TCCB Bow Out With Wide-ball Rethink (11 Dec 1996)
A PROPOSAL that wides in first-class cricket should count as two runs rather than one is amongthe items on the last agenda to be discussed over the next two days at Lord`s by the Test and County Cricket Board
11-Dec-1996
11 December 1996
TCCB bow out with wide-ball rethink
By Christopher Martin-Jenkins
A PROPOSAL that wides in first-class cricket should count as two
runs rather than one is amongthe items on the last agenda to be
discussed over the next two days at Lord`s by the Test and County
Cricket Board. Created in 1968, the Board will be dissolved
after the meeting ends tomorrow, making way for the England and
Wales Cricket Board, who formally start business in the new year.
The reason for punishing wides more severely is an odd one. The
cricket committee have been tackling the growing practice in
championship matches of left-arm spin bowlers - and, very occasionally, leg-spinners - operating from over the wicket and aiming for the rough outside the legs of the right-handers.
Unless batsmen are to take major risks by hitting against the
often considerable spin, their only counter is to pad the ball
away. In the case of Dermot Reeve last season, this was accompanied by letting go of the bat in case the ball should pop up
off the pad and hit gloves or bat.
It is a genuine cause for concern but I am not sure that this
idea will help much. How are umpires to decide whether a ball
pitching some 2ft outside the leg stump and then turning - in the
case of Shane Warne, sufficiently far to sometimes hit the off
stump - is a genuine wide? Preferable, perhaps, would be to allow
leg before decisions to balls pitching outside leg stump if the
ball has been delivered from over the wicket. Negative bowling
would then become positive.
Other cricket matters on the agenda are less contentious. As revealed in The Electronic Telegraph a month ago, the perceived
disadvantage England teams faced in home Tests last season by using a ball not suited to their bowlers is about to be removed.
Assuming ratification by the Board, England, like other countries, will decide at the outset of a home series which ball will
be used for all the Tests.
England`s captain and coach, Mike Atherton and David Lloyd, were
understandably unhappy when Atherton kept losing the toss with
the Indian and Pakistan captains for the choice between the two
English-made balls. For better or worse, the Duke ball rather
than the Reader, which both Mohammad Azharuddin and Wasim Akram
preferred, will no doubt be selected for the Ashes series.
The Board will also be asked to agree that there should be an
inner 15-yard circle in next season`s Benson and Hedges Cup, to
make clear the limit for the two stationary close fielders required by the rules for one-day internationals. A new formula for
recalculating the target for the side batting second in rainaffected one-day games is being tried this winter - initially by
England in Zimbabwe - and will be adopted if it works more fairly
than other methods.
The finer details of the administrative exchange will be the main
business for an organisation who, over the last 28 years, have
filled the MCC committee room to bursting three times a year with
attendances of at least 40. The difficulty so unwieldy a body
have had in reaching a consensus on matters of national significance, and of taking quick decisions, is one of the reasons why a
single body responsible for cricket at all levels is required.
The last piece of the new body, inevitably something of a fudge,
should be agreed today when the constitution of the Recreational
Forum is formally adopted. The RF and the First Class Forum,
responsible to the new 16-man Management Board for amateur and
professional cricket respectively, already have chairmen, newly
elected by the counties. David Morgan will head the FCF; John
Pickup, chairman of Cheshire and the Minor Counties Cricket Association, becomes chief representative for youth and club cricket.
Two recent Board meetings have ensured what should be a smooth
transition on Jan 1. All but three members of The Management
Board, chaired by Lord MacLaurin, with Tim Lamb and Cliff Barker
as chief and deputy chief executives, are already elected. Peter
Edwards of Essex, Alan Wheelhouse of Nottinghamshire and Tony
Cross of Warwickshire have emerged from recent elections as the
representatives of county cricket on the Board.
MacLaurin and Lamb are automatic members of the England Management Committee, who will look after all aspects of international
cricket and who will become the crucial cog in the new machine.
Chaired by Bob Bennett, their other members will be David Acfield, another automatic inclusion as chairman of cricket, and
the newly elected John Barclay and Brian Bolus, who finished
ahead of Dennis Amiss and J T Murray. One of their first concerns
will be to find the right man to chair the England selectors next
year.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)