SA v India, 1st Test, Johannesburg, 5th day December 22, 2013

Closest draws and India spinners drawing a blank

Stats highlights from one of the greatest draws, between South Africa and India at the Wanderers
20

  • This was the third-closest draw in Tests in terms of runs remaining. There have been two instances of teams drawing a Test with just one run remaining, which are the closest of draws in Tests. England drew against Zimbabwe with one remaining in Bulawayo in 1996 and India against West Indies in Mumbai in 2011. India have been involved in four of the seven single-digit margin of draws in Test history. Click here for a list of the closest draws in Tests in terms of runs remaining.

  • The 136 overs that South Africa played in their fourth innings was the seventh-highest ever played in the fourth innings of a Test in South Africa and the highest South Africa have played at home since the 144 overs against New Zealand in Port Elizabeth in 1962. This was also the fourth-highest number of overs South Africa have played in the fourth innings to draw a Test.

  • The 205-run partnership beween AB de Villiers and Faf du Plessis was the highest ever for the fifth-wicket and the only double-century stand for that wicket to come in the fourth innings of a Test, beating the 177-run partnership between New Zealand's Bev Congdon and Vic Pollard against England at Trent Bridge in 1973.

  • This partnership was South Africa's highest partnership in the fourth innings of a Test, beating the 195 runs that Hashim Amla and Graeme Smith added for the second wicket against Australia in Cape Town in 2011. This was also the second-highest fourth-innings partnership and only the second double-century partnership in the fourth innings of a Test in South Africa. At the Wanderers, this partnership is now the highest, beating beating the 165 runs that Michael Hussey and Damien Martyn added in 2006. India have been on the receiving end on three of the seven fourth-innings century partnerships at the Wanderers.

  • Du Plessis' and de Villiers' hundreds were the fourth and fifth at the Wanderers in the fourth innings of a Test. Of these five, two have come against the hosts and three against India. Daryll Cullinan made an unbeaten 122 against India in 1997 helping South Africa escape with a draw on that occasion. This was Du Plessis' third hundred in ten Tests and de Villiers' 18th from 88 Tests.

  • The wicket of Jacques Kallis was Zaheer Khan's 300th in Tests. He's only the second India fast bowler after Kapil Dev to take 300 or more wickets. Only two other India bowlers, Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh, have taken 300-plus wickets in Tests. Among left-arm fast bowlers only Wasim Akram and Chaminda Vaas have reached this mark before Zaheer Khan in Tests. Zaheer Khan, contrary to the norm among Asian bowlers, has done better playing outside the subcontinent. In 35 matches outside the subcontinent, Zaheer has taken 136 wickets at 29.72, while his remaining 164 wickets have come playing in the subcontinent at 32.31.

  • South Africa hit the second-highest fourth-innings total ever in this innings to draw a Test. Their total of 450 for 7 in this innings was the third-highest fourth-innings total in Tests. This was also the second-highest fourth-innings total in South Africa and the highest in over 70 years. England's 654 for 5 against the hosts in Durban in 1939 is the highest fourth-innings total in South Africa. England drew that Test, falling short of the target by 41 runs. This is also the highest fourth-innings score at the Wanderers, beating England's 351 for 5 against the hosts in 1995.

  • India maintained their record of being the only visiting team to not lose a Test to the hosts at the Wanderers. In terms of wins though, Australia are the most successful team at this venue, having won six of the 11 Tests they have played against the hosts at this venue. The Wanderers is now one of the four overseas venues where India haven't lost a Test from four or more that they have played.

  • Du Plessis and De Villiers' stand was the 15th fourth-innings double-century partnership in Tests. The last time a pair added 200 or more in the fourth innings of a Test was in 1999 when Justin Langer and Adam Gilchrist made 238 for the sixth wicket against Pakistan in Hobart.

  • Including this innings, there are only three instances of two South Africa batsmen hitting centuries in the fourth innings of a Test. The last such instance came against Australia in Cape Town when Graeme Smith and Hashim Amla hit centuries while chasing down a target of 236. South Africa had won in the previous two instances.

