South Africa v Australia, 1st Test, Cape Town, 2nd day

Marsh in doubt for second Test

Brydon Coverdale at Newlands

November 10, 2011

Comments: 27 | Text size: A | A

Shaun Marsh takes a break after being struck by the ball, South Africa v Australia, 1st Test, Cape Town, 1st day, November 9, 2011
Following his first-innings' knock of 44, Shaun Marsh failed to take the field due to back stiffness © AFP
Related Links
Players/Officials: Shaun Marsh
Series/Tournaments: Australia tour of South Africa
Teams: Australia

Michael Clarke has conceded that Shaun Marsh is in doubt for the second Test in Johannesburg after he struggled with a stiff back on the first two days in Cape Town. Marsh did not field on the second day and batted at No.10, clearly hampered as he walked to the crease and faced his only two deliveries, including a delivery that kept low and trapped him lbw.

The problem arose on Wednesday during the latter stages of Marsh's first-innings 44, and the issue worsened on Thursday. The Wanderers Test starts in a week and Clarke, as a man who has suffered serious back problems himself over the years, said the most important thing was to ensure Marsh was not forced to play if he was not quite right.

"I'm a little nervous, no doubt," Clarke said after play on Thursday. "I know the feeling when you do your back, it's always a couple of days of mending time and treatment to try and get it right. I'm confident if he does get it right in this period before the second Test then he'll be fine to play.

"But I need to trust the judgment of Alex Kountouris, our physio, who has had a lot of experience on backs, unfortunately. Shaun knows his body pretty well. He's a big player for us, he's in all three forms of the game. He's a wonderful guy with a lot of talent, so I want to make sure we make the right decision."

Should Marsh be unavailable for the Johannesburg Test, it would mean a call-up for Usman Khawaja, the back-up batsman in the squad. While Khawaja is a fine prospect, Marsh has been one of the shining lights for Australia during their past three Tests.

He scored a century on debut in Pallekele in September and made 81 in his second Test, before starting his South African trip with a pair of half-centuries in the tour match in Potchefstroom last week. In the first innings in Cape Town, he was the only one of Australia's specialist batsmen who showed the centurion Clarke any support.

Marsh has had ongoing back issues throughout his career. He was ruled out of the third ODI against Sri Lanka last November and the Australia A game against England that followed due to back trouble, and a similar problem also ruled him out of the tour of New Zealand early last year.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Meety on (November 13, 2011, 1:11 GMT)

Marsh is an injury concern - he must be replaced by Khawaja.

Posted by s.sreekant on (November 12, 2011, 7:30 GMT)

its no use having this guy in the team if he gets injured so regularly as it will disturb the team structure and balance if we keep changing the team for every test in a series

Posted by crickprof on (November 11, 2011, 20:31 GMT)

Usman Khawja is much better player than marsh, usman khawja scored 37 against England when whole Australian batting got failed, if the CA has made debuet of Marsh against England he would never had scored a century, to score a century against SL is much much easier than to score runs against England...........

Posted by bindu on (November 11, 2011, 10:31 GMT)

the fitness levels also speak about the character of a person.......... Sachin playing since last 22 yrs and still going on speaks he is not bad cricketer when compared to the current lot of players..... 3 tests and a guy is down with injury and he is the one for a permanent role at no.3 position....... crazyyyyy

Posted by satish619chandar on (November 11, 2011, 6:56 GMT)

Marsh and Hussey were the only ones in form from SL tour consistently.. Good thing for Aussies is they got Khawaja as readymade replacement for that slot.. Bad thing is, he is the only reserve batter available!! They have 2 weaklinks in batting now.. Hughes n Punter(Sorry to say).. They would wish atleast one of them to come good next match..

Posted by RandyOZ on (November 11, 2011, 6:02 GMT)

@Vic Nicholas, well said, add to the fact we were against the best attack in the world and they were against one of the worst. If Brad haddin doesn't not get dropped ASAP I will not be watching this summer. How are Hilditch selections still being implemented?

Posted by landl47 on (November 11, 2011, 5:39 GMT)

The problem is for Aus that Marsh was one of the few batsmen in form. Watson has 94 in 7 innings in the SL/SA tests, SA have got Hughes worked out just as England did and Ponting is a walking wicket- 12 innings since his last test 50. Haddin is looking dreadful, Johnson is hit and miss (mostly miss) and the tail is the tail. Marsh, Clarke and Hussey have been the guys making runs and when they fail, Aus is up against it. The reserves are Khawaja, with 3 tests and a highest score of 37, and Warner, who hasn't played a test and only 10 first-class games. I see the call-ups being suggested are Katich, age 36, and Jaques, age 32 and out of the test side for 3 years. Aus really has a lack of depth and it's showing. @Vic Nicholas: You're right, but since that collapse almost 3 years ago England hasn't lost a series and their record is W18, D9, L4. This is the third time in just over a year Aus has been bowled out for under 100, so their problem goes much deeper than England's.

Posted by featurewriter on (November 11, 2011, 5:28 GMT)

I think Warner has proven that he is an incredible talent. I think it would be dangerous for Australian cricket to leave him sitting on the sidelines while he's in game-changing form. I think our current lineup should look like this: Warner, Marsh, Clarke, Hussey, Watson, Butterworth, Paine, Johnson, Harris, Cummins, Hauritz. Warner gives us a hint of Hayden and Sehwag; Marsh provides the gritty Langer-like balance; Clarke deserves to be batting at first-drop; Hussey is a great middle-order anchor; Watson needs more freedom in his batting, and his bowling is brilliant at the moment; Butterworth is a more than capable lower order bat and an outstanding seamer; Paine is a better gloveman and a better bat than Haddin at the moment (though his mate Wade is lurking in the shadows); I'd have Johnson in my starting 11 every time; Harris is an Andy Bichel-type loyal grunt who gets results; Cummins is a terror on the turf; and Hauritz is the best off-spinner at Test level in this country.

Posted by sudhar.n87 on (November 11, 2011, 3:38 GMT)

Besides Clarke, Marsh was the only top order batsman to show some sort of application to the innings. Hope he gets fit on time for the second test. Get well soon Marsh.

Posted by Skott on (November 11, 2011, 3:30 GMT)

jaques was in before Katich but got injured and spent about a year trying to get back to his best. Too late ofr him now. And Rogers. We have to stick with Hughes for a while at least-- give himn a chance to find his feet.

And @cindian. You want to dump Clarke as captain? He's doing a good job so far. Who else would you suggest? Hussey? And then who gets the job in a year when Hussey finally retires?

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
Tour Results
South Africa v Australia at Johannesburg - Nov 17-21, 2011
Australia won by 2 wickets
South Africa v Australia at Cape Town - Nov 9-11, 2011
South Africa won by 8 wickets
Sth Africa A v Australians at Potchefstroom - Nov 1-3, 2011
Australians won by 7 wickets
South Africa v Australia at Durban - Oct 28, 2011
Australia won by 3 wickets (with 15 balls remaining)
South Africa v Australia at Port Elizabeth - Oct 23, 2011
South Africa won by 80 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days