No. 1 on the field, not quite off it

South Africa had a satisfactory year, but the financial shortfall of an abbreviated India series and a light schedule for 2014 could spell trouble
Firdose Moonda January 3, 2014

South Africa's challenge in 2014 will be to find a worthy replacement for Jacques Kallis in the Test side © Getty Images

As in life, in cricket the best part often comes right at the end. That was South Africa's year in 2013 - an inverted pyramid that began with more fixtures than it ended with, but the most important ones came last.

The Test team spent all 12 months at No. 1 to extend their run to 19 months. They won three of the four series they played, beating New Zealand, Pakistan and India at home. The drawn rubber in the UAE against Pakistan meant South Africa's unbeaten series streak on the road lengthened to eight years. They were last defeated in a series away from home in Sri Lanka in July-August 2006 and are not due to play away until July 2014.

Their successes were underpinned by consistency in selection in the longest format. However, that will change with the retirement of Jacques Kallis. Although not as worshipped or as flamboyant as other greats who retired recently, his absence will do to South Africa what the exits of Sachin Tendulkar and Ricky Ponting did to India and Australia.

Plugging the gap will be South Africa's biggest Test challenge in the next year. As will fielding a black African in the Test XI, which has now gone three years without a representative from the country's biggest demographic group; pressure is growing for that to change.

In limited-overs cricket, South Africa can look back on a topsy-turvy 2013 with satisfaction, because flaws cruelly exposed at the Champions Trophy, where they crashed out in the semis, were eventually worked out. Of the 29 ODIs they played, they won 14 and lost 13, with important victories coming as the year ended. After series losses to New Zealand and Pakistan at home, and crushing defeats in Sri Lanka, there were worries over the make-up of the 50-over squad, particularly its batting line-up.

The opening pair has been firmed up, the middle order has settled down and there are options lower down. The bowling unit has also been through changes, with the long-term return of Dale Steyn the most important addition.

Steyn has also committed himself to the T20 squad, which has taken shape ahead of the World Twenty20. Faf du Plessis led them to series wins in Sri Lanka and Dubai and a drawn rubber at home. Combinations have been found and preparations are considered almost complete, as the search for a major trophy continues.

Beyond the boundary, Cricket South Africa faced boardroom issues that centred on the appointment of Haroon Lorgat as CEO. The eventual cost of choosing the man whom Chris Nenzani, CSA president, called the best candidate for the job was a severely shortened series against India. That brought with it financial losses of up to R200 million (US$20 million). The impact that shortfall will have on South African cricket in the long-term may start to show from next year and it is likely that development will be the first area to suffer.

For a country that has established itself among the best in the sport worldwide and continues to produce results that justify that label, maintaining strong structures is important. Whether CSA can do that as its reserves diminish may be the most pressing talking point in the future.

High point
Beating India in Durban was a four-in-one bonus for South Africa. It gave them a series win, sent off Kallis in fine style, ensured they won at a ground that had denied them the previous four times they played on it, and erased doubts about their ability to overcome pressure. The Johannesburg Test was a nerve-shattering thriller that showed off Test cricket at its most tense, but the Kingsmead one was an illustration of South Africa's ability to overcome. They faced hurdles in the form of conditions, weather and opposition, and dealt with their own emotions about Kallis' retirement, but overcame it all to end the year with success.

Low point
A shortened India tour was always expected to be an anti-climax and it proved exactly that. The reasons the tour was curtailed are shrouded in mystery. Did South Africa announce the fixtures unilaterally, or was the BCCI just throwing a tantrum? It's clear there is a skewed power structure in world cricket and administrative tussles can directly and dangerously affect the game. That, rather than South Africa's implosion at the Champions Trophy is what should worry fans.

Quinton de Kock steers the ball to the leg side, South Africa v Pakistan, 2nd ODI, Port Elizabeth, November 27, 2013
Quinton de Kock worked on his technical problems to end the year on a record-making note © Getty Images

New kid on the block
Three centuries in consecutive matches put Quinton de Kock in elite company. Only four other batsmen have achieved that feat, including AB de Villiers and Herschelle Gibbs. It sealed de Kock's spot in the one-day side ahead of Graeme Smith. After a lean run that was exacerbated by technical problems on slow pitches and against spinners in Sri Lanka, de Kock worked so hard on his game that his franchise coach, Geoffrey Toyana, said he feared de Kock would make him sleep in the nets to give him throwdowns at every available opportunity. Combined with careful mentoring, which included his batting partner telling him to "take it easy" at the end of every over, de Kock blossomed. He paced his innings well, scored freely and hit the ball cleanly. His wicketkeeping skills have also sharpened, and the promise of a successful 2014 beckons.