  • R Ashwin bowled 42 overs in this Test without taking a wicket and Murali Vijay bowled an over of spin too. This is only the eighth instance of India spinners remaining wicketless in a Test. The previous such instance came against Australia in Sydney when Ashwin and Virender Sehwag bowled 67 overs of spin between them without taking a wicket. All these instances have come in away Tests.

Shiva Jayaraman is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo.com

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • bowledout67 on December 23, 2013, 18:36 GMT

    i think the difference between a South African win and what happened was not due to the elegance of Virat Kohli nor the calm of Chiteshwar Pujara but to the flamboyance of the new and improved Zak. His 2 sixes at the end of the innings was the barrierl in the final analysis. good on you ZaK.

  • drnaveed on December 23, 2013, 11:00 GMT

    well played both sides, it was such an absorbing test match. most of us , also had an eye on the number of overs , that were left in the game , so , who says " TEST MATCHES ARE BORING " SA , should have pushed a bit more harder and should have gone for the win.they put the curtains down just at the last moment, "SO NEAR YET SO FAR" , Indians on the other hand applied their full strength ,to get opposition's last 3 wickets. they should have gone with 4 seamers. best of luck to both the teams for the next test.

  • on December 23, 2013, 10:53 GMT

    I think another important stat is about how ineffective Steyn was. He had 1-165 in the game which must surely be one of his worst performances, at least worst figures in Home-Tests?

  • on December 23, 2013, 10:29 GMT

    do not mind this pitch is so easy to bat on after 2 days even bowler like styen did not do anything .even our bowler bowled a very good line and length.the sa batsmen were a little bit lucky in 5th day pitch.

  • on December 23, 2013, 7:55 GMT

    Can someone explain why India used a spinner when the ball was still hard (and the light was still good).

  • Udendra on December 23, 2013, 6:58 GMT

    Indians are so used to ODI cricket that they forgot there is a fourth innings.

  • Rupix on December 23, 2013, 6:36 GMT

    Shiva - are you trying to put Steven out of a job? You're answering questions he's usually asked in Ask Steven :-P

  • Yousafahmed11 on December 23, 2013, 5:44 GMT

    No wonder why my fellow SL fans interested in this mouth watering tests rather than one sided SL-Pak ODIs.

  • Fast_Track_Bully on December 23, 2013, 5:12 GMT

    India need to include a leg spinner to the team than Ashwin. Umesh Yadav as the 4th fast bowler was a good option but there is no other player in the team who can do some spin bowling if required. All fast bowlers means penalty for captain for slow over rate. So we need a spinner.

  • Philippe on December 23, 2013, 4:01 GMT

    I feel at the end of the test match both teams played equally well.. May b overall performance of Indians r better than SAFs. Kohli's & Philander's first innings score did make difference in the match.. Otherwise it could hv been a finish not a draw. Good luck for second test both teams.. Let the true cricket TEST cricket prevail.

  • bowledout67 on December 23, 2013, 18:36 GMT

    i think the difference between a South African win and what happened was not due to the elegance of Virat Kohli nor the calm of Chiteshwar Pujara but to the flamboyance of the new and improved Zak. His 2 sixes at the end of the innings was the barrierl in the final analysis. good on you ZaK.

  • drnaveed on December 23, 2013, 11:00 GMT

    well played both sides, it was such an absorbing test match. most of us , also had an eye on the number of overs , that were left in the game , so , who says " TEST MATCHES ARE BORING " SA , should have pushed a bit more harder and should have gone for the win.they put the curtains down just at the last moment, "SO NEAR YET SO FAR" , Indians on the other hand applied their full strength ,to get opposition's last 3 wickets. they should have gone with 4 seamers. best of luck to both the teams for the next test.

  • on December 23, 2013, 10:53 GMT

    I think another important stat is about how ineffective Steyn was. He had 1-165 in the game which must surely be one of his worst performances, at least worst figures in Home-Tests?

