SL Board XI v Australians, Colombo August 24, 2011

Tour match headaches for tourists

24

Australia's captain Michael Clarke is certain that Phil Hughes will open the batting in the three-day tour match against a Sri Lankan Board XI at Colombo's P Sara Stadium from Thursday. Beyond that things get rather tricky.

Because the match has been bestowed first-class status, the tourists may only pick 11 players, when they have more, particularly in the bowling department, in need of match practice. Apart from Mitchell Johnson and James Pattinson who were in the ODI team, each of Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle, Trent Copeland, Nathan Lyon and Michael Beer are yet to play on tour.

Compounding the headache is that Clarke and the tour selectors Greg Chappell and Tim Nielsen are far from certain about the composition of their best XI for Galle, where the conditions are likely to assist spinners. However they are uncertain whether it would be assistance enough to have Australia play multiple specialist spinners for the first time since Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill - plus Dan Cullen in one Test - on the 2006 tour of Bangladesh.

Shaun Marsh is expected to be given first look at the No. 6 batting spot, but his rival Usman Khawaja may find himself at the top of the order if it is decided to rest Shane Watson after his limited overs exertions.

"I can say Hughesy will open the batting for us and then it would be between Usman [Khawaja] and Marshy to bat No. 6 I would say," Clarke said. "Then we've got to work out do we pick two spinners, do we pick three quicks. Conditions in Galle will determine that one and it's a hard one for selection for tomorrow as well, are we sure which three quicks, do we go for the three who we think are going to play, is it our best attack? There's a lot of questions we need to answer."

Rain sent the Australians scurrying indoors for practice on match eve, and it was in this environment that Clarke got his first genuine sight of the offspinner Lyon's bowling. It is thought that Lyon may be better prepared to adapt to Sri Lankan climes than his nominally senior spin partner Michael Beer, given how elastically Lyon has adapted to the different tactical demands of Twenty20, one-dayers and first-class cricket.

"They've obviously played a bit of cricket in Zimbabwe which I think helped, they got some overs under their belts in pretty slow, turning conditions as well," Clarke said of the pair. "They've been training hard since they got here and Tim's been at every training session, Greg's been at every training session, so if we pick two spinners tomorrow they get that opportunity, and if we only pick one it comes down to their preparation leading in, what they did in Zimbabwe."

Clarke denied that the choice of a single spinner for Colombo would dictate who played in Galle, as the amount of turn available would be the final arbiter on the number of spinners required.

"We still have net preparation that is important, but I still think you need to go on conditions once you get to Galle," he said. "It's hard because you can only fit 11 in [for the tour match], so do we think we're going to play three quicks or two spinners. If I look at the one-dayers, Steve Smith, Xavier Doherty and Dave Hussey played a big part in our success, but I think our fast bowlers statistically got the most wickets, so we need to work out what is the right combination as a bowling unit in the conditions."

Australia's preparations have been punctuated by the release of the Argus review, and Clarke reiterated his happiness with how the team had taken on his message that the size of the distraction was dictated by the players themselves.

"The one point I've tried to push is that in this business everybody has a job to do, and our job as players is to prepare well and perform well on the field," Clarke said. "The other stuff, the administration, the selectors, all the other stuff that goes with our game which is very important, all of that will be taken care of and is out of our control really, so the size of the distraction is determined by us. If we make it a big distraction then it could affect the team.

"But so far on tour, nobody has [made it a big distraction]. We know what we're here to do, we know how important this tour is, and I was stoked the way we won that fourth one-day game of the series, I think it showed a lot of character. What I see in the review is we're trying to make people accountable, we're trying to have measures of performance and trying to make people accountable.

"For us right now the players are accountable to our performances throughout this tour, the one-day tour we knew it was going to be tough cricket and we performed pretty well in quite different and tough conditions. The Test tour's the same, we're ranked 5th in Test cricket, so we need to improve. From the first camp we had up in Brisbane at the Centre of Excellence I think our preparation is outstanding. It's easy to say 'we're going to wake up every day and try to get better', but I know we have."

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Meety on August 24, 2011, 23:43 GMT

    @Truemans_Ghost - I agree, the only problem being is that with the scheduling, you may only get one tour match. In those situations, being able to have a look at MOST of your players is sensible. On an Ashes tour there is an expectation of spending the extra time to aclimatise - which is what England did very well in Oz. However, how many warm up matches would you have for a tour of Pakistan or Zimbabwe? Anyways, I think those 12+ player matches do have a place on short tours, but there is no need on a longer tour when you have at least 2 warm up games.

