Sangakkara's 100th Test

Two-Test series unsatisfactory - Sangakkara

Daniel Brettig in Colombo

September 15, 2011

Comments: 63 | Text size: A | A

Kumar Sangakkara plays the ball to the on side, Sri Lanka v Australia, 2nd Test, Pallekele, 4th day, September 11, 2011
Kumar Sangakkara believes Sri Lanka don't have to look overseas for coaching talent © Associated Press
Related Links
Players/Officials: Kumar Sangakkara
Series/Tournaments: Australia tour of Sri Lanka
Teams: Sri Lanka

On the eve of his 100th Test, Kumar Sangakkara has called on the ICC to do away with two-Test series, describing such scheduling as "unsatisfying". The third Test against Australia at Colombo will offer Sangakkara and his team the chance to pull back a 1-0 deficit, but they have not always been so fortunate.

As a stylish batsman, successful captain and articulate statesman for Sri Lankan cricket, Sangakkara said he had taken part in too many series where the narrative felt unduly clipped due to the lack of a third Test.

One of his imponderables is the 2007 series in Australia, where the under-prepared visitors lost in Brisbane but then, through Sangakkara's own majestic 192 in the second Test, pushed the hosts far further. The prospect of a third match might have made a significant change to the script.

"It is unsatisfactory to play so many two-Test series," Sangakkara told ESPNcricinfo. "As a country, to be measured up as a Test country, you need to keep playing three to five Test match series as much as you can.

"I don't think five Test series are attractive anymore to TV networks, but I think Test series should be a minimum of three matches. I hope the ICC can stipulate that, I don't know if they can."

Among forthcoming series, Australia's visit to South Africa has been cut to two Tests to accommodate the Twenty20 Champions League, a move that has already been heavily criticised for marginalising Test cricket.

"Test cricket is still, to my mind, the most important form of the game out there," Sangakkara said. "There's nothing like it, there's nothing that comes close to it. This is the only arena where you can really make your mark as a cricketer. If you are successful at Test cricket, that is all that matters I think."

Sri Lanka's success since Sangakkara's debut in 2000 has been charted largely under overseas coaches, including Tom Moody and Trevor Bayliss. However Sangakkara is fervent in his desire for a home-grown mentor to take the role full-time, and cited the former opening batsman Chandika Hathurusingha as an ideal candidate.

"I think we have a great opportunity to have a completely Sri Lankan coaching unit. That will be amazing if we can do it," Sangakkara said. "And we've had candidates the calibre of Chandika Hathurusingha, who is now the assistant coach for New South Wales. He has been a great loss to us.

"He made an amazing contribution to our cricket, and he is an extremely capable coach. Rumesh Ratnayake has also been exemplary, unfortunately he has come at a time when we've had quite a bad series, but these two people have shown we have the quality in Sri Lanka to have a completely local coaching unit which we can be proud of, and second to none in the world.

"At the same time if the administration and the captain also think a foreign coach is the way to go, that is also no problem, because there are many excellent coaches around the world … There is Graham Ford, Geoff Marsh and a lot of other coaches in the running for this job, they're fantastic people, they've got great records and have proven themselves all over the world.

"Any one of them would be a great addition to our cricket, but on a personal level, and it's not a sentimental thing, I think we have the quality in Sri Lanka as well, unfortunately not in Sri Lanka now. One of them is outside coaching NSW, but we have the Sri Lankans capable of also being national coaches and doing a great job."

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Daniel Brettig

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (September 20, 2011, 17:21 GMT)

day night test cricket is needed .and we indians are not running after t20 cricket we are playing max test and least t20 as internationals

Posted by 3rd_man on (September 18, 2011, 9:44 GMT)

I agree, more matches play in a series more chance of a result. too many test matches being end as drawn games these days. in the case of coach for srilanka, I think Haturusinghe is the best we had. Unfortunatly we lost him for some reason. Rumesh and Champaka did nice job with our pace bowlers. I would like to see taking Vaas in to the coaching staff somehow. he got lot to offer for srilankan young pace bowlers.

Posted by VivGilchrist on (September 18, 2011, 3:54 GMT)

@Herbert, enjoyed your comments so true.

Posted by Rafelgibt on (September 17, 2011, 15:18 GMT)

Yes im agree with Sangaa that bigger teams must play at least 3 test matches with eachother. But smaller teams like NZ,WI, BAN, ZIM should play 2 test matches in a series against the bigger teams.

Posted by   on (September 17, 2011, 5:55 GMT)

Any sport draws upon how it is built and the rules need to change according to the time. Cricket needs to come prallel to other team sports that complete within three to four hrs. Crowd want excitement, not crcket history. 20/20 model provides that where almost all action can be seen within a short period. To the other: league cricket at national team level can be istaged in different countries and could be more exciting than a money bazaar staged under a single roof. My gut feeling is, this issue is sooner going to be raised, and perhaps from the same place it started.

Posted by   on (September 17, 2011, 4:51 GMT)

Ya thats true sanga,should play more test matches!

Posted by MacFry on (September 16, 2011, 22:39 GMT)

2 test series is alright if we can have more of them. India just played a 4 test series in England. It'll be 4 or 5 years before they come back to play another series. It'd be better if they played 2 test matches every couple of years. That way the teams will meet every year either at home or away. It'll be great for fans as well many of who have shorter attention spans.

Posted by anver777 on (September 16, 2011, 13:20 GMT)

I totally agree with Sanga,.. 3match is better than 2 since there is always a comeback for either team & more entertaining....... mostly i have noticed SL is treated with only 2 match series specially against top ranked teams.

Posted by VEXXZ on (September 16, 2011, 12:44 GMT)

It is a GIVEN FACT that the shorter version of the game is killing the TEST cricket which is THE REAL CRICKET . You can clearly see the ICC going to the FAST FOOD style 20/20 , and 50 over games to keep up with the USA style of playing a game . Test Cricket is a game for the FITTEST , someone who can THINK for HOURS and SURVIVE .

Posted by Sohailh on (September 16, 2011, 10:59 GMT)

Test Series should 3-match test series or 5-match test series. 2-Match test series is of no use... Senseless ICC...

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Daniel BrettigClose
Daniel Brettig Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
Tour Results
Sri Lanka v Australia at Colombo (SSC) - Sep 16-20, 2011
Match drawn
Sri Lanka v Australia at Pallekele - Sep 8-12, 2011
Match drawn
Sri Lanka v Australia at Galle - Aug 31-Sep 3, 2011
Australia won by 125 runs
SL Board XI v Australians at Colombo (PSS) - Aug 25-27, 2011
Match drawn
Sri Lanka v Australia at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 22, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 4 wickets (with 18 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days