Beaten, but far from disgraced
The rearguardin Mohali, the first four days here; maybe Pakistan isjust beginning to learn how not to lose at the moment
Osman Samiuddin in Kolkata
20-Mar-2005
![]() |
|
Of today, the biggest regret can only be the nature of
the result. No, we should only be despondent that Pakistan
collapsed today, not so much because they lost, but because a wonderfully compulsive game of cricket, one
that refused to be tamed until its very end, produced
a tame climax.
India are the better team, of that there should be no
doubt. They have been throughout this series, but
Pakistan have competed gamely when they had no right to
and maybe not many gave them a chance to, considering
the rawness of their personnel. Consider the
monumental proportion of mismatches: a Mohammad
Khaleel or Rana Naveed-ul-Hasan against Sachin Tendulkar,
Virender Sehwag, Rahul Dravid; Anil Kumble against Kamran Akmal, Asim
Kamal, Taufeeq Umar or Salman Butt. But for nine days
out of ten in this series, Pakistan had somehow kept
apace - just. Into the tenth day, there was even a
glimmer of hope.
Just before and after lunch, there was evidence of
India's superiority. Already four wickets down,
thoughts of victory long gone, Asim Kamal took on
Harbhajan Singh. The penultimate over before lunch,
Harbhajan, shockingly resplendent in white patka,
found his bounce. Kamal tried to cut, but under-edged
instead. He turned around shaking his head. Next ball,
same again, except that he cut it for four.
Harbhajan continued to confound - in the third over
after lunch, Kamal prodded a sharply rising ball just
past short leg. Next ball, as it turned sharply and
reared up - it had promised to do just this on the
last day - Kamal cut, and edged, only for Rahul Dravid to
continue a mildly worrying dip in form at slip.
Soon after, he played a sharply rising ball as well as
he could, off his ribs almost, and watched, relieved
as it fell just short of silly mid-off. He also
managed to survive a strong lbw appeal next
ball. If they were boxing, the referee would have
stopped the fight. Kamal, like Pakistan, was bettered,
but he refused, also like Pakistan, to be battered so
easily.
Maybe for the Pakistanis, spoilt on the riches of Imran,
Javed, Wasim and Waqar, drunk on Pakistan's epic
battles with West Indies and dominance over India
in the 80s, a heavy loss against India is difficult to
accept. It shouldn't be, for this Indian side - as the
Australia side Pakistan played just before - is among
the greatest the country has ever produced. This
clearly isn't the case with Pakistan, the remnants of
their most successful side left only two years ago.
Rebuilding, as Bob Simpson and Allan Border might tell
you, can be a traumatic thing. Australia win
regularly, they win ruthlessly, but first they needed
to lose and then learn how not to lose. The rearguard
in Mohali, the first four days here; maybe Pakistan is
just beginning to learn how not to lose at the moment.
In time, they will learn to recognise passages of play
on which close matches hinge, like their third-day
collapse, like Dinesh Karthik's effervescent
intervention, like Shahid Afridi's blazing demise
against a dying sun, like the first ball this morning,
and learn to tilt the balance in their favour.
What we need to do is learn to accept that. We need to
recognise that Pakistan contributed fully to what
Rahul Dravid said had been a wonderful advertisement
for Test cricket. We need to recognise that in that,
there is no disgrace.
Osman Samiuddin is a freelance writer based in Karachi.