  • silly_mid_on on August 24, 2011, 22:26 GMT

    Our full strength test side should play in this warm up game.

  • on August 24, 2011, 20:29 GMT

    The ideal batting order would be Phil Hughes, Usman Khwaja, Ricky ponting,Mike hussey,MJ clarke,Shane watson ,Haddin,Mitch Jhonson, Trent Copeleand, Michael beer, nathan Lyon

  • on August 24, 2011, 19:25 GMT

    Aussies have the edge though Jaywardane will score tons and big ones :) as he does at home

  • randikaayya on August 24, 2011, 17:28 GMT

    Rains have arrived!! Right on cue!

  • 200ondebut on August 24, 2011, 17:27 GMT

    Looking at what was on offer during the ashes I would suggest Aus are better off playing 4 quicks and no spinners.

  • on August 24, 2011, 16:46 GMT

    ok Australia it's time to loose some matches now.....Sri Lanka has been too hospitable and far too generous lol

  • Truemans_Ghost on August 24, 2011, 15:46 GMT

    A pet topic of mine! I think warm up matches SHOULD be proper, competitive , 11-a-side first class matches. Partly because anything else cheats the public, partly because I think it is better preparation. In the last Ashes tour, England played State sides who wanted to beat them, or at least find out any weaknesses. I hated it under Fletcher when they played lazy 14 man nonsense games. If your top order gets skittled and no one gets any batting practice- tough! You've been given the chance to get some practice if you don't, well that is sport. I realise the days of the old fashioned tour are over, but I would havethough everyone (well the team and those forgeotten souls, the public at least) gains form playing a couple of matches agains strong domestic teams and one against an A team or invitations XI. Herendeththerant,

  • Wolfpac on August 24, 2011, 15:31 GMT

    I really like Clarke's attitude here, I am a Sri Lankan and big Sri Lankan supporter, but I got to admit Clarke's better and got a more positive approach than Dilly. But it's gna be tough in the test matches both sides don't have match winning bowlers

  • Dashgar on August 24, 2011, 15:24 GMT

    I don't think Ponting, Watson or Johnson need this practice match. My XI, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Hussey, Marsh, Haddin, Siddle, Lyon, Harris, Beer, Copeland. It is short on batsmen but who cares. We want to see all five of those bowlers bowl and it will give the out of form and inexperienced batsmen a turn. Also Clarke needs practice using his bowlers in first class length games.

  • Meety on August 24, 2011, 23:43 GMT

    @Truemans_Ghost - I agree, the only problem being is that with the scheduling, you may only get one tour match. In those situations, being able to have a look at MOST of your players is sensible. On an Ashes tour there is an expectation of spending the extra time to aclimatise - which is what England did very well in Oz. However, how many warm up matches would you have for a tour of Pakistan or Zimbabwe? Anyways, I think those 12+ player matches do have a place on short tours, but there is no need on a longer tour when you have at least 2 warm up games.

  • silly_mid_on on August 24, 2011, 22:26 GMT

    Our full strength test side should play in this warm up game.

  • on August 24, 2011, 20:29 GMT

    The ideal batting order would be Phil Hughes, Usman Khwaja, Ricky ponting,Mike hussey,MJ clarke,Shane watson ,Haddin,Mitch Jhonson, Trent Copeleand, Michael beer, nathan Lyon

  • on August 24, 2011, 19:25 GMT

    Aussies have the edge though Jaywardane will score tons and big ones :) as he does at home

  • randikaayya on August 24, 2011, 17:28 GMT

    Rains have arrived!! Right on cue!

  • 200ondebut on August 24, 2011, 17:27 GMT

    Looking at what was on offer during the ashes I would suggest Aus are better off playing 4 quicks and no spinners.

  • on August 24, 2011, 16:46 GMT

    ok Australia it's time to loose some matches now.....Sri Lanka has been too hospitable and far too generous lol

  • Truemans_Ghost on August 24, 2011, 15:46 GMT

    A pet topic of mine! I think warm up matches SHOULD be proper, competitive , 11-a-side first class matches. Partly because anything else cheats the public, partly because I think it is better preparation. In the last Ashes tour, England played State sides who wanted to beat them, or at least find out any weaknesses. I hated it under Fletcher when they played lazy 14 man nonsense games. If your top order gets skittled and no one gets any batting practice- tough! You've been given the chance to get some practice if you don't, well that is sport. I realise the days of the old fashioned tour are over, but I would havethough everyone (well the team and those forgeotten souls, the public at least) gains form playing a couple of matches agains strong domestic teams and one against an A team or invitations XI. Herendeththerant,

