Australia v England, 1st Test, Brisbane, 3rd day November 23, 2013

Warner learns to trust his instinct

David Warner is still learning to curb his natural instinct off the field when it can get him into trouble but on the field he has returned to trusting it
19

Instinct is important to David Warner, if occasionally dangerous. Instinct drove him to an outrageous international Twenty20 debut against South Africa at the MCG in 2009. Instinct pushed him to equally stunning centuries against India in Perth and the South Africans in Adelaide three years later.

Instinct overtook him when he punched Joe Root in a Birmingham bar in June and almost cost him his international career. And instinct swayed him to hook Stuart Broad's first ball of the Ashes series to the backward square leg boundary.

Two days later, Warner allowed his instinct to flourish gloriously into a hundred that took full advantage of the opportunity afforded him by the dramatic bowling of Mitchell Johnson, Nathan Lyon and Ryan Harris.

Warner's first Ashes century was a masterwork of channelled aggression, not allowing England's bowlers any respite but likewise not granting them any easy avenues for his wicket. It looked exactly the way that Warner should play every innings, on every surface, backing up Brad Haddin's pre-Test observation that "rascals win you comps".

But Warner's path to reaching the zone he has occupied in Brisbane this week has not been as straightforward as it might have been. There have been pitfalls and pratfalls, on the pitch, in the dressing room, in the nets and in the bars and clubs of India and England. Away from the game, Warner is still learning to curb his natural instinct when it can be inclined to get him into trouble. On the field he has returned to trusting it after being advised for some time to do otherwise.

The decision to aim a hook at Broad's first ball was particularly significant, for there was a time when Warner would have been rebuked for doing so. Under the former coach Mickey Arthur, Australia's batsmen had been pressed to adhere to a certain conservatism on their arrival at the crease, based on the notion that the first 20 balls were always those most likely to dismiss them. Such theories can be useful, disciplining the mind while a batsman is still getting his bearings in the middle, but for Warner they clouded an approach that has generally been more productive when as uncluttered as possible.

So it was that Warner made a mottled contribution to the Ashes in England once his penance for swinging at Root had been served. A shuffle down and then back up the batting order added to the confusion. Only one innings in six, a bold start to Australia's quest for an unlikely target at Chester-le-Street, was entirely convincing. Even then, Warner perished right at the moment he had started to raise thoughts of an Australian victory, snicking an admittedly fine delivery from Tim Bresnan. Instead of ushering a win, Warner became the first crack in a spectacular collapse. He resolved to carry on with the job next time he had the chance, but remained muddled in how he might do so.

The process of batting transformation began at the start of the domestic season. Dropped by Australia's selectors from the ODI and Twenty20 teams, Warner had the chance to settle into a rhythm at home, training with New South Wales and preparing for the domestic limited-overs tournament now to be played as a carnival in Sydney. His physical readiness for the task was not in question, following a diet and exercise regime begun earlier in the year that has made Warner more lithe than at any other time in his career.

Prepared as he was, Warner still looked conflicted at the start of an innings. His first appearance for the Blues was an ugly one on a poor Bankstown pitch, his second not much better. Caught between trying to score and survive, Warner was doing neither. Elsewhere he continued to court the displeasure of authority by skipping a grade game, earning a suspended sentence from the NSW chief executive Andrew Jones. Early rumblings began to emerge about his place in the Test team for Brisbane.

Around this time, Warner re-established contact with Trent Woodhill, his batting coach at various times. Together they discussed where he had struggled and why. Problems were traced back to the earlier directives to be secure early in an innings then attack later on, a mind-set deemed too mixed for Warner's instinct to follow. Instead it was decided that Warner must think always of attack, of scoring runs and placing pressure on the bowler to defeat him. Defence became not the first resort but the last, and boundaries were to be hit when offered by the bowler, no matter whether the ball was his first or 50th.

As Warner described it before the match: "If I just concentrate on looking to score, my defence takes care of itself. I was too worried about trying to be so defensive and then attacking. We talk about intent - if you're not looking to score, I feel that person who's bowling to you has already got the upper hand, because you're looking to defend. I'm at my most vulnerable when I'm looking to defend. If I look to score and I nick off, so be it, but I've got to be looking to score and have that intent because if I'm not looking to score I have no intent at all."

