One keeper a big mistake hitting out
Ridley Jacobs is a lucky man
Haydn Gill
21-Jul-2000
Ridley Jacobs is a lucky man.
From the time the West Indies selectors announced their squad of 16 in
May and included only one specialist wicketkeeper for the long tour of
England, there was a big hullabaloo.
Why was Courtney Browne not in as second-string wicketkeeper? What
about Junior Murray? Some were even mentioning the names of the
youngsters Vishal Nagamootoo and Wayne Philip.
It was major talk around the region in every rum shop, street corner,
and business house.
In their defence, the selectors identified Jimmy Adams and Wavell
Hinds as the two who would relieve Jacobs whenever he needed to be
rested for the many first-class matches during the tour.
Many were shocked. And they had reason to be. Adams has hardly kept
wicket for the last three years because of knee problems, while Hinds
has only been known to have done so on a couple of occasions for his
club in Jamaica.
A few days after the team left for England, it was announced that 22-
year-old Philip had joined the MCC playing staff on attachment and the
selection committee had endorsed his availability for the West Indies
team as the tour managers saw fit.
It was clearly pointed out, however, that he was not an official
member of the West Indies touring party and would be available for
tour matches other than Tests and One-Day Internationals.
By not picking another specialist wicketkeeper, one can assume that
the selectors were saying that Jacobs was virtually guaranteed a place
in the team for each of the five Tests and a maximum of nine One-Day
Internationals.
Jacobs did little in the first two Tests and the NatWest One-Day
series. Should he continue to perform disappointingly, will Adams or
Hinds be asked to take his place behind the stumps? I doubt it.
Everyone will acknowledge that Jacobs made a sterling contribution on
his entry to the team on the ill-fated tour of South Africa in 1998
and sustained it to some extent when Australia came to the Caribbean
last year.
His recent form with the bat, however, has been scratchy and his
wicketkeeping has also been on the decline, especially during the trination limited-overs series that involved England and Zimbabwe.
It is his batting that is causing the most worry. While he was good
enough to score 460 runs and average 32.85 in his first nine Tests,
his last nine Tests have produced only 131 at an average of 10.07.
His scores from the Christmas tour of New Zealand to the recent Lord's
Test were, in chronological order: 5, 2, 19 not out, 20, 10, 0, 27, 6,
10, 0, 5, 5, 10, 12. Unkind fans will suggest you can use some of
those numbers for tonight's Mega Six draw.
Surely, a player with such a recent record must not be allowed to have
an unchallenged place for as long as three months. Others with similar
records were discarded in the past.
History also shows that the West Indies have always picked two
specialist glovemen for tours of England during the last 25 years. In
1995, Murray and Browne were chosen; Jeffrey Dujon and David Williams
were carried in 1988 and 1991; Dujon and Thelston Payne in 1984;
Derryck Murray and David Murray in 1980; and Derryck Murray and Mike
Findlay in 1976.
This time around, only one keeper was picked a big mistake, I dare
say.