Srikkanth: Chappell’s divide & rule policy cost team dear
If Chappell had indeed used ‘friends’ in the media to get the news out before it could be discussed in the appropriate forum, then that does not talk highly of his methods
If Chappell had indeed used ‘friends’ in the media to get the news out before it could be discussed in the appropriate forum, then that does not talk highly of his methods. Right from the moment he took over the reins of Indian cricket, he has resorted to a policy of divide and rule. It may have worked in the ouster of Sourav. Maybe, he is trying his hand again now. Another area where Chappell has been found wanting is in not understanding his role with Indian cricket. He is not a Messiah to clean the system. He is a paid professional whose job was to ensure the Indian team won matches. Sadly, that never happened.
... If only Sourav (Ganguly) had heeded the warnings (about not hiring Chappell as coach) of several Australian players, including the highly-respected Steve Waugh, Indian cricket would have been saved of this 'tamasha'," he added with obvious bitterness at the nasty turn that Indian cricket has taken in the aftermath of the World Cup flop.
Elaborating on the typical modus operandi of an agent, the former official said, "he charges 30 per cent commission on total contract. He enrols a senior player, who has a say in selection and then ropes in other players (for advertisement) and shares his 30 per cent with the concerned senior player in exchange for the inclusion of the other players named by him (agent) in the team."'
Sriram Veera is a former staff writer at ESPNcricinfo