Results from such meetings are not always immediate, sometimes taking weeks, months or even seasons to take hold. But this time, Warner's improvement was near enough instant. Domestic teams were soon sent running for cover at North Sydney Oval, as he reeled off three centuries of escalating venom to drive NSW to the tournament final. In the Sheffield Shield, Warner cracked a fourth hundred against Victoria at the MCG, spending a mere 87 balls over his 104.

At the Gabba, Warner's first innings ended with the sort of dismissal he had foreshadowed, a somewhat presumptuous back foot slap landing in the hands of cover. Undeterred, he played with plenty of freedom but plenty of good sense too when batting again, negotiating an awkward period with Chris Rogers on the second evening when England might have kept up the destruction wrought by Australia with a few wickets of their own under overcast skies.

Building the lead the following morning, Warner looked entirely at ease with himself and his batting, choosing the right balls to smite but also those to defend. He was compelling in all he did, and helped his captain Michael Clarke to grow in fluency after an ugly day one exit. England's bowlers were treated sensibly but not courteously, poor balls dispatched and some good ones too. There was a minor stutter as Warner closed on his hundred, James Anderson finding a modicum of reverse swing. But a positive outlook helped ensure he survived, and he punched firmly through cover to bring up the milestone.

As he ran the 100th run, Warner could not help miming another punch. This was not a drunken shot at Root, but a jubilant thrust at the air. Instinct had again taken over.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • milepost on November 24, 2013, 17:47 GMT

    @Liquefierrrr, top summary. An English recovery looks further away then the next visit of Halley's Comet.

  • PrasPunter on November 24, 2013, 12:49 GMT

    @Sayak, on a related note, Warner once had revealed that it was Sehwag who encouraged him to set his sights for a place in the Test XI , during his IPL stint. I thought Warner played a couple of really matured ones this test mixing aggression with caution.

  • Liquefierrrr on November 24, 2013, 8:19 GMT

    What an absolute hiding this was.

    Swann 2/215 and completely outbowled by Lyon (once more).

    Trott abysmal and terrified.

    Prior useless.

    Cook and Carberry stone-like but dependable.

    Bell got himself out in the 1st & got out to a ripper in the 2nd, he's a genuine threat.

    KP a giant that slept through this match.

    Anderson solid as ever, Broad good, Tremlett good.

    That said, 20/315 with the bat on a pitch England's fans declared to be 'a road' after Day 1 speaks for itself. England didn't even manage 200 in an innings.

    Johnson was terrifying this match, completely owned the English top order, frightening stuff.

    Awesome work by Lyon, Harris is arguably as good as Steyn presently, Siddle was a good supporting char.

    Warner & Clarke smoked the English yesterday and took the game away from them.

    An absolute hiding has been handed out here by a side a lot of English media were declaring to be one of the worst getting around.

    C'mon Aus, enjoy this then reset your sights on Adelaide

  • on November 24, 2013, 6:30 GMT

    David Warner reminds me the Virender Sehwag of past. Growing up in the fast, bouncy pitches down under, he is more adept against pace bowling. But his weakness against quality spin cancels that out. It is the attacking, could not care less attitude with the willow that brings them both together.

  • Shaggy076 on November 24, 2013, 5:50 GMT

    Jagger; For one Bird is injured. 2) Siddle has again done his job, he bowls great areas over 140k/s. The wicket of Bell was a crucial wicket and great ball. Bell was handling Johnson and Harris better than any other English batsman. Teams always need a Peter Siddle and that he has done his job at an career average of 28 there is no way he is going to get dropped.

  • ashokvetri on November 24, 2013, 5:29 GMT

    Warner may be a villian for everyone, but he is my hero... Congrats buddy for your 100. Expecting few more in this series. Keep on...

  • Moppa on November 23, 2013, 22:35 GMT

    @CustomKid, not a bad analogy with Mark Cosgrove and I also am disappointed Cossie didn't make the choices you describe. Minor point though... he's 29... maybe there's hope for him yet?

  • Jagger on November 23, 2013, 21:44 GMT

    Siddle does not take enough wickets. Bird or Sayers must replace him in the next test.