  • on December 23, 2013, 10:29 GMT

    do not mind this pitch is so easy to bat on after 2 days even bowler like styen did not do anything .even our bowler bowled a very good line and length.the sa batsmen were a little bit lucky in 5th day pitch.

  • on December 23, 2013, 7:55 GMT

    Can someone explain why India used a spinner when the ball was still hard (and the light was still good).

  • Udendra on December 23, 2013, 6:58 GMT

    Indians are so used to ODI cricket that they forgot there is a fourth innings.

  • Rupix on December 23, 2013, 6:36 GMT

    Shiva - are you trying to put Steven out of a job? You're answering questions he's usually asked in Ask Steven :-P

  • Yousafahmed11 on December 23, 2013, 5:44 GMT

    No wonder why my fellow SL fans interested in this mouth watering tests rather than one sided SL-Pak ODIs.

  • Fast_Track_Bully on December 23, 2013, 5:12 GMT

    India need to include a leg spinner to the team than Ashwin. Umesh Yadav as the 4th fast bowler was a good option but there is no other player in the team who can do some spin bowling if required. All fast bowlers means penalty for captain for slow over rate. So we need a spinner.

  • Philippe on December 23, 2013, 4:01 GMT

    I feel at the end of the test match both teams played equally well.. May b overall performance of Indians r better than SAFs. Kohli's & Philander's first innings score did make difference in the match.. Otherwise it could hv been a finish not a draw. Good luck for second test both teams.. Let the true cricket TEST cricket prevail.

  • Rupix on December 23, 2013, 3:38 GMT

    Shiva - are you trying to put Steven out of a job? You're answering questions he's usually asked in Ask Steven :-P

  • Gr8Mindzzzz on December 23, 2013, 3:09 GMT

    @GSINGH7: The pitch never offered anything for spin. Look at Tahir too. He got just 2 wickets of the tail enders. They were 'give it off' wickets. This was a perfect bouncy pitch and even the bounce reduced after 2.5 days.

  • on December 23, 2013, 1:59 GMT

    Ashwin cannot be axed from the team predominantly due to his batting skills away from the subcontinent.. Only one of Rohit Sharma or Ajinkya Rahane should play while Ashwin plays no.7.. I would play Rahane ahead of Sharma due to his performance in this test and Rohit seems so loose with his technique required of a test batsman.. Playing five bowlers would have probably got India this win ultimately.. But Dhoni does not want to change this tried and tested combination.. Ashwin cannot go wicketless for an entire test match again if he wants to play for India..

  • guneshm on December 23, 2013, 0:41 GMT

    One very interesting stat missed out .. Dale hitting six of the last ball. Did any one did in a drawn match earlier ..?

  • on December 22, 2013, 23:48 GMT

    Great stuff. Although I thought the Proteas would take the risk and go for the win.

  • on December 22, 2013, 22:56 GMT

    Final stat says it all, and Ashwin figuring in 2 of them is bigger fact. although he reached 100 wickets but all (or most) of them were played in India. he needs to figure this out before he looses at home also.

  • parvinder7 on December 22, 2013, 21:28 GMT

    this is shameful cricket from india or do the groundsman in overseas do the bit for the home team. Forget the stats and think how a team who got bowled out for 244, survived on a wanderers pitch on the fifth day. This is not the no1 team like australia. I have seen this happen alot abroad in aus, sa and eng. Something changes in the pitch so teams from the subcontinent dont win. South africa should be shamed of their no 1 status. India you should look at your selves hard in the mirror and say we will never win abroad. Your team drops catches, your spinner is wicketless, and under ms dhoni we have not won a test. Dhoni u have not done anything to deserve this honour of test captaincy. At least dravid, ganguly gave it up. The luck u need is not with u anymore. Your team needs inspiration. We nearly lost a test by scoring 458, u should know by that, we as fans have got a miserable time ahead.

