ESPNcricinfo Awards

ESPNcricinfo Awards 2013 ODI bowling winner: Afridi's mysterious freakery

ESPNcricinfo Awards 2013 ODI bowling winner: Afridi's mysterious freakery

In Georgetown he employed indescribable bowling to achieve a feat of statistical ridiculousness
Osman Samiuddin

related links

Shahid Afridi

7 for 12 vs West Indies, first ODI, Georgetown

Drift, I'm beginning to think, is not quite the right word for it. It's not the right tone. Shane Warne used to get drift - that I can make sense of; Abdul Qadir used to as well, but the stock delivery for both used to float far more, like a lightly weighted balloon. What Shahid Afridi gets on those occasions when he is bowling well is called drift - I've called it that plenty of times - but I'm not sure I can any longer square that with either his style of bowling or his character.

Life drifts. Paper planes drift. Music drifts. Writing drifts. Afridi does not drift. Afridi does whatever is the opposite of drift. He is defined by that opposition. It is impossible to imagine him drifting in any sphere, shape or form. Granted bowling is not always an extension of personality but to reconcile his legspin getting drift with how he is is especially tricky.

So what is it? The central wrinkle in any appreciation of Afridi's bowling is that calling him a legspinner is to both be overambitious and inadequate. A sub-complication is that there is no such thing as orthodox legspin. You can use one fast bowler as a reference point in comparison to another and create a broadly homogenised genre. You can do the same with offspinners. But try doing that with a legspinner. Warne, Qadir, Anil Kumble, Stuart MacGill, Danish Kaneria (to use just five recent examples); as a category, legspin is only really as wide as each individual practitioner. That is partly why we love it. Afridi has never been a great turner of the ball. Sometimes he goes a whole spell without a single delivery turning away from bat. He has a wrong 'un, a conventionally gripped offbreak, a faster ball, and then a bunch of other stuff that might be deliberate and might not, but importantly might be harmless dot balls if delivered by any other man.

Lately I've started making sense of his bowling by imagining him to be a bit like Fazal Mahmood. Fazal's pace has always been a point of curiosity, but it is safe to assume, from various first-hand accounts, that he wasn't fast-bowler quick. That Richie Benaud once used his own legspin as a measure (Fazal, Benaud wrote figuratively, was twice as quick) I've always found telling. In particular, the legcutter Fazal made his name with. I can see how it might be a not-too distant relative of the vintage Afridi legbreak, except a few clicks quicker.

Fazal's best deliveries also used to get what we call drift, as well as some dip, before cutting away. But that word just isn't right; there is too much intent and purpose, too much ambition in those deliveries that behave that way, too much career-driven focus (the career, in this case, being a wicket at the end) for them to just drift. Let's maybe diagnose it exactly as we see it: deliveries with a mild affliction of swing?

The point to this pedantry being that when Afridi starts getting it is when the complex universe in his bowling is right. It was the absence of this in the months and matches leading up to this first ODI against West Indies that was beginning to make him look every one of his years - the real Pathan years. Between taking Mathew Wade's wicket off the last ball of his first over in Sharjah in August 2012 and having Lendl Simmons stumped off the first ball of his second over in Guyana in July 2013, Afridi had gone wicketless in six ODIs and 57 overs. For a guy who tries as hard to convince the world - and himself - that he really is a bowler and an incidental batsman (and to be fair has done a pretty good job with the convincing over the last decade), imagine the torture of being in such a rut.

That Simmons wicket was tell-tale of what was to come. It swung in - mildly, of course - cut away, and boom! Stumped, gone (with generous pause for endless third-umpire TV replays in between the boom, stumped and gone). Possibly it was the first one that had behaved like that for months.

And next ball he did it again, that mild inswing, except this one didn't break away. This one went on with the angle the ball's swing had created and thudded into Dwayne Bravo's front pad. Smart, dead, gone, so dead and gone, there was no use for technology this time. "It's an Afridi special as well," Ian Bishop reminded us on air, "it's quicker, and just slides straight on to Dwayne Bravo." Slide - I'm more comfortable with that than drift. Maybe it should be a genre of one: Afridi, right-arm slider.