    Some of the shots George Bailey played this test match were deplorable, quite frankly. I shudder to think what the world would be like if we all approached our jobs the way George approaches his. What has a 31 year old been doing all his life if he still plays like that? This is The Ashes, not beach cricket George.

    Where is the batting youth in the side? There is a future ahead and it's coming soon, James.

  • Aussasinator on November 23, 2013, 18:31 GMT

    He cannot play the faster rising ball and the moving ball. England has not tested him the right way.

  • on November 23, 2013, 15:13 GMT

    The most pleasing thing about warner is perhaps his admittance of the negatives he has done. As stubborn warner is, its obligatory for him to indulge in the issues off the field but to answer his stubborness with a composed innings in the second innings speaks about the class of a player. keep up the good work mate..

  • milepost on November 24, 2013, 17:47 GMT

    @Liquefierrrr, top summary. An English recovery looks further away then the next visit of Halley's Comet.

  • PrasPunter on November 24, 2013, 12:49 GMT

    @Sayak, on a related note, Warner once had revealed that it was Sehwag who encouraged him to set his sights for a place in the Test XI , during his IPL stint. I thought Warner played a couple of really matured ones this test mixing aggression with caution.

  • Liquefierrrr on November 24, 2013, 8:19 GMT

    What an absolute hiding this was.

    Swann 2/215 and completely outbowled by Lyon (once more).

    Trott abysmal and terrified.

    Prior useless.

    Cook and Carberry stone-like but dependable.

    Bell got himself out in the 1st & got out to a ripper in the 2nd, he's a genuine threat.

    KP a giant that slept through this match.

    Anderson solid as ever, Broad good, Tremlett good.

    That said, 20/315 with the bat on a pitch England's fans declared to be 'a road' after Day 1 speaks for itself. England didn't even manage 200 in an innings.

    Johnson was terrifying this match, completely owned the English top order, frightening stuff.

    Awesome work by Lyon, Harris is arguably as good as Steyn presently, Siddle was a good supporting char.

    Warner & Clarke smoked the English yesterday and took the game away from them.

    An absolute hiding has been handed out here by a side a lot of English media were declaring to be one of the worst getting around.

    C'mon Aus, enjoy this then reset your sights on Adelaide

  • on November 24, 2013, 6:30 GMT

    David Warner reminds me the Virender Sehwag of past. Growing up in the fast, bouncy pitches down under, he is more adept against pace bowling. But his weakness against quality spin cancels that out. It is the attacking, could not care less attitude with the willow that brings them both together.

  • Shaggy076 on November 24, 2013, 5:50 GMT

    Jagger; For one Bird is injured. 2) Siddle has again done his job, he bowls great areas over 140k/s. The wicket of Bell was a crucial wicket and great ball. Bell was handling Johnson and Harris better than any other English batsman. Teams always need a Peter Siddle and that he has done his job at an career average of 28 there is no way he is going to get dropped.

  • ashokvetri on November 24, 2013, 5:29 GMT

    Warner may be a villian for everyone, but he is my hero... Congrats buddy for your 100. Expecting few more in this series. Keep on...

  • Moppa on November 23, 2013, 22:35 GMT

    @CustomKid, not a bad analogy with Mark Cosgrove and I also am disappointed Cossie didn't make the choices you describe. Minor point though... he's 29... maybe there's hope for him yet?

  • Jagger on November 23, 2013, 21:44 GMT

    Siddle does not take enough wickets. Bird or Sayers must replace him in the next test.

    Some of the shots George Bailey played this test match were deplorable, quite frankly. I shudder to think what the world would be like if we all approached our jobs the way George approaches his. What has a 31 year old been doing all his life if he still plays like that? This is The Ashes, not beach cricket George.

    Where is the batting youth in the side? There is a future ahead and it's coming soon, James.

  • Aussasinator on November 23, 2013, 18:31 GMT

    He cannot play the faster rising ball and the moving ball. England has not tested him the right way.

  • on November 23, 2013, 15:13 GMT

    The most pleasing thing about warner is perhaps his admittance of the negatives he has done. As stubborn warner is, its obligatory for him to indulge in the issues off the field but to answer his stubborness with a composed innings in the second innings speaks about the class of a player. keep up the good work mate..

  • CustomKid on November 23, 2013, 12:50 GMT

    THe pleasing aspect of his game has been his off field commitment. The guy is fit, he's lost the little bit of spare tyre and is a little ball of muscle now.