  • Wolfpac on August 24, 2011, 15:31 GMT

    I really like Clarke's attitude here, I am a Sri Lankan and big Sri Lankan supporter, but I got to admit Clarke's better and got a more positive approach than Dilly. But it's gna be tough in the test matches both sides don't have match winning bowlers

  • Dashgar on August 24, 2011, 15:24 GMT

    I don't think Ponting, Watson or Johnson need this practice match. My XI, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Hussey, Marsh, Haddin, Siddle, Lyon, Harris, Beer, Copeland. It is short on batsmen but who cares. We want to see all five of those bowlers bowl and it will give the out of form and inexperienced batsmen a turn. Also Clarke needs practice using his bowlers in first class length games.

  • Ahsan_Shere on August 24, 2011, 14:53 GMT

    Common Shaun Marsh!!!! I can't wait for your permanent opening position in Australian side in all three formats. You are my favorite batsman in Australian side after Ricky Huss & Michael. Try to outscore & outperform your competitors.

  • The_Lethal_1 on August 24, 2011, 14:29 GMT

    I think Australia's first test team will be: 1. Watson, 2. Hughes, 3. Ponting, 4. Clarke, 5. Hussey, 6. Marsh, 7. Haddin, 8. Johnson, 9. Harris, 10. Siddle, 11. Lyon. In naming this eleven, a few elder players will need a rest while some will need a game to adapt to the conditions. I think Hussey, Johnson, Ponting and Watson will have a rest with Beer, Copeland, Khawaja and Pattinson to play instead from the aforementioned team. What do we all think?

  • Ben1989 on August 24, 2011, 14:12 GMT

    Really loving Clarke as capt (yes I'm surprised!), he seems to be completely honest with his thoughts & tells it straight out which is exactly what we need at the moment. I think his comment below really summed him up as a person & it is a great statement that I hope the players listen to.

    "The one point I've tried to push is that in this business everybody has a job to do, and our job as players is to prepare well and perform well on the field," Clarke said. "The other stuff, the administration, the selectors, all the other stuff that goes with our game which is very important, all of that will be taken care of and is out of our control really, so the size of the distraction is determined by us. If we make it a big distraction then it could affect the team''

  • Okakaboka on August 24, 2011, 13:41 GMT

    I think the biggest headache is finding a replacement for Iron Gloves Haddin who can't bat either. Is Wade or Paine in the squad??? We may as well give wicket keeping duties to..um... the sight screen attendant! Finding the correct bowling attack will be tricky: 1. Harris, Pattinson and Siddle? Mmmmm. Or 2. Harris, Siddle and Copeland?.....all similar very good bowlers. Or 3. Harris, Pattinson and Copeland? First or third option is a balanced attack. NO, THERE IS NO PLACE FOR OLD SPRAYGUN. He had success a couple of games ago so he is not due for success for at least another 5 - 6 games (Johnston). Actually, the sight screen attendant would be safer wicketkeeping than standing next to the sight screen if Johnston plays. Even the square leg umpire will be dressed in body armour. Lyon should get first opportunity in the spin department.

  • Mary_786 on August 24, 2011, 13:22 GMT

    Khawaja deserves to play ahead of Marsh. He is a class act and has only had his debut game in the ashes where he looked very promising.

  • tfjones1978 on August 24, 2011, 13:12 GMT

    To me the answer to whom to play in the warm up is easy. 4 players to rest should be Shane Watson, Michael Hussey, Ricky Ponting and Mitchell Johnson. All 4 of these players were in the ODI matches and have the experience that they can cope with being announced in the XI.

    The remaining XI players are: Phillip Hughes, Shaun Marsh, Michael Clarke, Usman Khawaja, Brad Haddin, Michael Beer, Trent Copeland, Ryan Harris, Nathan Lyon, James Pattinson, Peter Siddle.

    All of these players (excluding Clarke & Haddin) need experience playing in these conditions and should have an opportunity to prove themselves. This will mean each bowler bowls 15 overs a day, instead of 20-25. Still enough overs in a day to prove their form.

    Clarke needs to be in the squad to get practise captaining these up and coming players and Haddin needs to be there to get use to wicky'ing to the bowlers.

    I havent checked the 6 bowlers stats, but if any of them can bat a bit, then they get number 6 & 7 batting spots.

