Alagappan Muthu is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo
CWC League 2 (1)
QEA Trophy (1)
AUS v WI (1)
Hazare Trophy (3)
Challenger Trophy (1)
New Zealand 111 for 2 (Mitchell 49, Bumrah 2-19) beat India 110 for 7 (Boult 3-20, Sodhi 2-17) by eight wickets
India's chances of making the semi-finals of the 2021 T20 World Cup is in it's complicated territory after their comprehensive defeat at the hands of New Zealand on Sunday.
With Pakistan all but assured of one semi-final spot and New Zealand joining Afghanistan for the other one, India's campaign is now at risk of coming to an earlier close than expected.
The plan that backfired
India used to play T20s like ODIs, focusing on singles and twos and believing that boundaries are just bonuses. A consequence of time spent in the middle. Then they were beaten by a six-happy West Indies in the 2016 World Cup and had to wake up.
This format demands an experiment or three. A change or five. So they invested in a different kind of player. The kind who could hit sixes from ball one. Like Ishan Kishan. He opened the batting here ahead of the established Rohit Sharma and fell in the third over. #BestLaidPlans
Early wickets are crucial against this Indian team. A lot of their limited-overs success is built on having one of the top three going deep into an innings. New Zealand did well to deny that luxury as Tim Southee and Trent Boult took out the openers within the powerplay and set the stage for the headline act.
The spin strangle
India went 71 balls between the sixth and the 17th overs without hitting a single boundary. Such was the control that Santner and Sodhi had over this game.
The trick was in the lengths they bowled. Both spinners were careful not to stray so full that a batter could plant his front foot down and launch them out of the park. They were equally cautious about never giving them the room to free the arms as well.
Hitting that in-between spot repeatedly - while also targeting the stumps - enabled Santner and Sodhi to put so much pressure on India that they eventually crumbled to their second-lowest total in T20I history. 110 for 7.
The adaptation malfunction
Dubai is a tough place to set a total. Conditions are at their hardest at the start of the game before dew comes in during the second innings and helps the ball come onto the bat. Both teams were well aware of this vagary but only one of them could properly adapt to it.
Take Kohli's wicket, for example. India were 48 for 3 in the 11th over and he'd made only 9 off 16 balls. Dire. Yes, but he needed to forget about all that and just bat the 20 overs. He needed to be like the lead in that meme that goes "this is fine" while the whole building burns. But he panicked.
Instead of playing for the back end of the innings, when it becomes noticeably easier to score runs, he succumbed to the pressure and played a low-percentage shot. Sodhi had bowled that ball - a tossed up legbreak that dipped at the last second - looking for that shot and had the Indian captain caught at long-on.
With New Zealand's bowlers having done the lion's share of the work, their batters were able to go out and chase the target down with zero pressure on them. Daryl Mitchell then made things even easier, top-scoring with 49 off 35 balls, as his team raced to the finish line with eight wickets and 33 balls to spare.
Over 15 • NZ 111/2New Zealand won by 8 wickets (with 33 balls remaining)
Powered by Smart Stats
Ish Sodhi 2.0: How a horror series against England turned the legspinner's career around
The New Zealand leggie on advice from Mitchell Santner, his match-winning spell against India, and his friendship with Rashid Khan
Rathour: India opened with Ishan Kishan as 'we didn't want too many left-handers in late middle order'
"It was the whole management who sits together and takes this call and of course, Rohit is part of that group"
Mahela Jayawardene: 'Rohit Sharma should have opened against New Zealand'
Says India's last-minute rejig of their batting order may have done them more harm than good
Luck went against India, but so did their T20 template
They were up against it after losing two key tosses, but their anchor-heavy, allrounder-light structure made it even harder for them to compete
ICC Men's T20 World Cup