    I don't think he's ever been the sharpest tool in the shed but I think he may have realised that natural talent alone doesn't make a career, it also takes a lot of hard work behind the scenes and you only get one shot at this. Something I wished Mark 'I love beers and pies' Cosgrove should have worked out 6-8 years ago. He says he's a changed man but he's now in his 30's. Such a waste.

    Anyway, a great knock by Warner and I hope you secure your position long term by filling your boots with runs this summer.

  • Beertjie on November 23, 2013, 12:47 GMT

    Agree @xtrafalgarx. If he can become more consistent he'll become a major building block in the team. Bailey needs to go after Adelaide unless he gets a score.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge-Needs-A-Hug on November 23, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I mean if we lose from here that would ridiculous. A weather affected draw is even a possibility but let's hope not, test cricket benefits from results and not even @FFL would suggest Australia deserve to lose this match. Funny things happen in cricket though. Warner looks good but I still have reservations about a few of our other batters. I really want Watson to do well but how often does he make runs? You need a 3 that gets in and makes runs. I hope even a crushing victory doesn't gloss over that there are some good players making runs in the shield right now and players need to be selected on performances, not just potential.

  • peeeeet on November 23, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I have always thought that Warner had what it takes to be a test cricketer. What he has said here about having the intent to score is spot on. Notice how it was score and not hit boundaries. The best part of this innings was his 1s, 2s and 3s which showed he doesn't have to try and hit everything into the carpark in order to score quickly. Very similar to how he played against NZ in Hobart and how he should play all his test innings. Now admittedly this score was against a demoralised and flat English attack but it's a start in the right direction and I really hope he continues on to be the very very good test opener that I feel he can be.

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on November 23, 2013, 11:49 GMT

    Long overdue and good ton just what he needed to regain self belief and try to be just to his abilities he has failed to due to rashness and indisiplined shot selection and impetuous . Thing is Eng has no batsman anywhere near the class,talent and calibre of Warner let alone a Michael Clarke . Having said that ,Warner's inngs was easily the best played in this year in all forms by any young bat from any team . Can't compare with seasoned and class acts like Clarke who has far no. of even better inngs. to his name this year. His batting is a good lesson for the struggling Eng lineup . It must be said though that Warner had a very pedestrian of bowling of Eng and he made the most of it ,making it count unlike no. of times past when he threw it away with bowling in his control and he just had to make it big .On other hang Eng are up against the best pace attack in the world ,and some 1 named Mitch of course who's got them hop left , right , before sending them on their way for not much.

  • wonderstar1 on November 23, 2013, 11:35 GMT

    @ xtrafalgarx- Well said. Agree with whatever you said.

  • TheBigBoodha on November 23, 2013, 11:33 GMT

    If Warner fires, England will struggle this series. I said that before the series started. I predicted he would score big in these conditions too. He's the one player we have who has the brutal power and intimidating presence of the old boys like Hayden, Ponting, Gilchrist and co. If he can live up to his potential we have a real match winner here. Now, if only Watson could get his head screwed on right... One more test of failures and I reckon he'll be turfed for good. Anyone could do better at number three. Maybe he should see Johnson's psychologist, as he is another dodgy customer who seems to be finally getting it together.

  • dunger.bob on November 23, 2013, 11:26 GMT

    I thought his defence looked very composed today. Dancing feet in defence no less. Once or twice anyway. This business about defence being the last resort is the way I've always thought the game should be played as well. The hardest part is recognising a last resort when you see it and don't try to hit it into next week. Dave did that today and who knows, we might be seeing a whole lot more of it in this series. Bad news for England if that happens.

  • xtrafalgarx on November 23, 2013, 10:40 GMT

    He is a good batsman. People keep saying he is a T20 slogger, but you don't score a hundred against the best attack in the world (SA last year), guts out a hundred and bat through the innings on a tough pitch(Hobart against NZ), blast a team away in a session (Waca vs India) and then this. He is a good batter.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • xtrafalgarx on November 23, 2013, 10:40 GMT

    He is a good batsman. People keep saying he is a T20 slogger, but you don't score a hundred against the best attack in the world (SA last year), guts out a hundred and bat through the innings on a tough pitch(Hobart against NZ), blast a team away in a session (Waca vs India) and then this. He is a good batter.

