Matches (16)
IPL (4)
County DIV1 (3)
County DIV2 (4)
WT20 QUAD (in Thailand) (2)
OMA-W vs BAH-W (1)
CZE-W vs CYP-W (1)
Women's Tri-Series (SL) (1)
Analysis

Staying dumb may be the best option

The Indian board's latest warning to Sehwag was totally uncalled for and reeks of double standards, writes Siddhartha Vaidyanathan



Virender Sehwag: mum's the word, keep the secret © Getty Images
Here we go again. How irresponsible can Virender Sehwag get? One can understand his liberal swishing of the bat out in the middle, but look what he's done now. He actually had the audacity to publicly go on record and say that there's too much cricket and that players "need a break" to guard against burn-out. Worst still, he was cheeky enough to say that Sourav Ganguly was the best captain he has played under and added that (take a deep breath) "we miss him".
Obviously, none of this would sit well with the Indian board, who promptly issued a warning. One wonders how Niranjan Shah, the board secretary, controlled a chuckle when he read out this statement: "As a player you cannot give your opinion on any other player." Shah, probably realising his folly a day later, attempted a cover-up operation: "It was not a warning, just our advice to him. There is no question of taking action against Sehwag. The matter is closed."
But, more pertinently, why was it an issue in the first place? Sehwag isn't the first to be pulled up for opening his mouth. The two Singhs - Harbhajan and Yuvraj - have been gagged earlier and Greg Chappell has faced the music as well, except that his comments, unlike the other three, were against Ganguly. So it's 3-1 at the moment, but the refereeing has been quite hopeless.
Around a month back, at the pre-match press conference before the sixth one-dayer against England at Jamshedpur, Sehwag was asked about Ganguly. His response was guarded, more an effort to pass the question rather than create a stir: "... there's no question of looking back ... We have already forgotten that chapter." No warning then, no yellow card, no nothing.
Around two weeks back, Sachin Tendulkar was asked, again in a press conference, about too much cricket. One of his responses: "I have been happy with my schedule. It is important to physically and mentally recharge yourself after every series. One must make sure there is a break after matches and series." Tendulkar expresses his opinion. No hassles. Sehwag expresses his opinion. Warned. Inference: open your mouth but just don't say what the board doesn't want to hear.
And what if you are asked about your former captain? He might have been your greatest backer, he might have revitalised your career, and he might be your hero, but it's almost anathema to take his name, more so if you are praising him. If the Indian board has its way, a few years down the line you may watch this version of a player interview.
Interviewer: Who have been the key players in India becoming the best team in the world?
Player: Sorry, I am not in a position to answer that.
I: Tell us about the World Cup final. What a superb innings from your captain ...
P: I wish I could talk about that innings. But I can't publicly comment on other players.
I: Do you still have fond memories of your debut?
P: Great moment. I need to thank one man for having faith in me during that time. I am sure you know who I am talking about. That's all I can say.
I: A thousand Twenty20 games in the last year. Isn't it too much?
P: That is for the board to comment.

Siddhartha Vaidyanathan is staff writer of Cricinfo