  • Imz25 on August 24, 2011, 12:32 GMT

    Nathan Lyon, who looks like a genuine off spinner, should be given a chance. He'll be any day more effective than Michael Beer on Sri Lankan wickets. I'd like to see them rest Watson and Johnson for this match since they've had enough match practice already. Instead they should give Khawaja a chance with Hughes and also give Pattinson the new ball with Harris.

  • landl47 on August 24, 2011, 12:29 GMT

    Clarke should consult the selectors.... oh, he can't can he? CA fired them just before the test series.

  • jonesy2 on August 24, 2011, 12:21 GMT

    clarkey! i can answer your questions for you!! rest MJ and watto for the tour match. play ALL the bowlers. rest huss or ricky. the tour match outcome doesnt matter the bowling and usman, marsh, hughes are the things that matter.

    as for the first test XI: hughes, watto, ricky, skipper, huss, swampy, hadds, MJ, ryano, sids/copeland (whoever is looking in the best touch in the tour match), lyon.

  • Meety on August 24, 2011, 11:35 GMT

    I never thought I'd utter these words ever "PLEASE NO BEER!!!!" He got creamed a couple of weeks ago against an Emerging Indian XI, he actually went not 4, not 5, not 6 but 8 runs per over for about 15 overs! That was India's 3rd grade side! Before the squad was announced & assuming Hauritz was NOT injured, I'd of gone, 1. Watto, 2. Hughes, 3. Punter, 4. Khawaja, 5. Clarke, 6. M Hussey, 7 Hard Hands, 8. O'Keefe, 9. MJ, 10. Hauritz, 11. Copeland 12th Smith. No O'Keefe or Hauritz, So I'd go 1 spinner (Lyon) & Harris!

  • on August 24, 2011, 11:09 GMT

    If they want to look at Harris, Siddle, Copeland, Beer and Lyon, who not play 5 bowlers? Its a 3 day match, the result isn't important, and it gives you a look at all the new guys coming over. You get an XI of Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Hussey, Marsh, Haddin, Harris, Siddle, Lyon, Copeland, Beer. Long tail, but it gives Hussey a chance to work his way into form and the non-ODI players a chance to adapt to conditions.

    It should, ideally, get the majority of the squad to a point where they can be selected for the First Test and not be coming off a big cricket lay-off.

  • onlinegamer55 on August 24, 2011, 11:03 GMT

    Shaun Marsh (SOS) shouldn't be ahead of Khawaja in the pecking order. Marsh's first class average is mediocre and while he has improved in the past few years, Khawaja is rightly deserving of the No.6 spot especially since he was batting in the Ashes. Let's hope the selectors come to sense when SOS fails epically in the tour match with a king pair.

  • on August 24, 2011, 10:39 GMT

    Play 2 spinners in the tour game, use watto as 3rd quickie. Play Johnson and Ryan Harris. Open with hughes and watto, rest Mike Hussey, play both Marsh and Khawaja. Whoever does better in this match out of Marsh and Khawaja should be selected for 1st test match, its the only fair way. If the 2 spinners work well together and aussies win the game, then they shud play 2 spinners. If it doesnt work just play the extra seamer. The extra seamer should be Peter Siddle, with Copeland narrowly missing out, but siddle has enough experience it would be hard to leave him out(because no one knows Harris' form, and the spinners are both an unknown quantity) when u play siddle u know he will run in all day, he doesnt have a history of injuries and u know he'll get u a few wickets. But at the end of the day I doubt aussies will play 2 spinners in the test and I have a strong feeling Marsh will get the nod over khawaja regardless of what happens in the tour game.

  • Mervo on August 24, 2011, 10:12 GMT

    Why do some writers refer to 20/20 when talking about a player' suitability for Test cricket? That is why we have some many problems and players with a poor work ethic. The English have it right. These are different games for different audiences, with different players. Just look at Phil Hughes and he does not what to do except slog!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Mervo on August 24, 2011, 10:12 GMT

    Why do some writers refer to 20/20 when talking about a player' suitability for Test cricket? That is why we have some many problems and players with a poor work ethic. The English have it right. These are different games for different audiences, with different players. Just look at Phil Hughes and he does not what to do except slog!