Farewell to
Paul Harris and Ahmed Amla were among the long-serving players who called it a day in 2013, but the year will be remembered for being Kallis' last as a Test cricketer. He announced his retirement unexpectedly on Christmas Day and left the format six days later on a high. Kallis became the only player with 100-plus Tests to score a century in his final match. He finished with 13,289 runs, 292 wickets and 200 catches - and a reputation as South Africa's best cricketer.

What 2014 holds
Too little cricket. South Africa's schedule for the next 12 months is nothing short of sorry. January is completely bare, which allows the national players to turn out in the domestic T20 competition, but peak summer time should see more than that. Australia's tour of three Tests and three T20s precedes the World Twenty20, and is followed by a lengthy break. The FTP has a tour of Zimbabwe pencilled in for July, but with the financial problems in that country's cricket, it's likely that may be postponed. There's only West Indies to look forward to in the home summer.

. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (January 3, 2014, 2:51 GMT)

"As will fielding a black African in the Test XI, which has now gone three years without a representative from the country's biggest demographic group. Pressure is growing for that to change."

If S Africa select a Black African cricket in their test XI not on performances, that in itself can unbalance their team and upset their aim to achieve greater things as a # 1 team.

Currently no Black African is performing good enough in S Africa domestic cricket to be worth a test place. This is very clear.

Posted by Charith on (January 3, 2014, 4:28 GMT)

If they had played test cricket in Sri Lanka their record would have being very different.

Posted by yuvraj on (January 3, 2014, 5:05 GMT)

I dont know why the author lists beating a mediocre team like India at home as our high point of the year. I think this should be our lowpoint of the year , since we failed to whitewash a weak team like India at home.

Posted by Phillip on (January 3, 2014, 5:07 GMT)

@Charith99-Your Lanka struggled to beat Bangladesh at home.Right now they are getting thrashed in the U.A.E.What makes you think Africa would lose here?Their loss here nearly 8 yrs ago?ODI form

Posted by Faan on (January 3, 2014, 6:11 GMT)

@Wayne Perry Completely agree. No other side in the world could be forced to pick a player not based on performance. It is basic. It is wrong.

Posted by Android on (January 3, 2014, 6:14 GMT)

@Albert_cambell: dude this mediocre team has a cricket board which control give some respect to other team when you know that your team was under pressure for most of the time....

Posted by Faan on (January 3, 2014, 6:38 GMT)

If South Africa picks a team based on political interference (again - like in Australia 2002) the ICC should take steps. This is what FIFA would do. There must be standards.

Posted by Corne on (January 3, 2014, 7:33 GMT)

Politics will be the end of Cricket in SA. Between the BCCI and quotas AsA will once again drop back to the pack, add revenue shortfalls and the struggle would become too great to sustain a top team.

Posted by Garreth on (January 3, 2014, 7:35 GMT)

I think the real wake up call (for all nations that aren't India) is to stop depending on the BCCI's revenue to keep their boards alive. As a proud Proteas supporter, this has been a real shock to me. Call me ignorant but I did not have even the slightest idea of the extent that an Indian tour to our shores funds our cricket. But what is clear is that this has to change to at least a certain extent. It starts with our domestic game which seems to get very little help. The Sunfoil Series doesn't even get any form of advertising or PR. You can stroll through the gate. It's almost like they've just assumed no one will come so why bother? When I tell my friends about the Sunfoil Series, they don't know what on earth I'm talking about. And this coming from cricket fans! Not even the LAs are looked after. Only the Ram Slam is given a push. And the PR and marketing is poor there too. CSA needs to be more hands on. We should be generating our own revenue that is attractive to those overseas.

Posted by ZCF on (January 3, 2014, 7:39 GMT)

Wayne what are you on about? There is absolutely no reason to suggest that Tsotsobe would not have performed better than Morkel over the last 3 years, neither is there reason to suggest that Tsolekile would not have done well enough with the bat considering the likes of Boucher before him, then Faf, JP, Elgar & Alviro have all had horribbly low returns with the bat along the way.

Likewise in terms of wickets taken&economy, Phangiso would have done just as well as RobbieP&Tahir have. It's not as if they've set the world alight. They cannot contain at all, and cannot take wickets to an acceptable level for frontline spinners. That's what you would say of Aaron before he even gets picked, well , that's what those two have been since being picked!

Gqamane was red hot not so long ago but wasn't even selected for any FC XI A sides. Each time a limping Marchant&Parnell were selected ahead of him only to get pasted alongside the other seamers. This has nothing to do with being "good enough"!

Images of the year


More in 2013 review

How closely did you follow cricket in 2013? Take Steven Lynch's quiz