After that there could only be one outcome. Afridi's keenness to impress and please, and to be validated, has always been of a hyperactive bent. So here, where behind him stretched a long, long drought, which had led to him being dropped from the side, he had much to make up for. He had already made crucial runs when Pakistan batted. Now he also had two early wickets, and ahead of him a batting line-up that was swiftly receding in capability; it was like adding an espresso, some speed and then a shot of pure adrenaline to the hyperactivity.

Ultimately, and sadly, there remains something underwhelming about the performance, misplaced in a nothing series between two middling sides (the hosts more so than the tourists) in cricket's nothingest format. For a while afterwards it felt like a late-period outlier in Afridi's career: in seven ODIs immediately after this, he took only four wickets. Only late last year did he return to consistently better form and output. But such is its sheer statistical freakery that it is impossible to forget and ignore. Seven for 12? Those are figures from a terrible, uncovered, unprepared and rain-drenched pitch early in the 1900s, with stiff-legged batsmen unable to cope with, I don't know, a Sydney Barnes or even the Demon, Frederick Spofforth himself.

ESPNcricinfo Awards 2013 home

. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 17, 2014, 5:20 GMT)

great afridi it was your right

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 16, 2014, 12:51 GMT)

This must have been a great spell however my choice would have been Rubel Hussain taking the fastest 6 wicket haul of all time in odis

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 16, 2014, 5:49 GMT)

Congratulation to Shahid Afridi.......i luv u so on......

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 16, 2014, 5:00 GMT)

Great achievements for Pakistan and Afridi (Dr. Amanullah)

Posted by Manesh on (March 16, 2014, 4:42 GMT)

It is questionable! Does that performance against a current WI team worth it?

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 21:58 GMT)

why i love Afridi is his capacity to win for his team from no where.................................he done it regularly with his batting,bowling, fielding and some time his appearance................HE HIS LEGEND

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 14:14 GMT)

Although Shahid Afridi is an entertainer, he is not second to any current cricketer in the world.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 11:34 GMT)

Congratulation to Shahid Afridi. In many matches he has played a role of a winning player. He also provides an entertaining cricket. He is also famous as Boom Boom. Good luck & best wishes.

Posted by Adrian on (March 15, 2014, 9:39 GMT)

No question about this one. Not only the best statistically but the match and series situation meant that this was the best in terms of situation as well. Purely a brilliant effort. To go with this, Afridi scored runs as well. A simply superb effort. If there was an award for best ODI performance of the year, this would win it.

Posted by Dummy4 on (March 15, 2014, 8:30 GMT)

The point to remember here is that these awards was for a specific period of time and for best performance during that time. It was not for whole career so comparing with other bowlers is not right.

7 for 12 was a simple and easy decision to make. No other performance during that period comes close to it. 7 wickets were alone a big performance but also for just 12 runs.

This was amazing performance by afridi. and what makes it more special is the fact that he was wicket less for previous 6 games and coming after being dropped. Batted very well.

I think this can also go as 1 of best comebacks with a very superb all round performance.

About The Awards

The ESPNcricinfo Awards recognise the best individual batting and bowling performances in cricket over the calendar year. They are voted on by an independent jury of former cricketers, commentators, and ESPNcricinfo's senior writers. Previous winners have included Dale Steyn, Virender Sehwag, Shahid Afridi and Kumar Sangakkara.

ESPNcricinfo@20 Cricketer of the Generation

A high-powered jury of cricketers, current and past, cricket writers and commentators picks the player of the last 20 years to cap ESPNcricinfo's 20th anniversary celebrations.

Contribution to Cricket award

This award, the winner of which is nominated by Rahul Dravid, recognises significant contributions to cricket in a non-playing role.

Statsguru Awards

Which batsman was the most consistent over the year? Who was the best bowler in the third and fourth innings? The Statsguru Awards go beyond runs scored, wickets taken, or averages, and are the result of detailed data analyses of performances. ESPNcricinfo's ball-by-ball data analysis of every international game has answers to these queries and more.