  • on August 24, 2011, 10:39 GMT

    Play 2 spinners in the tour game, use watto as 3rd quickie. Play Johnson and Ryan Harris. Open with hughes and watto, rest Mike Hussey, play both Marsh and Khawaja. Whoever does better in this match out of Marsh and Khawaja should be selected for 1st test match, its the only fair way. If the 2 spinners work well together and aussies win the game, then they shud play 2 spinners. If it doesnt work just play the extra seamer. The extra seamer should be Peter Siddle, with Copeland narrowly missing out, but siddle has enough experience it would be hard to leave him out(because no one knows Harris' form, and the spinners are both an unknown quantity) when u play siddle u know he will run in all day, he doesnt have a history of injuries and u know he'll get u a few wickets. But at the end of the day I doubt aussies will play 2 spinners in the test and I have a strong feeling Marsh will get the nod over khawaja regardless of what happens in the tour game.

  • onlinegamer55 on August 24, 2011, 11:03 GMT

    Shaun Marsh (SOS) shouldn't be ahead of Khawaja in the pecking order. Marsh's first class average is mediocre and while he has improved in the past few years, Khawaja is rightly deserving of the No.6 spot especially since he was batting in the Ashes. Let's hope the selectors come to sense when SOS fails epically in the tour match with a king pair.

  • on August 24, 2011, 11:09 GMT

    If they want to look at Harris, Siddle, Copeland, Beer and Lyon, who not play 5 bowlers? Its a 3 day match, the result isn't important, and it gives you a look at all the new guys coming over. You get an XI of Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Hussey, Marsh, Haddin, Harris, Siddle, Lyon, Copeland, Beer. Long tail, but it gives Hussey a chance to work his way into form and the non-ODI players a chance to adapt to conditions.

    It should, ideally, get the majority of the squad to a point where they can be selected for the First Test and not be coming off a big cricket lay-off.

  • Meety on August 24, 2011, 11:35 GMT

    I never thought I'd utter these words ever "PLEASE NO BEER!!!!" He got creamed a couple of weeks ago against an Emerging Indian XI, he actually went not 4, not 5, not 6 but 8 runs per over for about 15 overs! That was India's 3rd grade side! Before the squad was announced & assuming Hauritz was NOT injured, I'd of gone, 1. Watto, 2. Hughes, 3. Punter, 4. Khawaja, 5. Clarke, 6. M Hussey, 7 Hard Hands, 8. O'Keefe, 9. MJ, 10. Hauritz, 11. Copeland 12th Smith. No O'Keefe or Hauritz, So I'd go 1 spinner (Lyon) & Harris!

  • jonesy2 on August 24, 2011, 12:21 GMT

    clarkey! i can answer your questions for you!! rest MJ and watto for the tour match. play ALL the bowlers. rest huss or ricky. the tour match outcome doesnt matter the bowling and usman, marsh, hughes are the things that matter.

    as for the first test XI: hughes, watto, ricky, skipper, huss, swampy, hadds, MJ, ryano, sids/copeland (whoever is looking in the best touch in the tour match), lyon.

  • landl47 on August 24, 2011, 12:29 GMT

    Clarke should consult the selectors.... oh, he can't can he? CA fired them just before the test series.

  • Imz25 on August 24, 2011, 12:32 GMT

    Nathan Lyon, who looks like a genuine off spinner, should be given a chance. He'll be any day more effective than Michael Beer on Sri Lankan wickets. I'd like to see them rest Watson and Johnson for this match since they've had enough match practice already. Instead they should give Khawaja a chance with Hughes and also give Pattinson the new ball with Harris.

  • tfjones1978 on August 24, 2011, 13:12 GMT

    To me the answer to whom to play in the warm up is easy. 4 players to rest should be Shane Watson, Michael Hussey, Ricky Ponting and Mitchell Johnson. All 4 of these players were in the ODI matches and have the experience that they can cope with being announced in the XI.

    The remaining XI players are: Phillip Hughes, Shaun Marsh, Michael Clarke, Usman Khawaja, Brad Haddin, Michael Beer, Trent Copeland, Ryan Harris, Nathan Lyon, James Pattinson, Peter Siddle.

    All of these players (excluding Clarke & Haddin) need experience playing in these conditions and should have an opportunity to prove themselves. This will mean each bowler bowls 15 overs a day, instead of 20-25. Still enough overs in a day to prove their form.

    Clarke needs to be in the squad to get practise captaining these up and coming players and Haddin needs to be there to get use to wicky'ing to the bowlers.

    I havent checked the 6 bowlers stats, but if any of them can bat a bit, then they get number 6 & 7 batting spots.

  • Mary_786 on August 24, 2011, 13:22 GMT

    Khawaja deserves to play ahead of Marsh. He is a class act and has only had his debut game in the ashes where he looked very promising.