  • dunger.bob on November 23, 2013, 11:26 GMT

    I thought his defence looked very composed today. Dancing feet in defence no less. Once or twice anyway. This business about defence being the last resort is the way I've always thought the game should be played as well. The hardest part is recognising a last resort when you see it and don't try to hit it into next week. Dave did that today and who knows, we might be seeing a whole lot more of it in this series. Bad news for England if that happens.

  • TheBigBoodha on November 23, 2013, 11:33 GMT

    If Warner fires, England will struggle this series. I said that before the series started. I predicted he would score big in these conditions too. He's the one player we have who has the brutal power and intimidating presence of the old boys like Hayden, Ponting, Gilchrist and co. If he can live up to his potential we have a real match winner here. Now, if only Watson could get his head screwed on right... One more test of failures and I reckon he'll be turfed for good. Anyone could do better at number three. Maybe he should see Johnson's psychologist, as he is another dodgy customer who seems to be finally getting it together.

  • wonderstar1 on November 23, 2013, 11:35 GMT

    @ xtrafalgarx- Well said. Agree with whatever you said.

  • electric_loco_WAP4 on November 23, 2013, 11:49 GMT

    Long overdue and good ton just what he needed to regain self belief and try to be just to his abilities he has failed to due to rashness and indisiplined shot selection and impetuous . Thing is Eng has no batsman anywhere near the class,talent and calibre of Warner let alone a Michael Clarke . Having said that ,Warner's inngs was easily the best played in this year in all forms by any young bat from any team . Can't compare with seasoned and class acts like Clarke who has far no. of even better inngs. to his name this year. His batting is a good lesson for the struggling Eng lineup . It must be said though that Warner had a very pedestrian of bowling of Eng and he made the most of it ,making it count unlike no. of times past when he threw it away with bowling in his control and he just had to make it big .On other hang Eng are up against the best pace attack in the world ,and some 1 named Mitch of course who's got them hop left , right , before sending them on their way for not much.

  • peeeeet on November 23, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I have always thought that Warner had what it takes to be a test cricketer. What he has said here about having the intent to score is spot on. Notice how it was score and not hit boundaries. The best part of this innings was his 1s, 2s and 3s which showed he doesn't have to try and hit everything into the carpark in order to score quickly. Very similar to how he played against NZ in Hobart and how he should play all his test innings. Now admittedly this score was against a demoralised and flat English attack but it's a start in the right direction and I really hope he continues on to be the very very good test opener that I feel he can be.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge-Needs-A-Hug on November 23, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I mean if we lose from here that would ridiculous. A weather affected draw is even a possibility but let's hope not, test cricket benefits from results and not even @FFL would suggest Australia deserve to lose this match. Funny things happen in cricket though. Warner looks good but I still have reservations about a few of our other batters. I really want Watson to do well but how often does he make runs? You need a 3 that gets in and makes runs. I hope even a crushing victory doesn't gloss over that there are some good players making runs in the shield right now and players need to be selected on performances, not just potential.

  • Beertjie on November 23, 2013, 12:47 GMT

    Agree @xtrafalgarx. If he can become more consistent he'll become a major building block in the team. Bailey needs to go after Adelaide unless he gets a score.

  • CustomKid on November 23, 2013, 12:50 GMT

    THe pleasing aspect of his game has been his off field commitment. The guy is fit, he's lost the little bit of spare tyre and is a little ball of muscle now.

    I don't think he's ever been the sharpest tool in the shed but I think he may have realised that natural talent alone doesn't make a career, it also takes a lot of hard work behind the scenes and you only get one shot at this. Something I wished Mark 'I love beers and pies' Cosgrove should have worked out 6-8 years ago. He says he's a changed man but he's now in his 30's. Such a waste.

    Anyway, a great knock by Warner and I hope you secure your position long term by filling your boots with runs this summer.

  • on November 23, 2013, 15:13 GMT

    The most pleasing thing about warner is perhaps his admittance of the negatives he has done. As stubborn warner is, its obligatory for him to indulge in the issues off the field but to answer his stubborness with a composed innings in the second innings speaks about the class of a player. keep up the good work mate..