  • IndTheBest on December 22, 2013, 21:25 GMT

    We definitely need a genuine fast bowling all rounder of Kallis or Filintof's caliber to make it world beater team. Without a genuine all rounder it's never gonna be #1 (consistently). Currently Irfan Pathan and Rishi Dhawan are the only remote possibility. BCCI must invest on finding a real all rounder otherwise we will always be short in taking 20 wickets.

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on December 22, 2013, 21:03 GMT

    @gsingh7: weren't you the guy who liked to troll Pakistan supporters by telling them Ashwin was better than Ajmal. You've changed your tune now.

  • gsingh7 on December 22, 2013, 19:02 GMT

    final stat is a telling one , ashwin seems involved in wicketless tests for spinners a lot and if he is not axed from team this trend is bound to continue.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • gsingh7 on December 22, 2013, 19:02 GMT

    final stat is a telling one , ashwin seems involved in wicketless tests for spinners a lot and if he is not axed from team this trend is bound to continue.

  • AndyZaltzmannsHair on December 22, 2013, 21:03 GMT

    @gsingh7: weren't you the guy who liked to troll Pakistan supporters by telling them Ashwin was better than Ajmal. You've changed your tune now.

  • IndTheBest on December 22, 2013, 21:25 GMT

    We definitely need a genuine fast bowling all rounder of Kallis or Filintof's caliber to make it world beater team. Without a genuine all rounder it's never gonna be #1 (consistently). Currently Irfan Pathan and Rishi Dhawan are the only remote possibility. BCCI must invest on finding a real all rounder otherwise we will always be short in taking 20 wickets.

  • parvinder7 on December 22, 2013, 21:28 GMT

    this is shameful cricket from india or do the groundsman in overseas do the bit for the home team. Forget the stats and think how a team who got bowled out for 244, survived on a wanderers pitch on the fifth day. This is not the no1 team like australia. I have seen this happen alot abroad in aus, sa and eng. Something changes in the pitch so teams from the subcontinent dont win. South africa should be shamed of their no 1 status. India you should look at your selves hard in the mirror and say we will never win abroad. Your team drops catches, your spinner is wicketless, and under ms dhoni we have not won a test. Dhoni u have not done anything to deserve this honour of test captaincy. At least dravid, ganguly gave it up. The luck u need is not with u anymore. Your team needs inspiration. We nearly lost a test by scoring 458, u should know by that, we as fans have got a miserable time ahead.

  • on December 22, 2013, 22:56 GMT

    Final stat says it all, and Ashwin figuring in 2 of them is bigger fact. although he reached 100 wickets but all (or most) of them were played in India. he needs to figure this out before he looses at home also.

  • on December 22, 2013, 23:48 GMT

    Great stuff. Although I thought the Proteas would take the risk and go for the win.

  • guneshm on December 23, 2013, 0:41 GMT

    One very interesting stat missed out .. Dale hitting six of the last ball. Did any one did in a drawn match earlier ..?

  • on December 23, 2013, 1:59 GMT

    Ashwin cannot be axed from the team predominantly due to his batting skills away from the subcontinent.. Only one of Rohit Sharma or Ajinkya Rahane should play while Ashwin plays no.7.. I would play Rahane ahead of Sharma due to his performance in this test and Rohit seems so loose with his technique required of a test batsman.. Playing five bowlers would have probably got India this win ultimately.. But Dhoni does not want to change this tried and tested combination.. Ashwin cannot go wicketless for an entire test match again if he wants to play for India..

  • Gr8Mindzzzz on December 23, 2013, 3:09 GMT

    @GSINGH7: The pitch never offered anything for spin. Look at Tahir too. He got just 2 wickets of the tail enders. They were 'give it off' wickets. This was a perfect bouncy pitch and even the bounce reduced after 2.5 days.

  • Rupix on December 23, 2013, 3:38 GMT

    Shiva - are you trying to put Steven out of a job? You're answering questions he's usually asked in Ask Steven :-P