South Africa seek missing ingredient
Not for the first time this winter, South Africa have been outwitted and outplayed in by a confident, bullish Australian team
The Verdict by Will Luke
27-Mar-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
As disappointing as they have been, it is also somewhat of a surprise
that South Africa have allowed Australia to be so dominant. Aside from
their personnel - an astute leader in Graeme Smith, a run machine in
Jacques Kallis and the inimitable Shaun Pollock - just two weeks ago
they successfully chased down 435 to win that most extraordinary of
one-day matches. Herschelle Gibbs' blitzkrieg innings of 175 ought to have lit up South Africa's summer; provided them with momentum and bounce and, crucially, proved to them that Australia are mortal. So
far this series, and especially in this Test, the only bounce evident
has come from the odd delivery from Makhaya Ntini. Australia have
ruled in every sense. And all this without Glenn McGrath.
However, you sensed South Africa knew their one-day triumph was a
one-off; that the thrill and euphoria owed as much to the alignment of
the stars than the alignment of Gibbs' bat. And so it has proved. A
golden opportunity to gain the upper hand in the Test series was lost
at Cape Town. In preparing a pitch more suited for seam than spin - in
an attempt to
counter Shane Warne - they fell foul to a metronomic journeyman,
Stuart Clark, making his debut. In a blink of an eye, the euphoria had
been replaced with, well, normality.
Similarly here at Durban, they have failed to grasp the key moment of
a session in which to attack. After going wicketless before lunch,
they watched Ponting better his first-innings hundred with a sublime
116 and, in doing so, became the second man behind Sunil Gavaskar to
hit twin-centuries in a match for the third time. South Africa lacked
spark and spunk and were drifting - where was the fight, the
aggression and the 'brave' cricket which Smith and his coach, Mickey
Arthur, spoke about before the series?
![]() |
![]()
|
For all Smith's admirable punch as a leader and his passionate
patriotism, he desperately needs a go-to man. When his side are up
against it, Kallis invariably digs them out with a backs-to-the wall
hundred, but there lacks dynamism in South Africa's play. Gibbs, too,
has had glittering moments in his career - not least in that one-dayer
- but has not scored a Test century since January 2005. Indeed,
perhaps more worrying are his mode of dismissals: in his last three
innings, Australia have crashed through his defence with ease.
Of all his men, Andre Nel is perhaps Smith's most outspoken player,
bristling with pride and passion. However today, the passion bubbled
over into farce when, faced with a pumped-up Adam Gilchrist - which,
to be fair, is a far from comforting sight as a bowler - he fell
victim to a controlled assault by the batsman. Gilchrist hit him for
22 in a single over, prompting Nel to launch a tirade of abuse - some
of it audible to the stump mic. That Gilchrist was to fall two runs
later, caught by Nel in the deep, was beside the point: South Africa
were clearly rattled, and Australia knew it. Not so much brave cricket
as thoughtless and slightly desperate.
As the gloom descended on Kingsmead, a similar shadow is cast over
South Africa's dressing-room. In times of desperation, South Africa
could do worse than apply the same go-for-broke attitude which won
them the most unlikely of one-dayers. Playing for the draw will not be
playing the Australians at their own game - something which, so far
this series, South Africa have failed to do.
Will Luke is editorial assistant of Cricinfo