shameful when someone deserves a contract after coming back from 2 years of injury troubles to perform as well as he did agians one of eth best batting line ups in the world. Unfortunately numbers don't show the amount of effort Mark Gillespie has put in to get back to the top! Very Poor NZ Cricket!

  • on June 20, 2012, 8:12 GMT

    very unlucky for mark gillespie, what more can he do than take back to back 6 for's against south africa , very harsh.

  • ForgeNZ on June 23, 2012, 5:38 GMT

    Rob Nicol is looking increasingly like a one innings wonder

  • on June 21, 2012, 7:42 GMT

    Oram is past his used by date and cannot hold a bat to save himself over the last year. Unfortunately NZ still has to put up with his poor chat on The Cricket Show. Ellis offers nothing to NZ cricket in the long term and likely at best will result as a C Grade Scott Styris contributor. Gillspie at least takes wickets, despite being expensive, unlike Ellis who offers 120kph nothings. Harry Boam will be in the squad within the next two years, heard it here first.

  • on June 21, 2012, 6:52 GMT

    Give Wagner a year before you give him a contract, he hasn't even played a game yet. Boult has earned his place in my eyes, he was a vital part of securing the first innings lead against Aus when we won, and only really had one bad innings, which was against SA. Plus, he's scored a lot of bonus runs. And I can see why Oram is still there, he is worth a lot with his bowling and can groom Ellis and Latham for the allrounder spots for the 2015 world cup.

  • anver777 on June 21, 2012, 5:03 GMT

    After an excellent comeback, he should be awarded this contract...... at least for a year !!!

  • on June 21, 2012, 4:02 GMT

    Strange no Jesse Ryder..

  • on June 20, 2012, 21:50 GMT

    Scanning the results of Rob Nicol's last ten performances screams, 'give that man a contract'. Fairy godmothers are real? who knew.

  • on June 20, 2012, 19:44 GMT

    YES! James Franklin gets a contract!

  • wiseshah on June 20, 2012, 13:59 GMT

    tarun nethula and andrew ellis is surprising. gillespie and ryder should get contract

  • Tillso on June 20, 2012, 8:58 GMT

    Sounds about right for a Buchanan team, rely on numbers and not performances. Shameful when someone deserves a contract after coming back from 2 years of injury troubles to perform as well as he did agians one of eth best batting line ups in the world. Unfortunately numbers don't show the amount of effort Mark Gillespie has put in to get back to the top! Very Poor NZ Cricket!

  • on June 20, 2012, 8:12 GMT

    very unlucky for mark gillespie, what more can he do than take back to back 6 for's against south africa , very harsh.

  • yetigoat on June 20, 2012, 6:58 GMT

    Andrew Ellis? really? No way he should get a contract over Gillespie

  • GCKelly on June 20, 2012, 6:48 GMT

    Gillespie is injury prone, maybe that has something to do with the decision? In fact, I think he has an ankle injury at the moment. The T20 world cup this year would have helped Oram score a contract as he's a limited overs specialist. If test cricket does have a higher weighting in terms of contract selections, does this mean James Franklin could be hopeful of filling the problematic all-rounder spot?

  • kiwicricketnut on June 20, 2012, 5:40 GMT

    good balance to the squad with 3 different types of spinner good variety in the quicks although i'd love to see an express bowler invested in, other than Jesse Ryder i think the best batters in the country are there too only thing is i dont think they need to contract 3 different keepers, good to see Franklin back, he should open in 20/20 and odi's especially now theres no Ryder

  • ForgeNZ on June 20, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    Niel Wagner is the second leading wicket taker in the natioanal comp. He was supposed to be the rising start of bowlimg. Instead Trent Boult gets in , he has done nothing to earn his place. I have no idea who J.Oram is , maybe he played ODI's for NZ when his body finally gets healed.

  • maddy20 on June 20, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    It was probably a tough call but I think its the right one. When you are a fast bowler and 30+ the injuries only become more frequent. Its like cricket becomes a past-time/part-time game in the space that the injuries allow for. A few more years earlier I am sure he would have been the first fast bowler to be handed a contract.

  • on June 20, 2012, 4:01 GMT

    How did Oram, who played one or two ODIs meet the criteria when our leading test wicket taker didn't, given tests have twice the weighting of ODIs..?

  • lesshero on June 20, 2012, 3:52 GMT

    I agree with Morgsy, this is ridiculous how can oram a nd nathan mccullum who are 20/20 and occasional odi players only get one ahead of gillespie, gillespie better still be picked for the windies tour

  • Morgsy on June 20, 2012, 2:00 GMT

    Personally I would've thought Gillespie - as a test wicket taker - would've been more deserving than Oram, who only gets wheeled out for a few ODIs each yr when his body can handle it...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Morgsy on June 20, 2012, 2:00 GMT

    Personally I would've thought Gillespie - as a test wicket taker - would've been more deserving than Oram, who only gets wheeled out for a few ODIs each yr when his body can handle it...

  • lesshero on June 20, 2012, 3:52 GMT

    I agree with Morgsy, this is ridiculous how can oram a nd nathan mccullum who are 20/20 and occasional odi players only get one ahead of gillespie, gillespie better still be picked for the windies tour

  • on June 20, 2012, 4:01 GMT

    How did Oram, who played one or two ODIs meet the criteria when our leading test wicket taker didn't, given tests have twice the weighting of ODIs..?

  • maddy20 on June 20, 2012, 4:13 GMT

    It was probably a tough call but I think its the right one. When you are a fast bowler and 30+ the injuries only become more frequent. Its like cricket becomes a past-time/part-time game in the space that the injuries allow for. A few more years earlier I am sure he would have been the first fast bowler to be handed a contract.

  • ForgeNZ on June 20, 2012, 5:37 GMT

    Niel Wagner is the second leading wicket taker in the natioanal comp. He was supposed to be the rising start of bowlimg. Instead Trent Boult gets in , he has done nothing to earn his place. I have no idea who J.Oram is , maybe he played ODI's for NZ when his body finally gets healed.

  • kiwicricketnut on June 20, 2012, 5:40 GMT

    good balance to the squad with 3 different types of spinner good variety in the quicks although i'd love to see an express bowler invested in, other than Jesse Ryder i think the best batters in the country are there too only thing is i dont think they need to contract 3 different keepers, good to see Franklin back, he should open in 20/20 and odi's especially now theres no Ryder

  • GCKelly on June 20, 2012, 6:48 GMT

    Gillespie is injury prone, maybe that has something to do with the decision? In fact, I think he has an ankle injury at the moment. The T20 world cup this year would have helped Oram score a contract as he's a limited overs specialist. If test cricket does have a higher weighting in terms of contract selections, does this mean James Franklin could be hopeful of filling the problematic all-rounder spot?

  • yetigoat on June 20, 2012, 6:58 GMT

    Andrew Ellis? really? No way he should get a contract over Gillespie

  • on June 20, 2012, 8:12 GMT

    very unlucky for mark gillespie, what more can he do than take back to back 6 for's against south africa , very harsh.

  • Tillso on June 20, 2012, 8:58 GMT

    Sounds about right for a Buchanan team, rely on numbers and not performances. Shameful when someone deserves a contract after coming back from 2 years of injury troubles to perform as well as he did agians one of eth best batting line ups in the world. Unfortunately numbers don't show the amount of effort Mark Gillespie has put in to get back to the top! Very Poor NZ Cricket!