Pakistan tangled in their own web
When did spin, not pace, become Pakistan's calling card?
04-Oct-2007
![]() |
![]()
|
'Are you 1970s India in disguise?' didn't ask any of the banners at the
National Stadium in Karachi. At least one should've done, for the trust
and emphasis Pakistan have placed on spin in this match has been similar
to that India used to in the days of Bedi, Prasanna and their mates. Is it
misplaced?
Pakistan went into this Test with, in effect, four spinners. Admittedly
the pitch has been brazenly flirting with them from ball one (that too was
basically in Pakistan's control) but as a change of policy, we haven't seen the likes since the Taliban became the enemy. Unless the world missed something that Shoaib Malik didn't, when did spin, not pace, become Pakistan's calling card?
Here, pace - and what fine specimens Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul are - has
been reduced to roles extras would scoff at. Asif didn't bowl at all today
(and he wasn't injured according to the selectors), Gul bowled seven
overs, while in all, Pakistan bowled 57 overs.
Barring a break to change ends, Abdur Rehman wheeled away throughout,
mostly partnered by Danish Kaneria. Neither was bad and the situation
beyond repair anyway, but relying entirely on both, ignoring your pace
made for mysterious ways.
Perhaps some myths need to be punctured, and not just that the quickest
way to a South African collapse is through the finger or the wrist.
Muttiah Muralitharan dispelled that notion last year (though only after
taking ten wickets against them): "South Africans are very good players of
spin. In the '90s I would say they were weak against spin but not now." On
this evidence, Murali is not wrong and if Jacques Kallis does have
weaknesses, spin doesn't seem one.
But as with the lazy assumption that Pakistani batsmen handle spin well,
so too should be ditched the notion that Pakistan has a great spin bowling
tradition and is a spin trap waiting to happen. There have been a few very
good ones, no doubt, and one probably great one. Over 55 years.
And even when Abdul Qadir was moodily turning matches, it was mostly in
tandem with pace. At its best, a lovely balance has existed: Imran at one
end, Qadir at the other, Wasim and Waqar with Mushtaq, Shoaib and Kaneria.
Pace has always played lead bully, spin its crafty, snide back-up,
scavenging away.
Had Malik chased up some previous in this matter, he may have hesitated
before boldly going where few Pakistan captains have gone before. Even at
Bangalore in 2005, when Pakistan last heavily relied on spin to win a
Test, they found Mohammad Sami in one of those rare, volatile moods
willing to blow away whatever came his way.
But the real series to dig up was England's visit in 2000-01. Pakistan,
believing England to be frail against spin, played two specialist spinners
in Faisalabad, two part-timers and opened the attack with Wasim Akram and
Abdul Razzaq. In Lahore they went one better and picked three specialist
spinners, one part-time and Akram and Razzaq for variety. In Karachi, they
played two specialists and a part-timer, Waqar Younis and Razzaq merely
taking shine off the ball. Nobody in Pakistan, and especially here in
Karachi, needs reminding of the consequences, and in particular that
England's hero was a tall left-arm wheely-bin.
South Africa, who are not muddled and instead utterly realistic about
their strengths, have made far better use of the same pitch with four
seamers and one spinner. As England's pace attack did back then, Andre Nel
and Jacques Kallis have mixed, matched and messed Pakistan up. That has
allowed Dale Steyn and Paul Harris a free hand to do what they are there
for. So well have they done that an out-of-sync Makhaya Ntini has barely
been noticed.
Whatever the result here, Pakistan have a problem to resolve already. Do
they stick with spin or slip back to their strength? Eight wickets on
debut, as Rehman took, is not to be sniffed at though neither is a
200-plus Test wicket legspinner. Word is that Lahore might also spin and
two spinners might play again. Dropping Mohammad Hafeez for a seamer is a
get-out clause, though it leaves their opening even weaker, more makeshift
than it already is.
Despite Younis Khan's magnificent fit of batting madness in the afternoon,
Pakistan are still likely to end up paying the consequences. And if they
persist in Lahore, then consequences may be greater still.
Osman Samiuddin is the Pakistan editor of Cricinfo