Australia should have picked Warne (14 February 1999)
THE more I saw of Shane Warne's captaincy during the one-day series, the more I was convinced the time was right for him to be appointed full-time Australian leader
14-Feb-1999
14 February 1999
Australia should have picked Warne
By Ian Chappell
THE more I saw of Shane Warne's captaincy during the one-day
series, the more I was convinced the time was right for him to be
appointed full-time Australian leader. The Australian Cricket
Board opted for Steve Waugh as captain and in doing so I believe
they missed a glorious opportunity to set in train another period
of excellent leadership to follow the reign of Mark Taylor.
As with captaincy itself, the time to act on a gut feeling is
immediately and if you do not the moment is lost. The ACB have
missed the moment and the time will never be as right for Warne
again.
In the finals series, Warne's captaincy made the difference in
the SCG match which England should have won. At the MCG
yesterday, Alec Stewart did not bring Darren Gough back into the
attack when the game was in the balance. Instead he allowed the
Darren Lehmann-Damien Martyn partnership to flourish by not
trying to make something happen - a mistake Warne has not been
guilty of making during his tenure.
The ACB chairman said that Steve Waugh was chosen as the next
captain because he was the right man for the job. All I can say
is he must be a hell of a lot better than Warne when it comes to
captaining Test matches because in the head-to-head leadership
battle in the one-day series, the bowler was clearly superior.
The way England batted it would not have mattered if Stewart had
made all the right moves in the field. There are major worries in
that department as they struggle against leg-spin because of
inept footwork and they were troubled by Glenn McGrath's pace and
bounce and were not able to collar the accurate Adam Dale. It was
obvious that the more the Australian bowlers saw of the England
batting line-up the less likely they were to make a big score and
it became patently clear they were relying heavily on Graeme Hick
to post a big total. Before the selectors made a few changes to
personnel, Australia were in a similar position with Mark Waugh,
but now they have a lot of batsmen contributing.
The Australian selectors are in the fortunate position for the
World Cup of having to worry about whom to leave out. Damien
Martyn, for example, will probably miss out on the first choice
side with Steve Waugh returning and yet he was a consistent
contributor. For their part the England selectors must be in a
quandary over World Cup personnel as this series has posed more
questions than it has solved problems. Apart from the batting
worries, England need more variety in bowling and also lack a
top-class all-rounder. While the home turf advantage will be put
forward as a reason not to make too many changes, I think the
problem is more a lack of quality options. I do not think the
home turf advantage will apply against better teams like
Australia and South Africa.
Australia are now in good shape for the World Cup and the only
major problem is one that reared its head under Steve Waugh's
captaincy. In two finals, in Sharjah and at the Commonwealth
Games, the players got angry as the run of play turned against
them and once they lost the plot, they lost the game. That has
not happened under Warne's captaincy and in fact they have
remained extremely well focused in tight situations and it has
helped them win a couple of games that appeared lost. It will be
interesting to see if Steve Waugh can eradicate this flaw that
has haunted his captaincy.
Ian Harvey, the Victorian all-rounder who has played one-day
international cricket for Australia, has been lined up as the new
overseas player for Gloucestershire. Harvey, a big hitter and
medium-paced bowler, will replace Courtney Walsh, who left the
county in controversial circumstances late last year.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)