Sehwag looks impressive
I was expecting a closely contested final at Durban on Friday but even as the Indian innings drew to a sorry close, I knew that my hopes were going to be dashed
Erapalli Prasanna
27-Oct-2001
I was expecting a closely contested final at Durban on Friday but even
as the Indian innings drew to a sorry close, I knew that my hopes were
going to be dashed.
After both Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly fell cheaply, only Sehwag
looked capable of taking the fight to the South African camp. The Delhi
lad impressed me a great deal during his sweet cameo. The way in which
he played some of the shots gave me the impression that he will be ready
to lead the Indian batting when Tendulkar and Ganguly hang up their
boots.
© CricInfo |
Ganguly was dismissed when he tried to break the shackles that Shaun
Pollock and Nantie Hayward had imposed. The two South Africans quicks
bowled with great discipline, keeping the ball where the fourth stump
would have been. This made it difficult for the Indian duo to unleash
their wide array of shots. Starved of any width for six overs, Ganguly
in desperation tried to make room for himself and hit over the top. But
on a pitch where the ball was not coming on to the bat, he only
succeeded in edging a catch to Boucher. Pollock, for his part, couldn't
contain his joy when his policy of denial finally worked.
Tendulkar too was not allowed to dominate - he only made 17 off the 40
balls he faced despite stroking three elegant boundaries. He too fell to
a desperate shot; trying to cut a ball that was not quite there for the
shot to be played. The South Africans had done excellent groundwork and
they carried out their plans to a T on the day. Once they had silenced
the two big guns the match was theirs for the taking.
Rahul Dravid again made a fighting 77, displaying his solid batting
technique and cool temperament. But then his innings was never going to
win us the match. His technical excellence is going to be more important
in the Test series that is to follow. If you were to ask me, Rahul
should bat at No.3 in the three-match series ahead of VVS Laxman.
This also brings me to another important point I would like to make.
Considering the vital role that my fellow Karnataka statemate will play
as a batsman in the Tests, I was baffled to see him 'keeping in the
final two one-dayers. Was the risk worth the gains; I, for one,
definitely don't think so.
In my opinion, Deep Dasgupta should have done the job that was entrusted
to him by the selectors. The young man from Bengal is a specialist
'keeper and only by giving him greater exposure can we turn him into a
better player. Dasgupta is also in the Test side and by telling him to
warm the benches, the team management was not doing his confidence any
good. The think-tank would do well to remember that two of the world's
finest 'keepers - Rodney Marsh and Ian Healy - were also never thought
to be any good during their salad days. It was only with experience
gained by greater exposure in the international arena that they matured
into the world-beaters they later proved to be.
As for the squad announced for the Tests, I feel that the selection of
five seamers was totally unnecessary. In any case, we can play only a
maximum of three seamers and so I felt that five were one too many. The
selection of Connor Williams as an opener too was a huge surprise to me.
The Baroda Ranji captain has no experience playing in the international
arena and I feel that it is not a very clever idea to expose him to the
South Africans quicks.
Coming to the selection of Sameer Dighe as the first-choice 'keeper, I
feel it must serve as a wake-up call to Dasgupta. Nayan Mongia would
most definitely have been the best choice but then it is common
knowledge that he is not in the good books of either the Indian captain
or the senior players.
© CricInfo |