Is 'Operation Gentleman' missing anyone?
Even as 'Operation Gentleman' draws to its concluding phase, searching lockers of various current and former cricketers nationwide, the mystery that sprung from another locker has gone largely unnoticed
Anand Vasu
24-Jul-2000
Even as 'Operation Gentleman' draws to its concluding phase, searching
lockers of various current and former cricketers nationwide, the
mystery that sprung from another locker has gone largely unnoticed. At
the end of June and the beginning of July, the contents of a locker at
the Mumbai Gymkhana attracted the attention of the national
media. Sunil Gavaskar, former captain of India had 'large' amounts of
foreign currency stowed away in his locker. One is forced to leave the
'large' amount relatively unqualified.
When the story first broke, the amount stood at Rs 1.25 Lakhs. In a
week, investigations suggested that the figure was closer to a
whopping 49 lakhs. A further week later, reports suggested that the
currency found was around the Rs 7 lakh mark. Through all this,
Gavaskar remained remarkably low key. Not committing himself either
about the contents of the locker or their origins of the same,
Gavaskar let the issue lose steam.
With investigating officials being tightlipped about the affair, the
matter was left unresolved.
And today, the lockers of a host of former players, current players
and administrators will be opened by Income Tax officials. Although
this is one time when Gavaskar will not mind being out of the
limelight, the whispers have begun to do their rounds. The
irregularities that were hinted at when the Bombay Gymkhana locker was
opened should have created enough room for suspicion. On what basis
was the list of people to be raided prepared?
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which has been investigating
the matchfixing allegations that have plagued the cricket world said
that it was working closely with the IT agencies. The Union Minister
of State for Finance, Dhananjaya Kumar, said the other day in
Bangalore "we have cogent evidence to prove their nexus in match
fixing for amassing this kind of wealth. The Income Tax department has
substantial evidence to prove concealment of wealth." This would
indicate that the raids conducted were at least partially
successful. It was also deemed that it could take upto two months for
the investigations to be completed. In that case, would it not have
been wise to raid all those who had given any room for suspicion?
People would argue that even those who were innocent would be harassed
in the event of such an investigation. This in turn begs the question,
how far are agencies willing to go in order to get to the bottom of
this affair?
Surely, anyone who did have anything to hide would have taken adequate
measures to escape the dragnet after the recent raids. If the
investigations missed someone, one would never know whether it was by
accident or design.